Scribd
Upload
23 views6 pages

Restaurant Case Study PDF

This case study analyzes restaurant data from Bangalore and Pune, focusing on exploratory data analysis, predictive modeling, and clustering to inform data-driven decisions. The dataset includes over 7,000 entries with various attributes, and findings reveal that Bangalore has more fine-dining options while Pune excels in budget-friendly delivery outlets. Recommendations include expanding delivery options in Bangalore and enhancing dine-in experiences in Pune to optimize market reach.

Uploaded by

lekhyareddy29
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views6 pages

Restaurant Case Study PDF

This case study analyzes restaurant data from Bangalore and Pune, focusing on exploratory data analysis, predictive modeling, and clustering to inform data-driven decisions. The dataset includes over 7,000 entries with various attributes, and findings reveal that Bangalore has more fine-dining options while Pune excels in budget-friendly delivery outlets. Recommendations include expanding delivery options in Bangalore and enhancing dine-in experiences in Pune to optimize market reach.

Uploaded by

lekhyareddy29
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Restaurant Data Case Study Analysis

1. Introduction

This case study focuses on a comprehensive analysis of restaurant data across two cities,
Bangalore and Pune.
The dataset comprises multiple attributes such as restaurant name, category, ratings,
location, pricing, and website availability.
The purpose of this case study is to perform Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), Predictive
Modeling, Clustering, and Dashboard-based insights to support data-driven decision-
making.

2. Dataset Overview

The dataset consists of over 7,000 entries with the following key columns:
- Restaurant_Name
- Category
- City
- Locality
- Pricing_for_2
- Dining_Rating
- Delivery_Rating
- Review Counts (Dining and Delivery)
- Website, Address, Phone No., Coordinates
This data provides a rich source for visual and algorithmic interpretation.

3. Data Cleaning & Preprocessing

Initial steps involved handling missing values, encoding categorical variables, and
converting pricing and rating columns to numerical format.
Special care was taken to remove any outliers or duplicate entries that could skew the
analysis.
4. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

Several visualizations were created to understand the distribution and trends across key
variables.
These graphs help in identifying key locations, top categories, average pricing, and rating
trends across cities.

Figure 1: Number of Restaurants per City

5. Predictive Modeling

A Random Forest Regression model was applied to predict Dining Ratings based on features
like Category, Locality, City, and Pricing.
Model Performance:
- MAE (Mean Absolute Error): ~0.23
- RMSE (Root Mean Square Error): ~0.086
These results show reasonable accuracy and highlight the impact of locality and pricing on
dining quality.

6. Clustering Analysis

KMeans clustering was implemented using features such as Pricing_for_2, Latitude, and
Longitude.
The objective was to group similar restaurants by price and location. 4 clusters were
visualized on a scatter plot.
This analysis is crucial for identifying prime restaurant hubs and competitor analysis.
7. Dashboard Insights

A dashboard was created using Power BI (or Tableau) to highlight city-wise distributions,
pricing patterns, and rating spreads.
Key insights include:
- Bangalore has more premium restaurants.
- Pune shows a tighter cluster of affordable options.
- Dining rating concentration is higher in core areas.
8. Comparison: Bangalore vs Pune

Bangalore dominates in terms of fine-dining options, while Pune excels in budget and
delivery-efficient outlets.
Rating averages:
- Bangalore: Dining ~4.0, Delivery ~3.8
- Pune: Dining ~3.7, Delivery ~4.1
This suggests Pune prioritizes delivery, while Bangalore emphasizes dine-in experiences.
9. Business Recommendations

1. Expand delivery options in Bangalore to match market needs.


2. Pune-based restaurants can explore dine-in ambience improvements.
3. Focus on areas with clustered high delivery ratings to optimize promotions and reach.
4. Use cluster-based segmentation for targeted marketing and offers.

10. Conclusion

This project presented a multi-layered analysis of restaurant trends, rating dynamics, and
consumer pricing behavior.
From predictive models to spatial clustering, the study delivers actionable insights to
support business strategy in the food & hospitality sector.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy