Unit 13
Unit 13
Structure
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Objectives
13.3 Types of Assessment
13.3.1 Based on Purpose
13.3.2 Based on Nature of Data
13.3.3 Based on Domain
13.3.4 Based on Measuring Standard
13.4 Authentic Assessment
13.5 Performance-Based Assessment
13.6 Outcome-Based Assessment
13.7 Alternative Assessment
13.8 Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE)
13.9 Competency Based Assessment
13.10 Peer Assessment
13.11 Assessing Individuals in Groups
13.12 Tools for Assessment
13.12.1 Portfolios
13.12.2 Rubrics
13.12.3 Learning Logs and Journal
13.13 Grading
13.14 Let Us Sum Up
13.15 Unit End Activities
13.16 References and Suggested Readings
13.17 Answers to Check Your Progress
13.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit, we tried to brief you the concepts of measurement and
evaluation. Teachers conduct different types of assessment activities to assess
their students. But most of the assessment is done only on the basis of pen-
paper test. Even there are different techniques of assessment, teachers are
using same type of assessment for all the subjects at all levels. Through this
unit, we are trying to familiarize you with some assessment techniques based
on nature of data, purpose, domain, and measuring standard, etc. The unit
also focuses on assessment techniques to assess different abilities and tools
for assessment.
112 *
Dr. P.D. Subhash & Dr. Sulekha Ram 115
Types of Assessment Types of Assessment
13.2 OBJECTIVES
and Evaluation and Evaluation
i) Formative Assessment
ii) Summative Assessment
iii) Diagnostic Assessment
i) Formative Assessment
114 117
Types of Assessment Types of Assessment
Demonstrates
and Evaluation
evolving understanding Gives overall results of classroom and Evaluation
of a topic instruction
Diagnostic in nature Evaluative in nature
Monitor student’s learning Evaluate student’s learning
Can assess more clearly what students No feedback on the learning process
have and haven’t learned
Before starting any topic/ class, a teacher should know how much the
students know about that particular topic. Ralph (1935) says “A
satisfactory diagnosis should be as specific as the desired outcomes
permit and as the possibility of localization of symptoms allow, so long
as the diagnosis is practicable.” If a student continuously faces learning
difficulties, a detailed diagnosis is recommended. Diagnostic assessment
is concerned with persistent learning difficulties. These difficulties can
be in reading, writing, arithmetic or in any other subjects. If a student
experience continuous failure, then teacher should understand that the
student is facing learning difficulties. These problems should be
analyzed and treated at the right time. A detailed and comprehensive
diagnostic test can be conducted to locate the area where the student has
problems. Various observation techniques also can be used for the
support of diagnostic test. Services of educational, psychologists and
counselors will be required for identifying serious learning disabilities.
Thus, the primary function of diagnostic assessment is to locate the areas
and causes of weaknesses of the students and formulate appropriate
remedial actions.
116 115
Assessment and Assessment and
Evaluation Check Your Progress 2 Evaluation
Notes: a) Write your answers in the space provided after each item.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
1) What are the different points to be considered by a teacher to prepare a
diagnostic test?
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
Quantitative Evaluation
Qualitative Evaluation
118 117
Assessment and Assessment and
Evaluation Check Your Progress 4 Evaluation
Notes: a) Write your answers in the space provided after each item.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the unit.
1) What are the different aspects of assessment in scholastic and co-
scholastic areas?
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
The meaning of this particular concept is revealed in the name itself, i.e. the
assessment is being made based on performance. The performance is
assessed by measuring to what extent or how the learner applies their
knowledge and skills that they learned from a unit or units during the
classroom instruction. Measurement of the useful and necessary learning
outcomes are assessed on the basis of performance only. For example, if you
want to assess student’s speaking skill you cannot do it through pen-paper
test.
120 123
Types of Assessment Types of Assessment
13.7 ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT
and Evaluation and Evaluation
All the existing assessment techniques that we use normally will give an idea
of what students learned so far. It focuses on continuous progress of an
individual student. Alternative assessment goes beyond the knowledge
acquired by learners and gives information about to what extent they are able
to apply their knowledge. Alternative forms of assessment allow seeing what
the learner can and cannot do rather than what they do or do not know. It
focuses on applied proficiency, problem solving, and reflection. Instead of
giving factual knowledge to a specific question, it demands the learner to
make judgment regarding what knowledge and skills they need to solve a
specific problem.
Deep and vast knowledge about the criteria for assessment make each learner
prepare their task accordingly.
126 125
Assessment and
Evaluation
13.12.1 Portfolios Assessment and
Evaluation
Portfolios were used as an assessment tool since 1990. In earlier days, it was
used by visual and performing artists to show their skill abilities in the field.
Nowadays portfolio has become a prominent tool to assess students’ work.
Many teachers use portfolios in their respective curriculum areas. Portfolio is
a systemic and well-planned collection of student works which serve for
various instructional and assessment purpose. It can provide information
about student’s performance during a particular academic period related to
any subject. Care should be taken to include best pieces of work according to
the purpose, guidelines and criteria of assessment to get maximum value. It
can be a basis to provide information about a student’s short span of
academic year or more than that. Selected significant samples of work can
serve as a three-way communication among teachers, students and parents. It
gives clear-cut evidence of their child’s effort and progress of achievement.
A portfolio includes:
a) Well stated objectives
b) Criteria to be used
c) Guideline for inclusion of materials
d) Wisely selected pieces of work
e) Evidence of students’ role in selection of content and self assessment
Based on useability, portfolios are distinguished mainly as
1) Working Portfolio
It contains works in progress as well as finished work. Working portfolio
works as a ‘holding tank’ because it is a project and it is ‘in the works’.
This is the primary stage before display or assessment. It is prepared over
a structured content area with a major purpose of diagnosis. It intended
to demonstrate current accomplishments and progress that is useful for
formative assessment.
2) Best works (Display Showcase) Portfolio
This is the documentation of the best pieces of works of students.
Students experience the highest-level achievement by exhibiting their
significant creations. Contents in this portfolio usually include completed
products that are useful for summative evaluation.
3) Assessment portfolio
Assessment portfolio focuses on what a student has learned. It is used to
elicit mastery in any subject/ curriculum area. Contents of the portfolio
collection may range any period of time.
13.12.2 Rubrics
Rubric is a scoring tool which includes set of criteria to assess students’
work. It contains performance expectations for a piece of work. The whole
126 129
Types of Assessment
work will be divided into different components and each component is Types of Assessment
and Evaluation and Evaluation
clearly described according to the characteristics of the work. It is an
assessment process based on performance which reflects process skills,
contents skills, working habit and learning outcomes. It can be used for
assessing any kind of performance because rubrics are very comprehensive in
nature.
On the basis of purpose of assessment, mainly two types of rubrics are used.
i) Holistic rubrics
A sample of holistic, analytic and blank rubrics are given in table 13.3, 13.4 and 13.5.
128 127
Assessment and Table 13.4: A Sample of Analytic Rubric Assessment and
Evaluation Evaluation
(Assessing Prose Reading Skill in English)
Performance level
Criteria Attempted Acceptable Admirable Awesome
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Decoding
Fluency
Vocabulary
Sentence
Construction
and Cohesion
Pronunciation
Performance level
Criteria Level-1 Level-2 Level-3 Level-4
(1) (2) (3) (4)
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
Learning logs and journals are the record of personal experiences of learners
during the teaching- learning process. Learning logs and journals give
emphasis on personal experience, reflections and reactions about what they
have learned. It is used as a medium of reflection. Learning logs focus on
recording the step by step activities accompanied with questions and ideas. It
will be helpful to the learners for self-assessment by correcting their
mistakes. Writing learning logs and journals help the learners to strengthen
the quality of their learning and integrate theory and practical.
128 131
Types of Assessment
Importance of writing learning logs and journals: Types of Assessment
and Evaluation and Evaluation
• It is a record of experiences. These experiences facilitate learning.
• Developing problem-solving skills, questioning attitude and critical
thinking.
• Enhancing inter-cognition and reflection.
• Improving the ability of self-expression and self-empowerment.
• It works as a means of communication between one learner and the
other.
13.13 GRADING
Grades are standardized measurement of varying levels of comprehension
within a subject area. Grades can be assigned in different ways such as a
letter (A,B,C,D, etc.), in percentage, as a scale (5.0-1.0), as description
(excellent, very good, good, average, satisfactory, needs improvement, etc.).
Most of the time it was found that evaluation stressed only cognitive aspects
of learning and numerical marking. Therefore, National Curriculum
Framework (NCF) 2005 introduced grading system in schools to reduce
examination pressure and negative assumptions about marking 0-100.
Grading is a system of assigning a degree using symbols of measurement of
achievement of students. Care will be taken to define each symbols used
uniformly and precisely so that all the concerned people can understand the
meaning of each symbol communicate meaningfully. The grading pattern
will be different for different departments/institutions. As far as school and
educational institutions are concerned, a general pattern of grading system
can be adopted. The grading pattern followed by CBSE for scholastic
achievement is given in table 13.6.
1) Mention some of the academic areas where grading is better than marking
for assessment.
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………
132 135
Types of Assessment
Dingel, M. & Wei, W. (2014). Influences on peer evaluation in a group Types of Assessment
and Evaluation and Evaluation
project: An exploration of leadership, demographics and course
performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Vol.39,(6),
pp. 729-742.
Davies, W.M. (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common
problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education 58:563–584.
Gronlund, W., Miller, M.D., & Linn, R.L. (2013). Measurement and
Assessment in Teaching. Nether Lands: Pearson.
Cohen, L., Manion, L.& Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in
education. New York, NY: Routledge.
NCERT. (2008). Source Book on Assessment. New Delhi: NCERT.
NCERT (2000). National Curriculum Framework for School Education
– 2000, New Delhi: NCERT
Palm, T. (2008). "Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A
conceptual analysis of The Literature." Practical Assessment Research
and Evaluation, 13(4).
Ralph W. Tyler. (1935). “Characteristics of a satisfactory diagnosis”,
educational diagnosis.34th Yearbook: Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Smith, S.L. (1994). Authentic assessment Vs. Traditional assessment
among students. (n.p.): Mercer University.
Stevens, D. & Levi, A. (2013). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment
tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student
learning. Virginia: Stylus.
VedPrakash, et. al. (2000). Grading in schools. New Delhi: NCERT
Walvoord, B. E. F., & Anderson, V.J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool
for learning and assessment. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Zhang, B., & Ohland, M.W. (2009). How to assign individualized scores
on a group project: An empirical evaluation. Applied Measurement in
Education, Vol.22(3), 290-308.