0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views7 pages

1 2025 W Assig6 Solution

The document presents solutions for various statistical control charts and process capability analyses, indicating that some processes are in statistical control while others are out-of-control. Key findings include the calculation of control limits, process capability indices, and the identification of out-of-control points. The document also discusses the implications of these analyses for quality control in manufacturing processes.

Uploaded by

Clint DSouza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views7 pages

1 2025 W Assig6 Solution

The document presents solutions for various statistical control charts and process capability analyses, indicating that some processes are in statistical control while others are out-of-control. Key findings include the calculation of control limits, process capability indices, and the identification of out-of-control points. The document also discusses the implications of these analyses for quality control in manufacturing processes.

Uploaded by

Clint DSouza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

INDU 372 Assignment 6 Solutions

6-3.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Xbar-R Chart of Ex5-3Dia
U C L=47.53
40
Sample Mean

20 _
_
X=10.9
0

-20
LC L=-25.73
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample

150
U C L=134.3
Sample Range

100

_
R=63.5
50

0 LC L=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample

The process is in statistical control with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles.
(b)
σˆ x R=
= = 27.3
/ d 2 63.5 / 2.326
(c)
USL = +100, LSL = –100
USL − LSL +100 − (−100)
=Cˆ P = = 1.22 , so the process is capable.
6σˆ x 6(27.3)
MTB > Stat > Quality Tools > Capability Analysis > Normal
Process Capability Analysis of Ex5-3Dia

LSL USL
Process Data W ithin
LSL -100.00000 O v erall
Target *
USL 100.00000 Potential (Within) Capability
Sample Mean 10.90000 Cp 1.22
Sample N 100 CPL 1.35
StDev(Within) 27.30009 CPU 1.09
StDev(Overall) 25.29384 Cpk 1.09
CCpk 1.22
Overall Capability
Pp 1.32
PPL 1.46
PPU 1.17
Ppk 1.17
Cpm *

-90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90


Observed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. Overall Performance
PPM < LSL 0.00 PPM < LSL 24.30 PPM < LSL 5.81
PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 549.79 PPM > USL 213.67
PPM Total 0.00 PPM Total 574.09 PPM Total 219.48

1
6-4.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Xbar-R Chart of Thickness (Ex5-4Th)
0.0640
U C L=0.063893

0.0635
Sample Mean

_
_
0.0630 X=0.062952

0.0625

0.0620 LC L=0.062011
1
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sa mple

1
0.0024 U C L=0.002368
Sample Range

0.0018

0.0012 _
R=0.00092
0.0006

0.0000 LC L=0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sa mple

Test Results for Xbar Chart of Ex6-4Th


TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from center line.
Test Failed at points: 22
TEST 5. 2 out of 3 points more than 2 standard deviations from center line (on
one side of CL).
Test Failed at points: 22

Test Results for R Chart of Ex6-4Th


TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from center line.
Test Failed at points: 15
* WARNING * If graph is updated with new data, the results above may no
* longer be correct.

The process is out-of-control, failing tests on both the x and the R charts. Assuming assignable causes
are found, remove the out-of-control points (samples 15, 22) and re-calculate control limits. With the
revised limits, sample 14 is also out-of-control on the x chart. Removing all three samples from
calculation, the new control limits are:

Xbar-R Chart of Thickness (Ex5-4Th)


(S amples 15, 22, 14 removed from control limits calculations)
0.0640 1
UCL=0.063787

0.0635
Sample Mean

_
_
0.0630 X=0.062945

0.0625

LCL=0.062104
0.0620
1
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample

1
0.0024
UCL=0.002118
0.0018
Sample Range

0.0012
_
R=0.000823
0.0006

0.0000 LCL=0

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample

(b)
σˆ x R=
= = 0.000486
/ d 2 0.000823 /1.693

2
(c)
Natural tolerance limits are: x ± 3σ=
ˆ x 0.06295 ± 3(0.000486)
= [0.061492, 0.064408]
(d)
Assuming that printed circuit board thickness is normally distributed, and excluding samples 14, 15,
and 22 from the process capability estimation:
USL − LSL +0.0015 − (−0.0015)
=Cˆ P = = 1.028
6σˆ x 6(0.000486)

MTB > Stat > Quality Tools > Capability Analysis > Normal
Process Capability Analysis of Thickness (Ex5-4Th_w/o)
(Estimated without Samples 14, 15, 22)

LSL USL
Process Data W ithin
LSL 0.06150 O v erall
Target *
USL 0.06450 Potential (Within) Capability
Sample Mean 0.06295 Cp 1.03
Sample N 66 CPL 0.99
StDev(Within) 0.00049 CPU 1.07
StDev(Overall) 0.00053 Cpk 0.99
CCpk 1.03
Overall Capability
Pp 0.94
PPL 0.90
PPU 0.97
Ppk 0.90
Cpm *

0.0616 0.0620 0.0624 0.0628 0.0632 0.0636 0.0640 0.0644


Observed Performance Exp. Within Performance Exp. Overall Performance
PPM < LSL 15151.52 PPM < LSL 1467.61 PPM < LSL 3419.33
PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 689.70 PPM > USL 1814.55
PPM Total 15151.52 PPM Total 2157.31 PPM Total 5233.88

6-5.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-S (Ex6-5Vol)
Under “Options, Estimate” select Sbar as method to estimate standard deviation.
Xbar-S Chart of Fill Volume (Ex5-5Vol)
1.0 U C L=1.037

0.5
Sample Mean

_
_
0.0 X=-0.003

-0.5

-1.0 LC L=-1.043
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sa mple

2.0
U C L=1.830

1.5
Sample StDev

_
S =1.066
1.0

0.5
LC L=0.302
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sa mple

The process is in statistical control, with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles.
(b)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R (Ex6-5Vol)

3
Xbar-R Chart of Fill Volume (Ex5-5Vol)
1.0 U C L=0.983

0.5

Sample Mean
_
_
0.0 X=-0.003

-0.5

-1.0 LC L=-0.990
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample

6.0
U C L=5.686

4.5
Sample Range

_
3.0 R=3.2

1.5
LC L=0.714
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample

The process is in statistical control, with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles. There is no
difference in interpretation from the x − s chart.
(c)
Let α = 0.010. n = 15, s = 1.066.
CL= s= 2
1.066=2
1.136
UCL = s 2 (n − 1) χα2 / 2,n −1 = 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( χ 0.010
2
/ 2,15 −1 ) = 1.066 (15 − 1) ( 31.32 ) = 2.542
2

LCL= s 2 (n − 1) χ12−(α / 2),n −1= 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( χ12−(0.010 / 2),15−1 )= 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( 4.07 )= 0.330

MINITAB’s control chart options do not include an s2 or variance chart. To construct an s2 control
chart, first calculate the sample standard deviations and then create a time series plot. To obtain sample
standard deviations: Stat > Basic Statistics > Store Descriptive Statistics. “Variables” is column
with sample data (Ex6-5Vol), and “By Variables” is the sample ID column (Ex6-5Sample). In
“Statistics” select “Variance”. Results are displayed in the session window. Copy results from the
session window by holding down the keyboard “Alt” key, selecting only the variance column, and then
copying & pasting to an empty worksheet column (results in Ex6-5Variance).

Graph > Time Series Plot > Simple


Control limits can be added using: Time/Scale > Reference Lines > Y positions

Control Chart for Ex5-5Variance

2.5 UCL = 2.542

2.0
s^2 (Variance)

1.5

CL = 1.136
1.0

0.5
LCL = 0.33

0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample

4
Sample 5 signals out of control below the lower control limit. Otherwise there are no runs, trends, or
cycles. If the limits had been calculated using α = 0.0027 (not tabulated in textbook), sample 5 would
be within the limits, and there would be no difference in interpretation from either the x − s or the x−R
chart.

6-12.
50 50
=n 6 items/sample;=
∑ xi 2000;= =
∑ Ri 200; m 50 samples
=i 1 =i 1

(a)
50 50
∑ xi 2000 ∑ Ri 200
=x i= = 40; =
1 =i 1
R = = 4
m 50 m 50
UCL x =+
x A2 R =
40 + 0.483(4) =41.932
LCL x =−
x A2 R =
40 − 0.483(4) =
38.068
=
UCL R D=
4R = 8.016
2.004(4)
=
LCL R D=
3R = 0
0(4)

(b)
x 3 ( R / d2 ) =
natural tolerance limits: x ± 3σˆ x =± 40 ± 3(4 / 2.534) =
[35.264, 44.736]

(c)
USL - LSL +5.0 − (−5.0)
=Cˆ P = = 1.056 , so the process is not capable.
6σˆ x 6(1.579)

(d)
 36 − 40 
pˆ scrap = Pr{x < LSL} = Pr{x < 36} =Φ   =Φ (−2.533) = 0.0057 , or 0.57%.
 1.579 
 47 − 40 
pˆ rework = Pr{x > USL} = 1 − Pr{x < USL} = 1 − Φ   = 1 − Φ (4.433) = 1 − 0.999995 = 0.000005 or
 1.579 
0.0005%.
(e)
First, center the process at 41, not 40, to reduce scrap and rework costs. Second, reduce variability
such that the natural process tolerance limits are closer to, say, σˆ x ≈ 1.253 .

6-15
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R

5
Xbar-R Chart of Strength Test (Ex5-15aSt)
85.0 U C L=84.58

82.5
Sample Mean

_
_
80.0
X=79.53

77.5

75.0
LC L=74.49
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sa mple

20
U C L=18.49

15
Sample Range

10 _
R=8.75

0 LC L=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sa mple

Yes, the process is in control—though we should watch for a possible cyclic pattern in the averages.
(b)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Under “Options, Estimate” use subgroups 1:20 to calculate control limits.
Xbar-R Chart of Strength Test (Ex5-15bSt)
1
85.0 U C L=84.58
8

82.5 8
Sample M ean

8
_
_
80.0 X=79.53

77.5

75.0
LC L=74.49
1 1
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
Sample

30 1 1
1
1 1
1
Sample Range

1
20
U C L=18.49

2
10 _
R=8.75

0 LC L=0

3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
Sample

Test Results for R Chart of Ex6-15bSt


TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from center line.
Test Failed at points: 25, 26, 27, 31, 33, 34, 35
TEST 2. 9 points in a row on same side of center line.
Test Failed at points: 32, 33, 34, 35

A strongly cyclic pattern in the averages is now evident, but more importantly, there are several out-of-
control points on the range chart.

6
6-30.
30 30
=n 6;=
∑ xi 6000;= =
∑ Ri 150; m 30 samples
=i 1 =i 1

(a)
30
∑ xi 6000
=x = = 200
i =1
m 30
30
∑ Ri 150
=
R = = 5
i =1
m 30
UCL x =+x A2 R =
200 + 0.483(5) =
202.42
LCL x =−
x A2 R =
200 − 0.483(5) =
197.59
=
UCL R D=
4R = 10.02
2.004(5)
LCL =R D= 3R = 0
0(5)
(b)
=σˆ x R= = 1.97
/ d 2 5 / 2.534
USL − LSL +5 − (−5)
=Cˆ p = = 0.85
6σˆ x 6(1.97)
The process is not capable of meeting specification. Even though the process is centered at nominal,
the variation is large relative to the tolerance.
(c)
 202.42 − 199   197.59 − 199 
β − risk = Pr{not detect} = Φ  −Φ 
 1.97 6   1.97 6 
= Φ (4.25) − Φ (−1.75) = 1 − 0.04006 = 0.95994

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy