Bar and Bench Rlt.
Bar and Bench Rlt.
Bijaya K Bhattarai
Roll No.12
The everlasting relation
So the term `Bench’ refers to the Judges and the `Bar’ refers to the
Advocates.
Bar-Bench relation means the cardial relation between the judges and
the Advocates.
Contd.
• If the independent judiciary is the pillar of democracy, the Bar is the
foundation of the independent Judiciary.
4. For getting favourable order they should not give pressure or influence
the judges.
• Unfortunately, it has many seen and unseen effects that the Political
division has divided Bar brutally and formation of Lawyers’
Association has defeated the purpose of Nepal Bar Association role in
Justice administration in Nepal.
Case laws defining relationship between
Bar and Bench
• Supreme Court of India, P.D. Gupta vs Ram Murti & AIR on 8 July,
1997
An advocate should be fair not only towards his client but also towards the court as
well as towards the opposite party of the case. The process of administration of
justice has to be kept clean and uncorrupted. The Administration of justice not only
concerns the Bench, it concerns both the Bench and the Bar. The principal ground
for recruiting judges is the Bar, both the judges and the advocates complement
each other. The main duty of an Advocate is to present the case in court by
informing the court about the law and the facts of the case and to help the court in
arising at the conclusion of the case. For good administration of justice, an advocate
shall possess good advocacy skills, so that he can put forward the case in court
properly and not get interrupted by the judge unless the interruption is necessary.
• THE HIGH COURT OF LAHORE Decided On: 14.09.1942, Mahant
Hakumat Rai Vs. Emperor
An advocate can claim their right to be heard by the court before which
they are practicing while performing their duty they shall be fearless
and independent, and also they have the right to protest against any
irregular procedure done by any judge. He would be perfectly right in
asking for getting a proper hearing and objecting to any interruption
made by the judge in order to disturb him while he is arguing the case
in court and performing his duty towards the client. However, the
presence of professional etiquette coupled with the recognition by the
judiciary will help in reducing the conflicts between the Bar and Bench.
Conclusion:
• An independent and fearless Bar is not preferred over an independent
Bench, similarly, an independent Bench is also not preferred over an
independent and fearless Bar, neither of them is superior over the other,
both are essential for a free society.
• The freedom given to the Bar requires an independent judiciary, through
which if necessary the freedom that is given to the Bar, be vindicated.
• A well-behaved, responsible, cultured, and a leaned Bar is one of the
potent means for assuring judges their independence. Finally, the keystone
for the smooth functioning of the courts in the general interest of the
society is the reciprocal adjustment conducted by the Bar and the Bench.
At last not at least,
• J.S Jadhav V. Mustafa Mohamad Yusuf, AIR 1993
Advocacy is not a craft but a calling; a profession wherein devotion to
duty constitutes the hallmark. Sincerity of performance and the
earnestness of endeavor are the two wings that will bare aloft the
advocate to the tower of success. Given these virtues other
qualifications will follow of their own account. This is the reason why
the legal profession is regarded as a noble one.
References:
• Role of bench and bar by Justice MIRZA HAMEEDULLAH BEG
• Bar and bench relation article by Justice CHINWEIYIZOBA JCA
• https://
www.srdlawnotes.com/2017/09/concept-and-role-of-bar-bench-relati
on.html
• https://
www.slideshare.net/valechakaran/relationship-between-bar-and-benc
h
• Code of conduct of Legal Practitioners 2051(1994)
• THE HIGH COURT OF LAHORE Decided On: 14.09.1942, Mahant
Hakumat Rai Vs. Emperor
• Supreme Court of India, P.D. Gupta vs Ram Murti & Anr on 8 July, 1997