Unit - Vii
Unit - Vii
Partnership Meaning
According to Section 4 of the Partnership Act,1932
“Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by
all or any one of them acting for all”.
Features of Partnership:
The partnership agreement becomes the foundation or the basis on which it is based. It can be either written
or oral. The written agreement is known as a partnership deed. Partnership deed mainly consists of the
following details:
The Indian Partnership Act 1932 governs partnership but does not regulate the maximum
no of partners in a partnership firm.
It is determined by the Companies Act 2013 (section 464), which allows up to 100 as
the maximum no of partners in partnership firms.
According to Rule 10 of Companies (Miscellaneous) Rules, 2014 states, the maximum
no of partners in partnership firms should not exceed 50.
A partnership firm is formed by a minimum of two people.
The central government stated that the maximum no of partners in partnership firms
could not exceed 50 as per Rule 10(2014).
According to section 11 of the Companies Act, 1956 a partnership for a banking business
must not have more than 10 partners and for other business it must not exceed 20.
3. Sharing of Profit: Another significant component of the partnership is, the accord
between partners has to share gains and losses of a trading concern. However, the
definition held in the Partnership Act elucidates – partnership as an association between
people who have consented to share the gains of a business, the sharing of loss is
implicit. Hence, sharing of gains and losses is vital.
4.Business Motive: It is important for a firm to carry some kind of business and should
have a profit gaining motive.
5. Mutual Business: The partners are the owners as well as the agent of their firm. Any
act performed by one partner can affect other partners and the firm. It can be concluded
that this point acts as a test of partnership for all the partners.
Agree on the partnership: Partners can agree orally, but it's recommended to put the
agreement in writing.
Register the business: Register the partnership with the Registrar of Firms in the state
where the business is located.
The Indian Partnership Act 1932 clearly defines a partnership. But how can we decide if a given association of
persons is truly a partnership or not? So the Act has also given us a litmus test to determine if a firm is a
partnership. This is known as the True Test of a Partnership. Let us study this.
The true test of a partnership is a way for us to determine whether a group or association of persons is a
partnership firm or not. It also helps us recognize the partners of the firm and separate them from the third
parties.
The idea behind such a true test is to examine the relevant facts and determine the real relations between
parties and conclude about the presence of a partnership.
Let us take a look at the three important aspects of a true test of a partnership, namely agreement, profit
sharing and mutual agency.
For there to be a partnership between two or more persons there has to be an agreement of partnership
between them. The partnership cannot arise family status or any operation of law. There has to be a specific
agreement between the partners.
So if family members of a HUF are running a business together this is not a partnership. Because there is no
agreement of partnership between them. The members of HUF are born into the HUF, so they cannot be
partners.
2] Profit Sharing
Sharing of profits is an aspect of the true test of a partnership. However, profit sharing is only a prima facie
evidence of a partnership. The Act does not consider profit sharing as a conclusive evidence of a partnership.
This is because there are cases of profit sharing that are still contradictory to a partnership. Let us see some
such cases
Sharing of profits/ gross receipts from a property that two or more persons own together or have a
joint interest in is not a partnership
A share of profits given to an agent or servant does not make him a partner
3 Mutual Agency
Here’s a table summarising the differences between a partnership and a company based on the key
aspects discussed: discussed:
Basis of
Partnership Company
Difference
Transfer of
Not allowed without consent of partners. Allowed, except in private companies.
Shares
A partnership is
Mode of creation created through The right to a Hindu Undivided Family is formed by status. It is created by birth into such a family.
an agreement.
Death of a partner
partnership.
equally entitled to
Management The right of management of a HUF is vested with the Karta, the governing male member of the family.
take part in a
partnership
business.
Authority to bind By an act, a The Karta or the manager holds the authority to contract for the business and the rest of the members of the family
partner can bind
the firm.
The liability of a
partner in a In a HUF, the liability of the Karta alone is unlimited. The rest of the co-partners are only liable to the extent of their
Liability
partnership is in the profits of the family business.
unlimited.
accounts on the accounts, When a HUF splits up, a member is not entitled to ask for accounts concerning the family business.
dissolution of the
firm.
The Partnership
partnership.
A minor cannot
be a part of a
partnership.
Although, a minor
can be admitted In a HUF business, a minor becomes a member of the family business by birth. The favour of the majority is not r
Minor’s capacity
to the benefits of to take part in the business.
the partnership
based on the
partners.
Continuity A firm gets A HUF can continue until it is divided. The states of a HUF is not affected by the death of a member.
dissolved by the
death or
insolvency of a
partner subject to
a contract
between the
partners.
Types of Partners1
An active partner is also known as Ostensible Partner. As the name suggests he takes
active participation in the firm and the running of the business. He carries on the daily
business on behalf of all the partners. This means he acts as an agent of all the other
partners on a day to day basis and with regards to all ordinary business of the firm.
Hence when an active partner wishes to retire from the firm he must give a public
notice about the same. This will absolve him of the acts done by other partners after
his retirement. Unless he gives a public notice he will be liable for all acts even after
his retirement.
2] Dormant/Sleeping Partner
This is a partner that does not participate in the daily functioning of the partnership
firm, i.e. he does not take an active part in the daily activities of the firm. He is
however bound by the action of all the other partners.
He will continue to share the profits and losses of the firm and even bring in his share
of capital like any other partner. If such a dormant partner retires he need not give a
public notice of the same.
3] Nominal Partner
1
https://www.toppr.com/guides/business-laws/the-indian-partnership-act/types-of-partners/
This is a partner that does not have any real or significant interest in the partnership.
So, in essence, he is only lending his name to the partnership. He will not make any
capital contributions to the firm, and so he will not have a share in the profits either.
But the nominal partner will be liable to outsiders and third parties for acts done by
any other partners.
4] Partner by Estoppel
If a person holds out to another that he is a partner of the firm, either by his words,
actions or conduct then such a partner cannot deny that he is not a partner. This
basically means that even though such a person is not a partner he has represented
himself as such, and so he becomes partner by estoppel or partner by holding out.
This partner will only share the profits of the firm, he will not be liable for any
liabilities. Even when dealing with third parties he will be liable for all acts of profit
only, he will share none of the liabilities.
6] Minor Partner
Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act 1932 contains legal provisions about a minor
in a partnership
i. Sharing profit-A minor partner will obviously have the right to his share of the
profits of the firm. But the minor partner is not liable for any losses beyond
his interests in the firm. So a minor partner’s personal assets cannot be liquidated to
pay the firms liabilities.
ii. Inspection of books-He can also like any other partner inspect the books
of accounts of the firm. He can demand a copy of the books as well.
iii. Right to sue-If necessary he can sue any or all of the other partners for his share of
the profits or benefits.
iv. Option on attaining majority-A minor partner on attaining majority has the right
to become a partner of the firm. He has six months from attaining majority to decide
if he will execute this right. Whether he decides to become a partner or not he must
give public notice about the same.
These purchases can also be made for the purpose and in course of the business of the
firm, including the goodwill of the firm. All partners collectively own such properties.
All property and rights and interest in property that the partners purchase in the
common stock as their contribution to the common business.
All property and rights and interest in property that the firm purchases either for
the firm or for the purpose and in course of the business of the firm.
Hence, if a firm uses the property of a partner for its purposes, it does not make it a
partnership property unless that was the real intention. At any time, the partners may
agree to convert the property of a partner or partners into partnership property.
Duties of partners
The rights and duties are correlated with each other. When the
rights are given to the partners then there must be some which the
partners should perform..the various duties of partners are as
follows:
A partner who leaves the partnership firm in which the remaining partners continue
the business is an outgoing partner. Such a partner has certain liabilities and rights as
prescribed by the Partnership Law. In this article, we will focus on the rights of an
outgoing partner.
Right of an Outgoing Partner to Carry on a Competing Business
Section 36 (1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 (Partnership law), imposes certain
restrictions but allows an outgoing partner to carry on a business and advertise it,
which competes with the partnership firm. However, it restricts him from:
Using the name of the partnership firm
Soliciting the custom of persons who were dealing with the firm before he
ceased to be a partner.
According to Section 37, of the Partnership Law, if a member of the firm dies or
otherwise ceases to be a partner of the firm, and the remaining partners carry on the
business without any final settlement of accounts between them and the outgoing
partner, then the outgoing partner or his estate is entitled to share of the profits made
by the firm since he ceased to be a partner.
Dissolution of a Firm
When the partnership between all the partners of a firm is dissolved, then it is called
dissolution of a firm. It is important to note that the relationship between all partners
should be dissolved for the firm to be dissolved. Let us look at the legal provisions for
the dissolution of a firm.
According to Section 40 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, partners can dissolve the
partnership by agreement and with the consent of all partners. Partners can also
dissolve the partnership based on a contract that has already been made.
This section focuses on the dissolution of the firm on happening of certain events. Dissolution of
the firm can take place if the following events take place:
Expiry of fixed term: If the contract of a partnership firm is on a fixed term. Then,
dissolution of that firm will take place on the expiry of that contract. when the contract
expires dissolution will take place.
If the firm was formed for a certain number of task. Then on completion of that task,
the firm ceases to exist. If the firm is constituted for a particular task then on
completion of that task firm will dissolve, unless there is a contract or agreement.
Dissolution can also take place with the death of a partner. Dissolution of the firm can
take place only when the other partner chooses too. If he wants to continue the firm
even after the death of a partner then there will be no dissolution of the firm. Only the
partnership will be dissolved.
When one of the partners or all the partners is insolvent then dissolution can take
place. Even the insolvency of one partner can dissolve the firm.
Dissolution can also take place if any one of the partners resigns. If one partner thinks
not to continue further then he/she can resign but this will also dissolve the firm
According to Section 44 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the Court may dissolve a
firm on the suit of a partner on any of the following grounds:
1] Insanity/Unsound mind
If an active partner becomes insane or of an unsound mind, and other partners or the
next friend files a suit in the court, then the court may dissolve the firm. Two things to
remember here:
3] Misconduct
When a partner is guilty of conduct which is likely to affect prejudicially the carrying
on of the business, and the other partners file a suit in the court, then the court may
dissolve the firm.
Further, it is not important that the misconduct is related to the conduct of the
business. The court looks at the effect of the misconduct on the business along with
the nature of the business.
1. Embezzlement
2. Keeping erroneous accounts
3. Holding more cash than allowed
4. Refusal to show accounts despite repeated requests, etc.
5] Transfer of Interest
A partner may transfer all his interest in the firm to a third party or allow the court to
charge or sell his share in the recovery of arrears of land revenue. Now, if the other
partners file a suit against him in the court, then the court may dissolve the firm.
6] Continuous/Perpetual losses
If a firm is running under losses and the court believes that the business of the firm
cannot be carried on without a loss in the future too, then it may dissolve the firm.
The court may find other just and equitable grounds for the dissolution of the firm.
Some such grounds are:
Deadlock in management
Partners not being in talking terms with each other
The firm is wound up. Assets are Assets and liabilities of the firm are only
Winding up
realized and liabilities are settled. revalued.
If the registrar is satisfied with the documents, he will register the firm in Register of Firms and issue Certificate
of Registration.
It is always advisable to register the firm since a registered firms enjoy special rights which aren’t available to the
unregistered firms.
1] No suit in a civil court by the firm or other co-partners against any third
party
If the firm registration is not done, then the firm or any other person on its behalf
cannot file a suit against a third party for breach of contract which the firm has entered
into. Further, the person filing the suit on behalf of the firm should be in the register of
the firm as a partner.
Without firm registration, any action brought against the firm by a third party having a
value of more than Rs. 100 cannot be set-off by the firm or any of its partners.
Pursuance of other proceedings to enforce rights arising from the contract cannot be
done either.
3] An aggrieved partner cannot bring legal action against other partner or the
firm
A partner of the firm or any person on his behalf cannot bring legal action against the
firm or against any partner (or alleged to be a partner) if firm registration is not done.
However, if the firm is dissolved, then such a person can sue the firm for dissolution it
accounts and realization of his share in the firm’s property.
Even if the firm registration is not done a third party can bring legal action against the
firm.
Exceptions
It is also, important to note that despite these disabilities, the non-registration of a firm
does not affect the following rights: