1 2025 W Assig6 Solution
1 2025 W Assig6 Solution
6-3.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Xbar-R Chart of Ex5-3Dia
U C L=47.53
40
Sample Mean
20 _
_
X=10.9
0
-20
LC L=-25.73
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample
150
U C L=134.3
Sample Range
100
_
R=63.5
50
0 LC L=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample
The process is in statistical control with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles.
(b)
σˆ x R=
= = 27.3
/ d 2 63.5 / 2.326
(c)
USL = +100, LSL = –100
USL − LSL +100 − (−100)
=Cˆ P = = 1.22 , so the process is capable.
6σˆ x 6(27.3)
MTB > Stat > Quality Tools > Capability Analysis > Normal
Process Capability Analysis of Ex5-3Dia
LSL USL
Process Data W ithin
LSL -100.00000 O v erall
Target *
USL 100.00000 Potential (Within) Capability
Sample Mean 10.90000 Cp 1.22
Sample N 100 CPL 1.35
StDev(Within) 27.30009 CPU 1.09
StDev(Overall) 25.29384 Cpk 1.09
CCpk 1.22
Overall Capability
Pp 1.32
PPL 1.46
PPU 1.17
Ppk 1.17
Cpm *
1
6-4.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Xbar-R Chart of Thickness (Ex5-4Th)
0.0640
U C L=0.063893
0.0635
Sample Mean
_
_
0.0630 X=0.062952
0.0625
0.0620 LC L=0.062011
1
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sa mple
1
0.0024 U C L=0.002368
Sample Range
0.0018
0.0012 _
R=0.00092
0.0006
0.0000 LC L=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sa mple
The process is out-of-control, failing tests on both the x and the R charts. Assuming assignable causes
are found, remove the out-of-control points (samples 15, 22) and re-calculate control limits. With the
revised limits, sample 14 is also out-of-control on the x chart. Removing all three samples from
calculation, the new control limits are:
0.0635
Sample Mean
_
_
0.0630 X=0.062945
0.0625
LCL=0.062104
0.0620
1
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
1
0.0024
UCL=0.002118
0.0018
Sample Range
0.0012
_
R=0.000823
0.0006
0.0000 LCL=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sample
(b)
σˆ x R=
= = 0.000486
/ d 2 0.000823 /1.693
2
(c)
Natural tolerance limits are: x ± 3σ=
ˆ x 0.06295 ± 3(0.000486)
= [0.061492, 0.064408]
(d)
Assuming that printed circuit board thickness is normally distributed, and excluding samples 14, 15,
and 22 from the process capability estimation:
USL − LSL +0.0015 − (−0.0015)
=Cˆ P = = 1.028
6σˆ x 6(0.000486)
MTB > Stat > Quality Tools > Capability Analysis > Normal
Process Capability Analysis of Thickness (Ex5-4Th_w/o)
(Estimated without Samples 14, 15, 22)
LSL USL
Process Data W ithin
LSL 0.06150 O v erall
Target *
USL 0.06450 Potential (Within) Capability
Sample Mean 0.06295 Cp 1.03
Sample N 66 CPL 0.99
StDev(Within) 0.00049 CPU 1.07
StDev(Overall) 0.00053 Cpk 0.99
CCpk 1.03
Overall Capability
Pp 0.94
PPL 0.90
PPU 0.97
Ppk 0.90
Cpm *
6-5.
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-S (Ex6-5Vol)
Under “Options, Estimate” select Sbar as method to estimate standard deviation.
Xbar-S Chart of Fill Volume (Ex5-5Vol)
1.0 U C L=1.037
0.5
Sample Mean
_
_
0.0 X=-0.003
-0.5
-1.0 LC L=-1.043
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sa mple
2.0
U C L=1.830
1.5
Sample StDev
_
S =1.066
1.0
0.5
LC L=0.302
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sa mple
The process is in statistical control, with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles.
(b)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R (Ex6-5Vol)
3
Xbar-R Chart of Fill Volume (Ex5-5Vol)
1.0 U C L=0.983
0.5
Sample Mean
_
_
0.0 X=-0.003
-0.5
-1.0 LC L=-0.990
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample
6.0
U C L=5.686
4.5
Sample Range
_
3.0 R=3.2
1.5
LC L=0.714
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample
The process is in statistical control, with no out-of-control signals, runs, trends, or cycles. There is no
difference in interpretation from the x − s chart.
(c)
Let α = 0.010. n = 15, s = 1.066.
CL= s= 2
1.066=2
1.136
UCL = s 2 (n − 1) χα2 / 2,n −1 = 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( χ 0.010
2
/ 2,15 −1 ) = 1.066 (15 − 1) ( 31.32 ) = 2.542
2
LCL= s 2 (n − 1) χ12−(α / 2),n −1= 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( χ12−(0.010 / 2),15−1 )= 1.0662 (15 − 1) ( 4.07 )= 0.330
MINITAB’s control chart options do not include an s2 or variance chart. To construct an s2 control
chart, first calculate the sample standard deviations and then create a time series plot. To obtain sample
standard deviations: Stat > Basic Statistics > Store Descriptive Statistics. “Variables” is column
with sample data (Ex6-5Vol), and “By Variables” is the sample ID column (Ex6-5Sample). In
“Statistics” select “Variance”. Results are displayed in the session window. Copy results from the
session window by holding down the keyboard “Alt” key, selecting only the variance column, and then
copying & pasting to an empty worksheet column (results in Ex6-5Variance).
2.0
s^2 (Variance)
1.5
CL = 1.136
1.0
0.5
LCL = 0.33
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Sample
4
Sample 5 signals out of control below the lower control limit. Otherwise there are no runs, trends, or
cycles. If the limits had been calculated using α = 0.0027 (not tabulated in textbook), sample 5 would
be within the limits, and there would be no difference in interpretation from either the x − s or the x−R
chart.
6-12.
50 50
=n 6 items/sample;=
∑ xi 2000;= =
∑ Ri 200; m 50 samples
=i 1 =i 1
(a)
50 50
∑ xi 2000 ∑ Ri 200
=x i= = 40; =
1 =i 1
R = = 4
m 50 m 50
UCL x =+
x A2 R =
40 + 0.483(4) =41.932
LCL x =−
x A2 R =
40 − 0.483(4) =
38.068
=
UCL R D=
4R = 8.016
2.004(4)
=
LCL R D=
3R = 0
0(4)
(b)
x 3 ( R / d2 ) =
natural tolerance limits: x ± 3σˆ x =± 40 ± 3(4 / 2.534) =
[35.264, 44.736]
(c)
USL - LSL +5.0 − (−5.0)
=Cˆ P = = 1.056 , so the process is not capable.
6σˆ x 6(1.579)
(d)
36 − 40
pˆ scrap = Pr{x < LSL} = Pr{x < 36} =Φ =Φ (−2.533) = 0.0057 , or 0.57%.
1.579
47 − 40
pˆ rework = Pr{x > USL} = 1 − Pr{x < USL} = 1 − Φ = 1 − Φ (4.433) = 1 − 0.999995 = 0.000005 or
1.579
0.0005%.
(e)
First, center the process at 41, not 40, to reduce scrap and rework costs. Second, reduce variability
such that the natural process tolerance limits are closer to, say, σˆ x ≈ 1.253 .
6-15
(a)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
5
Xbar-R Chart of Strength Test (Ex5-15aSt)
85.0 U C L=84.58
82.5
Sample Mean
_
_
80.0
X=79.53
77.5
75.0
LC L=74.49
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sa mple
20
U C L=18.49
15
Sample Range
10 _
R=8.75
0 LC L=0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sa mple
Yes, the process is in control—though we should watch for a possible cyclic pattern in the averages.
(b)
MTB > Stat > Control Charts > Variables Charts for Subgroups > Xbar-R
Under “Options, Estimate” use subgroups 1:20 to calculate control limits.
Xbar-R Chart of Strength Test (Ex5-15bSt)
1
85.0 U C L=84.58
8
82.5 8
Sample M ean
8
_
_
80.0 X=79.53
77.5
75.0
LC L=74.49
1 1
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
Sample
30 1 1
1
1 1
1
Sample Range
1
20
U C L=18.49
2
10 _
R=8.75
0 LC L=0
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
Sample
A strongly cyclic pattern in the averages is now evident, but more importantly, there are several out-of-
control points on the range chart.
6
6-30.
30 30
=n 6;=
∑ xi 6000;= =
∑ Ri 150; m 30 samples
=i 1 =i 1
(a)
30
∑ xi 6000
=x = = 200
i =1
m 30
30
∑ Ri 150
=
R = = 5
i =1
m 30
UCL x =+x A2 R =
200 + 0.483(5) =
202.42
LCL x =−
x A2 R =
200 − 0.483(5) =
197.59
=
UCL R D=
4R = 10.02
2.004(5)
LCL =R D= 3R = 0
0(5)
(b)
=σˆ x R= = 1.97
/ d 2 5 / 2.534
USL − LSL +5 − (−5)
=Cˆ p = = 0.85
6σˆ x 6(1.97)
The process is not capable of meeting specification. Even though the process is centered at nominal,
the variation is large relative to the tolerance.
(c)
202.42 − 199 197.59 − 199
β − risk = Pr{not detect} = Φ −Φ
1.97 6 1.97 6
= Φ (4.25) − Φ (−1.75) = 1 − 0.04006 = 0.95994