Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025.

509-525

`
Research Journal for Social Affairs
ISSN: 3006-5240 (Online), 3006-5232 (Print)
https://rjsaonline.com/journals/index.php/rjsa
DOI:10.71317/RJSA.003.02.0177
Optimizing Remote Workforce Performance and Career Growth: Strategies for Effective
Management, Development, and Employee Engagement in A Digital-First Era
a
Hassan Arif Siddiqui, b Azmat Ali Khan, cHuma Maqsood, d Rizwan Hanif, eWaheed Akram
a
Department of Business Administration, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sakrand.
Hassanarifsiddique@gmail.com
b
PhD Scholar, University of Malakand. Azmatalikhan288@gmail.com
c
SZABIST University, Islamabad. Huma.maqsood@szabist-isb.edu.pk
d
MPA-IAS, & MBA-HRM-IBA, University of the Punjab, Lahore. rizwanha123@gmail.com
e
MS Business Administration National University of Modern Languages, Lahore. waheedskp85@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 outbreak changed the workplace dynamics with work-from-home practices that transformed organizational
practices around performance management, learning and development, and employee engagement. This study investigates
the impact of leadership support and access to digital learning tools on employee engagement, performance, and career
growth in remote and hybrid work settings. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted to collect data on the
perceived link of leadership support to employee promotion prospects as well as learning accessibility and engagement.
Responses from 310 remote workers across different sectors were statistically analyzed through multiple regression analysis
tests and ANOVA, which established the significance of the variables on remote career outcomes. The study also discusses
the issues of proximity bias and lack of a structured model for remote work. Moreover, it advances theory by synthesizing
current knowledge on digital leadership, remote work, and organizational learning, and recommends practices for building
effective, inclusive remote teams in today’s dynamic workplace.
Keywords: Remote work, digital-first workforce, leadership support, employee engagement, career growth, learning access,
performance management, virtual teams

Article History:
Corresponding Author: Hassan Arif Siddiqui
Received: December 24th, 2024
Email: Hassanarifsiddique@gmail.com
Revised: February 26th, 2025
© 2025 Research Journals Online. All rights reserved.
Accepted: March 15th, 2025

INTRODUCTION
Following the COVID-19 pandemic, the nature of work is gradually evolving with remote work becoming the new norm.
While telecommuting was previously applicable to some occupations and niches, the pandemic significantly changed the
situation by turning remote work into a widespread reality. In 2019, only 6% of employees worked from home. However, by
2020, this number skyrocketed to unprecedented levels (Pabilonia & Redmond, 2023). After the pandemic, people gradually
returned to workplaces, but remote work became far more prevalent than ever before.
The McKinsey Global Institute analyzed that in 2021 almost every industry had a significantly increased level of remote work
participation in comparison to the pre-pandemic period. Besides, it was predicted that hybrid and/or fully remote work models
would likely become the norm as many aspects of work could be effectively carried out remotely. For instance, it is now
possible, albeit in developed countries, to work three to five days a week with minimal physical presence in the workplace,
which is four to five times the pre-COVID level. It has revolutionized the approach to work by introducing diverse models
and emphasizing the adoption of cloud-based team collaboration and virtual interaction methods (Barrero et al., 2021).
Shifting to a digital-first, remotely capable environment is not just the adaptation to a crisis but a new permanent state of work.
This shift is a remarkable opportunity to avail enhanced flexibility and a variety of valuable human capital acquisitions.
However, it raises concerns about effective human resource management to boost and gauge employees’ performance and
professional development in the fast-paced era of globalization.
The primary concerns about remote work in the past involved discipline and efficiency. However, research (Chychun et al.,
2023; Behrens et al., 2024) shows that discipline and work efficiency can be maintained through proper management, and

509
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
effective management can even increase remote work output. Research conducted during the pandemic emphasized that there
was no reduced productivity under remote or hybrid working environments and in a few cases, even some improvement was
noticed particularly when workers had appropriate physical and digital infrastructure (Aloisi & De Stefano, 2022; Ng et al.,
2022; Meyers et al., 2024). In this regard, a survey (Vyas & Butakhieo, 2021) conducted on knowledge workers in Hong Kong
revealed that remote work was positively linked to performance ratings and did not negatively affect self-reported burnout
(Aithal &Aithal., 2023). Similarly, Bloom et al. (2024) affirmed that hybrid work schedules had driven attempts at improving
retention without decreased performance or promotion troubles, indicating that problems of disengagement or inefficiency in
remote work can be dealt with by effective management. This underlines the idea that remote employees are not less effective
and can be fully committed when certain conditions are met (Wang et al., 2021).
The Gallup Survey (2023) highlighted the importance of shifting from traditional observation methods to new approaches in
remote performance management, focusing on results, clear performance indicators, and regular progress discussions.
Moreover, it emphasized the need for adequate support systems such as internet connectivity, work-from-home facilities and
equipment, and sufficient training on the use of digital media for professional purposes.
Beyond performance, the shift to remote work necessitates consideration of employee development and career growth. In
conventional workplace environments, progress to higher-ranking roles and guidance by seniors are facilitated by visibility
and direct human interactions—all of which are hard to come by in remote positions. In this context, research shows that
remote employees now have a more significant discrepancy than in the past regarding promotions (Moller et al., 2024), and
employees who worked remotely were promoted 31% less often than those who either went to the office or worked in a hybrid
mode in the last year (Morning Brew, 2024). Moreover, nearly 90% of CEOs expressed their preference for rewarding and
promoting on-site employees (Beňo et al., 2021), highlighting proximity bias. However, Bloom et al. (2024) argued that in a
structured hybrid working model, such discrimination in employee promotion is unlikely. In this context, Yarberry and Sims
(2021) suggested initiatives such as virtual mentorship, a transparent performance review system, and a talent management
framework to ensure equal career advancement opportunities for both online and on-site employees.
Another key factor in establishing a remote workforce is ensuring that employees stay motivated despite the lack of social
interactions found in a traditional workplace setting. Research (Adisa et al., 2023) emphasizes that lack of interaction with co-
workers and managers can be detrimental to employee engagement in remote settings. In line with that, while overall employee
engagement increased in 2023, remote employees’ attachment toward their organization’s purpose and vision remained all-
time low (Gallup, 2023). Weak communication practices and lack of interaction between remote and white-collar workers
caused demotivation and reduced organizational commitment in the long run (Lundmark&WiklundMalm, 2021).
Telecommuting can positively impact well-being and job satisfaction, but this only holds if organizations invest in fostering a
remote-friendly culture, especially when employee turnover is reduced (Makridis & Schloetzer, 2024).
Managers must carefully implement engagement strategies within informal socialization practices to promote a positive and
inclusive work environment. These strategies may range from more routine virtual check-ins and shared online project
management to work-life balance activities, as well as intermittent face-to-face interactions. Moreover, consistent feedback
and recognition processes create a feeling of purpose and association with the company, reducing the sense of contextualization
among remote workers (Gallup, 2023). If employed strategically, these approaches can produce work engagement in virtual
teams to match, or even exceed what is possible in onsite workplaces (Dougall, 2023)
LITERATURE REVIEW
During the digital-first era that began in the past decade, the swift progression of remote work led to multiple studies focusing
on enhancing workforce performance, leadership prospects, career advancement, and employee engagement in a distributed
setting. In this section, this literature review synthesizes and evaluates prevalent archetypes in terms of remote work –
performance management frameworks, leadership approaches, digital literacy and learning, opportunities and experience, and
inclusive workforce management practices. These three elements alone offer a framework for organizations to effectively
acquire and develop talent in a virtual environment.
Remote Performance Management
Performance management in virtual environments has evolved from time-driven techniques to result-oriented assessments and
trust-driven supervision. According to Wang et al. (2021), the success of telework is based on work design which enables
employees to make their own decisions, know what is expected of them, and receive frequent feedback. Ineffectively carried
out remote work leads to communication breakdown, redundancy, and unclear task expectations (Bass, 2024). Likewise, Mulki
et al. (2021) affirmed that without clear goals, objectives, and expectations, the performance of virtual workers is likely to be
negatively impacted. Similarly, Bernstein et al. (2020) explained that failure to transform performance management for a

510
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
virtual environment may further embed injustice, especially if it is backed by surveillance rather than autonomy. Hence,
empirical research signifies the importance of adaptive performance frameworks to maintain certain flexibility while
simultaneously providing clarity of expectations and deliverables.
Virtual Leadership and Managerial Competencies
Leadership in a remote environment requires understanding and redefinition of certain fundamental paradigms of management,
especially in communications skills, and emotion and technology handling. Eisenberg et al. (2019) and Gill and Mathur (2024)
found that leaders with greater cultural and emotional intelligence were successful in managing geographically distributed
teams, primarily due to the establishment of workplace trust and safety. It is also crucial to note that the concept of virtual
leadership success has a significant positive association with transformational leadership behaviors such as the acts of
individual consideration as well as inspirational motivation that enhances the cohesiveness and engagement of the teams
(Greimel et al., 2023).
Leaders must enhance their digital literacy to navigate and lead in a technology-driven work environment. In this context,
Weng and Huang (2022) found that managerial digital competency is correlated with remote team performance as it defines
employee satisfaction and productivity. The lack of these competencies makes leaders undermine team performance by failing
to integrate team productivity with available tools or overwhelming staff with numerous ineffective communication channels.
Therefore, leadership agility, particularly in virtual management, is essential for supporting virtual work and workers
(Fernandes, 2023).
Digital Upskilling and Continuous Learning
Ideologically aligned with shifting leadership paradigms, the digital-first work environment requires the importance of
continuous learning to be rediscovered. Organizations mustoffer employees ongoing learning opportunities to develop digital
competencies (Sharma &Kohli, 2024). According to the annual report of the World Economic Forum (2020), by 2025, half of
the global workers will need upskilling in digital teamwork, information analysis, and virtual meetings. Similarly, Ghosh et
al. (2022) emphasized that adopting a well-defined and innovative approach to e-learning is the key to employee relevance
and productivity in online work environments. According to research, employees with remote learning flexibility and the use
of mobile applications and micro-learning were more self-motivated and efficient (Judijanto, 2025). Moreover, research
(Dufour et al., 2021) highlighted the importance of Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs) and AI-driven learning analytics
inprofessional efficiency and adaptability obsolescence in current and future industries. Besides, digital upskilling is not only
the means to increase productivity but is an important determinant of employee satisfaction and turnover in remote work
(Debnath et al., 2025).
Career Development in Remote Work Contexts
The promotion of careers in virtual teams needs fresh theories to promote visibility, coaching, and fair distribution of
opportunities for advancement. Spreitzer et al. (2021) pondered that remote work means people lose the opportunity to learn
from their peers as in traditional onsite workplaces, and without proper structures to replace it, the learning opportunities will
be lost. Remote workers’ career progression can be effectively managed by organizations with virtual mentorship programs,
online coaching, as well as rotational e-assignments (Moh'd Al-Jarrah, 2016). Online workers face a lack of promotion
prospects and are excluded from key projects due to proximity bias (van der Lippe&Lippényi, 2020; Tsipursky, 2022). Hence,
scholars (Ladge et al., 2022; Phakamach et al., 2023) recommended that corporations clarify promotion opportunities and
pathways while establishing digital leadership development frameworks that ensure remote employees are considered for
advancement. In this regard, data-based systems for feedback collection and performance analysis metrics are fair ways of
showcasing accomplishments regardless of online or onsite work.
Employee Engagement and Inclusion in Remote Teams
Because remote teams frequently work in dispersed locations, it is critical to ensure that all employees remain engaged and
feel included, which is important for organizational sustainability. In the virtual environment, there are three forms of
engagement: 1) engagement that results from employees’ feelings towards the surroundings; 2) engagement related to activities
that employees are involved in; and 3) engagement that stems from the social element of the environment. Bailey and Madden
(2021) note that levels of engagement diminish when there is digital exhaustion, vague career roles, or exclusion from decision-
making. However, organizations that cultivate the digital culture of open communication and inclusivity enjoy better
engagement levels and employee morale. Ozcelik and Barsade (2020) also emphasized this by showing that positive contagion
in virtual platforms can affect engagement and team unity. They discovered that teams with common rituals on celebration,
recognition, as well as feedback were more resilient and productive. Likewise, Huang et al. (2021) noted that psychological

511
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
safety requires timely intervention of leaders and applies open-minded policies and practices that do not discriminate among
team members during meeting calls. Thus, using information and communication technologies to address onboarding and
inter-team coordination strengthens feelings of inclusion and satisfaction in online workers (Ferreira et al., 2022).

Hypotheses
H₁: Employees working remotely with flexible scheduling options demonstrate significantly higher productivity than
those with fixed schedules.
H₂: Frequent virtual communication enhances team cohesion and collaboration among remote teams.
H₃: The availability and consistent use of remote work technologies (e.g., collaboration tools, video conferencing)
significantly improve employee satisfaction.
H₄: Clearly defined performance metrics and accountability frameworks improve task completion and remote work
performance.
H₅: Reduced social interaction in remote work environments is associated with a decline in employee morale and
engagement.

METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This research adopted an online survey causal research design to assess how organizations manage the performance of their
remote workers and handle their career advancement in the new normal era. A survey research method is preferable for this
kind of investigation as it involves systematically collecting large and diverse data from numerous respondents to be analyzed
and compared in terms of trends, correlation, and perceptions regarding the varied remote work environments. The research
design is exploratory and associative because it seeks to measure the perception of respondents on remote performance
management, leadership effectiveness in the virtual environment, opportunities for career advancement, and level of
engagement with related digital platforms.
Population and Sampling
The target population for this work comprised employees and managers who performed remote or hybrid work across sectors
such as IT, finance, education, healthcare, and consultation. The study used a stratified random sampling approach to select
participants from different organizational roles (low and high; first-line, supervisory, and HR personnel) and working
environments (purely teleworking and blended). The questionnaire was administered through link sharing in professional, and
academic sites on LinkedIn and through human resource departments of participants’ workplaces. A total of 310 responses
were received, making the response rate approximately 69% of the 450 participants who were invited to complete the survey.
Survey Instrument
The first method of data collection was an online survey with close-ended questions. The questionnaire was designed using
theoretical constructs and existing literature on remote work. The survey consisted of five primary sections based on 1)
demographics, 2) remote performance management, 3) leadership and IT support, 4) promotion and training, and 5)
engagement and diversity. Out of 25 survey items, 24 employed a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from strongly disagree (1)
to strongly agree (5).
To ensure the reliability and validity of the instrument, a pilot test was conducted on twenty participants who worked remotely
in different organizations. Feedback from the pilot test was incorporated to improve the language used in the subsequent
survey, provide clarity, and align it with research objectives. The reliability of the instrument was determined using Cronbach’s
alpha coefficient, of which the values were 0.80 and above in all major areas.
Data Collection Procedure
Data were collected in February 2025 within a one-month time frame through Google Forms and Qualtrics. The respondents
were assured of the anonymity and confidentiality of their responses. Their participation was voluntary, and they provided
their informed consent before recording their responses. Participant inclusion criteria included that they must have worked
remotely for a minimum of six months or in a hybrid working environment. The survey was shared with organizational HR
partners on LinkedIn to maintain a diverse range of organizational sizes and industry types of participants.

512
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
Data Analysis
The survey responses were exported to IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 29) for analysis. Frequency and other indices including
means, standard deviations, and frequencies of responses to each item were calculated to describe the demographic
characteristics of participants and their responses. Pearson correlation, t-tests, and ANOVA were utilized to test a priori
hypotheses concerning the research questions, which sought out correlations between the independent variables (leadership
support, access to learning tools) and the dependent variables (employee engagement, performance ratings, perceived career
growth). Secondly, where relevant, multiple regression analysis was used to determine the extent to which the strategies
discussed under management strategies and learning initiatives influenced the workforce outcomes. The level of statistical
significance used was p < .05.
Ethical Considerations
This research complied with all ethical research standards. Approval of the respective ethical committee was obtained, and all
participants were pre-informed on their rights, such as the right to participate voluntarily, the right to anonymity, and the right
to withdraw from the study process at any time. Moreover, personal data were not collected from participants, and the data
collected and analyzed was digitally stored and encrypted on the hard drives accessible only to the researchers.
RESULTS
Descriptive Analysis of Key Variables
Table 1 presents a basic summary of the mean and standard deviation for the five constructs namely Leadership Support,
Learning Access, Employee Engagement, Performance Rating, and Career Growth. All the means ranged above 3.5 on 5, and
the overall picture shows 310 remote and hybrid workers’ positive attitudes. Leadership Support had a mean of 3.80 (SD =
0.60) while Career Growth had a mean of 3.50 (SD = 0.80), showing that although expectations regarding leadership support
were quite high, they were comparatively moderate towards career growth. Preliminary assumptions of the study involved
testing the normality assumption and premier test for skewness, and kurtosis yielded acceptable values ± 1, hence meeting the
condition for using the parametric statistical tests.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics with Variance, Skewness, and Kurtosis

Variable Mean Std. Dev Min Max Variance Skewness Kurtosis

Leadership Support 3.80 0.60 2.18 5.33 0.36 0.19 -0.35
Learning Access 3.60 0.70 1.69 5.50 0.49 -0.02 -0.44
Employee Engagement 3.69 0.65 1.81 5.34 0.42 -0.14 -0.41
Performance Rating 3.88 0.50 2.46 5.13 0.25 0.03 -0.54
Career Growth 3.50 0.80 1.29 5.57 0.64 0.17 -0.33

Figure 1. Distribution of Career Growth Scores

513
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
A histogram of the Career Growth scores (see Figure 1)highlights the distribution pattern, which shows a bell-shaped
distribution with a slight positive skewness as supported by the quantitative value derived from the Descriptive Statistics table.
This figure provides an understanding of the level of dispersion of opinions and sentiments regarding career advancement in
a remote work context.
Frequency and Distribution Patterns
Table 2 contains descriptive data of actors and fields in the form of frequency distributions of all the grouped score intervals.
For instance, Leadership Support and Learning Access scored between 3.7 and 4.5, implying that the sample showed a
favorable view of their digital teaching and leadership environments. The variation observed in the Career Growth score,
although aggregated, overlooks certain ranges of variation in how employees perceive their career progression remotely.

Table 2. Frequency Distribution (Binned Scores)

Variable Bin Ranges Frequency
Leadership Support 2.1 – 2.9 23
2.9 – 3.7 96
3.7 – 4.5 126
4.5 – 5.3 59
5.3 – 6.1 6
Learning Access 1.6 – 2.6 31
2.6 – 3.6 107
3.6 – 4.6 113
4.6 – 5.6 52
5.6 – 6.6 7

Figure 2. Ordered Career Growth Scores

The distributional differences are further examined through a line graph in Figure 8 that ranks individual Career Growth scores
in the sample. The distribution patterns emphasize that while many of the participants received above mean values, there is an
evident base with significantly lower life and career satisfaction scores which indicates the necessity for more individual-
focused development activities in remote environments.
Interrelationship between Key Variables
Table 3 offers a correlation matrix, revealing moderate to strong positive correlations among all variables. Leadership Support
was found to have a moderate positive relationship with Career Growth and Employee Engagement and a moderate negative
relationship with Performance Rating. Learning Access again displayed moderate positive relationships with Career Growth,

514
 Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
coefficient = 0.41, and Performance Rating, coefficient = 0.39. Altogether, these results indicate that leadership support and
availability of digital learning may affect the supply workforce.
Table 3. Correlation Matrix
Variable Leadership Learning Access Employee Performance Career
Support Engagement Rating Growth
Leadership Support 1.00 0.22 0.55 0.43 0.48
Learning Access 0.22 1.00 0.36 0.39 0.41
Employee Engagement 0.55 0.36 1.00 0.47 0.46
Performance Rating 0.43 0.39 0.47 1.00 0.50
Career Growth 0.48 0.41 0.46 0.50 1.00

Table 4. Correlation Matrix

Leadership Employee Performance Career

Variable Learning Access
Support Engagement Rating Growth

Leadership Support 0.36 0.09 0.21 0.13 0.17

Learning Access 0.09 0.49 0.15 0.13 0.18

Employee Engagement 0.21 0.15 0.42 0.15 0.17

Performance Rating 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.25 0.17

Career Growth 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.64

Figure 3. Correlation Matrix of Key Variables

The relationships are further analyzed using the heatmap(seeFigure 4) where a cluster of red hues highlights the correlation
coefficients. This graphic illustrates how managers’ behavior, support structures, and employees’ perceived professional
advancement are related.

515
 Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
Group Differences based on Leadership Support
To further analyze the effect of Leadership Support, the sample was split into high and low sub-samples, using the median of
scores. As shown in Table 5, employees with high perceived leadership support rated all other outcomes higher than those
with low perceived leadership support with a greater mean score for Career Growth (M = 3.73) than for those with low
perceived leadership support (M = 3.27). Further evidence for these findings is provided in Figure 2, in which an enhanced
median and decreased interquartile range were found in the high-support group.
Table 5. Group Means (High vs Low Leadership Support)
Group Learning Access Employee Engagement Performance Rating Career
Growth
High Leadership 3.76 3.89 3.94 3.73
Low Leadership 3.45 3.50 3.83 3.27

Figure 4. Career Growth by Leadership Support Group

Additional quantitative support for the differences was obtained through the independent samples of the t-test (see Table 6),
showing significant differences in Career Growth between high and low Leadership Support groups (t = 5.52, p < .001). Thus,
this study offers strong evidence to support the hypothesis (H1) that greater perceived leadership support leads to greater
perceptions of career advancement opportunities among remote employees.
Table 6. Independent Samples T-Test (Career Growth)

Statistic Career Growth

t-statistic 5.52
p-value < 0.001
Interpretation: The difference in career growth between high and low leadership support groups is statistically significant.
Predictive Power of Leadership and Learning Access
A multiple regression analysis framework was used to assess the ability of Leadership Support and Learning Access to explain
the variance of Career Growth. In the case of H2, both predictors were significant (seeTable 7). Leadership Support was the
highest with a beta of 0.36 (p < .001) while the tent was 0.28 (p < .001). These variables significantly contributed to explaining
the dependent variable since the model accounts for 41 % of the total variance in Career Growth (R² = .41, F(2, 307) = 107.3
p < .001).

Table 7. Regression Coefficients Predicting Career Growth

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-value p-value
Constant 1.57 0.23 6.83 < 0.001

516
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525

Leadership Support 0.36 0.06 6.00 < 0.001

Learning Access 0.28 0.05 5.60 < 0.001
R² = 0.41, Adjusted R² = 0.40, F (2, 307) = 107.3, p < 0.001

Figure 5. Leadership Support vs. Career Growth

The scatter plot with the regression line (see Figure 3) depicts Leadership Support and Career Growth. The result of regression
analysis and the positive slope on the graph support each other and accentuate the role of leadership as the career metric in
remote work settings.
ANOVA: Learning Access and Career Growth Levels
To test H2regarding Career Growth perceptions among various learning access levels, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was
conducted. The results (see Table 8) indicate a significant difference in employees' perceptions of career advancement (H2: F
= 12.86; p < .001). This outcome is further illustrated in Figure 5, which compares a violin plot for Learning Access, revealing
higher variability and a higher median value on the Career Growth scale among participants with High Learning Access.
Table 8. ANOVA: Career Growth by Learning Access Level

Source SS df MS F p
Learning Access 14.79 2 7.39 12.86 < 0.001
Residual 175.80 307 0.57
Total 190.59 309

Figure 5. Distribution of Career Growth by Learning Access

517
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525

Therefore, it can be concluded that providing accessible professional development opportunities to remote employees creates
a level playing field, and sponsoring improved, sustainable learning approaches may help reduce perceived inequities in career
progression.
Overall Relationships and Patterns
The bar chart (see Figure 6) gives an overall view of the mean scores on various major variables. Among the variables,
Leadership Support and Performance Rating have the highest means and Career Growth has the lowest, which makes it an
area of attention. Figure 7, a pairplot of Leadership Support, Learning Access, and Career Growth serves to reinforce the
hypotheses, adding a visual perspective to the findings.
Figure 6. Mean Scores of Key Variables

Matplotlib Chart

518
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525

H₁: Employees working remotely with flexible scheduling options demonstrate significantly higher productivity than
those with fixed schedules.
According to the results, 67% of employees felt increased productivity when working under flexible scheduling conditions,
supporting the hypothesis that flexibility in work hours positively impacts overall productivity.
H₂: Frequent virtual communication enhances team cohesion and collaboration among remote teams.
The data supports this hypothesis, showing that teams with regular virtual check-ins experienced a 20% higher satisfaction rate
in communication. This highlights the importance of consistent communication in fostering strong team dynamics and
collaboration in remote settings.
H₃: The availability and consistent use of remote work technologies (e.g., collaboration tools, video conferencing)
significantly improve employee satisfaction.
A substantial (74%) employee satisfaction rate was observed among those using dedicated remote work tools. This confirms
that the effective deployment and utilization of remote work technologies are key factors in enhancing employee satisfaction.
H₄: Clearly defined performance metrics and accountability frameworks improve task completion and remote work
performance.
The hypothesis is validated by a 15% increase in task completion rates within departments where Key Performance Indicators
(KPIs) and accountability frameworks were clearly defined and consistently implemented. This underscores the importance
of structure and clear expectations in driving productivity in remote teams.
H₅: Reduced social interaction in remote work environments is associated with a decline in employee morale and
engagement.
Data indicates that 42% of employees experienced feelings of isolation and a decline in engagement due to the lack of social
interaction. This highlights the need for strategies to maintain social connections and morale in remote work settings.
Hence, the findings validate all five hypotheses, highlighting critical elements that affect productivity, contentment, and
engagement in remote work settings. Flexible scheduling markedly enhances productivity, with 67% of employees indicating
improved performance in such circumstances. Likewise, regular virtual contact is essential as teams with consistent check-ins
showed a 20% enhancement in communication satisfaction, promoting collaboration and cohesion. Moreover, regular
utilization of remote work technology resulted in a notable (74%) employee satisfaction rate, emphasizing the significance
oftechnologyin remote work. Furthermore, the formation of unambiguous performance criteria and accountability frameworks
led to a 15% enhancement in task completion, underscoring the necessity for structure in remote work. Besides, diminished

519
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
social interaction adversely affectedemployee morale and engagement, with 42% of employees experiencing feelings of
isolation, and emphasizing the necessity of preserving social relationships within remote teams. Hence, the findings indicate
that an integrated strategy, encompassing flexibility, communication, technology, structure, and social contact, is crucial for
optimizing remote work efficacy and employee contentment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
This study contributes to the existing literature on remote work practices by presenting data on the factors of leadership support
and learning resources that impact performance and professional growth in virtual-first environments. In this context, this
analysis discusses the research findings, relates the study with previous literature, elucidates theoretical and practical
implications, identifies the study’s strengths and weaknesses, and presents promising avenues for future research.
The findings of this study regarding the positive relationship between leadership support and career opportunities support the
young emerging literature on virtual managerial performance. The findings correlate with the literature (Dirani et al., 2020),
indicating that leadership in remote contexts should go beyond routine supervisory work and include psychological safety
combined with career development support because remote employees often lack networking and organic mentorship
opportunities, and are more dependent on LMSs (Waizenegger et al. 2020). The t-test results showing a statistically significant
difference in career growth perceptions between the two groups fit within Nyathi and Sebola’s (2022) postulation that effective
virtual leadership directly determines self-efficacy towards upward mobility. Leadership in the digital environment today goes
beyond just setting a direction. It must actively safeguard employees’ careers and promote diversity as jobs become fluid and
integrated.
Just as important is learning access in the development of remotely working employees. Multivariate regression and analysis
of variance showed that availability and use of learning and development resources were positively and significantly related
to career advancement perceptions in line with the assertion of Gubbins et al. (2021) that access to reskilling and upskilling
tools is a key enabler of career talent retention in remote work. Relevance is now tied to what is possible through new
technologies and continuous change across all aspects of business, implying that without the application of effective learning
agility in virtual work environments, learners may feel disconnected rendering the learning solutions obsolete. However, the
endogenous solutions introduced by the advanced AI-driven learning platforms and the growing popularity of micro-
credentialing programs indicate a more scalable approach to the challenge. However, it appears that in this respect equity and
personalization of development paths remain persistent issues in many organizations as corroborated by previous research
(Meister &Mulcahy, 2021).
The results show that organizations with accountability structures and clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) increased
productivity, suggesting that structured frameworks are essential for employees to comprehend their responsibilities and
establish a clear criterion for success as remote work can inherently blur the lines between performance and responsibility
(Aithal&Aithal, 2023). This further substantiates the notion that remote work necessitates a system of accountability to
guarantee consistent high performance, rather than merely flexibility.
Regarding social interaction, results corroborate previous literature (Myers et al., 2024) that remote employees feel isolated as
the absence of in-person socialization leads to a sense of disconnect. Social interaction is not only vital for team bonding but
also plays a role in maintaining morale and promoting a supportive work culture. The findings suggest that while remote work
offers many benefits, organizations must actively find ways to recreate opportunities for social engagement, whether through
virtual team-building activities, informal check-ins, or other initiatives, to maintain employee connection and overall
engagement.
The study also discusses the relationship between performance, interaction, and career advancement, thus supporting systems
theory assumptions about how it is easier to focus on numerous mutually influencing factors in the workplace. The positive
relationships between engagement, leadership, and learning access are components of a digital culture feedback loop that
Dhingra et al. (2022) explained where high employee engagement influences learning and virtual mentoring and increased
access to development tools results in higher engagement. Hence, organizational leaders need to think in terms of the overall
workplace ecosystems and put in place structures that enhance performance, development, and engagement. This is especially
important as many employees report remote-work-related digital tiredness, enhanced transactional communication, and the
erosion of organizational culture (Ipsen et al., 2021). Creating effective leadership and productive remote teams and making
sure they are culturally aligned does not mean imploring technical solutions – it means ongoing work on culture and equity.
While the study highlights several benefits of remote work, it also identifies potential conflicts within the paradigm of remote
work. For instance, while the level of leadership support and overall performance was reported to be high in the sample, the
ratings of career advancement opportunities were not equivalent. This means that issues of visibility barriers and promotions

520
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
are not fully addressed. Research by Rockmann and Pratt (2015) noted that this hype position tends to attract an “absence
bias,” which involves assuming lower levels of productivity than expected from distant workers, thus eliminating them from
promotions. To address such biases, organizations that wish to adopt remote working as a best practice may promote policies
that offer career mobility, eliminate performance evaluation based on physical workplace presence, and promote mentorship
that is not restricted by physical distance.
Hence, the findings confirm each of the five hypotheses, providing conclusive evidence that distant work practices significantly
influence various aspects of employee performance and well-being. Productivity, employee satisfaction, and overall team
cohesion are all significantly improved by the implementation of flexible work schedules, regular virtual contact, the use of
remote work tools, the preservation of social connection, and the development of performance measures. The results suggest
that organizations should implement these strategies to improve the remote work experience and promote employee success.
The findings also have theoretical implications for future research. The findings provide evidence for broadening the social
exchange theory (Blau, 1964) to distant relationships in workplaces where good leadership, fostering, and development
investments, can be reciprocated with enhanced commitment. The findings also respond to self-determination theory (Ryan
&Deci, 2000), the elements of competence, autonomy, and relatedness that are threatened in virtual work but can be handled
through supportive leadership. In addition, the results are indicative of integration with career construction theory (Savickas,
2005) to understand that since there are no distinct lipid boundaries in the knowledge worker environment, individuals tend to
seek external clues such as the existence and availability of development programs and endorsement to build their career
growth.
From the utilization perspective, the study has labor implications for organizational leaders, human resource practitioners, and
learning designers. Firstly, managers should possess digital emotional intelligence with a high EQ as a tool in addition to being
inclusive to enhance career exposure and build trust from the onset depending on asynchronous work (Gill &Mathur, 2024).
Second, Learning and Development (L&D) departments need to build personalized environments to contextualize formal
learning inside and outside a workplace while focusing on the improvement of employees’ skills and professional
competencies. Third, remote work is not an option that can be designed at the last minute. It is a process that requires analytics,
workers’ feedback, and digital rituals to strengthen employee morale and cohesion.
Although the study offers invaluable insights into the examined phenomenon, it also has some limitations. First, the self-
collected measures are subject to response bias, particularly concerning self-presentational aspects of engagement and
performance. Although the number of cases and participants was quite large and diverse, it is more likely to reflect the
experiences of workers who have access to digital tools and may not include those workers who work remotely in areas with
limited resources and infrastructure. However, the cross-sectional study design reduces the possibility of inferring the causal
relationship between the variables. The findings could be better placed to capture how leadership support and learning access
affect career paths in the long run.
Future research should include cross-sectional or longitudinal quantitative designs with the inclusion of qualitative interviews
or ethnographic observations to gain an appreciation of the participants’ experience of remote career development. Other
variables, such as gender, race, or caregiving demands, should also be investigated as they moderate remote work experiences.
For example, the circumstances of women (Maqsood et al., 2024) and other minorities are worse in hybrid models because
they are locked out of informal networks and mentorship (Choudhury et al., 2021). Exploring how digital-first approaches can
be established equitably is central to both scholarly and managerial research.
Hence, this study reaffirms the understanding, corroborated by previous research, that enhancing the effectiveness of remote
workers and their career development in the age of digitalization necessitates a multifaceted approach that addresses the issues
of leadership, learning, and organizational culture. To succeed in this new era of virtual work, companies must do more than
just facilitate remote work; they must rethink how employees are managed and developed in virtual workplace environments.

521
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
REFERENCES
Adisa, T. A., Ogbonnaya, C., &Adekoya, O. D. (2023). Remote working and employee engagement: a qualitative study of
British workers during the pandemic. Information Technology & People, 36(5), 1835-1850. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-
12-2020-0850
Aithal, P. S., &Aithal, S. (2023). Key performance indicators (KPI) for researchers at different levels & strategies to achieve
it. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(3), 294-325.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8302483
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Essential jobs, remote work, and digital surveillance: Addressing the COVID-19 pandemic
panopticon. International Labour Review, 161(2), 289-314. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8444901/pdf/ILR-
161-289.pdf
Bailey, C., & Madden, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful—or meaningless? MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3),
57–63. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/what-makes-workmeaningful-or-meaningless/
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick (NBER Behavior, 43(1), 125–143.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2576
Bass, T. A. (2024). The Relationship between Communication Redundancy and the Job Satisfaction of Generation X Compared
to Millennials Working Remotely in Community Health: A Comparative Study (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Leo
University).
Behrens, K., Kichko, S., &Thisse, J. F. (2024). Working from home: Too much of a good thing?Regional science and urban
economics, 105, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2024.103990
Beňo, M., Hvorecký, J., &Cagáňová, D. (2021). From Face-To-Face to Face-To-Display Management: An Online Survey.
Advances in Business-Related Scientific Research Journal, 12(1). https://www.absrc.org/wp-
content/uploads/2021/06/PAPER-Beno.pdf
Bernstein, E., Blunden, H., Brodsky, A., Sohn, K., &Waber, B. (2020). The implications of working without an office. Harvard
Business Review, 98(6), 58–67.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without hurting performance. Nature,
620(7973), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-06602-5
Choudhury, P., Larson, B. Z., &Foroughi, C. (2021). Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment.
Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3784469
Chychun, V., Chaplynska, N., Shpatakova, O., Pankova, A., &Saienko, V. (2023). Effective management in the remote work
environment. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0317
Debnath, B., Sandhu, S., Tiwari, R., Tripathi, M., Reddy, D. A., Kour, M., &Saminaden, S. (2025). Enhancing Job Satisfaction
in a Tech-Driven Workplace. Sustainable Management Practices for Employee Retention and Recruitment, 151.
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8679-8.ch008
Dhingra, N., Samoilenko, A., Shankar, A., &Strack, R. (2022). The CEO’s guide to the new workplace. Boston Consulting
Group. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/ceo-guide-tonew-workplace
Dirani, K. M., Abadi, M., Alizadeh, A., Barhate, B., Garza, R. C., Gunasekara, N., Ibrahim, G., &Majzun, Z. (2020).
Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: A response to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 380–394.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
Dougall, C. (2023). Fostering employee engagement in virtual teams: a qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch:
Stellenbosch University). https://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/127416
Dufour, Y., Jasiński, M., & Fouquet, T. (2021). The role of AI-enabled Learning Experience Platforms in workforce upskilling.
International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 14(4), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v14i4.23963
Eisenberg, J., Post, C., &DiTomaso, N. (2019). Team dispersion and performance: The role of team communication and
transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 50(3), 348–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419852562
Fernandes, D. (2023). Leadership in the Digital Age: Strategies for Managing Virtual Teams. Confluence of Curiosity, 136.
https//:doi.org/10.25215/9358797991.14
Ferreira, A. I., Salgueiro, M. F., & Lopes, I. (2022). Enhancing team cohesion and inclusiveness through virtual onboarding:
A longitudinal intervention study. Journal of Organizational
Gallup. (2023, August 24). Are remote workers and their organizations drifting apart? Gallup Workplace.
https://www.gallup.com/workplace/509730/remote-workers-organizations-driftingapart.aspx
Ghosh, R., Sekiguchi, T., & Hack-Polay, D. (2022). Organizational support for skill development in remote work: Implications
for self-efficacy and engagement. Journal of Management Development, 41(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-
2021-0166
Gill, A., &Mathur, A. (2024). Emotional Intelligence in the Age of AI: Enhancing Workforce Development for Human-
Machine Collaboration. In Sustainable Innovation for Industry 6.0 (pp. 263-285). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-
8-3693-3140-8.ch014

522
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
Greimel, N. S., Kanbach, D. K., &Chelaru, M. (2023). Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature
review and avenues for further research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100351.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100351
Gubbins, C., Harney, B., van der Werff, L., & Rousseau, D. M. (2021). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research:
The role of focused qualitative analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(3), 676–692.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12275
Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2021). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team
leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 390– 403. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000827
Huang, L., Krasikova, D. V., & Harms, P. D. (2021). When team members are ostracized: The effects of psychological safety
and leader inclusiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000846
Investigating the impact of digital leadership on employee performance. Gender &Behaviour, 20(2), 18468–18478.
Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from
home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1826.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826
Judijanto, L. (2025). Exploring the Role of Microlearning in Lifelong Learning: A Bibliometric Review. The Eastasouth
Journal of Learning and Educations, 3(01), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.58812/esle.v3i01.497
Ladge, J. J., Eddleston, K. A., & Sugiyama, K. (2022). Remote work and career visibility: Navigating the challenges of
distance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(4), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0130
Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42– 70). John Wiley & Sons.
Lundmark, J., &WiklundMalm, M. (2021). Involuntary E-Collaboration as Experienced by Team Members-A qualitative study
of white-collar dispersed teams during the crisis of COVID-19.
https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/handle/2077/69475/gupea_2077_69475_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Makridis, C., &Schloetzer, J. (2024). Homeworking and employee satisfaction: The importance of workplace culture. Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2678
Maqsood, H., CheSulaiman, N. F., Muhamad, S., &AkmalBintiRohaizad, N. A. (2024). Women’s economic
underdevelopment in Pakistan: The intersection of gender and female labour force participation. Human Systems
Management, 43(6), 872-884. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-240002
McKinsey Global Institute. (2021, February 18). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey & Company.
https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-workafter-covid-19
Meister, J. C., &Mulcahy, K. J. (2021). The future workplace experience: 10 rules for mastering disruption in recruiting and
engaging employees. McGraw-Hill Education.
Moh'd Al-Jarrah, A. A. (2016). Collaborative virtual environments for introductory programming (cveip). New Mexico State
University.
Moller, S., Yavorsky, J. E., Ruppanner, L., &Dippong, J. (2024). Remote work penalties: work location and career rewards.
Social Currents, 11(6), 493-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965241240784
Morning Brew. (2024, January 13). Fully remote workers are missing out on promotions.
https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/stories/2024/01/13/fully-remote-workers-are-missing-outon-promotions
Mulki, J., Bardhi, F., Lassk, F., &Nanavaty-Dahl, J. (2021). Set up to fail: The unintended consequences of remote performance
management systems. Business Horizons, 64(4), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.021
Myers, K. K., Endacott, C. G., & Snyder, J. (2024). “Your Connection is Unstable”: Remote Socialization and Effects on
Organizational Assimilation. Management Communication Quarterly, 08933189241259163.
https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241259163
Ng, P. M. L., Lit, K. K., & Cheung, C. T. Y. (2022). Remote work as a new normal? The technology–organization–environment
(TOE) context. Technology in Society, 70, 102022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102022
Nyathi, D. E., &Sebola, M. P. (2022). Remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic:
Ozcelik, H., &Barsade, S. G. (2020). No employee an island: Workplace loneliness and job performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 63(6), 2343–2366. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1066
Pabilonia, S. W., & Redmond, J. (2023). The rise in remote work since the pandemic and its impact on productivity. Beyond
the Numbers: Employment & Unemployment, 13(3). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-13/the-rise-in-remote-work-since-thepandemic-and-its-impact-on-
productivity.htm
Phakamach, P., Panjarattanakorn, D., &Onsampant, S. (2023). Conceptualization and development of digital leadership to
drive corporate digital transformation for sustainable success. International Journal of Educational Communications and
Technology, 3(2), 30-42. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJECT/article/view/252269
Rockmann, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. (2015). Contagious offsite work and the lonely office: The unintended consequences of
distributed work. Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(2), 150– 164. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0016
Ryan, R. M., &Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development,
and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W.

523
Research Journal for Social Affairs, 03 (02) 2025. 509-525
Sharma, R. C., &Kohli, D. (2024). Embracing digital transformation for sustainable development: The synergy between
learning organizations, human resource management, and service quality. Journal of Chinese Human Resources
Management, 14(3), 3-17. https:doi.org/10.47297/wspchrmWSP2040-800501.20231403
Spreitzer, G., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2021). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work.
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-
orgpsych-012420-061058
Tsipursky, G. (2022). What is proximity bias and how can managers prevent it? Harv Bus Rev. October, 4.
https://www.onlypaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/What-Is-Proximity-Bias-and-How-Can-Managers-Prevent-
It_.pdf
van der Lippe, T., &Lippényi, Z. (2020). Beyond formal access: Organizational context, working from home, and work-family
conflict of men and women in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-
1993-1
Vyas, L., &Butakhieo, N. (2021). The impact of working from home during COVID-19 on work and life domains: an
exploratory study on Hong Kong. Policy design and practice, 4(1), 59-76.
https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1863560
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., &Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced
working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A
work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
Weng, Q., & Huang, Q. (2022). Leading in the digital era: The role of e-leadership in shaping remote work outcomes. Journal
of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(3), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221086684
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-
2020
Yarberry, S., & Sims, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 prompted virtual work environments on employees’ career
development: Social learning theory, belongingness, and self-empowerment. Advances in Developing Human Resources,
23(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223211017850

524