Scribd
Upload
192 views5 pages

LTE Cell Split and 44 MIMO Solution

The document discusses two solutions: LTE cell split and 4x4 MIMO. For cell split, challenges include Mod3 planning, degrading 2G quality from additional splits, and needing extra feeders. A trial plan is outlined. For 4x4 MIMO, using existing antennas avoids extra equipment but performance relies on UE penetration, with some diplexer loss. Both solutions aim to improve network capacity and throughput.

Uploaded by

himu_050918
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
192 views5 pages

LTE Cell Split and 44 MIMO Solution

The document discusses two solutions: LTE cell split and 4x4 MIMO. For cell split, challenges include Mod3 planning, degrading 2G quality from additional splits, and needing extra feeders. A trial plan is outlined. For 4x4 MIMO, using existing antennas avoids extra equipment but performance relies on UE penetration, with some diplexer loss. Both solutions aim to improve network capacity and throughput.

Uploaded by

himu_050918
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

LTE CELL SPLIT AND 4×4 MIMO

SOLUTION
Solution Summary
Cell Split Solution 4×4 MIMO Solution
Consideration: Consideration:
• Existing 3G dual beam solution • Existing 3G Single beam antenna

Challenges: Challenges:
• Mod3 planning • PRB resource will not be increased
• 2G 1800 cell split (Quality will be degraded) • No 2G and 4G Cell Split required
• Additional feeder will be required for Huawei. • Low UE penetration

Trial Plan: We are planning LTE Cell split trial in CTG_L0470_1_3 (Nokia Overlay)

Design Survey of Cell Split KPI Trial Closure


finalize the site Installation Monitoring & & Final
and and WO at the site Optimization Report
Analysis issue

3rd December, 5th December, 10th December, 16th December, 19th December,
2019 2019 2019 2019 2019

Planned Ongoing Completed


PRESENTATION TITLE – CLIENT NAME 2
LTE Cell Split Solution (1. Using 3G
Dual Beam Antenna)
SB DB DB
Antenna Antenna Antenna

Diplexer Diplexer

Current Target
LTE LTE LTE

UMTS UMTS UMTS UMTS


GSM GSM GSM

2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 2T2R RRU 2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 1T2R RRU

 2G 1800 will also splitted. Quality will be degraded due to additional HO.
 One single beam antenna will be saved
 There will be 0.2 ~ 0.5 dB insertion loss in diplexer for both 2G, 3G and 4G.
3
LTE Cell Split Solution (2. Using
separate HW for GSM)
SB DB SB DB
Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna

Diplexer Diplexer

Current Target
LTE

UMTS UMTS UMTS UMTS


GSM LTE LTE
GSM

2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 1T2R/2T2R 2T2R RRU 2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 1T2R RRU
RRU

 One additional HW will be required. No additional Antenna Required


 There will be no power constrain for 2G and 4G
 There will be 0.2 ~ 0.5 dB insertion loss in diplexer for both 3G and 4G. 4
LTE 4×4 MIMO solution (1. Using
existing SB antenna of UMTS)
SB SB SB SB
Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna

Diplexer

Current Target
LTE LTE LTE

UMTS 4×4 MIMO UMTS


GSM GSM GSM

2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU 2T2R RRU 2T2R RRU 1T2R RRU

 No additional Antenna Required


 No 2G 1800 and 4G split required. 100% gain dependent on UE penetration.
 There will be 0.2 ~ 0.5 dB insertion loss in diplexer for 3G and one part of 4G. 5

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy