Software Engineering Module22
Software Engineering Module22
CHAPTER 5
- What is it?
-Who does it?
-Why is it important?
-What are the steps?
-What is the work product?
-How do I ensure that I’ve done it right?
Understanding Requirements Engineering
3
• Many software developers argue that
– Building software is so compelling that we want to jump right in (before
having a clear understanding of what is needed)
– Things will become clear as we build the software
– Project stakeholders will be able to better understand what they need only
after examining early iterations of the software
– Things change so rapidly that requirements engineering is a waste of time
– The bottom line is producing a working program and that all else is
secondary
• All of these arguments contain some truth, especially for small
projects that take less than one month to complete
• However, as software grows in size and complexity, these arguments
begin to break down and can lead to a failed software project
4
A Solution: Requirements Engineering
•Begins during the communication activity and continues into the modeling
activity
•Builds a bridge from the system requirements into software design and
construction
•Allows the requirements engineer to examine
– the context of the software work to be performed
– the specific needs that design and construction must address
– the priorities that guide the order in which work is to be completed
– the information, function, and behavior that will have a profound impact on the
resultant design
5
Requirements Engineering Tasks
• Seven distinct tasks
– Inception
– Elicitation
– Elaboration
– Negotiation
– Specification
– Validation
– Requirements Management
• Some of these tasks may occur in parallel and all are adapted to the
needs of the project
• All strive to define what the customer wants
• All serve to establish a solid foundation for the design and
construction of the software
6
Example Project: Campus
Information Access Kiosk
• Both podium-high and desk-high terminals located throughout the
campus in all classroom buildings, admin buildings, labs, and
dormitories
• Hand/Palm-login and logout (seamlessly)
• Voice input
• Optional audio/visual or just visual output
• Immediate access to all campus information plus
– E-mail
– Cell phone voice messaging
7
5.2 Establishing the Ground Work -
Inception Task
• During inception, the requirements engineer asks a set of questions to
establish…
– A basic understanding of the problem
– The people who want a solution
– The nature of the solution that is desired
– The effectiveness of preliminary communication and collaboration between the
customer and the developer
• Through these questions, the requirements engineer needs to…
– Identify the stakeholders
– Recognize multiple viewpoints
– Work toward collaboration
– Asking the First Questions
8
The First Set of Questions
These questions focus on the customer, other stakeholders, the overall
goals, and the benefits
9
The Next Set of Questions
These questions enable the requirements engineer to gain a better
understanding of the problem and allow the customer to voice his or
her perceptions about a solution
10
The Final Set of Questions
These questions focus on the effectiveness of the
communication activity itself
• Are you the right person to answer these questions? Are your answers
"official"?
• Are my questions relevant to the problem that you have?
• Am I asking too many questions?
• Can anyone else provide additional information?
• Should I be asking you anything else?
11
5.3 Eliciting Requirements
• Eliciting requirements is difficult because of
– Problems of scope in identifying the boundaries of the system or
specifying too much technical detail rather than overall system objectives
– Problems of understanding what is wanted, what the problem domain is,
and what the computing environment can handle (Information that is
believed to be "obvious" is often omitted)
– Problems of volatility because the requirements change over time
• Elicitation may be accomplished through activities
– Collaborative requirements gathering
– Quality function deployment
– Usage Scenarios
– Elicitation Work Products
12
5.3.1Basic Guidelines of Collaborative
Requirements Gathering
• Meetings are conducted and attended by both software engineers,
customers, and other interested stakeholders
• Rules for preparation and participation are established
• An agenda is suggested that is formal enough to cover all important
points but informal enough to encourage the free flow of ideas
• A "facilitator" (customer, developer, or outsider) controls the meeting
• A "definition mechanism" is used such as work sheets, flip charts, wall
stickers, electronic bulletin board, chat room, or some other virtual
forum
• The goal is to identify the problem, propose elements of the solution,
negotiate different approaches, and specify a preliminary set of
solution requirements
13
14
5.3.2 Quality Function Deployment
• This is a technique that translates the needs of the customer into
technical requirements for software
• It emphasizes an understanding of what is valuable to the customer
and then deploys these values throughout the engineering process
through functions, information, and tasks
• It identifies three types of requirements
– Normal requirements: These requirements are the objectives and goals
stated for a product or system during meetings with the customer
– Expected requirements: These requirements are implicit to the product or
system and may be so fundamental that the customer does not explicitly
state them
– Exciting requirements: These requirements are for features that go beyond
the customer's expectations and prove to be very satisfying when present
15
5.3.4 Elicitation Work Products
The work products will vary depending on the system, but should
include one or more of the following items
16
5.4 Developing Use Cases -
Elaboration Task
• During elaboration, the software engineer takes the information
obtained during inception and elicitation and begins to expand and
refine it
• Elaboration focuses on developing a refined technical model of
software functions, features, and constraints
• It is an analysis modeling task
– Use cases are developed
– Domain classes are identified along with their attributes and relationships
– State machine diagrams are used to capture the life on an object
• The end result is an analysis model that defines the functional,
informational, and behavioral domains of the problem
17
5.4 Developing Use Cases
• Step One – Define the set of actors that will be involved in the story
– Actors are people, devices, or other systems that use the system or product
within the context of the function and behavior that is to be described
– Actors are anything that communicate with the system or product and that
are external to the system itself
• Step Two – Develop use cases, where each one answers a set of
questions
18
Questions Commonly Answered by
a Use Case
• Who is the primary actor(s), the secondary actor(s)?
• What are the actor’s goals?
• What preconditions should exist before the scenario begins?
• What main tasks or functions are performed by the actor?
• What exceptions might be considered as the scenario is described?
• What variations in the actor’s interaction are possible?
• What system information will the actor acquire, produce, or change?
• Will the actor have to inform the system about changes in the external
environment?
• What information does the actor desire from the system?
• Does the actor wish to be informed about unexpected changes?
19
Template for detailed descriptions of use cases:
20
21
22
UML use case diagram for SafeHome home security function
23
5.5 Building the Requirements Model
24
• Scenario-based elements
– Describe the system from the user's point of view using scenarios that are
depicted in use cases and activity diagrams
25
• Class-based elements
– Identify the domain classes for the objects manipulated by the actors, the
attributes of these classes, and how they interact with one another; they
utilize class diagrams to do this
26
• Behavioral elements
– Use state diagrams to represent the state of the system, the events that
cause the system to change state, and the actions that are taken as a result
of a particular event; can also be applied to each class in the system
27
• Flow-oriented elements
– Use data flow diagrams to show the input data that comes into a system,
what functions are applied to that data to do transformations, and what
resulting output data are produced
28
5.6 Negotiating Requirements
• During negotiation, the software engineer reconciles the conflicts
between what the customer wants and what can be achieved given
limited business resources
• Requirements are ranked (i.e., prioritized) by the customers, users, and
other stakeholders
• Risks associated with each requirement are identified and analyzed
• Rough guesses of development effort are made and used to assess the
impact of each requirement on project cost and delivery time
• Using an iterative approach, requirements are eliminated, combined
and/or modified so that each party achieves some measure of
satisfaction
29
The Art of Negotiation
30
Specification Task
• A specification is the final work product produced by the requirements
engineer
• It is normally in the form of a software requirements specification
• It serves as the foundation for subsequent software engineering
activities
• It describes the function and performance of a computer-based system
and the constraints that will govern its development
• It formalizes the informational, functional, and behavioral
requirements of the proposed software in both a graphical and textual
format
31
Typical Contents of a Software
Requirements Specification
• Requirements
– Required states and modes
– Software requirements grouped by capabilities (i.e., functions, objects)
– Software external interface requirements
– Software internal interface requirements
– Software internal data requirements
– Other software requirements (safety, security, privacy, environment,
hardware, software, communications, quality, personnel, training,
logistics, etc.)
– Design and implementation constraints
• Qualification provisions to ensure each requirement has been met
– Demonstration, test, analysis, inspection, etc.
• Requirements traceability
– Trace back to the system or subsystem where each requirement applies
32
33
5.7 Validation Requirements
• During validation, the work products produced as a result of
requirements engineering are assessed for quality
• The specification is examined to ensure that
– all software requirements have been stated unambiguously
– inconsistencies, omissions, and errors have been detected and corrected
– the work products conform to the standards established for the process,
the project, and the product
• The formal technical review serves as the primary requirements
validation mechanism
– Members include software engineers, customers, users, and other
stakeholders
34
35
Questions to ask when Validating
Requirements
• Is each requirement consistent with the overall objective for the
system/product?
• Have all requirements been specified at the proper level of
abstraction? That is, do some requirements provide a level of technical
detail that is inappropriate at this stage?
• Is the requirement really necessary or does it represent an add-on
feature that may not be essential to the objective of the system?
• Is each requirement bounded and unambiguous?
• Does each requirement have attribution? That is, is a source
(generally, a specific individual) noted for each requirement?
36
• Do any requirements conflict with other requirements?
• Is each requirement achievable in the technical environment that will
house the system or product?
• Is each requirement testable, once implemented?
– Approaches: Demonstration, actual test, analysis, or inspection
• Does the requirements model properly reflect the information,
function, and behavior of the system to be built?
• Has the requirements model been “partitioned” in a way that exposes
progressively more detailed information about the system?
37
Requirements Management Task
• During requirements management, the project team performs a set of
activities to identify, control, and track requirements and changes to
the requirements at any time as the project proceeds
• Each requirement is assigned a unique identifier
• The requirements are then placed into one or more traceability tables
• These tables may be stored in a database that relate features, sources,
dependencies, subsystems, and interfaces to the requirements
• A requirements traceability table is also placed at the end of the
software requirements specification
38