Scribd
Upload
5 views3 pages

Snafbafhafh

The document analyzes the factors of malnutrition among elders based on sex, age, and highest educational attainment using one-way ANOVA. It finds no significant difference in malnutrition factors related to sex (p-value = 0.468), while there is a significant difference related to age (p-value = 0.000). The analysis includes detailed statistics and means for each demographic group.

Uploaded by

pone6489
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views3 pages

Snafbafhafh

The document analyzes the factors of malnutrition among elders based on sex, age, and highest educational attainment using one-way ANOVA. It finds no significant difference in malnutrition factors related to sex (p-value = 0.468), while there is a significant difference related to age (p-value = 0.000). The analysis includes detailed statistics and means for each demographic group.

Uploaded by

pone6489
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Rusty Lloyd Abang

Junecel Hamoy
Christine Jane R. Jaralve
Kit Niel Baloyos

Is there a significant difference in the factors of malnutrition in terms of psychological and


cognitive factors among the elders when analyzed according to profile (Sex, Age, Highest
Educational Attainment).

Tally for Discrete Variables: Sex, Age, Highest Educational


Attainment

Highest
Educational
Sex Count Percent Age Count Percent Attainment Count Percent
1 98 42.42 1 37 16.02 2 84 36.36
2 133 57.58 2 37 16.02 3 147 63.64
N= 231 3 99 42.86 N= 231
4 29 12.55
5 29 12.55
N= 231

(Christine)

One-way ANOVA: Highest Educational Attainment versus Sex

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal


Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values


Sex 2 1, 2

Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value


Sex 1 0.1232 0.1232 0.53 0.468
Error 229 53.3314 0.2329
Total 230 53.4545

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)


0.482585 0.23% 0.00% 0.00%

Means

Sex N Mean StDev 95% CI


1 98 2.6633 0.4750 (2.5672, 2.7593)
2 133 2.6165 0.4881 (2.5341, 2.6990)

Pooled StDev = 0.482585

(Rusty)

(Junecel)
One-way ANOVA: Highest Educational Attainment versus Age

Method

Null hypothesis All means are equal


Alternative hypothesis At least one mean is different
Significance level α = 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor Levels Values


Age 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Age 4 14.17 3.5413 20.37 0.000
Error 226 39.29 0.1738
Total 230 53.45

Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)


0.416949 26.50% 25.20% 23.75%

Means

Age N Mean StDev 95% CI


1 37 2.8649 0.3466 (2.7298, 2.9999)
2 37 2.7297 0.4502 (2.5947, 2.8648)
3 99 2.3636 0.4835 (2.2811, 2.4462)
4 29 3.000 0.000 ( 2.847, 3.153)
5 29 2.7931 0.4123 (2.6405, 2.9457)

Pooled StDev = 0.416949

(Kit Niel)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy