Drivetest NOKIA
Drivetest NOKIA
• Objective :
to get the image of Cluster Tuning Process
Data Analyst To Analyze the data and carry out Simulation
Reporting. Submit the report to Nokia before see the customer
Explain to customer about the Solution (together with Nokia engineer)
Improve the report according to customer request
Ensure the changes are implemented to the network
Instruct Drive test team to start the 2nd drive without any delay
Window Person Confirm the site status with Nokia NMS engineers
Located in Nokia office
Ensure the RAN tuning activity is carried out according to the schedule
Participate the progress meeting if necessary
Main interface between Nokia and subcons
Table of content
Introduction :
Tuning Flow Diagram
Responsability
Preparation & Drivetest
Analysis Process
Reports
Drivetest Preparation
Sub-cluster Categories Description
BTS Sites Max DT Route [km]
Urban 6-10 160 km
Categories-1
Sub-urban 1-5 200 km
Urban 11-15 320 km
Categories-2
Sub-urban 6-10 400 km
Urban 16-20 450 km
Categories-3
Sub-urban 11-15 600 km
Drivetest Preparation
• Route Map
• Navigator plans Route Map according to Road Map
• Every road in the Road Map should be included but drive route in
route map should not be overlapped each other if possible.
• If highway exists in cluster, the measurement in highway should
basically be performed and stored in separated data file.
• Problem areas should be marked in one of Route maps
• Navigator handles 2 Route map – one is for navigation and the other
is for announcing field test engineer the problem area during drive test.
No good
Modify
Drivetest Route
• Pre-Simulation Results
• Default propagation model (Okumura Hata model) is used for pre-
simulation
• Problem Candidate Areas found through Pre-simulation result are
marked in one Route map and Problem Area Sheet – This work is
done by Data Analyst.
• Plot of Simulated Best Server RSCP:
Identifies poor best server’s RSCP coverage areas. The threshold
level is –92dBm.
• Plot of Simulated Best Server Ec/Io:
Identifies poor best server’s Ec/No coverage areas. The
threshold level is –9 dB.
• Plot of Simulated 4th Best Server RSCP:
Identifies excessive no. of SC – pilot pollution - from RSCP
point of view. The threshold is –92 dBm as well.
Drivetest Preparation
• Test equipments :
• Nemo SAM & TOM dongles & software
• Nemo handy (phone 6630, 6650, etc), with USB cable
• GPS + car roof antenna, preferably Garmin III+
• Scanner, preferably Anritsu (high accuracy).
• Laptop
• Inverter + 3m cable
• Dual (or triple ?) serial port (PCMCIA/USB)
• Handlers Licenses (GPS, Handphone, scanner)
• Extension Cable
• Case
Drivetest Tool Configuration
• Scanner, AMR & Data call test connection configuration of equipments
CS
Call
PS
call
Equipment check
Can Can’t
Whether measurement
Logging Start can be continued or
not.(In office)
Logging
NMS Person
Navigator Measurement Engineer Window person
RNC Engineer
Etc
Driver
Driver
Driver
Driver
Navigator MeasurementEngineer
Engineer
Navigator Measurement
Navigator Measurement Engineer
Navigator Measurement Engineer
Cluster Drivetest
• Report of Drive Test Status (for Window person)
Cluster Drivetest
Drive test team SHOULD BRING the following items :
Database Server
Card
Reader
NOKIA
ML8720B software CD-R
or
NOKIA
software Local Network
Processed Data Prob. area sheet Propagation model Other tuned model
Simulation branch
Problematic area Simulation result
w/o solution
Output Solution
Data Processing & Analysis
Plot of Measured Best
Processing Server RSCP
Distribution of RSCP and Ec/No of problem area Histogram and CDF of No. of SC
Data Processing & Analysis
• Required material for making Cluster / Area Tuning Report
Item Detail
RF Performance Analysis (note: Problem Area Map
each UE will have own CPICH Best Server CPICH RSCP
RSCP and Ec/No data for the Best Server CPICH Ec/No
analysis) Cumulative Distribution of RSCP
Cumulative Distribution of Ec/No
Distribution of RSCP and Ec/No
Voice AMR
% cdf
%pdf
65%
15.0 % 60% 50 50
55%
40 40
50%
45% 30 30
10.0 % 40%
35% 20 20
30%
25% 10 10
5.0 % 20%
15% 0 -32 0
-37
-42
-47
-52
-57
-62
-67
-72
-77
-82
-87
-92
-97
-102
-107
-112
-117
10%
5% RSCP in dBm
0.0 % 0%
First drive pdf(%) Second drive pdf(%)
-16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 Third Drive pdf (%)(if any) First drive cdf (%)
Second drive cdf (%) Third Drive cdf (%)(if any)
Data Processing & Analysis
• Distribution of RSCP and Ec/No
• Distribution of RSCP and Ec/No for Problem Area: Dotted distribution of
measured CPICH RSCP and Ec/No profiles for problem area.
• This plot is very useful to compare the network improvement achieved in
2nd drive test with that of 1st drive test.
A5-1 Distribution of Best Server RSCP and Ec/No (First Drive)
-30
-25
12.61% 14.51%
-20
-15
Ec/No (dB)
-10
-9.7
-5
71.55% 1.34%
0
-92
5
-30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 -130
RSCP (dBm)
Data Processing & Analysis : AMR call
• Call set-up failure ratio
• This includes RRC connection set-up failure and RAB connection set-up failure .
• The ratio is calculated according to the whole drive route as a reference purpose
only.It is not the indication of a cell-based performance.
MOS distribution
1%
2%
21% 12%
64%
9.00%
8.00%
7.00%
Freq of BLER
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
0.00% 0.25% 0.50% 0.75% 1.00% 1.25% 1.50% 1.75%
BLER
Data Processing & Analysis : AMR call
• Call drop point indicated on map
• Showing the problem events on the map for a clear indication and to
facilitate the problem analysis.
Data Processing & Analysis : PS call
• Throughput cumulative distribution
• For the PS call session test , throughput is used as an important index for the
session quality.And the distribution can be used to be a reference for the whole
drive test route.
Measured Throughput
14.00% 100%
95%
90%
12.00% 85%
80%
75%
10.00% 70%
65%
60%
8.00%
55%
50%
45%
6.00%
40%
35%
4.00% 30%
25%
20%
2.00% 15%
10%
5%
0.00% 0%
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900
Ec/No (dB)
Problem 1400 Making -25
-100 -35
-40
-120
1300 -45
1 037
-140 -50
1200
1300
1400
1600
Data No.
Prepare Report
according to defined
format
No
Visit customer
Agree? with Partner and
Submit the tuning
Yes report
Submit report to
Customer
Structure of Report Format
•Cluster ID, map, & site information in the cluster
•How does the cluster look like?
•Transmitting sites in neighbor cluster
Cluster •Total length of drive route
Information •Comments on anything special about environment
Introduction and measurement condition
of Cluster Measurement •Model name, serial no.
Area Tool Information •Measurement mode, option, and data proc. method
CS UDI
Description of
surroundings of
problem area
Cause of
problem area
Describing the
expected
Good and adverse
Effects when the
above
method is applied
Suggestion is made Explanation about the improvement when the solution is
here when the applied.
problems To verify the improvement, basically NetActPlanner
could not be solved simulation is
referred and sometimes theoretical calculation is also
needed.
Important Concerns
• How is the polygon is defined
• Executive summary should be there and match with the
adjective
• Problem could not be solved should be analyzed and
explained in the report
• Action required toward the failure , Additional drive test,
optimize during the Area tuning or re try with alternative
solution
• Does the result match with our expectation
• Clear relationship between the overall performance
improvement and the improvement in each problem area
should be established
• In the analysis, the appendix, figure used in analysis work
should indicated in the explanation part.
Change Request Form (1/2)
Get approval from customer on the proposed solution
Change Request Form (2/2)
•In AREA tuning, we recommend to change RAN parameter as well according
the cause of the problems