article

Special issue on innovation through open data: a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda: guest editors' introduction

Authors:

Anneke Zuiderwijk,

Natalie Helbig,

J. Ramón Gil-García,

Marijn JanssenAuthors Info & Claims

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Volume 9, Issue 2

Pages i - xiii

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200001

Published: 01 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

[1]

E. Barry and F. Bannister, Barriers to open data release: A view from the top, in Proceedings 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2013.

Google Scholar

[2]

C. Bason, Leading Public Sector Innovation. Co-Creating for a Better Society. Bristol, United Kingdom: The Policy Press, 2010.

Google Scholar

[3]

J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, J. A. Shuler, S. N. Simmons, and J. M. Grimes, Reconciling government documents and e-government: Government information in policy, librarianship, and education, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 433-436, 2009.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

P. Birkinshaw, Freedom of Information. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press, 2010.

Google Scholar

[5]

M. Blakemore and M. Craglia, Access to public-sector information in Europe: Policy, rights and obligations, The Information Society, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13-24, 2006.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[6]

C. L. Borgman, Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

S. Borins, Encouraging innovation in the public sector, Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 310-319, 2001.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

M. T. Borzacchiello and M. Craglia, The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 114-129, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

Y. Charalabidis, E. Ntanos and F. Lampathaki, An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens, in Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, Delft, the Netherlands, 2011, pp. 77-85.

Google Scholar

[10]

A. M. Cresswell and D. S. Sayogo, Developing public value metrics for returns to government ICT investments, The Research Foundation of State University of New York (SUNY), New York, 61268, 2012.

Google Scholar

[11]

S. Dawes, Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 377-394, 1996.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[12]

S. Dawes and N. Helbig, Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency, in Proceedings 9th International Conference on E-government (EGOV), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 50-60.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[13]

S. Dawes, T. Pardo and A. Cresswell, Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 2004.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[14]

S. S. Dawes. (2012, June) A realistic look at open data. W3 org. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_38.pdf

Google Scholar

[15]

B. Detlor, M. E. Hupfer, U. Ruhi, and L. Zhao, Information quality and community municipal portal use, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 23-32, 2013.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[16]

K. W. Deutsch, The Nerves of Government. Model of Political Communication and Control. New York: The Free Press, 1966.

Google Scholar

[17]

E. Duval, W. Hodgins, S. Sutton, and S. L. Weibel, Metadata principles and practicalities, D-lib magazine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. unknown, 2002.

Google Scholar

[18]

European Commission. (2012, December) Directive 2003/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. European Commission. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm.

Google Scholar

[19]

European Commission, Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Open data. An engine for innovation, growth and transparent governance, European Commission, Brussels, COM(2011) 882 final, 2011.

Google Scholar

[20]

European Commission. (2013, March) Digital agenda: Commission's open data strategy, questions & answers. [Online]. Available: http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/891&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.

Google Scholar

[21]

European Commission, Digital agenda: Turning government data into gold, European Commission, Brussels, P/11/1524, 2011.

Google Scholar

[22]

E. Ferro. (2013, June) Emerging business models in PSI reuse. Enrico Ferro Blogspot. [Online]. Available: http://enricoferro.blogspot.nl/2012/04/emerging-business-models-in-psi-reuse.html.

Google Scholar

[23]

E. Ferro, and M. Osella. (2012, June) Business models for PSI Re-Use: A multidimensional framework. W3 org. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/pmod2012_submission_16.pdf.

Google Scholar

[24]

E. Ferro and M. Osella. (2013, April) Eight business model archetypes for PSI re-use. W3 org [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/papers.

Google Scholar

[25]

M. Foulonneau and T. W. Cole. (2012, December) Strategies for reprocessing aggregated metadata. IMLS DCC. [Online]. Available: http://imlsdcc.grainger.uiuc.edu/docs/metadatareprocessing.pdf.

Google Scholar

[26]

S. Ganapati and C. G. Reddick, Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 115-122, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[27]

C. P. Geiger, and J. V. Lucke, Open government and (linked) (open) (government) (data), Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 265-278, 2012.

Google Scholar

[28]

Gemeente Amsterdam. (2013, December) Amsterdam Open Data. [Online]. Available: http://www.amster-damopendata.nl/home

Google Scholar

[29]

Y. Glickman, M. Flügge, and V. Pterneas. Deliverable D7.7.6. Data provision methods and components, http://www.engage-project.eu/wp/?page_id=212.

Google Scholar

[30]

T. M. Harrison, S. Guerrero, G. B. Burke, M. Cook, A. Cresswell, N. Helbig, J. Hrdinova, and T. Pardo, Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective, Information Polity, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 83-97, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

T. M. Harrison, T. A. Pardo, and M. Cook, Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda, Future Internet, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 900-928, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[32]

J. Hartley, Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present, Public money and management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27-34, 2005.

Google Scholar

[33]

N. Helbig, A. M. Cresswell, G. B. Burke, and L. Luna-Reyes, The dynamics of opening government data. A white paper, Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, State University of New York, New York, USA, 2012.

Google Scholar

[34]

M. Hunt and R. A. Chapman, Open government and freedom of information, in Open government in a theoretical and practical context (R. A. Chapman and M. Hunt, Eds.). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2006, pp. 1-10.

Google Scholar

[35]

K. Janssen, The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 446-456, 2011.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[36]

M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, G. Kuk, and T. Cresswell, Guest Editors' Introduction: E-government Interoperability, Infrastructure and Architecture: State-of-the-art and Challenges, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. I-VIII, 2011.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[37]

M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government, Information Systems Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258-268, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[38]

M. Janssen and A. Zuiderwijk, Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 32, no, 5, pp. unknown, 2014.

Google Scholar

[39]

K. G. Jeffery, Metadata: The future of information systems, in Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes (J. Brinkkemper, E. Lindencrona and A. Sølvberg, Eds.). London: Springer Verlag, 2000.

Google Scholar

[40]

T. Jetzek, M. Avital and N. Bjørn-Andersen, The value of open government data: A strategic analysis framework. 2012 Pre-ICIS Workshop, in Proceedings International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, Florida, United States, 2012.

Google Scholar

[41]

A. Joorabchi and A. E. Mahdi, An unsupervised approach to automatic classification of scientific literature utilizing bibliographic metadata, Journal of Information Science, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 499-514, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[42]

T. B. Jørgensen and B. Bozeman, Public values: An inventory, Administration & Society, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 354-381, 2007.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[43]

S. J. Kline and N. Rosenberg, An overview of innovation, in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth (R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, Eds.). United States of America: National Academy of Sciences, 1986, pp. 275-305.

Google Scholar

[44]

S. Kulk and B. V. Loenen, Brave new open data world?, International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 196-206, 2012.

Google Scholar

[45]

V. Kundra, Digital Fuel of the 21st Century: Innovation through Open Data and the Network Effect, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, 2012.

Google Scholar

[46]

La Ville de Paris. (2013, December) Paris data. Open Data. [Online]. Available: http://opendata.paris.fr/page/home/.

Google Scholar

[47]

J. Lindman, M. Rossi and V. K. Tuunainen, Open data services: Research agenda, in Proceedings 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Wailea, Maui, Hawaii, 2013, pp. 1239-1246.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[48]

U. Maier-Rabler and S. Huber, Open: the changing relations between citizens, public administration and political authority, eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government (JeDEM), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 48-58, 2011.

Google Scholar

[49]

P. McDermott, Building open government, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 401-413, 2010.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[50]

A. Meijer, Publishing public performance results on the Internet. Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold dutch public service organizations to account?, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 165-185, 2007.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[51]

A. Meijer, J. de Hoog, M. van Twist, M. van der Steen, and J. Scherpenisse, Understanding the dynamics of open data. From sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions, in Open Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (M. Gasco, Ed.). New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 101-114.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[52]

A. Meijer and M. Thaens, Public information strategies: Making government information available to citizens, Information Polity, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 31-45, 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[53]

T. Meynhardt, Public value inside: What is public value creation?, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 32, no. 3-4, pp. 192-219, 2009.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[54]

T. Meynhardt and S. Bartholomes, (De)composing public value: In search of basic dimensions and common ground, International Public Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 284-308, 2011.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[55]

L. B. Mohr, Determinants of innovation in organizations, The American Political Science Review, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 111-126, 1969.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[56]

M. H. Moore, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, USA: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Google Scholar

[57]

National Information Standards Organization, Understanding metadata, Bethesda: National Information Standards Organization Press, 2004.

Google Scholar

[58]

K. Nilsen, Economic theory as it applies to public sector information, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 419-489, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[59]

R. P. Nugroho, A comparison of open data policies in different countries. Lessons learned for an open data policy in Indonesia, Master thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2013.

Google Scholar

[60]

K. O'Hara, Transparent government, not transparent citizens: A report on privacy and transparency for the cabinet office, Gov. UK, London, 272769, 2011.

Google Scholar

[61]

K. O'Hara, Transparency, open data and trust in government: shaping the infosphere, in ACM Web Science 2012, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[62]

B. Obama. (2013, February) Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government. The White House. [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Transparency_and_Open_Government

Google Scholar

[63]

B. Obama. (2012, September) Open government directive. The White House. [Online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf.

Google Scholar

[64]

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, Oslo Manual, 2013.

Google Scholar

[65]

S. L. Pallickara, S. Pallickara and M. Zupanski, Towards efficient data search and subsetting of large-scale atmospheric datasets, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 112-118, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[66]

D. S. Sayogo and T. Pardo, Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. S19-S31, 2013.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[67]

D. S. Sayogo and T. A. Pardo, Exploring the motive for data publication in open data initiative: Linking intention to action, in Proceedings 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii 2012, pp. 2623-2632.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[68]

D. S. Sayogo and T. A. Pardo, Understanding smart data disclosure policy success: The case of green button, in Proceedings 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Quebec City, Canada, 2013, pp. 72-81.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[69]

J. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1934.

Google Scholar

[70]

N. Schuurman, A. Deshpande and D. Allen, Data integration across borders: a case study of the Abbotsford-Sumas aquifer (British Columbia/Washington State), JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 921-934, 2008.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[71]

C. Tenopir, S. Allard, K. Douglass, A. U. Aydinoglu, L. Wu, E. Read, M. Manoff, and M. Frame, Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions, PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. e21101, 2011.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[72]

The World Bank. (2013, December) Access to Information. The World Bank. [Online]. Available: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTANDOPERATIONS/EXTINFODISCLOSURE/0,menuPK:64864911~pagePK:4749265~piPK:4749256~theSitePK:5033734,00.html.

Google Scholar

[73]

United Nations Statistical Commission and Economic Commission for Europe. (2011, December) Guidelines for statistical metadata on the internet. UNECE. [Online]. Available: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/metadata.pdf.

Google Scholar

[74]

A. F. E. van Veenstra, IT-induced Public Sector Transformation. 's-Hertogenbosch: Uitgeverij BOX Press, 2012.

Google Scholar

[75]

M. Vardaki, H. Papageorgiou and F. Pentaris, A statistical metadata model for clinical trials' data management, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 129-145, 2009.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[76]

A. Whitmore, Extracting knowledge from U.S. department of defense freedom of information act requests with social media, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29 no. 2, pp. 151-157, 2012.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[77]

P. Windrum and P. Koch, Innovation in Public Sector Services. Entrepreneurship, creativity and management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008.

Google Scholar

[78]

World Wide Web Consortium. (2013, July) Standards. W3C. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/standards/.

Google Scholar

[79]

B. Worthy, More open but not more trusted? The effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government, Governance, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 561-582, 2010.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[80]

Z. Yang and A. Kankanhalli, Innovation in government services: The case of open data, in Proceedings IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, TDIT 2013 Banglore, India, 2013, pp. 644-651.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[81]

J. Zhang, S. Dawes, and J. Sarkis, Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 18 no. 5, pp. 548-567, 2005.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[82]

A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making, in Proceeding 12th Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), Koblenz, Germany, 2013, pp. 38-49.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[83]

A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, Barriers and development directions for the publication and usage of open data: A socio-technical view, in Open Government, Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (M. Gascó-Hernández, Ed.). New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 115-136.

Google Scholar

[84]

A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A comparison framework, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17-29, 2014.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[85]

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, S. Choenni, and R. Meijer, Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 8, no. 2, 2014.

Google Scholar

[86]

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, S. Choenni, R. Meijer, and R. Sheikh Alibaks, Socio-technical impediments of open data, Electronic Journal of eGovernment, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 156-172, 2012.

Google Scholar

[87]

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen and K. Jeffery, Towards an e-infrastructure to support the provision and use of open data, in Proceedings Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM13), Krems an der Donau, Austria, 2013, pp. 275-291.

Google Scholar

[88]

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen, R. Meijer, S. Choenni, Y. Charalabidis, and K. Jeffery, Issues and guiding principles for opening governmental judicial research data, in Proceedings 11th Conference on Electronic Government, Kristiansand, Norway, 2012, pp. 90-101.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[89]

A. Zuiderwijk, M. Janssen and A. Parnia, The complementarity of open data infrastructures: An analysis of functionalities, in Proceedings 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2013), Quebec, Canada, 2013, pp. 166-171.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[90]

A. Zuiderwijk, K. Jeffery, and M. Janssen, The potential of metadata for linked open data and its value for users and publishers, Journal of e-Democracy and Open Government, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 222-244, 2012.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Sheoran SMohanasundaram SKasilingam RVij S(2023)Usability and Accessibility of Open Government Data Portals of Countries WorldwideInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.32230719:1(1-25)Online publication date: 9-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJEGR.322307
Interian RMendoza IBernardini FViterbo J(2022)Unified vocabulary in Official Gazettes: An exploratory study on procurement dataProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3560107.3560301(195-202)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3560107.3560301
Gao YJanssen M(2022)The Open Data Canvas–Analyzing Value Creation from Open DataDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/35111023:1(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511102
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Special issue on innovation through open data: a review of the state-of-the-art and an emerging research agenda: guest editors' introduction
1. Applied computing
  1. Electronic commerce
2. General and reference

Recommendations

Information technology and open innovation

Advances in information technology (IT) have enabled firms to increasingly rely on open innovation. Although researchers and practitioners are interested in this phenomenon, there is a lack of theoretically driven research on how IT impacts ...
Research on open innovation performance: a review

Under the economic globalization, traditional closed innovation cannot meet the demand of enterprises for shorter R&D cycle and lower R&D cost. Consequently, enterprises have paid more attentions to open innovation which is more important. Based on ...
Introduction to the Special Issue

In this introductory paper, I discuss the goals and motivations for the special issue New Perspectives in Organization Science, which coincides with the 20th anniversary of the journal Organization Science. Senior editors of Organization Science provide ...

Comments

comments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research Volume 9, Issue 2

May 2014

133 pages

ISSN:0718-1876

Editors:
Anneke Zuiderwijk
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, the Netherlands
,
Natalie Helbig
Center for Technology in Government / SUNY Albany
,
J. Ramón Gil-García
Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas, Mexico
,
Marijn Janssen
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, the Netherlands

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Talca

Talca, Chile

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2014

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

14
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Sheoran SMohanasundaram SKasilingam RVij S(2023)Usability and Accessibility of Open Government Data Portals of Countries WorldwideInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.32230719:1(1-25)Online publication date: 9-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJEGR.322307
Interian RMendoza IBernardini FViterbo J(2022)Unified vocabulary in Official Gazettes: An exploratory study on procurement dataProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3560107.3560301(195-202)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3560107.3560301
Gao YJanssen M(2022)The Open Data Canvas–Analyzing Value Creation from Open DataDigital Government: Research and Practice10.1145/35111023:1(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3511102
Zuiderwijk AHinnant CZuiderwijk AHinnant C(2019)Open data policy-makingInformation Polity10.3233/IP-19016024:2(117-129)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-190160
Liu SPan LLei Y(2019)What is the role of New Generation of ICTs in transforming government operation and redefining State-citizen relationship in the last decade?Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3326365.3326374(65-75)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3326365.3326374
de Oliveira LJúnior CJanssen MChun SWeerakkody V(2018)Public value innovationProceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age10.1145/3209281.3209357(1-9)Online publication date: 30-May-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209281.3209357
Reis JViterbo JBernardini FJanssen MChun SWeerakkody V(2018)A rationale for data governance as an approach to tackle recurrent drawbacks in open data portalsProceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age10.1145/3209281.3209354(1-9)Online publication date: 30-May-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209281.3209354
de MagalhÃes Santos LJanssen MChun SWeerakkody V(2018)Towards the open government ecosystemProceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age10.1145/3209281.3209283(1-3)Online publication date: 30-May-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3209281.3209283
Csáki CKő A(2018)Open Data Research Challenges in the EUElectronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_15(192-204)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_15
Khayyat MBannister F(2017)Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government dataInformation Polity10.3233/IP-17040622:4(211-231)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.3233/IP-170406
Show More Cited By

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Information technology and open innovation

Research on open innovation performance: a review

Introduction to the Special Issue

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.