Comic Con?!
Comic Con?!
COMIC CON?!
omic books and graphic novels have provided the basis for a whole host of movies over the last decade or so. From Superman to Batman, Sin City to Blade, these cinematic reincarnations of beloved animation and beautiful artwork have never been so relevant. There are a few notable exceptions, of course, that perhaps aren't so noteworthy, but that's not my fight. 'Comic-book movies' are extremely difficult to produce: for the most part, there is often an army of dedicated comic-yielding fans to please, and that in itself ain't an easy task. I know plenty of these crazed yielders, and expectations are sky bloody high when it boils down to these films. Perhaps the best place to start to prove my 'thumbs-up-to-comicbook-films' theory is the recently reinvigorated Batman franchise. Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins took comic book material and made it into a proper film, without gimmicks or a suitably vivid and colourful superhero fantasy world to fall back on. Three years later, Nolan did it all over again with The Dark Knight, drawing upon relevant themes of terrorism, fear and paranoia, all of which exist at the heart of our own contemporary society and applying them to Wayne's own make-believe universe. It worked on a magnificent scale. In a similar vein, Frank Miller's graphic novels, 300 and Sin City, were both
film
52 /film@gairrhydd.com
(take note Obama) could possibly deny that, with the exception of perhaps Batman (please remember the monstrosities that were Batman Forever and Batman and Robin), comic book films have failed to replicate the plot complexity, character depth, emotional development, subtlety or sense of sheer sodding excitement of the comics they are based on. Perhaps its in some ways understandable considering that comic books have hundreds of issues at their disposal when creating their characters mythologies. However, that isnt really an excuse. As The Dark Knight so wonderfully demonstrated this summer, it can be done when directors and writers start to do their ruddy jobs and cease to simply use the comics as storyboards (here's looking at you Frank MIller). When you consider how much money has been ploughed into these movies, it is hard not to wonder what original blockbusters havent been made as a result. But that isnt really the point. These movies are being churned out at such a rate because they are low risk, lazy money-spinners - even Catwoman took $82 million. As we stand we have a mere handful of worthy comic book movies and more are due this coming year. What we need to decide is whether well start demanding better from these films, or keep on buying into this comic con regardless. SMASH! How's that for a Simcredible sign off Iron-Fran? You're going to go down, down like a lead balloon...I mean Iron. Balloon that is. Shit.
film@gairrhydd.com / 53