CY 2024 SELF-MONITORING CHECKLIST ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LGUs 10-YEAR SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT PLAN
Name of LGU:
Date:
10-Year SWM Planning Period:
If answered NO, NONE, Please attach
INSUFFICIENT, below 50%, Geotagged
indicate the action plans for Pictures of the
MONITORING such following. Use
STATUS SCORE REFERENCE
INDICATORS Activit Timeli Implement separate sheet for
AREA

ies ne ing the attachments

Arrangem
ents
 Presence of the
following If “present” = 2 points,  Ordinances
ordinances/code/progra Present None otherwise the score is 0  Use of
m: ecobags in
o Regulation/ public
Prohibition of the Present None market
Sale and Use of  Citation
Plastic Bags Present None tickets (CY
o No Segregation, Present None 202__)
No Collection
Source Reduction (14 points)

Policy
o Anti-littering Present None
o Anti-burning esp.
yard and farm Present None
waste and plastic
wastes Present None
o Composting in
Every Home
o Environmental
Code
 Records on Fines and
Penalties (based on the
Citation ticket)

Page 1 of 5
  Presence of Collection Present None If “present” = 2 points,  Collection
Points otherwise the score point
 Presence of scheduled Present None is 0  Hauling
collection Vehicles
 Presence of segregated  Garbage
collection for each type With set schedule = 1 collection
of wastes (indicate the ______________ Schedule point, otherwise the schedule
schedule) ______________ Schedule score  Records of
o Biodegradables ______________ Schedule is 0 garbage
o Recyclables ______________ Schedule collection
Collection (17 points)

o Residuals If 75% and above = 5 fees

o Special Wastes ______________% (Percentage) points, otherwise the
 % Collection coverage score is 0
(no. of barangays served/ Sufficient
total number of barangays) Insufficient If “sufficient” = 2
X 100% points, otherwise the
 Presence of Hauling Present None score
vehicles is 0
 Records on Garbage
Collection Fees
 % of Barangay If 75% and above = 5  MRFs of all
Compliance (no. of ______________% (Percentage) points, otherwise the brgys
barangays with access to score is 0  Consolidate
functional MRFs/ total ______________%(Percentage) d MRFs
number of barangays) x records of
Material Recovery Facility (11 pts)

100%
barangays
 % of barangays with
With means of
proper record keeping of
enforcement = 1,
their MRFs’ operational
Indicate means of enforcement otherwise the score is 0
management
 Means of enforcement of
segregation,
composting, and
recycling in institutions
(schools), business
establishments and
industries (indicate on the
blank)

Page 2 of 5
  Provision of properly  Color coded
labeled and color-coded Present None If “present” = 2 points, bins
Segregation, Recycling, and Composting (15 pts) segregation receptacles otherwise the score is 0  Composting
in public areas facilities
 Requiring transport Yes No If “Yes” = 2 points,  Backyard
operators to provide otherwise the score composting
waste bins in all vehicles is 0 in
 % of barangays with ______________% (Percentage) households
composting facilities If 75% and above = 3
 Presence of central Present points, otherwise the
composting facility None score is 0
 Composting method
utilized (indicate) _____________________
 Mandatory composting
in place
o % Households ______________% (Percentage)
practicing
composting ______________% (Percentage)
o % of famers
practicing
composting and
utilizing compost
 Presence of Sanitary Present  Components
Landfill Facility ______Lifespan If “present” = 5 points, of SLF
If present, indicate ______ Year otherwise the score is 0 -active cell
Disposal (5 pts)

service lifespan and year started -leachate

started None treatment pond
o Result of water Current Waste Disposal -drainage
monitoring conducted Facility: ___________________ system
(Recent) Passed Failed -perimeter fence
o Volume of waste -gas vents
disposed (Daily) ______________ (cu.m) -ROLA
 Presence of Ecobrick Present None If “present” = 1 point,  RWPD
Project Present None otherwise the score is 0 project
 Presence of plastic Present None
Technology for

pulverizer
Alternative

 Presence of shredding
machine
 Presence of Livelihood If “present” = 1 point,  Conduct of
programs on otherwise the score is 0 livelihood
o Compost Product Present None programs
o Recycled Product Present None
Development

o Concrete product Present None

Enterprise

mixed with
shredded plastics
o Reusable bags Present None
 Showcase eco-products If “present” = 2 points,  Conduct of
Development

during Municipal Trade Yes No otherwise the score is 0 marketing

Marketing

Fairs/ town fiestas or in of

other avenues ecoproducts

Page 3 of 5
  Special wastes are Yes No If “yes” = 2 points,  Septic vault

Management (6 points)
collected/recovered otherwise the score is 0  MOA with
Special Wastes  On-site disposal of Yes No TSD facility
healthcare wastes at
septic vault
 Partnership with TSD Yes No
Facility
 Presence of C/MENRO Yes No If “Yes” = 3 points,  MENRO
(permanent/with otherwise the score is 0 position
plantilla)  Conduct of
Institutional Arrangement (7 points)

 Functionality of meeting
Municipal Solid Waste _____________ (Number) At least one (1)
Management Board meeting and resolution
o No. of meetings conducted = 2 points,
conducted in a _____________ (Number) otherwise the score is 0
year (CY 2023)
o No. of
resolutions
passed in a
year (CY 2023)
 % of Functional BSWMCs ______________% (Percentage) If 75% and above = 3  Conduct of
 Waste diversion rate (CY ______________% (Percentage) points, otherwise the meeting of
2023) score is 0 brgys
Monitoring (12 points)

 No. of monitoring ______________ (Number)

conducted
o % household ______________% (Percentage)
practicing
proper
segregation ______________% (Percentage)
o % household
practicing
proper
composting
 No. of seminars, ______________ (Number) At least one (1) IEC  IEC
trainings conducted in conducted = 2 points, conducted
IECs (2 points)

CY 2020 ______________ otherwise the score is 0

 Stakeholders
participation (indicate
name of groups/target
audience)
 Indicate the programs: ______________________________ With incentive  Conduct of
__ programs = 2 points, incentive
Indicate the specific program otherwise the score is 0 programs
Programs(2
Incentive

TOTAL SCORE (points)

INTERPRETATION
MONITORING TEAM
Name Position Signature
Accomplished by:
Page 4 of 5
Verified by: Department Head

Noted by: Mayor

MONITORING RATING INTERPRETATION
Score (points) Interpretation
100 points Excellent with full compliance
91-99 points Highly satisfactory with highly adequate
compliance
81-90 points Satisfactory with adequate compliance
75-80 points Fair with compliance
74 points and below Poor with low compliance

Page 5 of 5