ISS-DSS - Module 2
ISS-DSS - Module 2
1. Knowledge:
Knowledge is different from information and data. While data refers to raw facts and
figures, and information is processed data, knowledge is a mix of experience, values,
contextual information, and intuition that individuals or organizations use to make
decisions. Knowledge can be tacit (personal, context-specific, and hard to formalize)
or explicit (codified and easy to communicate).
2. Knowledge-Sharing:
A core aspect of KM is facilitating the sharing of knowledge across an organization.
This involves the creation of platforms, communication channels, and a culture that
promotes the exchange of ideas, best practices, and experiences. Knowledge sharing
ensures that valuable insights are accessible to others, improving overall
organizational efficiency.
3. Knowledge-Creation:
Knowledge creation refers to the generation of new knowledge within the
organization, which may arise from research, innovation, or new experiences. It
involves collaboration and the application of creative thinking to solve problems or
create opportunities.
While technology plays an important role in KM, it is not the primary driver. KM is
fundamentally about people and processes. Successful KM focuses on fostering a
culture of knowledge sharing, collaboration, and continuous learning. Technology
(such as knowledge repositories, collaboration tools, and AI-based systems) is a
facilitator, but it should align with organizational goals, not be the focus of the
strategy itself.
KM is only relevant or beneficial for large organizations with vast amounts of
data and employees.
Storing knowledge is just one aspect of KM. KM is also about organizing, accessing,
sharing, and applying that knowledge to solve problems, make decisions, and drive
innovation. It focuses not only on the repository but on how to ensure that knowledge
is used effectively in real-world scenarios.
Types of Knowledge
1. Explicit Knowledge
2. Tacit Knowledge
3. Declarative Knowledge
Declarative knowledge refers to facts and descriptive information, answering the "what"
questions. This includes data such as sales figures, market trends, and organizational
hierarchies. In information systems, declarative knowledge is stored in databases and serves
as the foundational input for analysis and reporting. Decision support systems leverage
declarative knowledge to provide users with an understanding of the current state of affairs,
enabling them to evaluate options effectively.
4. Procedural Knowledge
Procedural knowledge focuses on the "how-to" aspect, detailing the steps required to perform
specific tasks or solve problems. In information systems, procedural knowledge is often
encoded into algorithms, workflows, and automated processes. For example, a DSS might use
procedural knowledge to guide a user through supply chain optimization or troubleshooting a
technical issue. This type of knowledge is essential for ensuring that systems not only provide
information but also facilitate actionable insights and solutions.
5. Heuristic Knowledge
Heuristic knowledge consists of rules of thumb, best practices, and guidelines that help in
making decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Unlike procedural knowledge, heuristics
are not rigid or universally applicable; they are derived from experience and may vary by
context. Decision support systems often incorporate heuristic knowledge to offer flexible
recommendations when precise data is unavailable. For instance, in financial forecasting, a
DSS might suggest general strategies based on market patterns and historical behavior rather
than exact predictions.
6. Contextual Knowledge
7. A Priori Knowledge
A priori knowledge refers to knowledge derived from logical reasoning and pre-existing
models, independent of direct experience or empirical evidence. In the context of decision
support systems, a priori knowledge might include pre-built theoretical frameworks, such as
optimization algorithms or statistical models, which are applied to analyze data and make
predictions. This type of knowledge is essential for creating robust and scalable systems that
can process diverse scenarios.
Knowledge Management Life Cycle
This step involves assessing the current technological, organizational, and cultural infrastructure to
determine its readiness for a Knowledge Management System. It includes analyzing existing tools,
processes, and knowledge repositories to identify gaps and areas for improvement. This evaluation
ensures that the organization understands its current capabilities and limitations, laying the groundwor
for the KMS.
A dedicated Knowledge Management team is established in this phase. This team typically includes
experts from different departments, IT professionals, and project managers. Their role is to oversee
the design, implementation, and maintenance of the KMS. This collaborative effort ensures that the
system aligns with organizational goals and addresses the diverse needs of stakeholders.
3. Knowledge Capture
In this stage, knowledge from various sources is collected and documented. This includes explicit
knowledge, such as documents and databases, as well as tacit knowledge residing in employees'
minds. Techniques like interviews, brainstorming sessions, and digital tools are often employed to
ensure valuable knowledge is systematically gathered.
4. Design KM Blueprint
The Knowledge Management blueprint outlines the structure and functionality of the KMS. It defines
how knowledge will be stored, organized, and accessed. The blueprint includes selecting technologies,
defining workflows, and determining how the system will integrate with existing processes. This step
acts as the foundation for the technical and functional design of the system.
Before full-scale implementation, the Knowledge Management System undergoes rigorous testing.
This phase ensures that the system functions as intended, addressing any technical issues or user
concerns. Testing typically involves pilot programs or prototypes where a subset of users interact with
the system, providing feedback to refine its usability and performance.
In this step, the KMS is deployed organization-wide. This includes installing the system, migrating
knowledge into the repository, and ensuring it is accessible to all intended users. Training sessions
may be conducted to familiarize employees with the system and its functionalities. Implementation
marks the transition from planning to practical usage.
Introducing a KMS often requires cultural and organizational change. This step focuses on managing
resistance to change and encouraging adoption through clear communication, training, and support.
Reward structures, such as recognition or incentives for active participation, are implemented to
motivate employees to contribute to and use the system effectively.
8. Post-System Evaluation
The final step involves evaluating the system’s performance and its impact on organizational goals.
Metrics such as user adoption rates, system usage, and knowledge accessibility are analyzed to
identify successes and areas for improvement. Feedback from users is gathered to make necessary
updates or enhancements, ensuring the KMS remains effective and relevant.
It explains how knowledge is created, transferred, and converted between tacit and explicit forms
through four dynamic processes:
Socialization: The process of sharing tacit knowledge through direct interaction and shared
experiences. For example, employees learn through mentoring, observation, or teamwork.
Socialization is vital for transferring experiential knowledge that cannot be easily
documented.
Combination: The process of combining different pieces of explicit knowledge to create new
knowledge. For example, data from various departments might be integrated into a report that
provides comprehensive insights for decision-making.
Internalization: The process by which explicit knowledge is absorbed and becomes part of
an individual’s tacit knowledge base. This often occurs through learning and practice, such as
employees using training materials to develop new skills.
Wiig’s KM model focuses on the systematic creation, organization, and application of knowledge to
achieve business goals. This model highlights the importance of aligning knowledge management
practices with organizational goals, ensuring that knowledge is a strategic asset.
It categorizes knowledge into three types and emphasizes the importance of each:
Building Knowledge: This involves acquiring knowledge through learning, research, and
observation. Organizations build knowledge by investing in training, education, and research
initiatives.
Holding Knowledge: Refers to organizing and storing knowledge in accessible formats, such
as databases, repositories, or documentation. The goal is to make knowledge available when
needed.
Applying Knowledge: Knowledge must be applied to solve problems, make decisions, and
achieve objectives. Wiig stresses that knowledge has no value unless it is used effectively.
Boisot’s Information-Space (I-Space) model explores how knowledge moves through organizations
and society. It focuses on two dimensions: codification (the degree to which knowledge can be
articulated) and diffusion (how widely knowledge is shared). The I-Space model emphasizes how
knowledge transitions from tacit to explicit and becomes widely accessible, facilitating organizational
learning and innovation.
Uncodified and Undiffused Knowledge: Tacit knowledge that exists only in individuals,
such as personal experiences or insights.
Codified but Undiffused Knowledge: Knowledge that is documented but not widely shared,
such as proprietary research.
Codified and Diffused Knowledge: Knowledge that is accessible to a broad audience, such
as industry standards or best practices.
4. Probst’s KM Cycle
2. Knowledge Acquisition: Collecting knowledge from internal and external sources, such as
hiring experts, conducting research, or collaborating with partners.
4. Knowledge Distribution: Sharing knowledge across the organization using tools like
intranets, training programs, or collaborative platforms.
5. Knowledge Retention: Ensuring knowledge is preserved for future use through proper
documentation, archiving, and storage.
Choo’s model focuses on how organizations make sense of their environment and use knowledge to
make informed decisions. Choo’s model emphasizes the dynamic relationship between knowledge,
action, and decision-making, ensuring organizations stay adaptive and competitive.
Decision-Making: Knowledge is applied to choose the best course of action and align it with
organizational objectives.
This model expands on Nonaka’s SECI model by focusing on how knowledge operates at multiple
organizational levels: individual, group, organizational, and inter-organizational. It highlights the
interplay of explicit and tacit knowledge at each level and how they contribute to organizational
learning and innovation. This model emphasizes that knowledge management requires coordination
across different levels of the organization.
At the individual level, knowledge creation is driven by personal experiences and insights.
At the group level, collaboration and shared learning enhance knowledge sharing.
At the organizational level, systems and processes are used to codify and store knowledge.
The definition of the knowledge-based organization is centered around three attributes: its
principal mission is to acquire, manipulate and deploy information and knowledge; it strives
to be a—learning organization—in which its members, both individually and collectively, are
continuously enhancing their capacity to produce results and adapt to changing
circumstances; and it is guided by commitment to organizational excellence through such
pursuits as benchmarking, best practices and the fostering of collaborative relationships
among its various stakeholders. Knowledge organizations have been characterized as
enterprises in which the key asset is knowledge.
Process
Knowledge Sharing and Creation Most organizations are primarily focused on the
concrete and observable activities that make up what they do on a day-to day basis. A
knowledge-based organization attends to two related processes that underlie these
direct processes: the effective application of existing knowledge and the creation of
knew knowledge. The goal is fourfold: to ensure that knowledge from one part of a
company is applied to activities in other parts; to ensure that knowledge is shared over
time so that the company benefits from past experience; to make it possible for people
from various parts of the organization to find each other and collaborate to create new
knowledge; and to provide opportunities and incentives for experimentation and
learning.
Place
Knowledge Boundaries: Knowledge creation and sharing in today‘s economy are not
bound by the traditional physical and legal limits of the corporation. Companies are
increasingly realizing that knowledge is often produced and shared as a by product of
daily interactions with customers, vendors, alliance partners and even competitors.
The knowledge-based organization, then, is a collection of people and supporting
resources that creates and applies knowledge via continued interaction. Its boundaries
are blurred, malleable and dynamic. At some point, the knowledge-based organization
stops worrying about who works for whom and focuses instead on who needs to work
with whom.
Purpose
Knowledge Strategy: Even a highly effective set of knowledge management processes
does not guarantee that an organization will perform well or better than its
competitors. Only a few years ago Polaroid, for example, had generally effective
processes in place to capture and share knowledge about products, customers,
applications, technologies and the competitive environment. The culture was
conducive to sharing and cooperation, and the company had implemented a
reasonably good information system for supporting virtual collaboration. All in all, it
appeared to be managing knowledge well. The knowledge being created and shared,
however, was entirely focused on analog film and cameras. Polaroid knew little about
digital imaging and this contributed to its eventual bankruptcy. Companies that
succeed over the long term align their knowledge management processes with their
strategy.
Perspective
The Knowledge Point of View: The knowledge-based organization, regardless of
whether its products are tangible or not, holds a knowledgeoriented image of itself.
That is, it takes knowledge into account in every aspect of its operation and treats
every activity as a potentially knowledge enhancing act. It uses knowledge and
learning as its primary criteria for evaluating how it organizes, what it makes, where it
locates, who it hires, how it relates to customers, the image it projects, and the nature
of its competition.
1. Tacit Knowledge: This includes the personal insights, skills, and experiences of
employees, which are often difficult to document or transfer. Examples include
leadership skills, creativity, and problem-solving expertise.
1. Knowledge Repositories
2. Collaboration Tools
3. Knowledge Bases
o ERP systems like SAP and Oracle integrate various business processes and
provide access to organizational knowledge related to finance, operations, and
human resources.
o Analytical tools such as Tableau, Power BI, and Google Analytics extract
valuable insights from large datasets, aiding knowledge discovery and
decision-making.
o Tools like Alfresco and DocuWare manage the lifecycle of documents and
ensure proper version control and access permissions.
1. Align Technology with Business Goals: Ensure that KM technologies are selected
and implemented to address specific business objectives.
3. Regularly Update KM Systems: Ensure that systems remain relevant and up to date
with evolving business needs and technological advancements.
4. Monitor and Evaluate KM Processes: Use metrics like system usage rates,
employee satisfaction, and productivity improvements to assess the effectiveness of
KM technologies.
Implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) in an Organization
The first step in implementing KM is understanding the organization's specific needs and
strategic objectives. Key actions include:
Defining the types of knowledge (tacit and explicit) that need to be managed.
Mapping Knowledge Flows: Analyze how knowledge moves across departments and
teams.
Processes: Define the processes for capturing, storing, sharing, and utilizing
knowledge.
Technology: Select tools and platforms (e.g., knowledge repositories, collaboration
tools) to support the KM system.
Ensure the team is equipped with adequate resources and authority to execute the KM
strategy.
Select and implement appropriate tools to support KM processes. Key technologies include:
Before full-scale implementation, test the KM system with a small group or department.
Conduct training sessions to familiarize employees with the new tools and processes.
Regularly assess the effectiveness of the KM system to ensure it meets organizational goals.
Use metrics such as system usage rates, employee satisfaction, and productivity
improvements.
Expert System
1. Knowledge Base: This is the collection of facts, rules, and expertise relevant to the
domain. It serves as the foundation of the expert system, where information is stored
and used for decision-making.
2. Inference Engine: The inference engine processes the knowledge in the knowledge
base to draw conclusions. It applies logical reasoning techniques, such as forward or
backward chaining, to solve problems or make decisions.
3. User Interface: This allows users to interact with the expert system, providing input
and receiving results. The interface should be user-friendly to ensure that users can
effectively communicate with the system.
4. Explanation System: This component explains the reasoning behind the expert
system’s decisions, helping users understand how conclusions were drawn and
increasing the system’s transparency.
1. Interviews: One of the most common ways to capture tacit knowledge is through
structured or unstructured interviews with experts. These interviews involve asking
individuals to share their knowledge, experiences, and insights, often through face-to-
face or virtual discussions.
2. Workshops and Focus Groups: These are group settings where knowledge sharing
occurs through collaborative discussions. Participants can brainstorm, share ideas, and
document key insights, which can be valuable for capturing diverse perspectives on
specific topics.
3. Surveys and Questionnaires: These tools help gather explicit knowledge from a
larger group of individuals. Surveys can be used to collect data on specific topics,
allowing organizations to capture knowledge on trends, practices, or opinions across a
broad audience.
4. Documenting Best Practices: By systematically documenting best practices and
processes, organizations can capture valuable knowledge on what works effectively.
This can be done through manuals, guides, case studies, or internal reports.
8. Collaborative Tools and Platforms: Using platforms such as wikis, forums, or social
media tools, employees can collaborate in real time and share knowledge with
colleagues. These tools facilitate knowledge capture in a collaborative and accessible
manner.
9. Knowledge Mapping: Creating knowledge maps helps visualize the expertise and
knowledge within an organization. This process involves identifying key knowledge
sources and their relationships, making it easier to locate and share knowledge.
10. Content Management Systems (CMS): CMS tools are used to organize, store, and
retrieve explicit knowledge, such as documents, research papers, and project reports.
These systems enable efficient knowledge capture and management in digital formats.
11. Video and Audio Recordings: Capturing knowledge in the form of recorded
sessions, such as webinars, lectures, or expert talks, provides a valuable resource for
future reference. Video and audio formats allow knowledge to be shared in a more
engaging way.
12. Observation and Data Collection: In some cases, observing processes or collecting
data directly from operations can be a form of knowledge capture. This technique is
particularly useful for operational knowledge and process improvement.