Preparing Resilient Communities to Mitigate Risk–Bairro Encosta Luz Case Study (Odivelas, Portugal) †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Collection
3. Results and Discussion
- The population is predominantly male (55.91%) and aged over 61 years (46.27%);
- The majority of the community has completed Basic Education—first cycle (first to fourth year—40.85%), likely attributed to the aging demographic, as many individuals left school early to enter the workforce and support their families, prioritizing livelihood over education;
- A segment of the population remains active and employed (36.56%);
- Villa ownership is prevalent in BEL, with T3 housing being the most common type (43.01%);
- The nuclear family structure, consisting of a couple and their children, is predominant (32.26%);
- BEL has an established community, with residents living in the area for 27 to 37 years.
- Regarding the analysis of the perceptions of the studied population, the following results were obtained (Table 1):
- The BEL population reports positive neighborhood relations, which are crucial for forming resilient communities;
- There is a notable lack of preparation and participation in actions or courses related to risk and safety situations;
- In an emergency, residents would contact 112 and/or the fire department;
- The main risks identified were fire, landslides, and earthquakes; despite these risks, residents perceive their community as safe from extreme events;
- The population views the municipality’s performance as weak, contributing to a persistent disconnect between residents and local political authorities;
- To enhance community resilience and preparedness, residents emphasize the importance of cleaning streets and land.
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report; Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; 151p. [Google Scholar]
- UN. How To Make Cities More Resilient—A Handbook for Local Government Leaders; United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR); United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; Available online: https://www.unisdr.org/files/26462_handbookfinalonlineversion.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2023).
- UNDRR. History of Making Cities Resilient; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR): Geneva, Switzerland, 2024; Available online: https://mcr2030.undrr.org/who-we-are/history (accessed on 9 December 2023).
- INE. Censos 2021. XVI Recenseamento Geral da População. VI Recenseamento Geral da Habitação: Resultados Definitivos; INE: Lisboa, Portugal, 2022; Available online: https://www.ine.pt/xurl/pub/65586079 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
- Resolution of the Council of Ministers No. 39/2015, of August 18. Available online: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/resolucao/39-2015-70041196 (accessed on 11 December 2023).
- CMO. Documentação e Legislação de Odivelas; Câmara Municipal de Odivelas: Odivelas, Portugal, 2023; Available online: https://www.cm-odivelas.pt/areas-de-intervencao/protecao-civil/documentacao-e-legislacao (accessed on 9 December 2023).
Variable | Bairro Encosta Da luz Responses | |
---|---|---|
Sociodemographic | Sex | Male (55.91%) |
Age | >61 years old (46.27%) | |
Education | Basic Education 1st cycle (40.85%) | |
Professional situation | Employee (36.56%) | |
Type of habitual residence | Villa (72.04%) | |
Housing typology | T3 (43.01%) | |
Accommodation type | Owner (55.91%) | |
Family type | Nuclear-couple and children (32.26%) | |
Average number of household residents | 2.97 | |
Residence time | 27 to 37 years (29.03%) | |
Perceptions | Opinion on neighborly relations | Good (54.84%) |
Security actions/courses | No (55.91%) | |
Participation in local initiatives | No (90.32%) | |
Who to contact in case of emergency | 112 (73 responses), Firefighters (22 answers) | |
Main risks in the area | Fires, Landslides, Earthquakes | |
How do you consider the area in relation to the risks of extreme events | Safe (62.37%) | |
Opinion on the municipality’s performance | Weak (33.33%) | |
Improvement measures | Urban/land cleaning, Legalization of the neighborhood |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Oliva, R.; Oliveira, A.P. Preparing Resilient Communities to Mitigate Risk–Bairro Encosta Luz Case Study (Odivelas, Portugal). Proceedings 2025, 113, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025113009
Oliva R, Oliveira AP. Preparing Resilient Communities to Mitigate Risk–Bairro Encosta Luz Case Study (Odivelas, Portugal). Proceedings. 2025; 113(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025113009
Chicago/Turabian StyleOliva, Raul, and Ana Paula Oliveira. 2025. "Preparing Resilient Communities to Mitigate Risk–Bairro Encosta Luz Case Study (Odivelas, Portugal)" Proceedings 113, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025113009
APA StyleOliva, R., & Oliveira, A. P. (2025). Preparing Resilient Communities to Mitigate Risk–Bairro Encosta Luz Case Study (Odivelas, Portugal). Proceedings, 113(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025113009