0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views31 pages

Week 2

Chapter 2 of 'The Foundations: Logic and Proofs' covers propositional logic, including the language of propositions, logical connectives, and truth tables. It discusses the construction of propositions, rules of inference, and proof methods, as well as applications in translating English sentences and system specifications. The chapter also explores predicate logic, logical equivalences, and the use of truth tables to demonstrate equivalences and non-equivalences among propositions.

Uploaded by

Alish J
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views31 pages

Week 2

Chapter 2 of 'The Foundations: Logic and Proofs' covers propositional logic, including the language of propositions, logical connectives, and truth tables. It discusses the construction of propositions, rules of inference, and proof methods, as well as applications in translating English sentences and system specifications. The chapter also explores predicate logic, logical equivalences, and the use of truth tables to demonstrate equivalences and non-equivalences among propositions.

Uploaded by

Alish J
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

The Foundations: Logic

and Proofs
Chapter 2, Part I: Propositional Logic
Chapter Summary
Propositional Logic
 The Language of Propositions
 Applications
 Logical Equivalences
Predicate Logic
 The Language of Quantifiers
 Logical Equivalences
 Nested Quantifiers
Proofs
 Rules of Inference
 Proof Methods
 Proof Strategy
Propositional Logic Summary
The Language of Propositions
Connectives
Truth Values
Truth Tables
Applications
Translating English Sentences
System Specifications
Logic Circuits
Propositional Logic
Section 2.1
Section Summary
Propositions
Connectives
Negation
Conjunction
Disjunction
Implication; contrapositive, inverse, converse
Biconditional
Truth Tables
Propositions
 A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true
or false.
 Examples of propositions:
a) The Moon is made of green cheese.
b) Trenton is the capital of New Jersey.

1+0=1
c) Toronto is the capital of Canada.
d)
e) 0+0=2
 Examples that are not propositions.
a) Sit down!
b) What time is it?
c) x + 1 = 2
d) x + y = z
Propositional Logic
Constructing Propositions
Propositional Variables: p, q, r, s, …
The proposition that is always true is denoted by T
and the proposition that is always false is denoted
by F.
Compound Propositions; constructed from logical
connectives and other propositions
Negation ¬
 Conjunction ∧

 Disjunction ∨

Implication →
Biconditional ↔


Compound Propositions: Negation
The negation of a proposition p is denoted by
¬p and has this truth table:
p ¬p
T F
F T

Example: If p
round.”, then ¬p
denotes “The earth is
denotes “It is not the case
that the earth is round,” or more simply “The
earth is not round.”
Conjunction
The conjunction of propositions p and q is
denoted by p ∧ q and has this truth table:
p q p∧q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F

Example: If p denotes “I am at home.” and


q denotes “It is raining.” then p ∧q denotes
“I am at home and it is raining.”
Disjunction
The disjunction of propositions p and q
denoted by p ∨q and has this truth table:
is

p q p ∨q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F

Example: If p denotes “I am at home.” and


q denotes “It is raining.” then p ∨q denotes
“I am at home or it is raining.”
The Connective Or in English
In English “or” has two distinct meanings.
 “Inclusive Or” - In the sentence “Students who have taken
CS202 or Math120 may take this class,” we assume that

have taken both. This is the meaning of disjunction. For p ∨q


students need to have taken one of the prerequisites, but may

to be true, either one or both of p and q must be true.


 “Exclusive Or” - When reading the sentence “Soup or salad
comes with this entrée,” we do not expect to be able to get

In p ⊕ q , one of p and q must be true, but not both. The truth


both soup and salad. This is the meaning of Exclusive Or (Xor).

table forp ⊕ is: q p ⊕q


T T F
T F T
F T T
F F F
Implication
 If p and q are propositions, then p →q is a conditional statement
or implication which is read as “if p, then q ” and has this truth

p q p →q
table:

T T T
T F F
F T T
F F T

 Example: If p denotes “I am at home.” and q denotes “It


is raining.” then p →q denotes “If I am at home then it is

 In p →q , p is the hypothesis (antecedent or premise) and q


raining.”

is the conclusion (or consequence).


Understanding Implication
In p →q there does not need to be any connection
between the antecedent or the consequent. The
“meaning” of p →q depends only on the truth
values of p and q.
These implications are perfectly fine, but would
not be used in ordinary English.
“If the moon is made of green cheese, then I have
more money than Bill Gates. ”
 “If the moon is made of green cheese then I’m on
welfare.”
“If 1 + 1 = 3, then your grandma wears combat
boots.”
Understanding Implication (cont)
One way to view the logical conditional is to think
of an obligation or contract.
“If I am elected, then I will lower taxes.”
“If you get 100% on the final, then you will get an A.”
If the politician is elected and does not lower taxes,
then the voters can say that he or she has broken

the professor. This corresponds to the case where p


the campaign pledge. Something similar holds for

is true and q is false.


Different Ways of Expressing p →q
if p, then q p implies q
if p, q p only if q
q unless ¬p q when p
q if p
q whenever p p is sufficient for q
q follows from p q is necessary for p

a necessary condition for p is q


a sufficient condition for q is p
Converse, Contrapositive, and Inverse
From p →q we can form new conditional statements

q →p is the converse of p →q
.

 ¬q → ¬ p is the contrapositive of p →q

¬ p → ¬ q is the inverse of p →q
Example: Find the converse, inverse, and
contrapositive of “It raining is a sufficient condition
for my not going to town.”
Solution:
converse: If I do not go to town, then it is raining.
inverse: If it is not raining, then I will go to town.
contrapositive: If I go to town, then it is not raining.
Biconditional
 If p and q are propositions, then we can form the
biconditional proposition p ↔q , read as “p if and only if
q .” The biconditional p ↔q denotes the proposition
p q p ↔q
with this truth table:

T T T
T F F
F T F
F F T

 If p denotes “I am at home.” and q denotes “It is


raining.” then p ↔q denotes “I am at home if and
only if it is raining.”
Expressing the Biconditional
Some alternative ways “p if and only if q” is
expressed in English:

 p is necessary and sufficient for q


 if p then q , and conversely
 p iff q
Truth Tables For Compound Propositions
Construction of a truth table:
Rows
 Need a row for every possible combination of
values for the atomic propositions.
Columns
Need a column for the compound proposition
(usually at far right)
Need a column for the truth value of each
expression that occurs in the compound
proposition as it is built up.
 This includes the atomic propositions
Example Truth Table
Construct a truth table for
p q r r pq pq→
r
T T T F T F
T T F T T T
T F T F T F
T F F T T T
F T T F T F
F T F T T T
F F T F F T
F F F T F T
Equivalent Propositions
Two propositions are equivalent if they
always have the same truth value.
Example: Show using a truth table that the
conditional is equivalent to the
contrapositive.
p q ¬p ¬q p →q ¬q → ¬
Solution:
p
T T F F T T
T F F T F F
F T T F T T
F F T T T T
Using a Truth Table to Show Non-
Equivalence
Example: Show using truth tables that
neither the converse nor inverse of an
implication are not equivalent to the
implication.
p Solution:
q ¬p ¬q p →q ¬ p →¬ q→p
q
T T F F T T T
T F F T F T T
F T T F T F F
F F T T T T T
Problem
How many rows are there in a truth table
with n propositional variables?

Solution: 2n We will see how to do this in


Chapter 6.

propositional variables, we can construct 2n


Note that this means that with n

distinct (i.e., not equivalent) propositions.


Precedence of Logical Operators
Operator Precedence
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5

p q  r is equivalent to (p q)

If the intended meaning is p (q 


 r

r )
then parentheses must be used.
Applications of
Propositional Logic
Section 2.2
Applications of Propositional Logic:
Summary
Translating English to Propositional Logic
System Specifications
Logic Circuits
Translating English Sentences
Steps to convert an English sentence to a
statement in propositional logic
Identify atomic propositions and represent
using propositional variables.
Determine appropriate logical connectives
“If I go to Harry’s or to the country, I will not
go shopping.”
p: I go to Harry’s If p or q then
q: I go to the country. not r.
r: I will go shopping.
Example
Problem: Translate the following sentence
into propositional logic:
“You can access the Internet from campus only
if you are a computer science major or you

One Solution: Let a, c, and f represent


are not a freshman.”

respectively “You can access the internet


from campus,” “You are a computer science

a→ (c ∨ ¬ f )
major,” and “You are a freshman.”
System Specifications
System and Software engineers take
requirements in English and express them in
a precise specification language based on
logic.
Example: Express in propositional logic:
“The automated reply cannot be sent when
the file system is full”
Solution: One possible solution: Let p
denote “The automated reply can be sent”

q→ ¬ p
and q denote “The file system is full.”
Consistent System Specifications
Definition: A list of propositions is consistent if it is
possible to assign truth values to the proposition
variables so that each proposition is true.
Exercise: Are these specifications consistent?
 “The diagnostic message is stored in the buffer or it is retransmitted.”
 “The diagnostic message is not stored in the buffer.”
 “If the diagnostic message is stored in the buffer, then it is retransmitted.”

Solution: Let p denote “The diagnostic message is stored in the

specification can be written as: p ∨ q, ¬p, p → q. When p is false


buffer.” Let q denote “The diagnostic message is retransmitted” The

and q is true all three statements are true. So the specification is


consistent.

Solution: Now we are adding ¬q and there is no satisfying


 What if “The diagnostic message is not retransmitted is added.”
assignment.
So the specification is not consistent.
Logic Circuits
 Electronic circuits; each input/output signal can be viewed as a 0 or 1.
 0 represents False
 1 represents True
 Complicated circuits are constructed from three basic circuits called gates.

 The inverter (NOT gate)takes an input bit and produces the negation of that bit.
 The OR gate takes two input bits and produces the value equivalent to the
disjunction of the two bits.
 The AND gate takes two input bits and produces the value equivalent to the
conjunction of the two bits.
 More complicated digital circuits can be constructed by combining these
basic circuits to produce the desired output given the input signals by
building a circuit for each piece of the output expression and then
combining them. For example:

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy