0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views37 pages

Edited CT Pres GRP 3

Uploaded by

sanyengere
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views37 pages

Edited CT Pres GRP 3

Uploaded by

sanyengere
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

GROUP 3

TOPIC: IMAGE QUALITY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

COURAGE MLAMBO
BLESSED CHARI
TINAISHE TIMIRE
Image quality

 refers to the clarity, sharpness, and level of detail present in the images produced
by the CT scanner.
 CT scans use X-ray technology and multiple cross-sectional image slices to create
detailed images of the body's internal structures.
 Many factors affect the quality of the image produced.
 Some of these variables can be regulated by the operator.
.
.
Factors that the operator can control

 milliampere (mA) level


 scan time
 slice thickness
 field of view
 reconstruction algorithm
 kilovolt-peak (kVp)
Reconstruction algorithm

 Depending on the manufacturer, this feature may be called algorithm, convolution


filter, or simply filter.
 By choosing a specifi c algorithm, the operator selects how the data are fi ltered
in the reconstruction process.
 Changing the reconstruction algorithm will change the way the raw data are
manipulated to reconstruct the image.
slice thickness

 In general, thinner slices produce sharper images


 to create an image the system must flatten the scan thickness into two dimensions
 The thicker the slice, the more flattening is necessary.
Factors affecting image quality in ct

 Spatial resolution
 Contrast resolution
 Noise
 Artifacts
 Dose optimization
 Post-processing and visualization
Noise

 Noise in computed tomography is an unwanted change in pixel values in an


otherwise homogeneous image.
 Often noise is defined loosely as the grainy appearance on cross-sectional
imaging; more often than not, this is quantum mottle.
 Noise in CT is measured via the signal to noise ratio (SNR).comparing the level
of desired signal (photons) to the level of background noise (pixels deviating from
normal).
 The higher the ratio, the less noise is present in the image.
 Noise in a cross-sectional image will equal a decrease in the picture quality and
inadvertently will hinder the contrast resolution.
Factors affecting noise

 mAs
 Slice thickness
 Patient size
 Reconstruction algorithm
 Noise metrics
 Magnitude
 Texture
 Non-uniformity
.
Spatial resolution

 refers to the ability of the CT scanner to differentiate small structures within an


image.
 Higher spatial resolution means better detail and sharpness in the image.
 It depends on factors like the size of the X-ray beam, the number of detectors, and
the pitch of the scanner
.
Contrast resolution

 refers to the ability of the CT scanner to differentiate between tissues with similar
densities.
 It affects the ability to distinguish between different types of tissues, tumors, or
abnormalities.
 Better contrast resolution allows for more accurate diagnosis.
 It is influenced by factors like X-ray tube voltage, tube current, and image
reconstruction algorithms.
.
.
Artifacts

 These are undesirable features in the CT image that do not represent the true
anatomy.
 They can occur due to various reasons like metal implants, patient motion, beam
hardening, or image reconstruction errors.
 Artifacts can degrade image quality and lead to misinterpretation.
 Techniques like metal artifact reduction algorithms and motion correction can
help minimize artifacts and improve image quality.
Dose optimization

 CT scans involve exposure to ionizing radiation.


 It is important to balance image quality with radiation dose to ensure patient
safety.
 Advancements in CT technology have led to dose reduction strategies like
automatic exposure control, iterative reconstruction algorithms, and low-dose
protocols.
 These techniques aim to maintain high image quality while minimizing radiation
exposure.
Post-processing and visualization

 A number of factors can degrade the post-processed images, reducing their


usefulness in diagnosis.

 Advanced post-processing techniques like multi-planar reconstruction, maximum


intensity projection, or volume rendering can enhance the visualization of specific
structures or abnormalities.
 In addition, the radiologist interpreting these images must understand the type of
images being viewed, and the various limitations and strengths of different
rendering and segmentation techniques.
.
.
Quality Assurance (QA)
 optimization of image quality and dose to the patient
 plays a vital role in ensuring safe and effective examinations
 makes sure a CT system is producing the best possible image quality using the minimal radiation
dose to the patient
 provides methods for the systematic monitoring of the system’s performance so problems can be
identified and corrected
QA Program Concepts

 the tests that make up a program must be performed on a regular basis


 The results from all the tests must be recorded using a constant format
 documentation should state whether the tested parameter is within specified
guidelines
QA Phantoms

 Many aspects of image quality can be evaluated using phantoms


 Most phantoms are designed with many components so that a single phantom can
be used to examine a broad range of scanner parameters
CT Number Uniformity
 it relates to the fact that a CT number of each pixel in the image of an homogeneous object
should be the same over various regions
 the difference in the CT number between a peripheral and a central region of an homogeneous
test object should be < ± 4 HU
 CT number uniformity can be assessed at the same time as measuring noise, by placing four
additional ROI (N, E, S and W) at positions near the edge of the image of a uniform phantom
 Mean CT number is then noted for these four regions, as well as the central one
 The deviation from the central value should be calculated and the tolerance should be < ± 4 HU
 test is performed on a weekly basis
Axial image of an homogenous phantom
CT Number Linearity
 It concerns the linear relationship between the calculated CT number and the linear attenuation
coefficient of each element of the object
 Deviations from linearity should be < ± 4 HU
 CT number linearity is assessed using a phantom containing inserts of a number of different
materials (materials should cover a wide range of CT numbers)
 test is performed semi-annually
Noise
 noise is generally assessed using cylindrical phantoms, which are either filled with water or made
of a tissue equivalent material
 Noise = 1/√dose
 once an axial image of the phantom has been acquired, noise is obtained from the standard
deviation in CT number in a region of interest (ROI) placed centrally within the image
 noise figures given in manufacturers’ specifications are quoted for a specific phantom (e.g.
manufacturer’s QA phantom) and for specified scan parameters
 dose for axial scans can be measured by taping an ion chamber to the surface of the phantom
 the tolerance of the measured value from the specified value should be ± 15%
 test is done on a weekly basis
Spatial Resolution Test (High Contr)
 can be evaluated using a line pairs phantom which contains groups of lead strips having different
strip width and spacing
 the resolution is given as the number of visible line pairs (lead strip and space) per millimeter
 the spatial resolution measured should be equal to the manufacturer’s specifications for that
scanner at minimum ±0.5 lp/cm discrepancy
 measurement using line pairs is considered subjective
 test is performed monthly
Line pairs phantom
Contrast Resolution Test (Low Contr)

 to evaluate contrast resolution a phantom is used that contains objects of varying


sizes.
 these objects have only a small difference in density from their background.
 the phantoms are scanned at different mAs settings
 an observer is then required to detect objects as distinct
 test is performed on a monthly basis
Radiation Dose
 to monitor the amount of radiation to which patients are exposed
 measurements are made using standard head and body CT dose index (CTDI)
phantoms and a pencil ionization chamber.
 the CTDI is a measure of dose from a single rotation of the gantry
 measurements are made in the centre of the phantom and in several locations on
the periphery and averaged in order to derive a weighted value (CTDIw)
 the CTDI values produced are compared to reference dose values
 tolerance should be ± 20 % of the quoted value
Laser Light Accuracy Test

 test for laser lights located both inside and outside the gantry
 a specific phantom designed for the purpose and provided by the scanner
manufacturer is used
 The light field should coincide with the radiation field to within 2 mm.
 This test is usually performed semiannually.
Slice Thickness Accuracy
 measurements of selected slice thickness are determined using a phantom that
includes a ramp, spiral, or step-wedge
 the phantom contains objects with known measurements and provides a standard
to compare with the scanner
 for a slice thickness of 5 mm or greater, the slice thickness should not vary more
than ±1 mm from the intended slice
 for a slice thickness of less than 5 mm, the slice thickness should not vary more
than ±0.5 mm
 this test is usually performed semiannually
References

 1. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB.).


 2. Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Williams A, Greenlee RT, Weinmann S, Solberg
LI.2013.]
 3. Guttikonda R, Herts BR, Dong F, Baker ME, Fenner KB, Pohlman B 2012
 4. Khong P, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K2011]
 5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. Automatic exposure control in.2011.
[PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 6. Söderberg M, Gunnarsson . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
.

 7. Ha S, Jung S, Chang H-J, Park E-A, Shim H.. Prog Med Phys. 2015.
[CrossRef] [Google Scholar] ;2
 8. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, et al.
Dual-energy multidetector [Google Scholar]
 9. Mileto A, Barina A, Marin D, Stinnett SS, Roy Choudhury K, Wilson JM, et al.
[Google Scholar]
 10. Beister M, Kolditz D, Kalender WA.] [Google Scholar]
 11. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, Licato PE, Do S, Pien HH, et al. Abdominal CT:
comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and Scholar

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy