0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views7 pages

EE250 Quiz03 Solution

The document provides solutions to an EE250 quiz, detailing control system analysis including root locus, Nyquist plots, and compensator design. It outlines calculations for system stability, gain margins, and state feedback gain matrices. Each problem is accompanied by relevant equations and results, emphasizing the importance of stability and performance metrics in control systems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views7 pages

EE250 Quiz03 Solution

The document provides solutions to an EE250 quiz, detailing control system analysis including root locus, Nyquist plots, and compensator design. It outlines calculations for system stability, gain margins, and state feedback gain matrices. Each problem is accompanied by relevant equations and results, emphasizing the importance of stability and performance metrics in control systems.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

EE250 Quiz 03 Solution

Total marks - 60 19-04-2024


Write only relevant data and explanation within the box provided. For rough work
use the answer script provided. Rough work sheet wont be evaluated.
Approximate your answers to second decimal place, if required.

Name: Roll no:

1. The block diagram of a control system is given in Fig. 1. Plot the root locus as a function of
parameter K > 0 and comment on range of K for which the system is stable. (15 marks)

Figure 1: Block diagram of a system.

Centroid and angle of asymptotes

The open loop zeros are 2 and the open loop poles are 2 + 3j.

(2 + 3j) + (2 − 3j) − 2
Centroid σa = = 2.
2−1
±(2k + 1) × 180o
Angle of asymptotes: ϕa = = 180o .
2−1
Imaginary axis crossing and corresponding K
s−2
The characteristic equation: 1 + K 2 = 0 ⇒ s2 + (K − 4)s + (13 − 2K) = 0.
s − 4s + 13
The RH-array is

s2 1 13 − 2K
1
s K −4
s 13 − 2K
For imaginary axis crossing, we must have K − 4 = 0 ⇒ √ K = 4. With K = 4 the auxillary
equation is s2 √
+ (13 − 2K) = 0 ⇒ s2 + 5 = 0 ⇒ s = ±j 5. Hence, one of the imaginary axis
crossing is at 5 rad/sec and corresponding K = 4.
13
Further, another imaginary axis crossing will be when 13 − 2K = 0 ⇒ K = . The auxillary
2
equation in this case is (K − 4)s = 0. Hence, the other imaginary axis crossing is at s = 0.
Breakaway/breakin points
s−2 s2 − 4s + 13
The characteristic equation: 1 + K 2 =0⇒K=− .
s − 4s + 13 s−2

dK 2(s − 2)2 − (s2 − 4s + 13)


=− = 0 ⇒ s = −1, 5.
ds (s − 2)2

Since there Root locus does not exist from [2, ∞), hence, the only breakaway point is −1.
Angle of departure/arrival

θd = ±(2k + 1)180o + (θ2 − θ1 )


⇒ θd = ±(2k + 1)180o + 90o − 90o
⇒ θd = 180o

Angle of departure from 2 + 3j is 180o .

Sketch the root locus

Comment on the stability of the system (Range of K for stability)


13
The closed loop system will remain stable for the range 4 < K < .
2
2. For the open-loop transfer function G(s) given below, sketch the Nyquist plot with K > 0.
Using the Nyquist plot, comment on the range of K for the system to be stable. (15 marks)
K(s + 4)
G(s) =
s(s − 2)
Draw the Nyquist contour

Analysis required to draw Nyquist contour


Analysis for set C1 :

K(4 + jω)
G(jω) =
jω(−2 + jω)
6K K(8 − ω 2 )
=− +j
(4 + ω 2 ) ω(4 + ω 2 )

K 16 + ω 2 ω    ω 
= √ ∠tan−1 − 90o − 180o − tan−1
ω 4 + ω2 4 2

3K
G(jω)|ω→0+ = − + j∞ = ∞∠90o .
2
G(jω)|ω→∞+ = −0 − j0 = 0∠ − 90o .
√ K
R-axis intersection at ω = 2 2 rad/sec with intersection at − .
2
Analysis for set C2 :

lim G(Rejθ )|, = 0∠ − 90o to 0o and + 90o .


R→∞
θ→+90o to 0o to −90o

Analysis for set C4 :

lim G(ϵejθ ) = ∞∠270o to 180o and + 90o .


ϵ→0
θ→−90o to 0o to +90o
Nyquist plot

K
Since P = 1, we must have N = 1 for stability. Hence > 1 ⇒ K > 2 for system to be
2
stable.
1
3. The unity feedback system shown in Fig. 2 with G(s) = is to be designed for a settling time
s2
of 1.667 seconds and a 16.3% overshoot. (8 marks)

Figure 2: A standard unity negative feedback system.


If the compensator zero is placed at −1, do the following:
(a) Find the coordinates of the dominant
√ (desired) poles.
2
Sol: Given Mp = 16.3% ⇒ e−πζ/ 1−ζ = 0.163 ⇒ ζ = 0.5.
4 5
= ⇒ ωn = 4.8 rad/sec.
ζωn 3 p
The dominant (desired) pole location are −ζωn ± jωn 1 − ζ 2 = −2.4 ± j4.157.
(b) Find the compensator pole.
Sol: Let θp be the angle contribution from the compensator pole at −2.4 + j4.157. We
must have

θ2 − 2θ1 − θp = 180o
     
o −1 4.157 o −1 4.157
180 − tan − 2 180 − tan − θp = 180o
1.4 2.4
 
o −1 4.157
⇒θp = 48.62 ⇒ tan = 48.62o ⇒ p = 6.06.
p − 2.4
The compensator pole will be p = 6.06.
(c) Find the system gain K.
s+1
Sol: The compensator is Gc (s) = s+6.06
. Therefore, we must have
K(s + 1)
|KGc (s)G(s)|s=−2.4+j4.157 = 1 ⇒ = 1 ⇒ K = 29.10.
s2 (s + 6.06) s=−2.4+j4.157

(d) Compensator transfer function


s+1
Sol: The compensator is Gc (s) = s+6.06
.
4. Design the value of gain, K, for the system in Fig. 2 to achieve a gain margin of 10 dB for
K
G(s) = . (8 marks)
s(s + 4)(s + 10)
Sol: Method-1: Let ωpc be the phase crossover frequency. Then we have
−1 ω
  ω
o −1
− 90 − tan − tan = 180o
4  10


ω/4 + ω/10
⇒tan−1 = 90o
⇒ ω = 40 rad/sec.
1 − ω 2 /40
Hence
K
0 − 20log (|G(jωpc )|) = 10 ⇒ √ √ √ = 10−10/20 ⇒ K = 177.09.
40 16 + 40 100 + 40

Method-2: Find the phase crossover frequency from the point where root locus of G(s) intersects
the imaginary axis. To do that we find the RH array corresponding to

1 + G(s) = 0 ⇒ s3 + 14s2 + 40s + K = 0.

The RH-array is
s3 1 40
s2 14 K
560−K
s 14
s0 K
Hence, for imaginary axis intersection
√ K = 560 and the intersection point is√given by solution
2
of 14s + 560 = 0, i.3., s = ±j 40. Thus, the phase crossover frequency is 40 rad/sec.
To attain 10 dB gain margin, we must have (Similar to Method-1)

K
0 − 20log (|G(jωpc )|) = 10 ⇒ √ √ √ = 10−10/20 ⇒ K = 177.09.
40 16 + 40 100 + 40

5. Find out the state feedback gain matrix K ∈ R1×3 for the following system such that the closed
loop system with control law u = Kx + r has a settling time of 0.8 sec and a peak overshoot
of 15%. (14 marks)
   
0 0 1 0  
ẋ = −2 −3
 0 x + 2 u, y = 1 0 0 x + u.
 
0 2 −3 0

Sol: Note that Mp = 15% ⇒ ζ = 0.517 and ts = 0.8 ⇒ ωn = 9.673 rad/sec. The desired
dominant pole location are −5 ± j8.28. We choose the third pole to be 10 times away from the
dominant ones. Let the third pole be −50.
The desired characteristic equation is

(s + 50)(s + 5 + j8.28)(s + 5 − j8.28) = s3 + 60s2 + 593.56s + 4677.84

The desired state-matrix in phase variable form is


 
0 1 0
Ades :=  0 0 1
−4677.84 −593.56 −60

Phase-variable form of the given system

The characteristic equation is s3 + 6s2 + 9s + 4. The phase-variable form of the system is


   
0 1 0 0
Ap =  0 0 1 , Bp = 0
 
−4 −9 −6 1

Feedback matrix for states in phase-variable form

 
Ades = Ap + Bp Kp ⇒ Kp = −4673.84 −584.56 −54
Computation of transformation matrix
 
1 0 0
  −1 1
T = Bp Ap Bp A2p Bp B AB A2 B = 0 0 1
4
0 2 −3

Control law
 
u = Kp T x + r ⇒ u = −1168.46 −27 −105.64 x + r
 
Therefore, K = −1168.46 −27 −105.64 .

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy