Chetan Report
Chetan Report
PROJECT REPORT
ON
“ RESTAURANT
GYM MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
SYSTEM ”
In
The fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of
“Pankaj
Divesh Yogesh
NarayanDivesh
Patil
Chetan
Patil Yogesh
& Chetan
Ramesh Patil
Ramesh
& Pranit Chauvhan
Chavan
Rajendra Patil”
Guided By
Prof.Mansi
“Prof.
Prof.Shweta
Mansi Talele
Chaudhari
Talele”
To
Affiliated To
2024 - 2025
G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Jalgaon
CERTIFICATE
Date : / /
Examined By-
Examiner I Examiner II
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A successful project is the result of a good work which consists of not only
the partners who put in their long and hard work but also those who guided them.
Indeed, a true saying.
I would like to thanks to Hon. Dr. Preeti Agrawal and Hon. HOD Ms.
“Prof. Mansi
Kalyani Neve and our Project guide "Prof.Shweta Chaudhari"
Talele” all my college Faculty
members for providing me with valuable support and guiding me throughout my
college days.
“Pankaj
Divesh Yogesh Divesh
Chetan
Patil
Narayan Yogesh
Ramesh
& Chetan
Patil Patil
Chavan
Ramesh
& Pranit ChanvhanPatil”
Rajendra
Index
1 Introduction 6
1.2 Overview
1.2 Functionality
1.3 Objectives
1.4 Abstract
3 System Design 10 - 16
4.1
Implementation
4.2 Maintenance
5.1 Results
5.2 Discussions
6 Snapshots 22 - 27
6.2 Update
6.2 Add Employees
info
6.3 Add
6.3 ViewMember
Employee
6.4 Add
6.4 Menu packages
Membership
6.5 Add
6.5 ViewTrainer
Order
6.7 Contact
6.7 View Product
Us
29
8 Bibliography
Chapter 1
Introduction:
- It integrates various functionalities like order management, billing, inventory control, and
customer relationship management.
- Its purpose is to enhance efficiency, reduce errors, and improve customer service.
2. Overview:
- RMS automates processes such as customer order handling, inventory tracking, billing, and
employee scheduling.
- It is user-friendly and suitable for restaurants of all sizes, offering modules for both front-end and
back-end operations.
3. Functionality:
- Billing & Payment: Simplified and accurate billing with various payment methods.
4. Objectives:
5. Abstract:
- The RMS is a comprehensive and scalable solution addressing the challenges of modern
restaurants.
- It aims to ensure seamless operations, improve customer experience, and provide actionable
insights for managers.
Chapter 2
Software Requirements:
• (Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10) o Front End- C#.net ( Microsoft Visual Studio 2008/2010)
Back End- MS SQL Server Database
•
2.2 System Requirement Specification :
Requirement of need (Requirement Specification): It refers to the client (the firm for which
project is developed) needs, requirement and expectations from the project to be developed. After
recognizing the firm’s need, it has been taken in writing and then a rough idea of the system/project
has been given to the firm. It takes approximately 2 days
.
1. Feasibility Study: It is always essential to evaluate the various aspects before we develop a
system. Evaluation should always justify the cost and benefits ratio. If it is found that benefits are
less compare to the cost of project, then it is better to avoid going in for computerization.
So economic, social and Technical Feasibility of project is analyzed. It has taken 2 days.
2. Data Collection: Here comes an important aspect of project development i.e. data collection.
For this to accomplish, we observe register, bills, invoices and order forms at client’s firm.
Data Collection required 3 days.
3. Data Normalization: Normalization means allowing only a single value in a table’s row and
column intersection. For this, entities are identified from the data collected and normalized tables
with appropriate relationships and minimized redundancy are designed. It required 1 day.
4. System Design: This step includes drawing of different diagrams such as DFD and ERD. It
Includes databases, form design etc. It required 4 days.
5. Coding: It is the most critical stage among all the stages of development. It has taken
approximately 9 days to complete. It involves giving functioning to data entry forms with help of
actions, validations, calculations and linking of different data entry forms.
6. Testing: It involves testing of the working of the project. It required 2 days.
7. Implementation: This involved deployment of project to client side. It took 2 to 3 days the
project.
8. User Training: It is 1 day activity involving training to the user to operate the project.
The software process and development of a Restaurant Management System (RMS) typically
involves several stages, each aimed at creating a robust, efficient, and user-friendly application.
Here's an overview:
1. Requirements Analysis
Identify the needs of the restaurant, such as order management, billing, inventory tracking,
and employee scheduling.
Gather input from stakeholders, including restaurant owners, managers, and staff, to ensure
the system meets their expectations.
2. System Design
3. Development
Implement the system using programming languages and frameworks suitable for the
application (e.g., Java, Python, or PHP for web-based systems).
Develop modules for key functionalities like Point of Sale (POS), inventory management,
and reporting.
4. Testing
Conduct rigorous testing to ensure the system is free of bugs and meets performance
standards.
Test individual modules (unit testing) and the entire system (integration testing).
5. Deployment
Install the system in the restaurant environment and ensure compatibility with existing
hardware (e.g., POS terminals, printers).
Provide training to staff on how to use the system effectively.
6. Maintenance
Offer ongoing support to address issues, update features, and ensure the system adapts to
changing business needs.
Chapter 3
System design
The system design of a Restaurant Management System (RMS) is broken down into several
components and functionalities to ensure smooth restaurant operations. Here's an organized
breakdown:
1. Order Management
3. Inventory Management
5. Employee Management
8. Security Features
9. User Interface
Entity-relationship diagram
E-R diagram can express the overall logical structure of a database graphically. Such a
diagram consists of the following major components.
⦁ Entity-relationship diagram symbol
Data Flow Diagram Context
Restaurant Request
Request Management
Admin
system
Database
Response Response
Restaurant
managaement
system
1. Implementation
Key Activities:
o Develop software modules for functionalities like order management, inventory
tracking, and reporting.
o Integrate the system with hardware (e.g., POS terminals, kitchen displays, printers).
o Ensure compatibility with third-party tools (payment gateways, reservation systems).
o Set up a secure database to store restaurant data (orders, inventory, customer
profiles).
Technology Stack:
o Use suitable programming languages (e.g., Python, Java).
o Employ frameworks (e.g., Django, Node.js) and databases (e.g., MySQL,
PostgreSQL).
2. Testing
Types of Testing:
o Unit Testing:
Test individual modules (e.g., billing, inventory) for functionality.
o Integration Testing:
Verify that different components work seamlessly together.
o Performance Testing:
Ensure the system handles high workloads (e.g., peak hours in restaurants).
o User Acceptance Testing (UAT):
Involve restaurant staff in testing to ensure usability.
Objective:
o Identify and fix bugs, optimize performance, and guarantee smooth operation.
3. Maintenance
Ongoing Activities:
o Bug Fixes: Address issues reported by users.
o Software Updates: Add new features or improve existing functionalities.
o System Monitoring: Check for security vulnerabilities and optimize performance.
Support:
o Provide technical assistance to restaurant staff.
o Offer training sessions for new employees.
Chapter 5
Results:
Time Reduction in Order Processing: The RMS significantly reduced the time between
order placement and delivery to the kitchen. By automating order flow and reducing the need
for manual entries, servers spent less time relaying orders, and the kitchen received real-time
updates, improving the turnaround time of dishes.
Faster Table Turnover: Through the effective table management system, wait times for
customers were reduced by 25%. Table reservations and status updates helped staff manage
the dining area more efficiently, resulting in faster customer seating and quicker service.
Real-time Inventory Management: Automated inventory tracking minimized human error
and allowed the system to send alerts when stock was running low. This helped prevent
stockouts and overordering, reducing waste by an estimated 15%.
Increased Revenue: Due to better tracking of orders, improved upselling features, and
automated promotions, restaurant revenue grew by 18% in the first six months of operation.
The system enabled personalized recommendations for customers, helping to increase
average order values.
Comprehensive Reporting: Managers now had access to detailed sales, inventory, and
employee performance reports. These insights helped make data-driven decisions, such as
optimizing the menu and adjusting pricing based on demand. This also improved cost
control, reducing operational overheads by 10%.
4. Employee Management and Productivity
Streamlined Scheduling: Staff scheduling was automated and aligned with peak business
hours, reducing scheduling conflicts and improving workforce management. This resulted in
a 20% improvement in overall employee satisfaction.
Simplified Payroll: Payroll was processed more efficiently with the RMS, as it integrated
employee hours and tips into the system. There was a notable reduction in payroll
discrepancies and processing errors.
Discussions:
The Restaurant Management System had a clear and positive impact on restaurant
operations. Key areas like order taking, inventory tracking, and staff management saw
the most significant improvements. However, there was an initial learning curve for staff
members unfamiliar with digital systems, requiring additional training during the system’s
rollout. Once fully adopted, the system drastically cut down on manual processes, leading to
a smoother workflow and better coordination between front-of-house and kitchen staff.
Order accuracy improved thanks to the system’s ability to reduce human errors in order
input. Before the RMS, mistakes made by servers in taking orders were frequent, which
resulted in delayed or incorrect food delivery. The new system ensured that the order was
transmitted directly to the kitchen and allowed for real-time updates and modifications.
2. Challenges Encountered
Integration Issues: One of the main challenges was integrating the RMS with existing
systems like third-party delivery services, accounting software, and hardware devices such as
printers and barcode scanners. While most integrations were successful, a few compatibility
issues arose, leading to some downtime during the early stages of implementation.
System Downtime: As with any digital system, occasional downtime for system updates or
server maintenance did cause some interruptions, especially during peak hours. However, the
restaurant prepared a contingency plan by having backup systems in place, such as manual
order-taking methods, until the system was restored.
Staff Adaptability: Although the system improved overall operational efficiency, some
employees found it challenging to adapt to the system, especially those who were less tech-
savvy. Additional training sessions and support helped ease this transition over time.
The customer-facing features, such as online ordering, table reservation, and the loyalty
program, were particularly well-received. Customers appreciated the convenience of
ordering from their phones and checking in for reservations via the system. The loyalty
program not only rewarded repeat business but also provided valuable insights into
customer preferences, which the restaurant used to further personalize the customer
experience.
Customer feedback was consistently positive regarding the faster service and more
accurate order fulfillment. However, some customers noted that they missed face-to-face
interactions with staff. The restaurant attempted to strike a balance by ensuring that the
technology complemented the human touch, rather than replacing it entirely.
Financially, the restaurant saw a noticeable increase in revenue due to the better upselling
opportunities created by the system’s recommendation features. By suggesting
complementary items (such as sides, desserts, or drinks), customers were more likely to add
additional items to their order.
On the operational side, inventory management became more streamlined, which reduced
overordering and waste. The system’s predictive capabilities allowed the restaurant to keep a
closer eye on stock levels, making more accurate purchasing decisions.
Despite initial investment and training costs, the restaurant saw a positive return on
investment (ROI) within the first year of system adoption, with higher revenues and
improved operational efficiency.
5. Future Improvements
As the restaurant continued to use the RMS, future improvements could include AI-driven
customer behavior analytics, offering even more personalized recommendations to
customers. Additionally, integrating more advanced delivery management tools could
further streamline the takeout and delivery process.
One potential area of improvement could be enhancing the mobile app experience for
customers, with features such as real-time order tracking and push notifications for special
promotions or menu changes.
Screen shots :-
Main Page:
Add Employee:
View Employee:-
Add Menu:
View order:
View Product:
Data Dictionary:
Faster service delivery, resulting in quicker table turnover and higher customer satisfaction.
Increased revenue through improved upselling, better order accuracy, and more efficient
management of orders and payments.
Reduced operational costs with automated inventory tracking, lower food wastage, and
optimized labor scheduling.
Higher customer retention via loyalty programs, personalized experiences, and a seamless
digital ordering experience.
Although the system encountered some initial integration challenges, the benefits it brought to the
restaurant's operations, financial performance, and customer experience were substantial. The
system's real-time data and analytics also empowered management to make informed decisions,
ensuring continued business growth.
Future Scope:
While the Restaurant Management System has already shown considerable value, there is always
potential for further enhancement and adaptation to future technological trends. Some possible areas
for development include:
McGraw-Hill. - Kendall, K. E., & Kendall, J. E. (2019). Systems Analysis and Design (10th
ed.). Pearson.
2. Online Resources:
Stack Overflow.(2024).
Stack Overflow. (2024).Community
Community Discussions
Discussions on on
GymRestaurant Management
Management Systems. Retrieved
Systems. Retrieved
from https://stackoverflow.com
Smith, J. (2023).
Smith, (2023)."Automation
"AutomationininGym
restaurant Management
Management Systems: Systems: A Comparative
A Comparative Analysis." Analysis."
Lee, K.,
K., &
&Johnson,
Johnson, R.
R. (2022).
(2022). "The Role
Role of
of AI
AI in Personalized Restaurant
Personalized Fitness Management."
Management."
Prof.Mansi
Prof.Shweta
Prof talele.
Talele Mansi . (2025).
chaudhari. Project
(2025).(2025). GuideNotes
Project
Project Guide Notes
Guide on Restaurant
Notes
on Gym on Management
Restaurant
Management System
Management
System System
Chavan
Patil
Patil Chetan
Divesh
Divesh Chavan
Yogesh
Yogesh (2025).
&(2025). Restaurant
Restaurant
Chauvhan Chetan Management
Management
Ramesh System
System
(2025). Gym - Final System - Final
- Final
Management