Session - Networking - Student
Session - Networking - Student
Management Science
2025
Hiran Abeywickrama
Department of Commerce
Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce
University of Sri Jayewardenepura
= 26 – 25 / 1.4
= 0.71
Table value = 0.7611 (Normal distribution table)
Critical path
START A – B – C – E – F – J – L – N FINISH
Estimated project duration = 44 weeks
• Now suppose, Manager wants to investigate the
possibility to reduce the anticipated duration of the
project to 40 weeks.
• The company will be paid $5.4 million for doing this
project
Sum of normal costs = $4.55 million
Sum of crash costs = $6.15 million
• Crash cost per week calculation:
Crash cost – Nominal cost
Maximum reduction in time
Activity J = $490,000 - $430,000
2
= $30,000.
Crash cost per week
• The problem is; What is the least expensive way of
crashing some activities to reduce the (estimated)
project duration to the specified level (40 weeks)?
• One way of solving this problem is marginal cost
analysis
• Determine the least expensive way to reduce project
duration 1 week at a time
• The smallest cost is $30,000 for activity J.
• This change results in reducing the length of each
path that includes activity J (the third, fourth, fifth,
and sixth paths
• At this point, the fourth path still is the longest (42
weeks), but activity J cannot be shortened any
further
• Among the other activities on this path, activity F now is the least
expensive to shorten ($40,000 per week)
• Therefore, this activity is shortened by a week to obtain the fourth
row of Table 6, and then (because a maximum reduction of 2 weeks is
allowed) is shortened by another week to obtain the last row of this
table.
• The longest path (a tie between the first, fourth, and sixth paths) now
has the desired length of 40 weeks, so we don’t need to do any more
crashing
• The total cost of crashing activities J and F to get down to this project
duration of 40 weeks is = $140,000 (J = $60,000; F = $80,000)
Why we crash?
• To speedup the project
How do we crash?
• By using marginal cost analysis (1 week at a time)
Why we prioritize the critical path when crashing?
• Critical path is the longest path + the critical activities are consuming
more time
Steps in crashing
1. Identify the maximum reduction in time (Normal time – crashing
time)
2. Identify the crash cost per week [(Crash cost – Normal
cost)/Maximum reduction in time]
3. Identify the available paths
4. Identify the critical path
5. Draw the crashing diagram
Let’s start crashing (44 Weeks to 40 Weeks)
• Draw the diagram and mention the time duration
Identified Paths
Let’s start crashing (44 Weeks to 40 Weeks)
• Identify the activities to be crashed (02 conditions to be applied)
1. Activity should be included in the critical path
2. Activity should have the minimum value