1 3 FoodCostControl
1 3 FoodCostControl
Food Cost - Food Cost is defined as the cost incurred to produce the food to be sold. This is
expressed in percentage (%). Hence, Food Cost % is mathematically defined as the ratio of the
cost of food to the total sales.
Cost control has been defined as the guidance and regulation of the costs of operating an
undertaking. To guide and regulate costs means to ensure that they are in accordance with the
pre determined objectives guide of the business. Hence the notion of the guidance and
regulation of costs pre supposes the existence of stated objectives as expressed in the policy
statements and the budgets of the undertaking.
Food cost control is simply cost control as applied to an undertaking operating food facilities.
Food cost control is therefore cost control as applied in hotels, restaurants, canteens and similar
establishments.
It is quite common in certain catering circles to regard food cost control as something wholly
negative designed to cut costs in all directions. This is quite wrong. The object of food cost
control is to ensure that costs are neither more or less than they ought to be that they are in line
with the financial and catering policies of the establishment.
An important feature, which distinguishes food cost control from systems of cost control in
other industries, is its materials costs orientation. In most aspects of food cost control, attention
is directed to primarily to the cost of materials (cost of sales) leaving the cost of labor and other
operating costs very much in the background. This is mainly due to the fact that in the short
run, labor and other operating costs tend to remain fixed and are thus largely uncontrollable
In many hotel and catering establishments, the expenditure on food is the largest single element
of cost. The maintenance of Food cost at pre determined levels are therefore of the greatest
importance in ensuring the satisfactory profitability of each establishment. Even where catering
is undertaken as a welfare facility food cost targets and costs ceilings are invariably imposed
from above either in total or on a per unit basis. The main objectives of food cost control may
be summarized as follows:
1. Analysis of Income and Expenditure: In financial accounts, stress is usually placed on an
ascertainment of total quantities e.g. sales, cost of sales, gross profit and net profit. In Food
cost control on the other hand, much stress is placed on the analysis of such total quantities
as between the various departments of the business. We are thus not satisfied with the
ascertainment of the total gross profits of the business as a whole, but attempt to ascertain
the cost of the profit on each department and each unit produced
2. Pricing of Food and Quotations: Another major objective of food cost control is to
provide a sound basis for menu pricing and quotations in respect of banquets and special
parties. Whilst often, menu prices are fixed by caterers by reference to prices charged by
competitors, the correct approach to the problem is to determine menu and other prices in
the light of the main costs and market considerations. Thus in addition to knowledge of
prices charged by competitors, the customers spending power etc, it is necessary to take
into account the costs of the establishment. This can only be done by installing a sound
system of Food Cost Control.
3. Prevention of Waste and Inefficiencies: As already noted, the purpose of control is to
ensure that current results are in accordance with the pre determined objectives of the
business. Invariably, such objectives are expanded in terms of targets for turnover, cost
ceilings and profit margins. Clearly, if such targets are to be reached, all possible forms of
waste and inefficiencies must be prevented. In order to be effective in preventing waste and
inefficiencies, a system of food cost control must cover the whole field of catering
operations – from the purchase of the foodstuffs to the sale of the meals. It will be
appreciated that as the catering process proceeds along the line along the line, linking the
purchase of foodstuffs to the sale of the meals, there are numerous critical areas (e.g.:
receipt of the incoming goods, preparation of meals and cash control) at which
considerable losses may be incurred. An effective system of food cost control will therefore
place particular stress on such critical areas of control and in this way help the
establishment to reach its pre-determined targets.
4. Data for Management Reports: An important function to be fulfilled by the food cost
control system is the provision of data for periodical reports on food operations. It is said
that the manager is like a judge. His judgment is only as good as the information supplied
to him. Effective catering management pre supposes adequate food cost reporting which
can only be based on a sound system of control.
In many respects food cost control is more difficult than systems of control in operation in
other industries. The specific factors which make food cost control relatively more difficult are
discussed here:
The development of an effective system of Food Cost Control resolves itself into three distinct
phases:
Phase I consists of basic policy decisions in relation to the financial and catering policies of
the establishment
Phase II consists of the necessary routine operation controls revolving around the catering
cycle
Phase III consists of what may be described as control after the event or post operational
control
Phase I
1. A Financial Policy – setting out the intentions of the management with regard to the
forecasted profitability. This involves setting up a profit target, the determination of
departmental profit target and the planning of a whole pattern of differential profit margins
in respect of each menu.
The financial policy of a catering establishment should be determined as in the five steps listed
below:
a. Determine the overall profit target. (return on capital employed)
b. Determine what percentage of net profit on sales must be aimed at.
c. By reference to the budgeted volume of sales, the type of service and the degree of
comfort to be provided to the customer. Determine what percentage of revenue will
be required to cover labor costs and overheads, and what percentage of revenue can
therefore be available to cover costs of sales.
d. By reference to the projected sales mix, determine the cost of sales for each
department of the business: food, beverages, alcoholic drinks and tobacco.
e. Having determined the overall cost of sales for each department, plan the
differential profit margin for each group of items offered on the menu, wine list etc.
a. Buying/Purchasing .
b. Receiving
c. Storing and Issuing
d. Preparation
e. Sales
Each of the above stages constitutes a highly critical stage of Food Cost Control. Any system
installed must therefore cover all the five stages.
A. Buying – There are 4 main points to be considered at this stage. Firstly, there is yield
testing. We have already evolved a catering policy, identified the type of customer, decided on
the type of the menu and established a set of costs and gross profit targets. The object of yield
testing is simply to discover the respective of yields of a whole range of commodities available
for any one purpose and so determine the costs concerned. It is only on the basis of yield
testing that we can compile the necessary purchase specifications. By the way, understand that
there is a difference between yield testing and product testing. In product testing, we are
mainly concerned with the physical properties of the food – texture, composition, keeping
quality, flavor etc. In reality, tests are carried out which would combine the two objectives.
Secondly, we have Purchase Specifications, which are concise descriptions of an item of food.
This helps the caterer to communicate with the supplier. Varieties of tomatoes are available,
some suitable for salads and some that may be used for soups and gravies. Similarly, brinjals
are available for stuffing and others for Bhurta. A set of specifications by themselves will not
be of much use. It is necessary to ensure that they are used – not only by the buying office but
also by the goods receiving office. Thirdly, the methods of buying must be considered. It is
clear that no single method of buying is suitable for all types of food. Hence, in relation to each
type of commodity, we must decide whether it should be bought open market, via a tender or
local purchase/imported. Finally, we must determine clerical procedures. It is necessary to
decide who originates, sanctions and places purchase orders and what sort of documentary
evidence is to be used. The use of the computer and material management packages is
widespread and will help generate reports, which helps immensely with food cost control
procedures.
B. Receiving – There seem to be three main points here. The first is quality control. Some
person must be made responsible for checking the quality of all incoming goods, and it is
obviously important to concentrate efforts in the direction of the perishable commodities. The
quality of non-perishables tends to be constant over a period of time. Secondly, we must assign
responsibility for the quantity inspection. The goods receiving clerk normally perform this
task. Blind receiving is now quite a popular receiving technique especially in large-scale
operations. Finally, the clerical procedures must be planned. How much paper work do we
really want? Do we keep a goods received book? What action should be taken in the event of
non-delivery or short delivery? These questions need to be answered and the policies framed.
Today, the computer helps to eliminate a lot of paper work. But, is the organization financially
equipped to install computers? Do they possess the personnel to operate the software??
C. Storing and Issuing – Several important matters must be planned for the third stage of the
cycle. First, there is the problem of stock records. It is necessary to decide whether or not these
will be kept at all and also for how long! Secondly, the matter of pricing of issues must be
decided upon. In other words, we must choose one or more of the following for computing the
cost of food consumed:
- Actual purchase price
- Simple average price
- Weighted average price
- Inflated price
- Standard price
Thirdly, stocktaking must be considered. Decisions must be made with regard to its frequency,
the pricing of stocks, methods with dealing with discrepancies etc. Finally, the necessary
clerical procedures must be established and introduced. Who writes the requisitions? How
many copies? Who will sanction? These are some of the questions that must be answered.
D. Preparing – This is possibly the most critical stage of the cycle. The cost of food consumed
depends on two factors: the number of meals produced and the food cost per meal. In order
therefore to control food costs we must be able to control the numbers being catered for (we
must have some method of volume forecasting) and control the food cost per meal in advance
(standard recipes and portion control). Volume forecasting is a method of predicting the sales
volume for a future period. In order to be of practical value, the forecast must predict the total
number of covers as well as the choice of menu items. The process of volume forecasting
consists of two stages: First, we have what we know as the initial forecast. This is done once a
week in respect of each day of the following week. The initial forecast is based on sales
histories, data relating to advance bookings as well as current trends. When the initial forecast
has been completed, the predicted sales are converted into quantities of raw material. Purchase
orders can then be prepared and sent out to the suppliers. The second stage is known as the
final forecast. And this usually takes place a day before. The final forecast takes into account
the latest developments including weather etc. If required, supplier’s orders can be amended. It
must be understood that volume forecasting is not a perfect method of prediction. We cannot
really tell the future. It does however help to minimize over and under production of food.
E. Selling – At this last stage of the catering cycle, we are concerned with three main
problems. The financial and catering policies will have defined the price policy of the business.
In operational food cost control, we are therefore only concerned with the routine pricing of
food. Where differential profit margins have been evolved, this is a relatively simple matter. A
more important tactical task that has to be faced is to ensure that any increase in the quantity of
food prepared is matched by a corresponding increase in cash received from the customer. This
will require a restaurant checking system. The final problem is of cash control. We must ensure
that all amounts received by the waiting staff are paid to the cashier. He in turn has to deposit
each day’s takings.
The first point is obviously a matter of some importance mainly for reasons of the specific
character of catering operations. Food is a highly perishable commodity and whether in the
form of cooked meals or raw materials, it cannot be stored indefinitely. Moreover, the demand
for catering facilities shows unpredictable trends and unexpected changes. The cycle of
production is extremely short, unlike other manufacturing operations such as automobiles for
example. All this means that current operations must be reviewed frequently and that there is a
need for a short review period. In order to control a food operation effectively, the manager
must have daily, weekly and other reports covering longer periods.
The second important aspect of food cost reporting is concerned with analysis. A catering
business, unlike most other businesses performs a dual function: production and selling.
Furthermore, many catering establishments are highly departmentalized, especially large hotels
and industrial canteens. The assortment of production (large menus) changes from day to day.
All these factors mean that from the point of vies of control; analytical reports showing
separate results for each branch of the catering operation are necessary. The assessment of
results is concerned with an appreciation of how far the actual results of food operations
correspond with the actual results. This means that assessment is not possible without a
yardstick for measurement. We could assess current results in relation to those of previous food
cost review periods or we could assess current actual results in relation to budgeted results.
Obviously, the second is the preferred one.
This brings us to the last stage: corrective action. Surely, any action that is taken following
receipt of a food cost report depends on circumstances and reasons of each case. Therefore, it
is difficult to lay down specific guidelines for corrective action and it here that the manager’s
tact and experiences as well as his feel for the job come into play. Questions of praise,
reprimand, authority and responsibility are very largely a matter of human relations.
*************************************