Scribd
Upload
593 views7 pages

Case Review Highlights - r7

This document provides information on case review procedures and the difference between case conferences and case reviews according to two directives: SOP 2012-001 outlines procedures for conducting case reviews of all Special Investigation Task Group cases and dismissed cases to identify investigative opportunities and ensure quality assurance. CMC 49/13 establishes a Case Review Committee to evaluate dismissed illegal drug, heinous and sensational crime cases determine errors to minimize failures. Key differences between the two directives are that SOP 2012-001 only requires review of SITG cases while CMC 49/13 reviews dismissed cases, and SOP 2012-001 reviews are done at the regional level while CMC 49/13 reviews are done at the police office or district level.

Uploaded by

Josman Mandal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
593 views7 pages

Case Review Highlights - r7

This document provides information on case review procedures and the difference between case conferences and case reviews according to two directives: SOP 2012-001 outlines procedures for conducting case reviews of all Special Investigation Task Group cases and dismissed cases to identify investigative opportunities and ensure quality assurance. CMC 49/13 establishes a Case Review Committee to evaluate dismissed illegal drug, heinous and sensational crime cases determine errors to minimize failures. Key differences between the two directives are that SOP 2012-001 only requires review of SITG cases while CMC 49/13 reviews dismissed cases, and SOP 2012-001 reviews are done at the regional level while CMC 49/13 reviews are done at the police office or district level.

Uploaded by

Josman Mandal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

INFORMATION BRIEFING

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION

Standard Operating Procedure Nr. 2012-001


June 28, 2012

PROCEDURES FOR THE CONDUCT OF CASE REVIEW

Command Memorandum Circular Nr. 49/13


October 2, 2013
CASE REVIEW COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE
DISMISSED CASES RELATED TO ILLEGAL DRUGS,
HEINOUS & SENSATIONAL CRIMES
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CASE CONFERENCE & CASE REVIEW
CASE CONFERENCE CASE REVIEW
• External to the PNP and conducted • Internal to the PNP and participants are limited
with those involved in the investigation to the investigation and review team
including other agencies, experts,
victims/family of victims, witnesses etc.
• Discuss the present development of • Identify both the positive and negative aspects
the case and actions to be undertaken of an investigation (Look on how the
investigation was conducted from the start up to
its present state )
• Develop investigative strategies • Ensure that all investigative opportunities are
exhausted (Evaluation of administrative and
operational aspect of investigation)
• Establish priorities • Act as a form of quality assurance in relation to
both the content and process of an investigation
(systems audit in order to reduce the likelihood
of both recurrent and typical errors)
• Determine sequence of investigative • Explore why systems fail and what can be done
procedures to minimize failure (What has been done? What
has not been done? What can still be done?)
WHAT ARE THE CASES SUBJECT FOR REVIEW?

• SITG handled cases (mandatory);

• Dismissed cases handled by SITG prior to the


formulation of this SOP (mandatory);

• Case review on other cases as directed by higher


headquarters; (optional)
WHEN TO CONDUCT CASE REVIEW ?
• (c) At the early stage of the investigation, usually around Day 7 of an ongoing
investigation; (optional)

• (d) For cases still under investigation after 28 days from the date of incident,
a case review must be undertaken immediately and expeditiously except
when a case review mentioned in the previous paragraph (8, par. c) was
already conducted; (mandatory)

• (e) For inquest cases, a case review must be undertaken immediately and
expeditiously after filing of the appropriate charges against the arrested
suspect; (mandatory)

• (f) For regular filing, a case review must be undertaken immediately and
expeditiously after the completion of the investigation of a particular case and
before referral to the prosecutor’s office except when a case review
mentioned in the previous paragraph (8, par. c & d) was already conducted.
(mandatory)
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SOP 2012-001 & CMC 49/13
SOP 2012-001 PROCEDURES FOR THE CMC # 49/13 CASE REVIEW COMMITTEE
CONDUCT OF CASE REVIEW TO EVALUATE DISMISSED CASES
DATED JUNE 28, 2012 RELATED TO ILLEGAL DRUGS , HEINOUS
& SENSATIONAL CRIMES DATED
OCTOBER 2, 2013
Procedure for Case Review Creation of Case Review Committee

Review All SITG Cases Only Review Dismissed Cases Only Related to
Illegal Drugs, Heinous and Sensational
Crimes
Review Team are from the Regional level Review Committee are from the
PPO/District/CPO level

Review Cases Under Investigation after Review Dismissed Cases from the
28-Days, after Inquest and before referral Prosecutors Office and Courts
at the Prosecutors Office
To exhaust/identify all investigative To determine errors, mistakes, lapses and
opportunities negligence by IOC, Prosecutors and
Judges
END OF PRESENTATION

www.didm.pnp.gov.ph

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy