For the COURT CASE YOU CAN FILE A 1099A ON THE COURT AND THE JUDGE AND THE

PROSECUTOR IF YOU KNOW WHO THEY ARE. YOU WILL NEED TO GET THE COURT'S TIN AND YOU
CAN GET THAT BY CALLING THEM FOR IT! YOU MAY ONLY NEED TO FILE ONE 1099A AGAINST THE
COURT WITH A 1096 AS THE COVER SHEET. YOU DO NOT NEED TO SEND THE AFFIDAVIT TO THE
COURT BUT YOU DO NEED TO SEND THE COURT COPY B OF THE 1099-A WHICH IS THE DEBTOR
COPY AND THAT IS THEM. COPY C IS FOR LENDER, THAT'S YOU AND YOUR COPY AND COPY A IS
FOR THE IRS! ON THE 1096 IT TELLS YOU WHAT IRS TO MAIL TO BASED ON WHAT STATE YOU ARE IN
SO YOU WILL MAIL THE 1099A WITH THE 1096 COVER SHEET TO THE IRS LISTED ON THE 1096
BASED ON YOUR STATE! REMEMBER WE ARE NOT DOING THE 1099-OID FOR RECOUPMENT ON
THIS BECAUSE WE DO NOT KNOW HOW MUCH CREDIT THEY USED OF YOURS. WHERE IT SAYS
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ON THE 1099-A THAT IS THE COURT CASE. FOR THE AMOUNT YOU
CAN PUT NOT DISCLOSED, UNDISCLOSED, UNKNOWN OR YOU CAN JUST PUT THE CASE NUMBER
IN THERE BECAUSE THAT "BOND" WAS ISSUED AGAINST YOUR CREDIT AND YOUR CREDIT WAS
USED TO ISSUE SAID "BOND" SO THESE BASTARDS OWE YOU!!

Please also read the following until you get what is going on here okay!

ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT (OID) STEMS FROM HJR 192 - Shall be discharged upon payment dollar for
dollar in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for all debts public and private debts.
What was legal tender for all debts public and private in 1933 was gold. The GOVERNMENT confiscated all of
your gold and they sent it to CHINA so they had to give you that with payment or discharge upon presentment.
The GOVERNMENT discharged all of your future debts. You can't take somebody's money away and not give
them compensation. So the GOVERNMENT compensated you by prepaying all of your debts, dollar for dollar
and this has been going on since 1933 and no one understands it because they are still trying to pay debts that
are prepaid. A tax is not a tax until you do an assessment of the tax. You have to assess a tax for it to become
a tax. Why do you have to assess a tax? Because you own the CREDIT that the GOVERNMENT uses. You
are the owner of the credit. You are the CREDITOR IN FACT. That is why every time the GOVERNMENT uses
your CREDIT, they have to give you an OID identifying you as identifying you as the PAYOR and as
themselves as the recipients of the funds. Go read IRS PUBLICATION 1212. There is one paragraph in
PUBLICATION 1212 that is the key to the whole redemption process. Look at the top of page 7 where it says
“NOMINEE”: Nominee. If you are the holder of an OID debt instrument and you receive a Form 1099-OID that
shows your TIN and includes amounts belonging to another person, you are considered a “nominee.”
What are those amounts belonging to another person? That's the amount of the bills that all of the
CORPORATIONS are sending you every month for the use of your CREDIT and these CORPORATIONS are
recording it on a tax statement. They're using YOUR CREDIT and they are doing it as a NOMINEE for you
because they are using your credit.
IRS PUBLICATION 1212 goes on to state” You must file another Form 1099-OID for each actual owner – WHO
IS THE OWNER? YOU ARE THE PAYOR ON THE 1099-OID because they are using YOUR CREDIT and
CORPORATIONS send you a bill to notify you that that's the amount of your credit that they are using! That
doesn't become a “TAX” until you assess it! And the way that you assess it is you have to file a 1040 tax form
and a 1099-OID and a 1096 and a 1040 And you do it to a pay to the order of. Who do you pay it to? You pay it
to the US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. Why? Because the US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY is handling
the book keeping and unless you report it as a return or a tax, they can't do the book keeping on it. That's why
the TREASURY'S books are all screwed up. Their payable and their receivables are all out of balance.
Payables are what they owe to you and they can't pay you because you haven't filed the proper paperwork to
get the refund on the Credit that you are giving away to everybody.
After 3 years someone comes in and grabs that. Because it's “ABANDONED PROPERTY” because you never
claimed it, so they do it! They do this “NOMINEE” AND THEY DO IT IN YOUR NAME and they use your
taxpayer identification number to do it and they do a 1099-A showing it as “ABANDONED PROPERTY”
because YOU NEVER CLAIMED IT!!! IT'S LIKE TAKING A SUITCASE FULL OF 100,00 DOLLAR BILLS AND
THROWING IT DOWN ON THE SIDEWALK AND WHOEVER CLAIMS IT, OWNS IT! You need to get their
TAX PAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) because that way you can identify them as the recipient of the
funds. You can't do that until you get to the TIN.
1212 states “and includes amounts belonging to another person” What are the amounts? That is the amount of
the credit that they are using. That is represented by you assessing the tax. When you assess the tax, it
becomes a RETURN or a tax issue or a tax matter. Now if you show them as the recipient of the funds, then
the IRS can issue you a REFUND and if you do not do this then you have “ABANDONED THE FUNDS”! SO,
THEY GIVE THEM AWAY TO SOMEONE ELSE THEN IF YOU DO NOT CLAIM THEM/ ABANDON THEM!
They are doing it as a “nominee” for the true owner and that true owner IS YOU! Those amounts that they are
showing are amounts belonging to somebody else and that somebody is you! If you accept somebody's bill as
a debt owed by you, you are acting as a DEBTOR. Your actions speak to what you are. You're acting like a
DEBTOR. You win in COURT by addressing the tax issue. You make them liable for all the taxes. You identify
them as the recipient of the funds and the case gets dismissed. A MORTGAGE COMPANY HAS NO
STANDING TO FORECLOSE ON A PROPERTY. You make a tax issue out of it identifying them as the
recipients of the funds. The MORTGAGE COMPANY FORECLOSES ON THE PROPERTY NOT THE BANK.
THE BANK DOESN'T OWN ANYTHING! You are the true owner. Who gave them the funds? YOU DID! You
just didn't report it. You abandoned it. So, THEY FILED A 1099-A and they claimed it! At the CLOSING ON A
PROPERTY, YOU ABANDON THE PROPERTY BECAUSE YOUR FUNDS ARE BEING USED BY THE
MORTGAGE COMPANY AND IF YOU DO NOT CLAIM THOSE FUNDS, YOU ABANDON THEM AND THE
MORTGAGE COMPANY FILES A 1099-A AND IT CLAIMS THEM SINCE YOU DIDN'T. YOU relinquish title
and ownership in the property in the DEED OF TRUST! What is in the DEED OF TRUST? REAL ESTATE,
PROMISSORY NOTES. You abandon the PROMISSORY NOTE. You abandoned the DEED OF TRUST, so
somebody else claimed it. YOU have 100% responsibility to do this. WHY? BECAUSE YOU OWN THE
CREDIT! THEY ARE USING YOUR CREDIT AND IF YOU ARE TOO LAZY TO DO IT, THEN DON'T
COMPLAIN WHEN YOU RUN OUT OF MONEY! ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY. IF YOU GO TO COURT, TELL
THE JUDGE YOU ARE THERE ON A TAX ISSUE. READ the publication for 1099-A and 1099-C. THE
COURT HAS TO FILE A 1099-OID. It states that in the 1099-A and 1099-C INSTRUCTIONS. COURTS HAVE
TO FILE A 1099 because they are USING YOUR CREDIT! THE COURTS ARE GOING TO DO IT UNLESS
YOU MAKE THEM DO IT. Makes the COURTS address the tax issue. You will not find one case where the
GRAND JURY has indicted anybody. WHY? Because there's NO CHARGE on the indictment. What does it
take to put a charge on an indictment? There has to be a CREDITOR. ALL OF THE CORPORATIONS,
PERSONS, PEOPLE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN ARE ALL DEBTORS UNDER a CHAPTER 11
REORGANIZATION. They are acting as DEBTORS. So, no one can charge an INDICTMENT because what
they are doing is sending you a TAX BILL. You're in the TAX COURT and the JUDGE is acting as an AGENT
for the IRS and the JUDGE is testing you to see if you know what you're doing. Tell the JUDGE you want to file
a 1099-OID AND IDENTIFY WHO THE PAYOR IS AND WHO THE RECIPIENT OF THE FUNDS IS. SO, the
JUDGE can verify his claim and facts, which is what the indictment is considered. They are bringing a claim
that is not in fact because there hasn’t been a 1099-OID filed. Ask the JUDGE to file a 1099-OID for proof of
his claims. He can't do it. WHY? Because he's a DEBTOR. ONLY the CREDITOR can file a 1099-OID.
That is why the JUDGE CAN NEVER PROVE HIS CLAIM! HOW CAN THEY COME AFTER YOU FOR
MONEY WHEN THEY ARE A DEBTOR? People end up in BANKRUPTCY because they are playing the role
of the DEBTOR. You should never ever be in BANKRUPTCY COURT, EVER! THIS IS WHAT TRUE
REDEMPTION IS. THIS IS ALL A TAX ISSUE!

VOLUME 33A AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE 2D SECTION 12400:

ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT (OID) as taxable interest.
The holder of a debt instrument issued with ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT must include part of the OID in
INCOME each year he holds the instrument.
If you give somebody a check, are they holding a debt instrument? YES! THE FACT THEY ARE BILLING YOU
FOR A DEBT MEANS THAT THEY ARE HOLDING THE INSTRUMENT! THE BANKS ARE TAKING YOUR
CHECKS AND THEY ARE OIDing them using the checks to buy securities! BANKS are investing those checks
as ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT. UCC 3-105 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-105) a and c - (a) "Issue"
means the first delivery of an instrument by the maker (https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103#Maker) or
drawer (https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103#Drawer), whether to a holder or Non holder, for the purpose of
giving rights on the instrument to any person.
(c) "Issuer" applies to issued (https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-105#Issue) and unissued instruments
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104#Instrument) and means a maker
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103#Maker) or drawer (https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-103#Drawer)
of an instrument
That is the “Issue" they are talking about in the OID. NO ONE IS DOING THIS IN THE PATRIOT COMMUNITY.
You should be OIDing EVERYTHING; EVERY CHECK YOU WRITE, ALL DEBT. The holder of a debt
instrument issued with the ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT MUST INCLUDE PART OF THE OID IN INCOME
EACH YEAR HE HOLDS THE INSTRUMENT! THEY SEND YOU A BILL, THE GAS COMPANY, THE
ELECTRIC COMPANY, THE WATER COMPANY, THEY ARE TELLING YOU IN THE BILL HOW MUCH OF
YOUR CREDIT THEY ARE USING AND HOLDING. AND WHAT DO YOU DO? LIKE A DUMMY, YOU SEND
THEM A CHECK! NOW THEY'VE GOT 2 DEBTS! THEY ARE USING YOUR CREDIT PLUS YOU GIVE
THEM ANOTHER DEBT INSTRUMENT WHICH THEY HAVE TO REPORT AS INCOME! THE COUPON, THE
VOUCHER THAT THEY SEND WITH YOUR BILL THAT YOU DIDN'T USE AND THAT YOU ABANDONED,
THEY USE IT! AFTER 3 YEARS THEY CLAIM THE PAYMENT COUPON THAT YOU DIDN'T USE! EVERY
BILL YOU GET HAS A COUPON ATTACHED TO IT. THAT COUPON IS THE PREPAYMENT WHICH YOU
SHOULD USE TO SHOW THAT IT IS PREPAID! THEY USE YOUR CHECK YOU SEND THEM AND SPEND
IT. THEY DON'T USE IT TO PAY THE BILL BECAUSE THE BILL'S ALREADY BEEN PAID! ORIGINAL ISSUE
DISCOUNT is taxable interest. Why is it taxable? Because they're using your credit! In Title 26 section 61 of
the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE – GROSS INCOME DEFINED:
(a)General definition Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from
whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1)
Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2)
Gross income derived from business;
(3)
Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4)
Interest;
(5)
Rents;
(6)
Royalties;
(7)
Dividends;
(8)
Annuities;
(9)
Income from life insurance and endowment contracts;
(10)
Pensions;
(11)
Income from discharge of indebtedness;
(12)
Distributive share of partnership gross income;
(13)
Income in respect of a decedent; and
(14)
Income from an interest in an estate or trust.
If you look at 11 in the above, “Income from discharge of indebtedness”.
Look at 14, “Income from an interest in an estate or trust.”. The TRUST IS THE ALL-CAPITAL LETTER NAME.
That is where the “CREDIT” is coming from.
Look at 13, “ Income in respect of a decedent”. The all-CAPITAL LETTER NAME is the “decedent”.

Concurrent inclusion of Original Issue Discount as Interest income:

The holder of a debt instrument specified at §12407 that is issued with the Original Issue Discount see 1248
MUST include a portion of that OID in income as interest in each year he holds the debt instrument even
though the OID isn't paid until maturity, the holder can't defer inclusion of the OID until it is actually paid.
(Does that say anything about PUBLIC DEBT INSTRUMENT? NO IT DOESN'T! It says the holder of a DEBT
INSTRUMENT.
Everything is a debt instrument because there's no money! CORPORATIONS AND MUNICIPAL
CORPORATIONS AND MUNICIPALITIES, STATE OR FEDERAL, I DON'T CARE WHAT IT IS. THEY ALL
DEAL IN COMMERCIAL DEBT! That is why they operate under the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC).
Because the UCC deals in DEBT INSTRUMENTS which are called “NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS''. They are
using your debt instrument which is called Credit. And you are not reporting it to the IRS, so there's no tax due
because you haven't assessed it! You have to assess it by filling a 1099-OID and a 1096 and a 1040 AS
CREDITOR, which is a payment voucher. You pay the IRS; THE IRS collects it back from the entities using
your credit. This is how it works. They're bookkeepers. They can't keep track of your books unless you're
reporting it.)
For how to determine the amount of currently includable OID see 12437XC.
For exceptions to these rules for certain holders see 12403.
12402 APPLICATION OF ANTI ABUSE RULE:
If a principal purpose is structuring a debt instrument or engaging in a transaction as to achieve a result that's
unreasonable in light of the purposes of the OID rules under 163 (prepayment of interest which is tax
deductible) EVERYTHING that you create is indebtedness because it is owed back to you because they are all
BANKRUPT! They went into a chapter 11 reorganization and they are all acting as debtors in possession
acting as TRUSTEES for the bankrupt ESTATE. Aren't they engaging in a transaction that is unreasonable in
light of the purposes of the OID RULE? They're trying to steal your CREDIT and not pay for it. They're not
paying you back. You're not getting paid back and the reason you're not getting paid back is because you're
not assessing the tax and making them pay you back! So, whose fault is it? YOURS! They are abusing you
because you are letting them.
A result is unreasonable when its transaction is structured to create an artificial tax law significantly in excess
of a reasonably expected economical laws a tax buyer buys 2 notes with offsetting interest rates, one expected
to increase significantly, the others to a decrease in input and latter claims a loss on sale of the note that
decreased in value. The Anti abuse rule did not apply to a convertible contingent debt instrument, an
instrument convertible and to the issue or stock calling for one or more contingent cash payments.
12403 Volume 33 of American Jurisprudence 2d on Federal Taxation covering ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT
AS TAXABLE INTEREST:
Holder (A person who is in possession and control of a debt instrument) (Holder is defined in UCC 3-301
(HOLDER IN DUE COURSE) https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-301, UCC 3-302 (HOLDER)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-302) THESE PEOPLE SELL YOUR CREDIT AS A PUBLICLY TRADED
DEBT INSTRUMENT BECAUSE YOU WON'T ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY! You have got to start assuming
responsibility.
Holder accepted for the OID current inclusion (they have to include it as income on their OID) rule does not
apply to holders of debt instruments issued before 1985. (This is all 1009 OIDs and all 1099s) all 1099s all
1098s all 1096s are classified as class 5 estate and gift taxes! It's saying that in the IRS processing manual!
There is no statute of limitations on a class 5 gift and estate tax. You can go back as far as there are 1099s. If
you are using a 1040 income tax return, there is a 3 years statute of limitations. If you file it as a class 5 gift
and estate tax, there is no statute of limitations!
The holder who buys the debt instrument at a premium (i.e. the price that exceeds the infamous state of
redemption price of maturity) a holder whose basis in the debt instrument is determined to the reference that
this basis is in the hands of a person who buys at a premium. (They're buying you debt instruments because
you're not claiming them! Because you abandoned them. You cannot abandon responsibility. On April 15th you
file the OID yearly on all these debt instruments that you have accumulated over a 12-month period.
None of these service companies that are doing these mortgages are the lenders. They're not the holder,
they're not the lender, They have no business going into court. The reason they are going into court is because
you didn't claim the tax. You did not assess the tax. This is a tax issue and you are in that court beating your
head arguing this “fact” and this “law” and the “JUDGE” ignores everything you say. ALL DEBT
INSTRUMENTS ARE ORIGINAL ISSUE DISCOUNT (OID). THERE IS NO MONEY. Everything that you call
“checks” “money orders” “cashier's checks” “letters of credit” are ALL EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS. All
evidence of indebtedness is includable in gross income. They are taking all of your CREDIT and using it and
not paying you for it because you don't want to assume the responsibility of claiming it.

12404 Volume 33 of American Jurisprudence 2d (OID): DEBT INSTRUMENT DEFINED:

(This is in 1273 and 1275 of Title 26 IRC defines what a debt instrument is) For OID purposes a debt
instrument ( notice it doesn't say PUBLIC DEBT INSTRUMENT. The IRS puts “PUBLIC DEBT INSTRUMENT
in their PUBLICATION 1212 to throw off Patriot types that are trying to do this with an OID every year. The IRS
is probably turning a lot of this stuff down just to see if you know what the hell you are doing. They're testing
you! Do they test you to see if you know what you are talking about, sure they do! The IRS has D-U-N-S-
NUMBER. What does that tell you? They are a PRIVATELY OWNED TRADING COMPANY RUNNING YOUR
BOOK KEEPING! You think they know what they're doing? Yes, they know what they're doing! They want to
see if YOU know what you're doing! And you are not going to know what you are doing until you start studying
this stuff and you have to assume the responsibility. ) is a BOND, A DEBENTURE (an unsecured loan
certificate issued by a company, backed by general credit rather than by specified assets), A NOTE, OR
CERTIFICATE OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS. (What is “OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF
INDEBTEDNESS?” IN TITLE 26 SECTION 1275 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/1275) THAT IS
WHERE “DEBT INSTRUMENT” is defined and “OTHER DEFINITIONS” is defined in the IRC. A friend I know
wrote this to a “JUDGE” saying to the assessment “PAY TO THE ORDER OF”. He asked the JUDGE for a TIN
NUMBER BECAUSE HE HAD THEIR DUNS NUMBER. He called up the DUN & BRADSTREET and got the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and he got their DUNS NUMBER. THESE ARE ALL PRIVATE TRADING
COMPANIES ACTING AS PUBIC BUT THEY AREN'T. THEY ARE PRIVATE ACTING IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN AND THEY ARE STEALING ALL OF YOUR CREDIT. THEY'RE NOT STEALING IT; YOU ARE
GIVING IT TO THEM AND YOU WONDER WHY YOU DON'T HAVE ANY MONEY!!
Title 26 section 1275:
(1)Debt instrument
(A) In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the term “debt instrument
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=26-USC-257
870444-2035263953&term_occur=999&term_src=title:26:subtitle:A:chapter:1:subchapter:P:part:V:subpart:A:se
ction:1275)” means a bond, debenture, note, or certificate or other evidence of indebtedness (what “OTHER
EVIDENCE OF INDEBTEDNESS”? ISN'T EVVERYTHING A DEBT INSTRUMENT? You show me something
that's NOT DEBT INSTRUMENT that is currently being used as MONEY. THAT'S WHY IT IS ALL
INCLUDABLE IN GROSS INCOME! GO ASK THE IRS! Jean Keating calls them up all the time and talks to
them and is referred to the SPECIAL ISSUE COMMITTEE.) Everything that you use as money is includible in
GROSS INCOME and you're not doing it!
(B)Exception for certain annuity contracts
The term “debt instrument
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id=26-USC-257
870444-2035263953&term_occur=999&term_src=title:26:subtitle:A:chapter:1:subchapter:P:part:V:subpart:A:se
ction:1275)” shall not include any annuity contract to which section 72
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/72) applies and which -
(i) depends (in whole or in substantial part) on the life expectancy of 1 or more individuals, or
(ii) is issued by an insurance company (THAT'S WHY A LOT OF THESE COURTS, THE JUDGES ARE
DOING ANNUITY CONTRACTS. THEY'RE DOING 801Ks WHICH IS AN OFFSHORE RETIREMENT FUND!
THAT'S WHERE ALL THIS MONEY THAT YOU ABANDON, THEY PUT IT IN AN 801K OFFSHORE AND
YOU'RE FUNDING THEIR RETIREMENT FUND! BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT ANY RESPONSIBILITY!).
subject to tax under subchapter L (or by an entity described in section 501(c) and exempt from tax under
section 501(a) which would be subject to tax under subchapter L were it not so exempt) -
THESE ARE ALL DEBT INSTRUMENTS SO THEY ARE INCLUDABLE AS INCOME. Now if you're the
recipient of funds from somebody else, then you wouldn't report it as income. If you report it as income, you're
going to have to pay a tax on it. Any evidence if indebtedness is INCOME. Whose income has the holder
received, YOURS. You do a 1096 and a 1099-OID and report it as taxable income, you get a refund. Do a
1040 as CREDITOR. You've got to do a “PAY TO THE ORDER OF” YOU WRITE ON THE BILL “PAY TO THE
ORDER OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY” CHARGED SUM SAID TO THE PERSON WHO SENT
YOU THE BILL. PEOPLE ARE NOT DOING THAT. THAT'S WHY THEY'RE NOT GETTING THE SETOFF.
THE IRS IS TURNING AROUND AND BILLING YOU FOR IT BECAUSE YOU PAID IT TO THEM
NOW,THEY'RE SENDING YOU THE BILL FOR THE TAX.. THAT'S WHY YOU HAVE GOT TO FILE THE OID
SHOWING THE RECIPIENT OF THE FUNDS, THE PERSON WHO RECEIVED YOUR FUNDS, THE
PERSON WHO IS USING YOUR CREDIT.

WE'RE GOING BACK TO HJR 192, shall be discharged upon payment. YOU DO PAY TO THE ORDER OF
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CHARGE SUM SAID THEN YOU PUT THE
PERSON'S NAME WHO SENT YOU THE BILL ON THERE. THAT'S A DISCHARGE UPON PAYMENT
DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR IN ANY COIN OR CURRENCY AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT IS LEGAL TENDER
FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DEBTS. IF YOU GO TO UCC 1-201 IT SAYS THE DEFINITION OF MONEY IS
NOT LIMITED TO WHAT IS LEGAL TENDER. MONEY IS 1813 L1 OF TITLE 12 SAYS A PROMISSORY
NOTE DEPOSITED IN A DEMAND DEPOSIT ACCOUNT (DDA) (is a bank account from which deposited
funds can be withdrawn at any time, without advance notice) IS THE EQUIVALENT OF MONEY OR CASH.