Current Transformers
Current Transformers
Current Transformers –
What?
Current transformer is an instrument transformer.
As the name suggests it is used with measuring
and protective equipment, in order to monitor the
current and to use it to activate protection
schemes as in relays or to simply indicate &
record as in measuring instruments.
Current Transformers – Why?
When the current to be measured is too
large to be handled by standard meters or
relays.
Acts as an isolation between primary and
secondary, so that instruments and relays can be
insulated for a lower voltage, instead of the much
higher system voltage.
Actual short circuit currents cannot be handled by
instruments or relays.
Reduction in the size of instruments/Relays
Instruments can be standardised, enabling overall
reduction in cost, as well as operational flexibility.
SELECTION PARAMETERS
TYPE
NOMINAL & HIGHEST SYSTEM VOLTAGE
RATED INSULATION LEVEL
FREQUENCY, IF DIFFERENT FROM 50 Hz
RATED TRANSFORMATION RATIO
RATED OUTPUT & CORRESPONDING
ACCURACY CLASS FOR MEASURING &
PROTECTIVE CTs
ACCURACY LIMIT FACTOR FOR PROTECTIVE
CTs
SELECTION PARAMETERS
INSTRUMENT SECURITY FACTOR (ISF) FOR
MEASURING CTs
RATED KNEE-POINT VOLTAGE & LIMITATIONS
OF EXCITING CURRENT FOR CLASS PS CTs
RATED CONTINUOUS & SHORT TIME
THERMAL CURRENT
RATED DYNAMIC CURRENT
LIMITING DIMENSIONS, IF ANY
SERVICE CONDITIONS
SELECTION PARAMETERS
TYPES
1) BAR TYPE
2) WOUND TYPE
3) RING TYPE
OR
1) DRY TYPE
2) LIQUID IMMERSED
3) HERMETICALLY SEALED
SELECTION PARAMETERS
TYPES
1) MEASURING
2) PROTECTIVE
3) DUAL PURPOSE
4) PROTECTIVE FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE
(CLASS PS)
SELECTION PARAMETERS
NOMINAL & HIGHEST SYSTEM
VOLTAGE
• NOMINAL SYSTEM VOLTAGE : LINE-TO-LINE
VOLTAGE (RMS) BY WHICH SYSTEM IS
DESIGNATED
• HIGHEST SYSTEM VOLTAGE : HIGHEST LINE-TO-
LINE VOLTAGE (RMS) WHICH CAN BE
SUSTAINED UNDER NORMAL OPERATING
CONDITIONS AT ANY TIME & AT ANY POINT OF
THE INSTALLATION (EXCLUDES TEMPORARY
VOLTAGE VARIATIONS DUE TO FAULTS &
SUDDEN DISCONNECTION OF LARGE LOADS)
SELECTION PARAMETERS
RATED INSULATION LEVEL
• IT IS THAT COMBINATION OF VOLTAGE VALUES (POWER
FREQUENCY & LIGHTNING IMPULSE) WHICH
CHARACTERISES THE INSULATION OF A C.T. WITH
REGARD TO ITS CAPABILITIY TO WITHSTAND DIELECTRIC
STRESSES
• RATED INSULATION LEVELS FOR NOMINAL SYSTEM
VOLTAGE UP TO O.60KV(RMS) :
0.60 0.66 3
SELECTION PARAMETERS
RATED INSULATION LEVEL
NOMINAL HIGHEST POWER FREQ. LIGHTNING
SYSTEM SYSTEM WITHSTAND IMPULSE
VOLTAGE VOLTAGE VOLTAGE WITHSTAND
(kV rms) (kV rms) (kV rms) VOLTAGE (kV peak)
3.3 3.6 10 40
6.6 7.2 20 60
11 12 28 75
22 24 50 125
33 36 70 170
IP (RATED)
RATED TRANSFORMATION RATIO, KN = ---------------
IS (RATED)
IP (ACTUAL)
ACTUAL TRANSFORMATION RATIO = ------------------
IS (ACTUAL)
RATED PRIMARY & SECONDARY
CURRENT
But, it must also be noted that for the same ratio, accuracy
class and burden, the cost of an 1A CT will be higher,as
also the open circuit volts. This is because, for 1A, the
resistance of the CT Secondary has to be higher, so finer
gauge wire is used for the secondary winding. And, with a
finer wire and lesser secondary current, the number of
turns in the secondary is increased, to achieve the
Ampere-Turns balance. As the number of turns is
Increased, the open circuit volts also increases.
Current Transformer
– Types based on application
Based on application, current
transformers are broadly classified
as Measuring Current Transformers
and Protective Current transformers.
The basic difference is in their
functional requirements.
Current Transformer
– Types based on application
A measuring current transformer, for example, has to
remain accurate only over its measuring range, may be,
a few percentage more. If it maintains its accuracy for
currents many times its rated current, such as fault
currents, then the measuring instruments connected to
them, may have to be designed to withstand this high
current, for the duration of the co-coordinated fault
clearing time. This will make the instruments bulky as
also costly. So, a measuring CT may well have to
saturate pretty quickly.
Current Transformer
– Types based on application
On the other hand, the protective CT must maintain its
accuracy, even for currents much beyond its rating, for
then only the protective devices can sense the fault and
issue trip commands to isolate the faulty feeder. The
level up to which it has to maintain its accuracy will be
determined by many system parameters, such as the
fault current, fault duration, short-time withstand levels
of equipment downstream & upstream, etc.
Measuring Current Transformers
– Class of Accuracy
ACCURACY CLASS IS THE
DESIGNATION ASSIGNED TO THE C.T.,
THE ERRORS OF WHICH REMAIN
WITHIN SPECIFIED LIMITS
PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE
ACCURACY RATIO ERROR AT COMPOSITE
CLASS RATED PRIMARY ERROR AT RATED
CURRENT PRIMARY CURRENT
5P 1.0 5.0
10P 3.0 10.0
15P 5.0 15.0
Protection Current Transformers
As can be seen from above, the r.m.s. ratio error of
a 5P CT is the same as that of a Class 1.0
Measurement CT. But, since the protective system
has to respond to instantaneous changes too, what
is of more importance is the Composite Error or
the error for any given instantaneous value of
current. For a 5P CT this is +/- 5%.
100 1 T
COMPOSITE ERROR = I
P T 0 (KN.is - ip)2 dt
-
DETERMINATION OF RATED
OUTPUT/BURDEN
Sn as close as possible to,
but not less than:
SL + SM (OR SP)
WHERE,
Sn = RATED VA BURDEN OF THE C.T.
SL = VA BURDEN DUE TO CONNECTING WIRES
(POWER LOSSES IN WIRES) = IS2 RL
SM OR SP = VA BURDEN (POWER CONSUMPTION)
OF MEASURING INSTRUMENT OR
PROTECTIVE INSTRUMENT RESPECTIVELY
BURDEN DUE TO CONNECTING
WIRES
SL = (IS)2(Rl x L)
OR
L
SL = (IS)
2
A
WHERE, Rl = RESISTANCE PER UNIT LENGTH OF WIRE
L = LENGTH OF THE WIRE = 2(ONE WAY LENGTH)
= RESISTIVITY OF THE MATERIAL OF THE WIRE
A = C/S AREA OF THE WIRE, &
IS = SECONDARY CURRENT OF C.T.
BURDEN DUE TO CONNECTING
WIRES
L
SL = (IS) 2
A
RESISTIVITY OF ROUND WIRE OF COPPER = 0.017213 -mm2/m
= 1/58 -mm2/m
2.5 mm2 0.35 0.69 1.02 1.37 1.71 2.05 2.40 2.74
TYPICAL VA BURDEN OF METERING
INSTRUMENTS
(SOURCE: RISHABH METERS)
INSTRUMENT SM IN VA
RELAY SP IN VA
1) ELECTROMECHANICAL
PHASE OVERCURRENT &
EARTH FAULT 3.0 VA
2) ELECTROMECHANICAL
EXTREMELY INVERSE IDMT OVER
CURRENT & E/F 3.5 VA
VA BURDEN OF
PROTECTIVE RELAYS
IP 2
SP = Sr
Ir
15 Ohms (15VA) 10
40 Ohms (40VA) 5
Class PS CTs
Normally protection CTs like 5P, 10P or 15P are
used in almost all protection schemes. But, for
Unit Protection Schemes like Differential, REF,
etc., these CTs are not preferred. Why?
In unit protection schemes, it is very very
important that the scheme operates only and only
for the internal faults and must remain stable for
all external faults. That is, when the unit
protection scheme operates, one can be pretty
sure that something is wrong within the protected
equipment.
Class PS CTs
Also, unit protection schemes are employed for
very critical equipment in the network. As such,
whenever any unit protection scheme operates, all
hell breaks loose. And one cannot put back the
equipment into service, without conducting an
array of tests and ensuring that the equipment is fit
to be put back to service. But, this will take time
and effort. And until such time, the plant will be
shut down. So, it is all the more imperative that the
unit protection scheme operates only for genuine
internal faults and NOT for any external faults.
Class PS CTs
Now, if we employ conventional protection class
CTs like 5P or 10P for this application, let us see
what happens. Lets us assume that one has
selected 5P10 Class CTs for a Unit Protection
Scheme. Let us say, the relay setting is 10%; this
means that any differential current of 10% will
operate the relay. Now, a 5P10 CT means that the
CT will maintain its accuracy at least up to 10
times the rated current. This means that the CT
will not saturate at least up to 10 times the rated
current.
Class PS CTs
This also means that the CT may saturate
anywhere after 10 times its rated current. This
level will differ for different CTs. Among the
same two 5P10 Class CTs, one may saturate at 12
times and the other may saturate at 13.5 times. In
such a condition, during a through fault condition,
there will be differential current and the relay will
operate for external faults too. Even when both
CTs are identically manufactured, the deterioration
of its core properties over time may differ and yet
they may behave differently over time.
Class PS CTs
Also, even when the CTs may be supplying to
unit protection scheme of the same equipment,
it is highly impossible that all the CTs of the
scheme will be located at the same place. The
incoming side CTs or the outgoing side CTs
may have to be located far away from the
relay location, thereby incurring extended lead
lengths, thus imposing additional burden on
the CTs. This increased burden will also shift
the saturation level, as we have already seen.
Class PS CTs
Thus again, during a through fault condition,
there will be differential current and the relay will
operate for external faults too.
There are many other similar factors contributing
to the maloperation of unit protection schemes,
when conventional protection class CTs are
employed. Thus, it has called for a special class
of CTs for such applications. That Special Class
is called Class PS.
Class PS CTs
Here, instead of generalising on the minimum
saturation level of the CT, the users have to
exactly specify the saturation level of the CT.
This is called the Knee Point Voltage (V KP), as it
appears as a human-knee in the CT Magnetisation
Characteristics. This specification will take into
account the maximum through fault current, the
actual lead burden, the relay burden & the
resistance of the CT secondary winding, as also a
factor of safety.
Class PS CTs – VKP Formula
The minimum Knee Point Voltage for a given PS Class
CT is calculated by:
VKP = K * I(f)s (RCT + RB), Where,
If(s) = Maximum thro fault current as reflected at the CT
secondary terminals ( = If(P) /CT Ratio)
RCT = CT Secondary Winding Resistance
RB = Connected Burden, includes the relay burden &
the burden of the connecting leads
K = Factor of Safety, normally taken as 2
VKP = Knee Point Voltage of the CT
Class PS CTs – VKP Formula
As can be seen from the above formula, here the
customer is specifying the level of saturation, duly taking
into account the maximum possible fault current in his
network, the actual burden connected to the CT, etc. If
the factor of safety is taken as two, this means that at
least up to two times the maximum possible fault current
the CTs will not saturate. Which also means that at the
maximum possible fault current, both the incoming and
outgoing side CT characteristics would exactly coincide.
That is, their secondary currents would match exactly
and the scheme would not operate for any external fault.
Point to note is that do not assume RCT; leave it to the CT
manufacturer.
SELECTION PARAMETER
RATED KNEE POINT VOLTAGE
50 % I k
VOLTAGE Volts
I ek
SECONDARY EXCITATION CURRENT mA
Class PS CT Selection – Case Study
System Data: 132/33kV, 50MVA Transformer, 5% Z
HT Amps. = 218.7; LT Amps. = 874.8A;
HT CT Ratio = 250/1A; LT CT Ratio = 1000/1A;
= 17, 496A
Knee Point Voltage of 33kV Side CT Shall be
VKP = 2 x (17, 496/1000) (RCT + 2 RL)
= 35 (RCT + 2 RL)
Class PS CT Selection – Case Study
As per a leading manufacturer of CTs, the secondary
winding resistance of a 1000/1A CT is 6.08 Ohms.
Consider about 100m of 2.5 sq.mm Copper Cable as
the connecting lead between the CT and the Relay. The
1 way lead resistance will be [(0.017213 x 100)/2.5] =
0.69 Ohms;
Now, VKP = 35 (6.08 + 1.38 + 0.33) = 272.65V
So, the knee point voltage of the 33kV Side CT shall
be greater than about 275V.
Similar calculations shall be made for the 132kV Side
CT too.
SELECTION PARAMETER
RATED CONTINUOUS THERMAL
CURRENT
IT IS THAT VALUE OF CURRENT WHICH CAN
BE PERMITTED TO FLOW CONTINUOUSLY IN
THE PRIMARY WINDING, THE SECONDARY
WINDINGS BEING CONNECTED TO THE RATED
BURDENS, WITHOUT THE TEMPERATURE RISE
EXCEEDING THE SPECIFIED LIMITS