Chapter 4 Capacity Design
Chapter 4 Capacity Design
¨ Introduction
¨ Long-term Capacity Planning
¨ Short-term Capacity Planning
1. Introduction
¨ Capacity = maximum capability to produce/serve= maximum
output
¨ Capacity planning applies to both manufacturing and service
organizations
¨ Capacity options can be categorized as short-term or long-term
¨ Volatile demand can further complicate capacity planning
¨ Capacity needs determined on the basis of demand forecast
¨ Rated/Designed Capacity
¨ Theoretical output that could be attained if a process were operating at full
speed without interruption, exceptions, or downtime
¨ Effective Capacity
¨ Takes into account the efficiency with which a particular product or
customer can be processed and the utilization of the scheduled hours or
work
Effective Daily Capacity = (no. of machines or workers) x (hours
per shift) x (no. of shifts) x (utilization) x ( efficiency)
Introduction (cont.)
¨ Utilization
¨ Percent of available time spent working
¨ Efficiency
¨ How well a machine or worker performs compared to a standard
output level
¨ Load
¨ Standard hours of work assigned to a facility
¨ Load Percent
¨ Ratio of load to capacity
load
Load Percent = x 100%
capacity
2. Long-Term Capacity Planning
¨ Definitions
¨ Capacity Strategies
C1= 115%-120%C
C1=115%-120%C
C
2.2. Capacity Strategies
¨ Sizing Capacity Cushions: capacity cushion is the amount of reserve capacity
that a firm maintains to handle sudden increases in demand or temporary
losses of production capacity. It measures the amount by which the average
utilization (in terms of effective capacity) falls below 100%
Capacity cushion, C = 100% - Utilization rate (%)
¨ Timing and Sizing Expansion
Lost sale
Long-term capacity
¨ if capacity is greater than demand, the organization can move all its
materials but it has spare capacity and underused resources.
Example
• Anne Jenkins has a contract to deliver 100 computer
systems a week to schools in South Wales.
Hence:
■ designed capacity = 40 units a tester a week
■ effective capacity = 30 units a tester a week
Solution (Cont.)
There are several ways of meeting the demand of 100 units a week:
■ Working a single shift on weekdays would need 100/30 = 3.33 testers. If Anne
only employs full-time testers, she has to round this up to 4. Then the utilization
of each would be 3.33/4 = 0.83 or 83%.
■ Employing 3 testers full-time, and one part-time tester for 1/3 time would meet all
capacity with 100% utilization.
■ Using overtime at the weekends would need 3 full time testers who are willing to
finish 10 tests at the weekend (working 10 / 0.75 = 13.3 hrs).
2.3.The main steps in capacity planning
1. Examine forecast demand and translate this into a capacity
needed, estimate future capacity requirements
=
=3.12 4 machines
Identify Gaps Example
¨ Grandmother’s Chicken Restaurant is experiencing a boom in business. The
owner expects to serve a total of 80,000 meals this year. Although the kitchen
is operating at 100% capacity, the dining room can handle a total of 105,000
diners per year. Forecasted demand for the next 5 years is as follows
year 1: 90,000 meals
year 2: 100,000 meals
year 3: 110,000 meals
year 4: 120,000 meals
year 5: 130,000 meals
What are the capacity gaps in Grandmother’s kitchen and dining room through
year 5?
Solution
¨ The kitchen is currently the bottleneck at a capacity of 80,000 meals/year. Based
on the demand forecast, the capacity gap for the kitchen is
Year 1: 90,000 meals – 80,000 meals = 10,000 meals
Year 2: 100,000 meals – 80,000 meals = 20,000 meals
Year 3: 110,000 meals – 80,000 meals = 30,000 meals
Year 4: 120,000 meals – 80,000 meals = 40,000 meals
Year 5: 130,000 meals – 80,000 meals = 50,000 meals
¨ Before year 3, the capacity of the dining room (105,000) is greater than demand.
In year 3 and subsequently, there are capacity gaps for the dining room:
Year 3: 110,000 meals – 105,000 meals = 5,000 meals
Year 4: 120,000 meals – 105,000 meals = 15,000 meals
Year 5: 130,000 meals – 105,000 meals = 25,000 meals
¨ Management decided to act now by developing and evaluating several
alternatives for expanding capacity, because operating at 100% capacity is
already creating some customer dissatisfaction and because the capacity gaps
are projected to increase
Evaluating the Alternatives Example
¨ One alternative for Grandmother’s Chicken Restaurant is to
expand both the kitchen and the dining room now, bringing their
capacities up to 130,000 meals/year. The initial investment would
be $200,000, made at the end of this year (year 0). The average
meal is priced at $10, and before-tax profit margin is 20%. The
20% figure was arrived at by determining that, for each $10 meal,
$6 covers variable costs and $2 goes toward fixed costs (other
than depreciation). The remaining $2 goes to pretax profit.
¨ What are the pretax cash flows from this project for the next five
years compared to those of the base case of doing nothing?
Solution
¨ Recall that the base case of doing nothing results in losing all potential sales
beyond 80,000 meals. With the new capacity, the cash flow would equal the extra
meals served by having a 130,000 meals capacity, multiplied by a profit of
$2/meal. In year 0, the only cash flow is -$200,000 for the initial investment. In
year 1, the 90,000-meal demand will be completely satisfied by the expanded
capacity, so the incremental cash flow is (90,000-80,000)(2) = $20,000. for the
subsequent years:
Year 2: Demand =100,000; Cash flow = (100,000 – 80,000)2 = $40,000
Year 3: Demand =110,000; Cash flow = (110,000 – 80,000)2 = $60,000
Year 4: Demand =120,000; Cash flow = (120,000 – 80,000)2 = $80,000
Year 5: Demand =130,000; Cash flow = (130,000 – 80,000)2 = $100,000
¨ Because the owner is evaluating an alternative that provides enough capacity to
meet all demand through year 5, the added meals served are identical to the
capacity gaps. That would not be true is the new capacity were smaller than the
expected demand in any year. To find the added meals in that case, we would
subtract the base case capacity from the new capacity (rather than the demand).
The result would be smaller than the capacity gap.
Complete Example
¨ A&B Coaches of Blackpool plan their capacity in terms of ‘coach-days’.
¨ Forecasts show expected annual demands for the next five years to
average 400,000 full-day passengers and 750,000 half-day passengers.
¨ A&B have 61 coaches, each with an effective capacity of 40 passengers a
day for 300 days a year. Breakdowns and other unexpected problems
reduce efficiency to 90%.
¨ They employ 86 drivers who work an average of 220 days a year, but
illness and other absences reduce their efficiency to 85%.
¨ If there is a shortage of coaches the company can buy extra ones for
$110,000 or hire them for $100 a day. If there is a shortage of drivers they
can recruit extra ones at a cost of $20,000 a year, or hire them from an
agency for $110 a day.
¨ How can the company plan for the required demand?
Solution
¨ Step 1 Translate forecasts and other information into a demand for
resources
■ 400,000 full-day passengers are equivalent to 400,000/40 = 10,000
coach days a year, or 10,000/300 = 33.33 coaches.
■ Adding these two gives the total demand as 64.58 coaches. Each
coach needs 300/220 drivers, so the company needs a total of 88.06
drivers.
= 32 customers/hr
1/= 4 min/customers = 60/4 =15 customers/hr
s = 3 servers
¨ 90min,
¨ opened book: no mobile phone, no computer
¨ offline
¨ 4 questions: 1 theory question, 3 calculation
¨ c1- c4
4. Adjusting Capacity- Short Term
Capacity Planning (reading)
¨ Problems with capacity planning
11-53
Process Flow Map for a Service
11-54
Relationship between Capacity
and Scheduling
¨ Capacity is oriented toward the acquisition
of productive resources
¨ Scheduling related to the timing of the use of
resources
Gantt Charts for Capacity Planning
and Scheduling (Infeasible)
11-56
Gantt Charts for Capacity Planning
and Scheduling (Feasible)
11-57
Short-Term Capacity Alternatives
¨ Increase Resources
¨ Improve Resource Use
¨ Modify the Output
¨ Modify the Demand
¨ Do Not Meet Demand
Increase Resources
¨ Overtime
¨ Add shifts
¨ Employ part-time workers
¨ Use floating workers
¨ Subcontract
Improve Resource Use
M = mNr
11-67
Capacity Requirements
Planning (CRP)
¨ Creates a load profile
¨ Identifies under-loads and over-loads
¨ Inputs
¨ Planned order releases
¨ Routing file
¨ Open orders file
CRP
MRP planned
order
releases
Capacity Open
Routing requirements orders
file planning file
90 –
80 –
70 –
60 –
50 –
Normal
40 – capacity
30 –
20 –
10 –
0–
1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (weeks)
Adjusted Load Profile
120 –
110 –
100 –
Hours of capacity
90 –
80 –
70 – Work
an
60 – extra Push back
Pull ahead
50 – shift
Overtime Push back Normal
40 – capacity
30 –
20 –
10 –
0–
1 2 3 4 5 6
Time (weeks)
¨ Load leveling
¨ process of balancing underloads and overloads