Scribd
Upload
5 views14 pages

CTP vs. O-CTP Enhancing Wireless Sensor Networks

Uploaded by

Debjit Bera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views14 pages

CTP vs. O-CTP Enhancing Wireless Sensor Networks

Uploaded by

Debjit Bera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

CTP VS.

O-CTP
ENHANCING WIRELESS SENSOR
A Comprehensive
NETWORKS Overview

Guided under: Dr. Nandini Mukherjee Name - Saptarshi Dutta


Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, PG-MCSE, 2024-26
Jadavour University Roll - 002410502016
WHAT IS
•CTP?
CTP (Collection Tree Protocol) is a tree-based
routing protocol for WSNs.
• Routes data from sensor nodes to a central sink
using metrics like ETX.
• Features:
a. Gradient-based routing (sink as root).
b. Adaptive beaconing with the Trickle Algorithm.
c. Focuses on reliability and energy efficiency.
LIMITATIONS OF
• CTP
Static Path Selection:
⚬ Fails in dynamic environments.
• Sensitivity to Interference:
⚬ High retransmissions and routing loops under
interference.
• Inefficient Overhead:
⚬ Frequent topology changes increase resource
consumption.
WHAT IS O-CTP?
• O-CTP (Opportunistic Collection Tree Protocol) is a
hybrid routing protocol.
• Combines traditional routing with opportunistic
routing.
• Features:
a. Opportunistic routing adapts to interference.
b. Dynamic triggers for switching routing modes.
c. Geographic opportunistic forwarding.
BASIC OPERATION OF O-
CTP
DIFFERENCE
ASPECT CTP O-CTP

Routing Mode Traditional only Hybrid: Traditional + Opportunistic

Handling Poor: Static paths fail under Excellent: Opportunistic paths


Interference interference improve reliability

Lower due to reduced


Overhead High under interference
retransmissions

Dynamic triggers for switching


Trigger Mechanisms None
modes

Handles loops by switching to


Routing Loops Susceptible
opportunistic
BASIC OPERATION OF O-
CTP
OPPORTUNISTIC ROUTING EXPLOITS THE
BROADCAST NATURE OF WIRELESS
NETWORKS. NODE S DOES NOT
PRESELECT A PREFERRED FORWARDER
BUT EXPLOITS THE FACT THAT THERE
MIGHT BE MANY POTENTIAL
FORWARDERS IN A NODE‘S VICINITY
ABLE TO RECEIVE THE BROADCAST
PACKE
WHY IS O-CTP
BETTER?
• Adaptability: Handles dynamic network conditions
effectively.
• Energy Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary
retransmissions.
• Reduced Overhead: Combines the best of both
routing approaches.
• Real-World Feasibility: Compatible with existing
WSN hardware.
WHY IS O-CTP
BETTER?

DELIVERY RATIO FOR O-CTP WITH DIFFERENT


RETRANSMIT THRESHOLDS MIGHT BE MANY POTENTIAL
THE DELIVERY RATIO AND OVERHEAD OF CTP, O-CTP
FORWARDERS IN A NODE‘S VICINITY ABLE TO RECEIVE
AND GEOPP WHEN THE NETWORK IS UNDER MEDIUM
THE BROADCAST PACKE
INTERFERENCE.
WHY IS O-CTP
BETTER?

DATAPACKETS TRANSMITTED BY EACH NODE ON THE DELIVERY RATIO ON DIFFERENT


DIFFERENT INTERFERENCE PATTERNS INTERFERENCE PATTERNS
REAL-WORLD
APPLICATIONS OF O-CTP
• Environmental monitoring in interference-prone
areas.
• Military and disaster response networks.
• Urban sensor networks for smart cities.
CONCLUSION
• CTP is effective in stable environments but
struggles under interference.
• O-CTP combines traditional and opportunistic
routing for superior performance.
• A practical solution for robust WSN deployments
in real-world scenarios
REFERRENCES
• Collection Tree Protocol
⚬ Omprakash Gnawali of Stanford University & University of Southern California
⚬ Kyle Jamieson of London University College
⚬ David Moss Rincon
⚬ Rodrigo Fonseca of Brown University & Yahoo, Philip Levis of Stanford
University
• The collection tree protocol (CTP)
⚬ Article · January 2006 Citations, Rodrigo L C Fonseca - Microsoft 116
PUBLICATIONS 8,159 CITATIONS
⚬ Kyle Jamieson Princeton University 140 PUBLICATIONS 13,129 CITATIONS

• O-CTP: Hybrid Opportunistic Collection Tree Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Joakim Flathagen, Erlend Larsen, Paal E. Engelstad and Oivind Kure -Norwegian
Defence Research Establishment (FFI), University of Oslo
THANK YOU

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy