Eeco 022317
Eeco 022317
ECONOMY
BASIC METHODS FOR
MAKING ECONOMY
STUDIES
Equation:
P15,000,000
= ---------------------186.688
= 80,350
P1,506,070
Rate of Return = ------------------- x 100
P12,000,000
P1,506,070
Rate of Return = ------------------ x 100
P12,000,000
P300,000 – P50,000
Depreciation = --------------------------
F/A, 8%, 7
P250,000
= ---------------- = P28,018
8.9228
Maintenance = 6,000
Total annual cost P34,018
Annual net savings P15,982
RATE OF RETURN METHOD
PROBLEM 2 cont’d:
Solution cont’d:
= 5.33% < 8%
= P822,575
3,600,000
(18,000)(150)
Fuel = ------------------- (120)(P7.95) = 190,000
RATE OF RETURN METHOD
PROBLEM #3 cont’d:
Solution cont’d:
Oil = (P3,200)(12) = P 38,400
Labour = (P21,000)(12) = 252,000
Taxes & insurance = (P8M)(0.05) = 400,000
Maintenance = 40,000
3,600,000
Tires = ------------------- (P32,000) = 42,667
(18,000)(150)
= P 74,160
Labour = (2)(48)(50)(P25.00) = 120,000
ANNUAL WORTH (AW) METHOD
PROBLEM #4 cont’d:
Solution cont’d:
Vacation pay = (2)(2)(48)(P25.00) = 4,800
Miscellaneous = (P8,500)(12) = 102,000
Owner’s salary = P25,000 (12) = 300,000
Total annual cost = P600,960
Net annual profit P119,040
P119,040
Rate of Return = -------------
P500,000 X 100 = 23.81 % > 20%
P500,000
Depreciation = --------------- = 74,160
F/A, 15%, 5
Excess = P 19,040
Note:
Since the excess of annual revenue over annual cost is
greater than zero, the investment is justified.
The man should invest.
PRESENT WORTH (PW) METHOD
The present worth (PW) method for economy studies is
based on the concept of equivalent worth of all cash
flows as of some base or beginning time called the
present.
The criterion for this method is that as long as the
present worth of the net cash flows is equal to or greater
than zero, the project is economically justified.
Because the annual revenues and costs do not have to be
the same, or even occur at regular intervals, the PW
method is flexible and theoretically can be used for any
type of economy study.
PRESENT WORTH (PW) METHOD
Itis used quite extensively in making economy studies in
the public works field where long-lived structures are
involved.
Disadvantages of this method:
1. It appears to assume that the present worth of all future
expenses is to be paid at one time.
2. The present worth usually is an amount of considerable
magnitude that may mislead the economy analyst.
Despite the difficulties that have been discussed, the
present worth method, is quite useful for situations in
which there are non-uniform cash flows.
FUTURE WORTH (FW) METHOD
The future worth (FW) method for economy studies is
exactly comparable to the present worth method except
that all cash inflows and outflows are compounded
forward to a reference point in time called the future.
If the future worth of the net cash flows is equal to, or
greater than zero, the project is justified economically.
PAYBACK (PAYOUT) PERIOD
METHOD
The payback period is commonly defined as the length
of time required to recover the first cost of an
investment from the net cash flow produced by that
investment for an interest rate of zero.
= P 29,609
Operation and maintenance = 81,000
Taxes & insurance = P270,000(0.04) = 10,800
Total annual cost P121,409
Net annual profit P 63,991
SAMPLE – ALL BASIC METHODS
PROBLEM 5 cont’d:
Solution cont’d:
By the rate of return method cont’d:
P63,991
Rate of return = -------------- x 100 = 23.70%
P270,000
P27,000
0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4 5
P270,000
Cash flow diagram of cash outflows
SAMPLE – ALL BASIC METHODS
PROBLEM 5 cont’d:
Solution cont’d:
By the present worth method cont’d:
Note:
In computing the total annual cost, depreciation was not
included because the method does not consider the time
value of money or interest. The use of the payback
period for making investment decisions should be
avoided as it may produce misleading results.
Assignment – February 28, 2017
For next meeting, submit in one sheet of bond paper. Write your name,
subject/section, date and write the problem statement. Please write legibly.
Non-compliance will mean non-acceptance of your assignment.
The corporate president of an automotive distributor in Nueva Ecija
availed of an early retirement package from her company and decided
to partner with a Japanese colleague to put up a mushroom growing
facility. There were two sites being considered:
One alternative is to build in her hometown of Cabanatuan City
where the plant would cost P10,000,000. Labour would cost
P720,000 yearly and an annual overhead cost of P240,000 is
anticipated. Power and water bills are estimated at about P150,000
per month based on the proposed equipment and lighting load. Taxes
and insurance would total 5% of the first cost of the plant. She lives
about 30 minutes away from the proposed site.
Continued next page >>>
Assignment – February 28, 2017
The other alternative is an industrial zone in Angeles City,
Pampanga where the plant would cost P8,000,000. Labour would
cost about 15% less than at Cabanatuan and overhead cost would be
slightly lower at P204,000 annually. Taxes and insurance are
anticipated to be around 2% of the first cost as the plant would
eventually be an economic zone in a year’s time. If this site is
chosen, she would need to rent a place to be there so she could stay
5 days a week. Rental and utility costs will be P12,000 per month
and gasoline and toll fees would amount to P10,000 per month.
Power and water will be slightly lower at P120,000 monthly as the
supply comes from a cooperative.
If capital must be recovered in 10 years and money is worth 14%,
which site should the enterprising retiree choose?
Data next page >>>
Assignment – February 28, 2017
DETAILS CABANATUAN PAMPANGA
1. Cost of plant P10,000,000 P8,000,000
15% less than
2. Labour cost/year P720,000
Cabanatuan
3. Overhead cost/year P240,000 P204,000
4. Taxes & insurance per
5% of first cost 2% of first cost
year
5. Power & water per
P1,800,000 P1,440,000
costs per year
6. House rental and
- P12,000
utilities cost per month
7. Gas and toll expenses
- P10,000
per month
8. Life, years 10 10
9. Cost of money 14% 14%