0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

risk-matrix

The document outlines a Risk and Incident Ranking Matrix that prioritizes serious risks to people and the environment over those to assets or production. It provides guidelines for assessing the likelihood of incidents and their potential consequences, categorizing them into various severity levels. The matrix serves as a tool for determining necessary actions based on the risk level, from immediate action plans for critical risks to acceptable measures for minor incidents.

Uploaded by

David Robin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

risk-matrix

The document outlines a Risk and Incident Ranking Matrix that prioritizes serious risks to people and the environment over those to assets or production. It provides guidelines for assessing the likelihood of incidents and their potential consequences, categorizing them into various severity levels. The matrix serves as a tool for determining necessary actions based on the risk level, from immediate action plans for critical risks to acceptable measures for minor incidents.

Uploaded by

David Robin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

NOTES:

1. "Serious" risks to people and


Risk Ranking / Priority Action Setting Relationship to Incident Reporting Pyramid
RISK and INCIDENT RANKING MATRIX environment have higher priority than
serious risks to asset or production.

2. When choosing Likelihood, consider: Risk is unacceptable to the company. WORK


SHALL NOT PROCEED until risk is reduced.
* Near Miss incidents Critical Immediate Action Plan is required before Major
* Incidents which have happened
Likelihood Of Occurrence on-site or at similar facilities
proceeding. Incidents
* Design of the Facility
→ Compared to intended operation Risk is undesirable. May proceed with approval
IMPROBABLE REMOTE OCCASIONAL PROBABLE FREQUENT from responsible Management. Consider
→ Over-design Serious additional safeguards to reduce risk. Serious
→ Design safety margins Incidents
Frequency Once in 1000 yrs Once in 100 yrs Once in 10 years Once in 5 years Once per year Short-Term Action Plan is required.
→ Materials of construction
* Publications and other industry
1.0 E-03 /yr 1.0 E-02 /yr 1.0 E-01 /yr 2.0 E-01 /yr 1.0 E-00 /yr documentation Reasonably practicable risk reduction measures and Minor
Qualitative * PHA's performed on similar operating Moderate safeguards must be used.
Incidents
Unlikely, but could facilities Long-Term Action Plan should be considered.
Description Very unlikely to May occur several
occur once in Very likely to occur.
occur in lifetime of Infrequent times at facility.
lifetime of this Regular, repeated
this facility; Rare occurrence in the Common
occurrence in the
facility. Rare
industry. occurrence in the
occurrence in the Normally accepted controls should be in place. Near Miss
industry.
occurrence in the
industry.
industry. Acceptable No additional action is required. Incidents
industry.

Consequence / Severity Description (without safeguards)


Unplanned Downtime for
A B C D E People Environmental Asset Damage or Losses
Client
Reputation

Reportable spill or release Negative international


Fatality or resulting in severe ecological Greater than 90 days, or publicity, significant

Major Incident
5 Moderate Serious Critical Critical Critical 5 Permanent Disability impact. Direct impact on public.
Greater than $ 1 Million
well must be abandoned impact on market share or
Prosecution. investor valuation

Negative national or
Reportable spill or release
regional publicity,
requiring external remedial
Consequence / Severity Ranking

4 Acceptable Moderate Serious Critical Critical 4 Hospitalization


measures. Regulatory restriction
$ 100,000 to $ 1 Million 15 days to 90 days transitory impact on
market share or investor
or enforcement action.
valuation

Reportable spill or release not contained

Serious Incident
Lost Time within client facility and requiring activation of Local media coverage,
3 Acceptable Acceptable Moderate Serious Serious 3 Injury/Illness (LTI)
facility's remedial actions or measures.Non-
reportable spill or release in company
$ 10,000 to $ 100,000 3 days to 15 days
Community complaint
facility requiring outside mitigation services.

Reportable spill or release


Medical Aid and/or contained within client facility, or
Little or no local media
2 Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate Serious 2 Restricted/Modified small release on company $ 2,500 to $ 10,000 1 shift to 3 days
coverage
Work Case facility not requiring activation of
any remedial measures.

Incident
Minor
Non-reportable spill or release
1 Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Moderate 1 First Aid contained within company or Less than $ 2,500 Less than one shift Negative public complaint
client facility.

Near Miss
Incident
No injury / illness;
0 Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable 0 or NEAR MISS
No environmental impact No cost impact No downtime No Impact

USE FOR SEVERITY RANKING OF ACTUAL INCIDENTS

USE FOR RISK RANKING OF POTENTIAL INCIDENTS

Document No. Revision Date Reason for Issue Prepared Revised Endorsed Approved

Issued for Review


Operations Manager HSE Manager VP Operations

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy