Scribd
Upload
81 views4 pages

Bail Application 420 439 Mohd - Akil

The document is a bail application for Mohd. Akil in a case involving FIR No. 59/11 under sections 420/34 IPC. The applicant argues that the investigation is complete, no prosecution witnesses have appeared, and the accused has suffered in jail without any incriminating evidence against him. The application requests bail on the grounds of the accused's respectable background, lack of flight risk, and the failure of the prosecution to present evidence within the mandated timeframe.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
81 views4 pages

Bail Application 420 439 Mohd - Akil

The document is a bail application for Mohd. Akil in a case involving FIR No. 59/11 under sections 420/34 IPC. The applicant argues that the investigation is complete, no prosecution witnesses have appeared, and the accused has suffered in jail without any incriminating evidence against him. The application requests bail on the grounds of the accused's respectable background, lack of flight risk, and the failure of the prosecution to present evidence within the mandated timeframe.

Uploaded by

kuldeep singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

IN THE COURT OF DISTT.

AND SESSIONS JUDGE:ROHINI

IN RE :

STATE VS. MOHD.AKIL @ AMAN @ LALLA

FIR NO. 59/11

U/S 420/34 IPC

P.S. SWAROOP NAGAR

SENT TO J.C.15.11.11

APPLICATION FOR BAIL U/S 439 CR.P.C.

RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1.That the investigation in the abovenoted case

has already been completed as the challan in

the abovenoted case has already been filed and

the accused has not been required for further

investigation.

2.That the charge has already been framed on

8.2.12 and the case has come up for

prosecution evidence .For the last 3-4 dates

of hearing no prosecution witness has been

turned up to depose before the Ld.trial court.

3.That as per section 437(6)Cr.P.C. the evidence

is to be concluded within 60 days from the

framing of charge or the accused shall be

entitled to bail if he is in judicial

custody.Pertinently inspite of presence of

presiding officer,Addl. Pubic Prosecutor and


the defence counsel the prosecution failed to

examine any witness what to talk of concluding

the prosecution evidence.

4.That nothing incriminating has been recovered

from or at the instance of the accused .

5.That as per list of witnesses all are stock

witnesses of the police and they are not

appearing before the Hon’ble trial court.

6. That the accused is not a previous convict or

habitual offender; moreover he belongs to a

respectable family having roots in the

society.

7.That there is no chance of his absconding or

tempering with the prosecution evidence if

released on bail moreover he has suffered a

lot in the jail.

8.That the accused is permanent resident of

Delhi and undertakes to furnish sound local

surety up to the satisfaction of this Hon’ble

court and the accused undertakes to appear

before the trial court as and when required.

9.That no fruitful purpose would be served by

keeping the accused in J.C. any more in the

company of hardcore criminals.


10. That the bail application under section 437

Cr.P.C. has already been dismissed .and the

bail application under section 439 Cr.P.c. has

also been dismissed and another application

dismissed in default.The anticipatory bail

application was also rejected by the Hon’ble

High Court at New Delhi.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most humbly prayed

that the accused /applicant may kindly be

admitted on bail, in the interest of justice.

DELHI APPLICANT

THROUGH

DATED COUNSEL
IN THE COURT OF DISTT. AND SESSIONS JUDGE:ROHINI

IN RE :

STATE VS. MOHD.AKIL @ AMAN @ LALLA

FIR NO. 59/11

U/S 420/34 IPC

P.S. SWAROOP NAGAR

SENT TO J.C.15.11.11

INDEX

SR. NO. PARTICULARS PAGES COURT FEE

1. Application for bail


-

2. Copy of FIR

3. Copy of orders dated

4. Vakalatnama Rs. 1.25/-

DELHI
APPLICANT

DATED THROUGH

COUNSEL

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy