Virtueethics
Virtueethics
Presentors
Pura, Michelle M.
Menes, Hanna F.
Nato, Yra Joiz D.
Porteros, Reynaldo Jr.
Marmol, Irish
VIRTUE ETHICS AS A MORAL
PHILOSOPHY
Over time, these virtues become so ingrained in us that they guide our
actions, emotions, and thoughts, leading us towards moral goodness
and away from moral evil.
AQUINAS’ CARDINAL AND
THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
Four (4) Cardinal Virtues:
2. Justice - this virtue is about giving others their due. It involves respect
for rights and fulfilling obligations or duties. This could be in relation to
individuals, such as repaying a debt, or towards society, such as
contributing to the common good.
AQUINAS’ CARDINAL AND
THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
1. Faith – it involves believing in God and trusting in his promises. It is a virtue that
provides a foundation for the other virtues and guides one’s relationship with the
divine.
2. Hope – It is the virtue of confident expectation and desire for eternal life. It involves
trusting in God’s providence and relying on His grace.
Thomas Aquinas' understanding of law is deeply intertwined with his philosophical and theological views.
1. Eternal Law: Aquinas believed that God, as the creator and ruler of the
universe, has a rational and purposeful plan for all of creation. This plan is
what Aquinas referred to as the Eternal Law. It's the ultimate source from
which all other laws derive their authority and power.
AQUINAS’ CARDINAL AND
THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
Thomas Aquinas' understanding of law is deeply intertwined with his philosophical and theological views.
Thomas Aquinas' understanding of law is deeply intertwined with his philosophical and theological views.
3. Human Law: These are the specific laws that human societies establish
based on their understanding of Natural Law. For Aquinas, a just human law
must be a specific application of the Natural Law, promoting the common
good and not violating the fundamental principles of morality.
AQUINAS’ CARDINAL AND
THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES
Thomas Aquinas' understanding of law is deeply intertwined with his philosophical and theological views.
4. Divine Law: Finally, Aquinas believed that God has specifically revealed
certain laws to humanity through religious revelation (like the Ten
Commandments in Christianity). This is the Divine Law. It serves to guide
humans towards their ultimate end (union with God), correct the fallibility of
human law, and reveal truths that are beyond human reason.
Natural Law, according to Aquinas,
is the participation of the rational
creature in the eternal law. It's the
law that's written in our hearts, so to Human Law, on the other hand, is
speak, and it's discoverable through the law that we create, such as the
reason. It includes basic moral statutes in our legal system. For
principles that are self-evident, like Aquinas, good human laws are
"do good and avoid evil," and derived from natural law. They apply
principles that are derived from the general principles of natural law
these, such as the duty to preserve to specific situations in society.
life.
So, the relationship between the two is that
Human Law is a specification of Natural
Law. Human Law takes the broad
THE principles of Natural Law and applies them
to particular circumstances to guide human
RELATIONSHIP behavior in society.
BETWEEN However, Aquinas also believed that if a
NATURAL AND human law contradicts natural law, it's not
truly a law but a corruption of law. This is
HUMAN LAW because it would be contrary to the
common good, which is the ultimate end
of law according to Aquinas.
What
happens
when a
human law
contradicts
natural law
according
to Aquinas?
According to Thomas Aquinas, when a human law
contradicts the natural law, it is no longer a true law
but becomes a "perversion of law". Aquinas
believed that the purpose of law is to guide human
actions towards the common good. Natural law,
which is universal and accessible through reason,
provides the fundamental principles for this
guidance. Human law, derived from natural law,
provides specific applications of these principles in
society. However, if a human law contradicts
natural law, it goes against the common good and
the inherent moral order.
Therefore, Aquinas considered such a law
to be unjust and a corruption of law. He
even went so far as to suggest that
citizens have a moral duty to disobey
such unjust laws. This is because these
laws violate the principles of justice and
morality as outlined in the natural law.
So, in Aquinas' view, an unjust law - one
that contradicts the natural law - lacks
legal binding force and should not be
followed.
In what
instances
would
Aquinas
consider a
human law
to be a
"perversion
of law"?
Aquinas would consider a human law to be a "perversion
of law" when it contradicts the principles of natural law.
This could occur in several instances: