1 2-1 3-Full
1 2-1 3-Full
1.2 Review
Theorem
Every matrix is row equivalent to one and only one matrix in reduced row
echelon form.
Note: Like echelon forms, the row reduction algorithm does not care if a
column is augmented: ignore the vertical line when row reducing.
The uniqueness statement is interesting—it means that, nomatter how you row
reduce, you always get the same matrix in reduced row echelon form.
(Assuming you only do the three legal row operations.) (And you don’t make
any arithmetic errors.)
Step 1a Swap the 1st row with a lower one so a leftmost nonzero entry is in 1st
row (if necessary).
Step 1b Scale 1st row so that its leading entry is equal to 1.
Step 1c Use row replacement so all entries below this 1 are 0.
Step 2a Swap the 2nd row with a lower one so that the leftmost nonzero entry is
in 2nd row.
Step 2b Scale 2nd row so that its leading entry is equal to 1.
Step 2c Use row replacement so all entries below this 1 are 0.
Step 3a Swap the 3rd row with a lower one so that the leftmost nonzero entry is in
3rd row.
etc.
Last Step Use row replacement to clear all entries above the pivots, starting with the
last pivot (to make life easier).
Example
0 −7 −4 2
2 4 6 12
3 1 −1 −2
[animated]
Row Reduction
Example
0 −7 −4 2 R1 ←→ R2 2 4 6 12
2 4 6 12 0 −7 −4 2
3 1 −1 −2 3 1 −1 −2
Step 1a: Row swap to make this nonzero. Step 1b: Scale to make this 1.
R1 = R1 ÷ 2 1 2 3 6
0 −7 −4 2
3 1 −1 −2
Step 1c: Subtract a multiple of
the first row to clear this.
R3 = R3 − 3R1 1 2 3 6
0 −7 −4 2
0 −5 −10 −20
R2 ←→ R3 1 2 3 6
Optional: swap rows 2 and 3 to 0 −5 −10 −20
make Step 2b easier later on.
0 −7 −4 2
Row Reduction
Example, continued
1 2 3 6 R2 = R2 ÷ −5 1 2 3 6
0 −5 −10 −20 0 1 2 4
0 −7 −4 2 0 −7 −4 2
Step 2a: This is already nonzero. Step 2c: Add 7 times
Step 2b: Scale to make this 1. the second row to clear this.
(There are no fractions because R3 = R3 + 7R2 1 2 3 6
of the optional step before.) 0 1 2 4
0 0 10 30
Note: Step 2 never messes up the first (nonzero) column of the matrix,
because it looks like this:
1 ? ? ?
“Active” row 0 ? ? ?
0 ? ? ?
Row Reduction
Example, continued
1 2 3 6 R3 = R3 ÷ 10 1 2 3 6
0 1 2 4 0 1 2 4
0 0 10 30 0 0 1 3
Step 3a: This is already nonzero.
Step 3b: Scale to make this 1.
Get
a 1 here Clear down Get a 1 here
Clear down
? ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? 1 ? ? ? 1 ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? 0 1 ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? 0 ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? 0 ? ? ?
Question
What does an augmented matrix in reduced row echelon form look like, if its
system of linear equations is inconsistent?
Answer:
1 0 ? ? 0
0 1 ? ? 0
0 0 0 0 1
How do we solve a system of linear equations if the row reduced matrix has a
column without a pivot? Let’s do an example.
2x + y + 12z = 1 2 1 12 1
gives rise to the matrix .
x + 2y + 9z = −1 1 2 9 −1
Let’s row reduce it: [interactive row reducer]
R1 ←→ R2
2 1 12 1 1 2 9 −1
(Optional)
1 2 9 −1 2 1 12 1
R2 = R2 − 2R1
1 2 9 −1
(Step 1c)
0 −3 −6 3
R2 = R2 ÷ −3
1 2 9 −1
(Step 2b)
0 1 2 −1
R1 = R1 − 2R2
1 0 5 1
(Step 2c)
0 1 2 −1
The system
x + 5z = 1
y + 2z = −1
comes from a matrix in reduced row echelon form. Are we done? Is the system
solved?
Yes! Rewrite:
x = 1 − 5z
y = −1 − 2z
For any value of z, there is exactly one value of x and y that makes the
equations true. But z can be anything we want! For this reason, we call z a
free variable, and it corresponds to a column with no pivot.
So we have found the solution set: it is all values x, y , z where
x = 1 − 5z
y = −1 − 2z for z any real number.
(z = z)
This is called the parametric form for the solution set. [interactive picture]
For instance, (1, −1, 0) and (−4, −3, 1) are solutions.
Free Variables
Definition
Consider a consistent linear system of equations in the variables x1 , . . . , xn . Let
A be a row echelon form of the matrix for this system.
We say that xi is a free variable if its corresponding column in A is not a pivot
column.
Important
1. You can choose any value for the free variables in a
(consistent) linear system.
2. Free variables come from columns without pivots in a
matrix in row echelon form.
In the previous example, z was free because the reduced row echelon form
matrix was
1 0 5 4
.
0 1 2 −1
Example 2
Suppose the reduced row echelon form of the matrix for a linear system in
x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 is
1 0 0 3 2
0 0 1 4 −1
The free variables are x2 and x4 : they are the ones whose columns are not pivot
columns.
This translates into the system of equations
x1 + 3x4 = 2 x1 = 2 − 3x4
=⇒
x3 + 4x4 = −1 x3 = −1 − 4x4.
What happened to x2 ? What is it allowed to be? Anything! The general
solution is
(x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ) = (2 − 3x4 , x2 , −1 − 4x4 , x4 )
for any values of x2 and x4 .
For instance, (2, 0, −1, 0) is a solution (x2 = x4 = 0), and (5, 1, 3, −1) is a
solution (x2 = 1, x4 = −1).
x1 + 5x3 =0
x4 = 0
To solve, we move the free variable to the right. The parametric form for the
solution set is
x1 = −5x3
x2 = x2 (free)
x3 = x3 (free)
x4 = 0
Or: (−5x3 , x2 , x3 , 0). The solution set is a plane because it has two free
variables. Each solution has four entries, so the solution set is a plane in R4 .
Free variables
Geometry, looking ahead!
z
t = −1 t=0 (t, w ) = (−1, 1)
(t, w ) = (1, −1)
t=1
y
x
(t, w ) = (2, 2)
Poll
This is in reduced row echelon form. The free variables are y and z. The
parametric form of the general solution is
x = 1 − y − z.
Rearranging:
(x, y , z) = (1 − y − z, y , z),
where y and z are arbitrary real numbers.
[interactive]
Trichotomy
There are three possibilities for the reduced row echelon form of the augmented
matrix of a linear system.
1. The last column is a pivot column.
In this case, the system is inconsistent. There are zero solutions, i.e. the
solution set is empty. Picture:
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
2. Every column except the last column is a pivot column.
In this case, the system has a unique solution. Picture:
1 0 0 ?
0 1 0 ?
0 0 1 ?
3. The last column is not a pivot column, and some other column isn’t either.
In this case, the system has infinitely many solutions, corresponding to the
infinitely many possible values of the free variable(s). Picture:
1 ? 0 ? ?
0 0 1 ? ?
Summary