Green_Revolution_Detailed_Extract-1
Green_Revolution_Detailed_Extract-1
Introduction
India, with 157.35 million hectares of land under cultivation, ranks second in global agricultural land
holdings. Despite becoming self-sufficient in food production, India continues to face critical
nutritional challenges. Agriculture employs 58% of rural households, yet the sector's historical
underperformance posed a significant threat of famine in the early decades post-independence. The
Green Revolution was a strategic response in the 1960s to address the severe food insecurity, poor
increasing crop yields, ensuring national food security, and reducing reliance on foreign aid. While
the food grain output improved significantly, India still struggles with alarming statistics: over 195.9
million undernourished people, 58.4% of children under five suffering from anemia, and substantial
gender-specific malnutrition ratios. These challenges reveal that while quantity increased, food
The Green Revolution is a term coined in 1968 by William S. Gaud of USAID to describe a
transformative period between the 1940s and 1960s when developing countries began adopting
new agricultural technologies. The core objective was to significantly boost food production through
modern scientific interventions. Central to this revolution were high-yielding varieties (HYVs) of
crops, especially wheat and rice. These HYVs were genetically enhanced for better productivity,
resilience to fertilizers, and quicker maturity. Rice varieties like IR-8 and IR-72 were cultivated in
India; IR-8 matured in 130 days and IR-72 in just 100 days compared to traditional varieties taking
150-180 days. These crops were less sensitive to light cycles (photo-insensitive), enabling
year-round farming. The initiative also benefited from international research bodies like IRRI
(Philippines) and CIMMYT (Mexico), and was supported by donor agencies such as the Rockefeller
- Use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides to stimulate plant growth and prevent crop loss.
- Policy support from government institutions (ICAR, Ministry of Agriculture) and international
- Crop management improvements: short cropping cycles, increased cropping intensity (2-3 crops
per year).
- Integration of scientific technologies with traditional practices, transforming Indian agriculture from
subsistence-based to productivity-focused.
- Training and education of farmers to adopt and implement these new technologies efficiently.
- Lack of technological progress in Indian agriculture-continued use of traditional tools like wooden
- Economic strain due to low agricultural productivity negatively affecting industrial growth.
- Involvement and encouragement from international donors (Rockefeller Foundation, USAID, etc.)
- The vision of political leaders to move towards food self-sufficiency and economic independence.
Benefits
- Wheat production rose from 50 million tonnes in 1950 to 95.1 million tonnes in 1968.
- Reduced dependence on food imports and increased national food security.
- Enhanced institutional capacity through the development of ICAR and state agricultural
universities.
- Provided India with political autonomy in food policy due to reduced dependency on international
aid.
Conclusion
While the Green Revolution successfully mitigated the threat of famine and made India self-sufficient
in staple crops, it led to a significant loss in crop diversity. Over 1 lakh traditional rice varieties were
lost due to focus on hybrid monocultures. Soil degradation from overuse of fertilizers, depletion of
groundwater, and declining nutritional intake are key side effects. Farmers faced increased
production costs, leading to debt and distress, particularly among smallholders. A holistic approach
biodiversity, and ensuring nutritional security. Future agricultural strategies must integrate traditional