0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views3 pages

Bail Application 439 363 366 Monu

The document is an application for bail filed by the accused, Monu, in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 363, 366, and 376. The applicant claims to be falsely implicated, has no prior convictions, and asserts that no incriminating evidence has been found against him. The application requests bail on the grounds that the applicant is no longer needed for investigation and poses no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views3 pages

Bail Application 439 363 366 Monu

The document is an application for bail filed by the accused, Monu, in a case involving serious charges under IPC sections 363, 366, and 376. The applicant claims to be falsely implicated, has no prior convictions, and asserts that no incriminating evidence has been found against him. The application requests bail on the grounds that the applicant is no longer needed for investigation and poses no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

IN THE COURT OF DISTT.

AND SESSIONS JUDGE :ROHINI

IN RE :

STATE VS. MONU

FIR NO. 323/10

U/S 363/366/376 IPC

P.S. JAHANGIR PURI

SENT TO J.C. 4.4.2011

APPLICATION FOR BAIL U/S 439 CR.P.C.

RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1.That the applicant has been falsely

implicated in the above noted case, in

fact he has nothing to do with the offence

alleged against him.

2.That the applicant is not a previous

convict or habitual offenders; moreover he

belongs to the respectable family having

roots in the society.

3.That nothing incriminating so far has been

recovered from or at the instance of the

accused and the alleged recovery has been

planted on the accused .

4.That the applicant is no longer required

for investigation purpose as he has been


in judicial custody and no purpose would

be served by keeping the accused in the

judicial custody in the company of

hardcore criminals.

5.That the applicant is ready to furnish

sound and local surety up to the

satisfaction of concerned court in case

released on bail.

6.That there is no chance of his absconding

or tempering with the prosecution

evidence.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most humbly prayed the

applicants may kindly be admitted on bail, in the

interest of justice.

DELHI APPLICANT

DATED THROUGH

COUNSEL

IN THE COURT OF DISTT. AND SESSIONS JUDGE :ROHINI


IN RE :

STATE VS. MONU

FIR NO. 323/10

U/S 363/366/376 IPC

P.S. JAHANGIR PURI

SENT TO J.C. 4.4.2011

INDEX

Sr.No. Particulars Pages Court fee

1. Application for bail 1-2 --

2. Copy of FIR --

3. Vakalatnama --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

DELHI

APPLICANT
DATED THROUGH

COUNSEL

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy