0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views69 pages

Pulse Radar MT I

The document presents a detailed overview of modern radar systems, focusing on pulse radar and moving-target indication (MTI) radar. It discusses key parameters such as pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, and the effects of pulse shape on system performance, as well as the types of pulse radar and their applications. The document also covers the functionality of MTI radar in rejecting stationary clutter and the use of delay-line cancelers to enhance target detection capabilities.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views69 pages

Pulse Radar MT I

The document presents a detailed overview of modern radar systems, focusing on pulse radar and moving-target indication (MTI) radar. It discusses key parameters such as pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, and the effects of pulse shape on system performance, as well as the types of pulse radar and their applications. The document also covers the functionality of MTI radar in rejecting stationary clutter and the use of delay-line cancelers to enhance target detection capabilities.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 69

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/357577357

Modern Radar System

Presentation · January 2022

CITATIONS READS

0 7,940

1 author:

Sanjeev Kumar Mishra


International Institute of Information Technology
114 PUBLICATIONS 1,082 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Sanjeev Kumar Mishra on 19 November 2024.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
Pulse Radar
D
A
R
MTI Radar
S
Y Lecture # 15-17
S
T
E Dr Sanjeev Kumar Mishra
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Introduction
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
PRT Carrier Freq.

A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M
PW PRT=1/PRF

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
Pulse Effects on System Performance
D
E Pulse Shape
R Pulse Width
N
• Determines the range resolution.
R
A
• Determines the minimum detection range.
D
• Can also determine the maximum range of radar.
A
R • The narrower the pulse, the better the range resolution.
S
Pulse Compression
Y • Increases frequency of the wave within the pulse.
S
T • Allows for good range resolution while packing enough power to
E
M provide a large maximum range.

D Pulse Power
E
S • High peak power is desirable to achieve maximum ranges.
I
G
• Low power means smaller and more compact radar units and less
N power required to operate.
M
O Pulsed Radar Parameters
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y • Pulsed radar waveforms can be completely defined by the following:
S
T • (1) carrier frequency which may vary depending on the design
E
M requirements and radar mission.

D • (2) pulse width, which is closely related to the bandwidth and


E
S defines the range resolution;
I
G
• (3) modulation; and
N • (4) the pulse repetition frequency
M
O Pulsed Radar Parameters
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Pulsed Radar Parameters
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Types of Pulse Radar in terms of PRF
D
E • The PRF must be chosen to avoid Doppler and range ambiguities as
R
N well as maximize the average transmitted power.
R • Radar systems employ
A
D • Low PRF,
A
R • Medium PRF, and

S • high PRF schemes.


Y
S
• Low PRF waveforms can provide
T • accurate, long, and unambiguous range measurements,
E
M • but exert severe Doppler ambiguities.
D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
• Medium PRF waveforms must resolve
R
• both range and Doppler ambiguities;
N
• however, they provide adequate average transmitted power
R
A as compared to low PRFs.
D
A • High PRF waveforms can provide
R
• superior average transmitted power and
S
Y • excellent clutter rejection capabilities.
S
T • Alternatively, high PRF waveforms are extremely ambiguous
E
M
in range.
• Radar systems utilizing high PRFs are often called Pulsed
D
E Doppler Radars (PDR).
S
I
G Note: Distinction of a certain PRF as low, medium, or high PRF is almost
N
arbitrary and depends on the radar mode of operations.
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O PRF Ambiguities
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Introduction
D
E
• The purpose of moving-target indication (MTI) radar is to reject
R
signals from fixed or slow-moving unwanted targets, such as
N
buildings, hills, trees, sea, and rain, and retain for detection or display
R
A signals from moving targets such as aircraft.
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Simplified Block diagram of a MTI system
M
O
D
E
• Moving target indication (MTI) is a mode of operation of a radar to
R
discriminate a target against clutter.
N
• The MTI radar uses Low Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) to avoid
R
A range ambiguities.
D
A • Radar MTI may be specialized in terms of the type of clutter and
R
environment:
S
Y • Airborne MTI (AMTI),
S
T • Ground MTI (GMTI), etc., or
E
M
• may be combined mode: stationary and moving target
indication (SMTI).
D
E NOTE: The phase of each transmit pulse is different from the previous and
S
I future transmit pulses. This phenomenon is called phase jitter. Ex: High
G
N power microwave devices, like crossed-field amplifier, are not phase-stable.
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M
Vt
D
E
S
I
G Vr Vdiff
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R
Vt
S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
Vr Vdiff
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
 4f t R0 
R Vdiff  Ad sin 2f d t 
N  c 
R
A • For the stationary targets the doppler frequency shift will be zero,
D
A hence Vdiff will not vary with time and may take on any constant value
R
from +Ad to –Ad including zero.
S
Y
• However, when the target is in motion relative to the radar fd has a
S value other than zero and the voltage corresponding to the difference
T
E frequency from the mixer will be a function of time.
M

D
E • To separate Doppler shifted echo signals of moving targets from the
S
I unwanted echoes of stationary clutter, sweep to sweep subtraction
G
N and delay line canceller is used.
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y (a) echo pulse train;
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N (b) video pulse train for doppler frequency fd > l/;
M
O
D
E
 4f t R0 
R Vdiff  Ad sin 2f d t 
N  c 
R
A
D
A
R
Vt
S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
Vr Vdiff
I
G
N
• Moving targets distinguished from stationary targets by
M
O observing the video output on an A-scope (amplitude vs. time).
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I (a-e) Successive sweeps of an MTI radar A-scope display (echo
G
N
amplitude as a function of time); (f) superposition of many sweeps;
arrows indicate position of moving targets
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Bipolar video: several sweep
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R Vt
A
D
A
R Vr
S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S • The simple MTI delay-line canceler
I  4f t R0  V
Ad sin 2f d t    diff is used to reject stationary clutter at
G  c 
N
zero frequency.
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
Superposition of many sweeps; arrows indicate position of moving targets
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Effect of delay line canceller on the signal
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Delay Line Canceler
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A MTI Receiver delay line canceler
R
• The simple MTI delay-line canceler is an example of a time-domain filter.
S
Y • DLC acts as a HPF to separate Doppler shifted echo signals of moving
S
T targets from the unwanted echoes of stationary clutter.
E • The capability of this device depends on the quality of the medium used as
M
the delay line.
D
E • The Pulse modulator delay line must introduce a time delay equal to the
S pulse repetition interval.
I
G • For typical ground-based air-surveillance radars this might be several
N
milliseconds.
M
O
D
E • Delay times of this magnitude can not be achieved with practical
R
N electromagnetic transmission lines.
• The use of digital delay lines requires that the output of the MTI receiver
R
A phase-detector be quantized into a sequence of digital words.
D
A • The compactness and convenience of digital processing allows the
R implementation of more complex delay-line cancelers with filter
S characteristics not practical with analog methods.
Y
S • One of the advantages of a time-domain delay-line canceler as compared to
T
the more conventional frequency-domain filter is that a single network
E
M operates at all ranges and does not require a separate filter for each range

D resolution cell.
E
• Frequency-domain doppler filter banks are of interest in some forms of MTI
S
I and pulse-doppler radar.
G
N
M
O
D
E
• The delay-line canceler acts as a filter which rejects the d-c
R
component of clutter. Because of its periodic nature, the filter also
N
rejects energy in the vicinity of the pulse repetition frequency and its
R
A harmonics.
D
A • The video signal received from a particular target at a range R0 is
R
V1  k sin 2f d t  0 
S
Y Where 0 = phase shift and k = amplitude of video signal.
S
T
• The signal from the previous transmission, which is delayed by a time
E T = pulse repetition interval, is V  k sin2f t  T    
M 2 d 0

D • The output of the subtractor is


E   T 
S V1  V2  2k sin f d T cos 2f d  t    0 
I   2 
G
N
M
O
D
E
• The output from the DLC consists of a cosine wave with the doppler
R
frequency fd as the input but with an amplitude 2k sin (fdT).
N
• Thus, the amplitude of the cancelled video output is a function of the
R
A doppler frequency shift and the pulse-repetition interval, or prf.
D
A • The magnitude of the relative frequency-response of the delay-line
R
2k sin f d T 
S
canceler H f   2 sin f d T 
k
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Frequency response of the single delay-line canceler; T = delay time
M
O
D
E • Properties of DLC
R
N • The frequency response function has zero response when
R moving targets have doppler frequencies at the prf and its
A
D harmonics.
A
R • The clutter spectrum at zero frequency is not a delta function of

S zero width but has a finite width so that clutter will appear in the
Y
S
pass band of the DLC.
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Blind Speed
D
E • The response of the single-delay-line canceler will be zero whenever
R
N the argument fdT in the amplitude factor is 0, which occurs when

R when fdT = 0,  , 2 ...


A
D H  f   2 sin f d T   0  sin f d T   0
A
 sin f d T   sin  n  n  0,1,2,3....  f d  n
R
 f d  nf r
S T
Y
S • The delay-line canceler a not only eliminates the d-c component
T
E caused by clutter (n = 0), but unfortunately it also rejects any moving
M
target whose Doppler frequency happens to be the same as the prf or
D
a multiple thereof.
E
S • Those relative target velocities which result in zero MTI response are
I
G called blind speed. nf r n
N  vn   n  1,2,3...  f  2vr
2 2T d

M
O
D
E nf r • Where, vn is the nth blind speed in knot
R  vn   nf r
N 1.02
 operating wavelength in m
R fr is prf in Hz
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Plot of MTI radar first blind speed as a function of R un
M
O Limitation in MTI Radar
D
E • The blind speeds are one of the limitations of pulse MTI radar which
R
N do not occur with CW radar.

R • Blind speed can be a serious limitation in MTI radar since they cause
A
D
some desired moving targets to be cancelled along with the
A undesired clutter at zero frequency.
R
nf r n
S  vn   n  1,2,3...
Y 2 2T
S
T • Based on the equation, there are four methods for reducing the
E
M detrimental effects of blind speeds.

D • Operate the radar at lower frequencies [or long wavelengths]


E
• Operate with a high prf
S
I • Operate with more than one prf [known as staggered-prf]
G
N • Operate wit more than one RF frequency [or wavelength]
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G Frequency-response of a single-delay-line canceler for f, = 1/T,; (b)
N
same for fr = l/T2; (c) composite response with T1/T2 =4/3.
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Clutter Spectrum
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O N Pulse Delay line Canceler
D
E • The frequency response of a single-delay-line canceler does not always have
R
as broad a clutter-rejection null as might be desired in the vicinity of d-c.
N
• The clutter-rejection notches may be widened by passing the output of the
R
A delay-line canceler through a second delay-line canceler as shown in Fig.
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T Double-delay-line canceler
E sout (t )  s(t )  2s (t  T )  s (t  2T )
M • The output of the adder

D
E
S
I
G
N
Three pulse canceler
M
O
D
E • The output of the two single-delay line canceler in cascade is the square of
R
H  f DDLC  H  f SDLC   4 sin 2 f d T 
2
that from a single canceler.
N
• The double delay line canceler and three pulse canceller are same
R
A frequency response function
D
A
• The weights of double delay line canceler or three pulse canceller are +1, -2,
R +1.  sout (t )  s (t )  2 s (t  T )  s (t  2T )
S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E • Similarly, the weights of four pulse canceler are +1, -3, +3, -1 and
R
N frequency response proportional to sin3fdT.
R • The weights of five pulse canceler are +1, -4, +6, -4, +1 and
A
D frequency response proportional to sin4fdT.
A
R • If n is the number of delay lines, there are n+1 = N pulses available to

S
produce a frequency response function proportional to sinnfdT when
Y
the weights are the coefficients of the expansion of binomial series (1-
S
T x)n with alternating signs.
E
M n!
wi   1
i 1
i  1,2,3..., n  1
D n  i  1!i  1!
E
S • The greater the value of N, the greater will be the clutter attenuation.
I
Note: N is no of pulses, n is no of delay lines
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D General form of a transversal (or nonrecursive) filter for MTI signal processing.
E
S This is known as trarnsversal filter. [also sometimes known as a feed
I
G forward filter, a nonrecursive filter, a finite memory filter or a tapped delay-
N
line filter.]
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M
Canonical-configuration comb filter
D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S Amplitude responses for three MTI delay-line cancelers.
I
G (1) Classical three-pulse canceler (2) five-pulse delay-line canceler with
N
"optimum" weights, and (3) 15-pulse Chebyshev design
M
O Clutter Spectrum and Clutter Attenuation
D
E • Although clutter targets such as buildings, water towers, bare hills. or
R
N mountains produce echo signals that are constant in both phase and

R amplitude as a function of time, there are many types of clutter that


A
D
cannot be considered as absolutely stationary.
A • Echoes from trees, vegetation, sea, rain, and chaff fluctuate with time,
R
and these fluctuations can limit the performance of MTI radar.
S
Y • Because of its varied nature, it is difficult to describe precisely the
S
T clutter echo signal.
E
M • The experimentally measured power spectra of clutter signals rnay be

D approximated by
E
S
I
G
N
Where, W (f) = clutter-power spectrum as a function of frequency
M
O g (f) = Fourier transform of input waveform (clutter echo)
D
E f0 = radar carrier frequency
R
N a = a parameter dependent upon clutter
R
A
Power spectra of various
D
A clutter targets.
R
(1) Heavily wooded hills,
S
20 mi/h wind blowing (a
Y
S = 2.3 x 1017; (2) sparsely
T
E wooded hills, calm day
M
(a = 3.9  1019); (3) sea
D echo, windy day (a =
E
S 1.41x1016), (4) rain
I
G clouds ( a = 2.8 x 1015);
N
M
O
D
E • The clutter spectrum can also be expressed in terms of an rms clutter
R
N frequency spread c in hertz or by the rms velocity spread v, in m/s.

R Thus,
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M
For a single-delay-line canceler, the clutter attenuation is

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E The improvement factor can be written as
R
N

R
A
D
A where S0/C0, output signal-to-clutter ratio,
R
Si/Ci input signal-to-clutter ratio, and
S
Y CA = clutter attenuation.
S
T The average is taken over all target doppler frequencies of interest.
E
M The clutter attenuation is
D
E
S
I
G
N Where, H (f) is the frequency response function of the canceler
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R
ex = xn / n! = 1 + x/1 + x2 / 2 + x3 / 6 + ...
S
Y
S
T
E
M Where, fp is the pulse repetition frequency = 1/T.

D The average gain (S0/Si)avg of the single delay-line canceler can be equal
E
S to 2. Therefore. The Improvement factor is
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
Find the improvement factor for a double delay line canceler, whose
N average gain is 6.
R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
• The transmitter shown employs a magnetron because a magnetron is
R
a pulsed oscillator that has no phase coherence between consecutive
N
pulses, a phase reference must be established for each transmitted
R
A pulse.
D
A • This is done by taking a sample of the transmitted pulse at a
R
directional coupler, mixing this pulse with the stalo (stabilized local
S
Y oscillator) and then using this pulse to phase-lock the coho (coherent
S
T oscillator).
E
M
• The coho then becomes the reference oscillator for the received
signals.
D
E • The lock-pulse amplifier is gated off just before the end of the
S
I transmitted pulse because a magnetron emits a certain amount of
G
N noise during the fall of the high-voltage pulse applied to it, and this
M
O
D
E • The received signals are mixed with the stalo and amplified in a
R
N linear-limiting amplifier.
R • The received signals are then compared in phase with the coho in a
A
D phase detector.
A
R • The output of the phase detector is a function of the relative phase of

S the signal and the coho, and it is also a function of the amplitude of
Y
the signal.
S
T • At the output of the phase detector, the signal phase and amplitude
E
M information has been converted into bipolar video.
D • If the point target is moving and if there is also a moving target in the
E
S region of strong clutter return, the superimposed bipolar video from
I
G several transmitted pulses may appear as in Figure
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
Bipolar video: several sweep
M
O
D
E • The output of the subtracter is a digital bipolar signal that contains
R
N moving targets, system noise, and a small amount of clutter residue if
R clutter cancellation is not perfect.
A
D • The absolute value of the signal is then converted to analog video in
A
R a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter for display on a PPI.

S • The digital signal may also be sent to automatic target detection


Y
circuitry.
S
T • The dynamic range (peak signal to rms noise) is limited to about 20
E
M dB for a PPI display.
D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
Non-Coherent MTI
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S Non-Coherent MTI
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
Coherent Pulsed MTI
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G Pulsed Coherent
N
MTI Search Radar
M
O
D
E • The detection of moving targets are improved by suppression of fixed
R
N targets.

R • This is expanded to incorporate Doppler processing as one possible


A
D
form of MTI implementation
A • is deified as one uses simple band reject to reject the return from
R
fixed targets Enhanced detection of the moving target
S
Y • Doppler filter
S
T • A relative narrow bandwidth clutter is rejected.
E
M • A broad passband (unknown Doppler shift)

D • Post-Doppler processing stage  Non-coherent integration


E
S • Rejection notches in the passband should be placed in frequency
I
G
about the response that are to be rejected and should be as wide
N as required to achieve the desired clutter cancellation.
M
O
D
E • Non-coherent Pulsed Radar
R
N • No reference signal

R • Coherent Pulsed Radar


A
D
• TX phase is reserved
A • MTI Radar
R
• detection of moving target by suppressing fixed targets
S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Non-Coherent Pulsed Radar
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O Coherent Pulsed Radar
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I Simplified block diagram of
G
N Coherent Pulsed Radar
M
O
D
E
R
1. M.I. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems, McGraw hill, 2000.
N 2. M.I. Skolnik, Radar Handbook, McGraw hill, 2nd edition, 1990.
R 3. A.K. Sen and A.B. Battacharya, Radar Systems andRadar Aids to
A
D Naviation, Khanna Publications, 1988.
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
M
O
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G
N
View publication stats

M
O
Coherent Pulsed MTI
D
E
R
N

R
A
D
A
R

S
Y
S
T
E
M

D
E
S
I
G Pulsed Coherent
N
MTI Search Radar

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy