0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views29 pages

Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly: Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin

mono

Uploaded by

Sabeeh Mumtaz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views29 pages

Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly: Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin

mono

Uploaded by

Sabeeh Mumtaz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

Chapter 11

Monopolistic
Competition and
Oligopoly

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter Objectives
• Characteristics of monopolistic
competition
• Normal profit in the long run
• Characteristics of oligopoly
• Game theory
• The oligopolist’s kinked demand
curve
• Collusion among oligopolists
• The effects of advertising
11-2
Monopolistic Competition
• Large number of sellers
–Small market shares
–No collusion
–Independent action
• Differentiated Products
–Product attributes
–Service
–Location
–Brand names and packaging
–Some control over price 11-3
Monopolistic Competition
• Easy entry and exit
• Need for advertising
–Nonprice Competition
• Which industries?
–Degree of concentration
–Four-firm concentration ratio
–Herfindahl index
11-4
Monopolistic Competition
• Firm’s demand curve
–Highly elastic
• Short run profit or loss
–Produce where MR=MC
• Long run normal profit
–Entry and exit
• Inefficient
• Product variety
11-5
Monopolistic Competition
Short-Run Profits
ATC
MC
Price and Costs

P1
A1

Economic D1
Profit
MR = MC

MR

0 Q1
Quantity
11-6
Monopolistic Competition
Short-Run Losses
ATC
MC

A2
Price and Costs

P2

Loss
D2

MR = MC

MR

0 Q2
Quantity
11-7
Monopolistic Competition
Long-Run Equilibrium
MC
ATC
Price and Costs

P3= A3

D3

MR = MC

MR

0 Q3
Quantity
11-8
Monopolistic Competition
P=MC=Min ATC for pure competition (recall)
MC

ATC
Price and Costs

P3= A3
P4

Price is Lower
D3

MR = MC
Excess Capacity at
Minimum ATC MR
0 Q3 Q4
Quantity
Monopolistic competition is not efficient
11-9
Oligopoly
• A few large producers
• Homogeneous or
differentiated products
• Control over price
–Mutual interdependence
–Strategic behavior
• Entry barriers
• Mergers
11-10
Oligopoly
• Four-firm concentration ratio
–Needs to be more than 40%
–Half of U.S. manufacturing
• Localized markets
• Interindustry competition
• World trade
–Import Competition
• Herfindahl index
11-11
Game Theory

RareAir’s Price Strategy


• 2 competitors High Low
• 2 price

Uptown’s Price Strategy


strategies A B
$12 $15
• Each strategy
has a payoff High
matrix $12 $6
• Greatest
combined
C D
profit $6 $8
• Independent Low
actions $15 $8
stimulate a
response

11-12
Game Theory

RareAir’s Price Strategy


• Independently High Low
lowered prices

Uptown’s Price Strategy


in expectation A B
$12 $15
of greater profit
leads to the High
worst $12 $6
combined
outcome
C D
• Eventually low $6 $8
outcomes make Low
firms return to $15 $8
higher prices

11-13
Game Theory

• Mutual interdependence
–Pricing policy
• Collusion
–Enhances profit
• Incentive to cheat
• Prisoner’s dilemma

11-14
Three Oligopoly Models
• Kinked-demand curve
• Collusive pricing
• Price leadership
• Why three models?
–Diversity of oligopolies
–Complications of interdependence

11-15
Kinked-Demand Curve
• Noncollusive oligopoly
• Strategies
–Match price changes
–Ignore price changes
• Combined strategy
• Price inflexibility
• The kinked-demand curve
11-16
Kinked-Demand Curve
Competitor and rivals strategize versus each other
Consumers effectively have 2 partial demand curves
and each part has its own marginal revenue part

Rivals Ignore
Price Increase

Price and Costs


D2 MC1
e e
P0 P0
Price

MR2 f
f
D2 MC2

MR2
Rivals Match g
Price Decrease g
D1 D1
0 Q0 MR1 0 Q0 MR1
Quantity Quantity
Resulting in a kinked-demand curve
to the consumer – price and output
are optimized at the kink
11-17
Kinked-Demand Curve

• Criticisms of the model


–How does price get to P0
–Explains inflexibility, not price
–Prices are not that rigid
–Price wars

11-18
Cartels and Other Collusion
• Price and output
–Joint profit maximization

MC Effectively Sharing
The Monopoly Profit
Price and Costs

P0 ATC

A0

MR=MC
Economic
Profit MR D

Q0
Quantity
11-19
The OPEC Cartel
Daily oil production (barrels) , November 2008
Saudi Arabia 8,904,000
Iran 3,843,000
Kuwait 2,538,000
Venezuela 2,368,000
Iraq 2,297,000
Nigeria 2,183,000
UAE 2,117,000
Angola 1,804,000
Libya 1,737,000
Algeria 1,417,000
Qatar 848,000
Indonesia 843,000
Ecuador 530,000
Source: A. T. Kearney, Foreign Policy
11-20
Cartels and Other Collusion
• Covert collusion
–Tacit understandings
• Obstacles to collusion
–Demand and cost differences
–Number of firms
–Cheating
–Recession
–Potential entry
–Legal obstacles: antitrust law
11-21
Price Leadership Model

• Leadership tactics
• Infrequent price changes
• Communications
• Limit pricing
• Breakdowns in price leadership:
–Price wars

11-22
Advertising

• Prevalent in monopolistic
competition and oligopoly
• Capture market share
• Better than a price cut
• Information for consumers
• Manipulation

11-23
Oligopoly and Advertising
The Largest U.S. Advertisers, 2006
Advertising Spending
Company Millions of $
Proctor and Gamble $4898
AT&T 3345
General Motors 3296
Time Warner 3089
Verizon 2822
Ford Motor 2577
GlaxoSmithKline 2444
Walt Disney 2320
Johnson & Johnson 2291
Unilever 2098
Source: Advertising Age
11-24
Oligopoly and Advertising
World’s Top 10 Brand Names, 2007
Coca-Cola
Microsoft
IBM
General Electric
Nokia
Toyota
Intel
McDonald’s
Disney
Mercedes-Benz
Source: Interbrand
11-25
Oligopoly and Efficiency
• Not productively efficient
• Not allocatively efficient
• Tendency to share the monopoly
profit
• Qualifications
–Increased foreign competition
–Limit pricing
–Technological advance
11-26
Oligopoly in the Beer Industry
• From hundreds to a few firms
• Demand side changes
– Taste shifts to lighter beers
– Shift from tap to cans or bottles
• Supply side changes
– Technological change increased
minimum efficient scale
– National brands enjoy cost advantages
• Consolidation into oligopoly
11-27
Key Terms
• monopolistic • strategic behavior
competition • mutual interdependence
• product differentiation • interindustry
• nonprice competition competition
• four-firm concentration • import competition
ratio
• game theory
• Herfindahl index
• collusion
• excess capacity
• oligopoly • kinked-demand curve
• homogeneous • price war
oligopoly • cartel
• differentiated oligopoly • price leadership
11-28
Next Chapter Preview…

Technology, R&D,
And Efficiency

11-29

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy