Asset Based Approach
Asset Based Approach
What is the asset based approach? This approach focuses on building on existing
strengths and resources rather than addressing weaknesses. It emphasizes on the
positive aspects of a community or individual.
This method uses the community’s own assets and resources as the basis for
development.
The Asset-Based Approach gained prominence through the work of John McKnight and
John Kretzmann in the 1990s with the development of Asset-Based Community
Development (ABCD). Their seminal work, Building Communities from the Inside Out,
introduced a framework for community development that begins by identifying local assets
rather than problems. Grounded in theories of empowerment, strengths-based practice,
and participatory development, ABA is closely aligned with humanistic and ecological
paradigms that view individuals and communities as inherently resourceful.
The Asset-Based Approach (ABA) is guided by several key principles that shape how
community development is carried out. These principles help ensure that the approach
remains people-centered, empowering, and sustainable.
Here’s a clear and simple explanation of the core principles of the Asset-Based Approach:
> Principle: People are not the problem—they are the solution.
Individuals in the community are seen as capable, creative, and resourceful. Their
knowledge, experience, and leadership are the foundation for development. ABA involves
everyone, not just a few leaders or experts.
ABA emphasizes building and strengthening relationships within the community. When
people connect and work together, they can solve problems more effectively. Strong
networks foster trust, collaboration, and support.
Instead of professionals designing solutions for the community, ABA puts the community in
the driver’s seat. Development is most effective when local people are the planners,
decision-makers, and implementers.
> Principle: Start with what you have, not what you lack.
Development efforts should begin by identifying and mobilizing the assets already
available in the community. This helps to build momentum and avoids dependency on
external aid.
> Principle: Outside support should amplify local efforts, not control them.
Governments, NGOs, and other external institutions are welcome—but they must respect
local leadership and enhance what the community is already doing.
1. Asset Mapping
Asset mapping involves identifying the skills, talents, and resources available within the
community. This includes:
When development initiatives are based on local assets, the community is more likely to
feel a sense of ownership and responsibility, which improves participation and
sustainability.
Education
Social Work
In social work, ABA aligns with strengths-based practice, which seeks to empower clients
by recognizing their resilience and abilities. Rather than labeling clients by their challenges,
social workers help clients discover and build upon their existing capacities and networks.
The following is an example of an instance in Kenya where the Asset Based Approach was
applied;
Background:
Makueni County, located in southeastern Kenya, is a semi-arid region that has long faced
challenges such as drought, food insecurity, and youth unemployment. Instead of focusing
on what the community lacked, local leaders, in partnership with community members
and organizations, applied an Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) approach to
transform the situation from the ground up.
3. Focusing on What Works: Instead of waiting for aid, the county supported community-
driven irrigation projects using existing sand dams and riverbeds. These systems were
cheap to maintain and based on indigenous knowledge.
Results:
The Asset-Based Approach (ABA) has several strengths and weaknesses, especially when
applied in community development. Here’s a breakdown of both:
1. Empowers Communities
2. Promotes Sustainability
Solutions are built on local resources, making them easier to maintain long-term.
When people contribute their own skills and resources, they are more likely to stay
committed.
Encourages creative use of what’s already available rather than waiting for what’s missing.
Strengthens trust and relationships, which are essential for community resilience.
6. Cost-Effective
In communities facing serious crises (e.g., conflict, famine, disease), focusing only on
assets may not be sufficient.
2. Takes Time
Results may not be immediate, which can be frustrating for donors or stakeholders seeking
quick wins.
If not done inclusively, some voices (especially women, youth, people with disabilities)
might be ignored.
4. Limited Resources
In extremely impoverished communities, local assets might be too few or too weak to
support effective development without outside help.
Many development practitioners are trained in deficit-based models and may resist
changing their approach.