Next Article in Journal
A Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Method Based on 3D Radar Reflectivity Inputs
Next Article in Special Issue
On Uniformly Starlike Functions with Respect to Symmetrical Points Involving the Mittag-Leffler Function and the Lambert Series
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Residual Network with a CBAM Mechanism for the Recognition of Symmetric and Asymmetric Human Activity Using Wearable Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differential Subordination and Superordination Using an Integral Operator for Certain Subclasses of p-Valent Functions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Symmetry
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/sym16050553
symmetry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model

by
Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed
1,2,*,
Ravi P. Agarwal
3,
Iver Brevik
4,
Mohamed Abdelwahed
5,
Artion Kashuri
6 and
Majeed A. Yousif
7
1
Department of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah 46001, Iraq
2
Research and Development Center, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah 46001, Iraq
3
Department of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, USA
4
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
5
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Mathematical Engineering, Polytechnic University of Tirana, 1001 Tirana, Albania
7
Department of Mathematics, College of Education, University of Zakho, Zakho 42002, Iraq
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2024, 16(5), 553; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050553
Submission received: 26 March 2024 / Revised: 24 April 2024 / Accepted: 29 April 2024 / Published: 3 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Geometric Theory of Analytic Functions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recently, nonlinear fractional models have become increasingly important for describing phenomena occurring in science and engineering fields, especially those including symmetric kernels. In the current article, we examine two reliable methods for solving fractional coupled nonlinear Schrödinger models. These methods are known as the Sardar-subequation technique (SSET) and the improved generalized tanh-function technique (IGTHFT). Numerous novel soliton solutions are computed using different formats, such as periodic, bell-shaped, dark, and combination single bright along with kink, periodic, and single soliton solutions. Additionally, single solitary wave, multi-wave, and periodic kink combined solutions are evaluated. The behavioral traits of the retrieved solutions are illustrated by certain distinctive two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and contour graphs. The results are encouraging, since they show that the suggested methods are trustworthy, consistent, and efficient in finding accurate solutions to the various challenging nonlinear problems that have recently surfaced in applied sciences, engineering, and nonlinear optics.

1. Introduction

Nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDEs) find applications in a myriad of scientific and engineering fields, including atmospheric science, climate modeling, combustion dynamics, population dynamics, pattern formation, material science, seismic wave propagation, plasma physics, astrophysics, and biological systems modeling. These equations are employed to model complex phenomena such as turbulent flows, chemical reactions, wave interactions, and nonlinear wave propagation in various mediums. They are essential for understanding and predicting the behavior of complex systems in both natural and engineered environments. However, due to the inherent complexity of NLPDEs [1,2,3,4,5,6], finding exact solutions using a single technique is often challenging. To address this, several reliable methods have been proposed, for instance, the modified exp ( − ϕ ( ω ) ) -expansion function [7,8], the sin-Gordon-expansion [9], the G ′ G 2 -expansion function [10], the first integral approach [11], and the Hirota bilinear approach [12,13]. Additionally, various strategies have been explored for deriving lump solutions [14]. Optical solitons, renowned for their capacity to transmit waves over extensive distances without dispersion, represent a significant research domain within optics and optoelectronics [15]. These solitons have revolutionized the telecom industry, leading to advancements in high-speed communication systems [16,17,18,19,20,21]. As a result, fractional-order NLPDEs have garnered attention in recent studies, particularly in optics and other applied sciences, owing to their potential applications in modeling highly nonlinear phenomena [22,23,24]. Fractional-order derivatives offer advantages over integer derivatives, providing more accurate mathematical and physical models for various technical issues [25,26,27]. Consequently, fractional NLSE models have become essential for understanding soliton dynamics in optical fibers, with various solution schemes developed over the past two decades [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The motivation behind this study stems from the growing need to address complex nonlinear phenomena across diverse scientific disciplines, particularly in optics and applied sciences. The main goal is to employ advanced techniques to solve fractionally coupled nonlinear Schrödinger models and extract multiple-wave solutions. The Sardar-subequation technique (SSET) is a powerful method employed in the realm of solving nonlinear differential equations. With its efficacy demonstrated across various disciplines, numerous researchers have leveraged SSET to tackle complex problems and unveil novel solutions. For instance, Ref. [40] utilized SSET to derive new solitary wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional Wazwaz–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations, showcasing its effectiveness in handling intricate systems. Similarly, Ref. [41] employed SSET to explore new wave solutions for a nonlinear Landau–Ginzburg–Higgs equation, revealing diverse types of solitons such as bright and dark solitons, singular periodic solitons, and hybrid solitons. Moreover, Ref. [42] extended the application of SSET to the (4+1)-dimensional fractional-order Fokas equation, demonstrating its capability in generating various soliton solutions. Ref. [43] utilized SSET to obtain exact wave solutions for a complex three-coupled Maccari’s system, further highlighting its versatility. Additionally, research in [44] has integrated SSET with conformable derivatives to investigate solitary solutions for the conformable fractional Klein–Gordon equation with high-order non-linearity. Overall, the Sardar-subequation technique (SSET) stands as a valuable tool in the arsenal of techniques for solving nonlinear differential equations, offering insights into a wide range of physical phenomena and mathematical models. The generalized tanh-function technique has emerged as a versatile method for solving a variety of fractional differential equations, offering insights into the dynamics of complex systems. Researchers have applied the GTHFT to address significant equations across different domains. For instance, Ref. [45] utilized the GTHFT to tackle the time-fractional Sharma–Tasso–Olver equation and the space-time fractional Kowerteg–de Vries–Burgers equations, showcasing its efficacy in handling both time- and space-fractional derivatives. Similarly, Ref. [46] employed the tanh-function technique to solve the time-fractional modified Liouville and mRLW equations, unraveling the dynamical behavior of traveling wave solutions. Ref. [47] further advanced the method, refining and modifying the tanh-function approach to uncover exact traveling wave solutions for a family of 3D fractional Wazwaz–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations, demonstrating its adaptability and precision. Moreover, Ref. [48] extended the tanh function approach to address nonlinear time-fractional Klein–Gordon and Sine–Gordon equations, revealing new traveling wave solutions. Through these applications, the generalized tanh-function technique continues to prove its utility in unraveling the intricate dynamics of fractional differential equations, paving the way for deeper understanding and analysis in various scientific disciplines. The novel aspect of this study is the application of both SSET and IGTHFT to derive a variety of soliton solutions. These solutions encompass periodic, bell-shaped, dark, and composite single bright solitons, along with kink, periodic, and single soliton solutions. Additionally, the exploration of single solitary wave, multi-wave, and periodic kink combined solutions adds further depth to the analysis. Through the illustration of distinct behavioral traits using two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and contour graphs, this study contributes valuable insights into the accurate and efficient solutions to challenging nonlinear problems encountered in applied sciences, engineering, and nonlinear optics.
Consider the coupled nonlinear fractional-order Schrödinger equations
i D t δ Ξ 1 + D x 2 γ Ξ 1 + α | Ξ 1 | 2 + β | Ξ 2 | 2 Ξ 1 = 0 , i D t δ Ξ 2 + D x 2 γ Ξ 2 + α | Ξ 1 | 2 + β | Ξ 2 | 2 Ξ 2 = 0 ,
where x ∈ [ − ∞ , ∞ ] , t > 0 , and the behavior of polarized waves within nonlinear fiber optics, with constraints 0 < δ , γ ≤ 1 . The functions Ξ 1 ( x , t ) and Ξ 2 ( x , t ) intricately depict the dynamic range of these waves in relation to t and x. Parameters α and β are real and non-zero integers. Our study employs two distinct methodologies: enhancements to the generalized tanh-function technique and the Sardar-subequation technique. These methodologies are applied under various conditions to deduce soliton and solitary wave solutions for the given model.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 covers the basics of conformable fractional derivatives. Section 3 introduces the SSET and IGTHFT techniques. Results and discussions are provided in Section 4, while concluding remarks are presented in Section 5.

2. Conformable Derivative

Fractional-order derivatives have attracted significant attention from researchers due to their broad applications across diverse scientific fields. Various fractional derivative operators, including the Caputo–Fabrizio, Caputo, and Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives, have been developed to provide innovative approaches for modeling intricate phenomena and accurately capturing memory effects and non-local behavior. These operators play crucial roles in classical dynamics, banking, discrete mathematics, microbiology, plastics research, elasticity studies, and numerous other scientific domains. Their capability to describe systems with fractional dimensions and represent non-local effects makes them indispensable tools for comprehending and analyzing a wide range of physical processes. Moreover, the conformable derivative, introduced by Khalil et al. in 2014 [49], stands out as a promising addition to fractional calculus, offering simplified and efficient solutions for various mathematical and scientific challenges.
Definition 1. 
Given a function p : [ 0 , ∞ ] → R , the conformable fractional derivative of p of order δ is defined by [49]
T δ p t = lim ω → 0 p t + ω t 1 − δ − p t ω , 0 < δ ≤ 1 .
Definition 2. 
Let δ ∈ ( n , n + 1 ] and p be n − differentiable at t, where t > 0 . Then the conformable fractional derivative for p of order δ is defined as [49]
T δ p t = lim ω → 0 p ( ⌈ δ ⌉ − 1 ) t + ω t ( ⌈ δ ⌉ − δ ) − p ( ⌈ δ ⌉ − 1 ) t ω ,
where ⌈ δ ⌉ is the smallest integer greater than or equal to δ.
Properties 1. 
Some Properties of Conformable Fractional Derivative [49]
Let δ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] , a ∈ R and Θ , Σ are δ − differentiable at point t > 0 , then:
1. 
T δ a 1 Θ + a 2 Σ = a 1 T δ Θ + a 2 T δ Σ , for all a 1 , a 2 ∈ R .
2. 
T δ t a = a t a − δ , for all a ∈ R .
3. 
T δ Θ ( t ) = 0 , if Θ ( t ) is constant function.
4. 
T δ Θ ( t ) = t 1 − δ d Θ d t ( t ) .
5. 
T δ sin a t = a t 1 − δ cos a t .
6. 
T δ cos a t = − a t 1 − δ sin a t .
7. 
T δ e a t = a t 1 − δ e a t .
Theorem 1. 
Assume Θ , Σ : ( 0 , ∞ ) → Q , 0 < δ ≤ 1 are two differentiable functions, then the following chain rule holds:
T δ ( Θ ∘ Σ ) ( t ) = t ( 1 − δ ) Σ ( t ) ( δ − 2 ) Σ ′ ( t ) T δ Θ ( t ) | t = Θ ( t ) .

3. Analytical Investigation

The main aim of this section is to gather a multitude of solutions for the models presented in this study. This is accomplished by substituting the following complex wave transformations for solving Equation (1):
Ξ 1 ( x , t ) = φ 1 ( ξ ) e i ϖ ,
Ξ 2 ( x , t ) = φ 2 ( ξ ) e i ϖ ,
and
ξ = n x γ γ − b t δ δ , ϖ = − σ x γ γ + ω t δ δ + ϑ 0 ,
where n , σ and ω represent real constants, while ϑ 0 denotes an arbitrary constant. To obtain the real and imaginary parts of Equation (1), the complex wave transformations (5) and (6) are substituted into (1).
n 2 φ 1 ″ + α φ 1 3 + α β φ 2 2 φ 1 − σ 2 + ω φ 1 = 0 , n 2 φ 2 ″ + α φ 2 3 + α β φ 1 2 φ 2 − σ 2 + ω φ 2 = 0 ,
and
d = − 2 σ ,
φ 2 = f φ 1 .
Then (7), becomes
n 2 φ 1 ″ + α + α β f 2 φ 1 3 − σ 2 + ω φ 1 = 0 .

3.1. Application of the SSET

Consider the solution of Equation (10), as
φ 1 ( ξ ) = ∑ l = 0 N Ω l Φ 1 ( ξ ) .
In this context, the coefficients required for solving are denoted by Ω l , l = 0 , 1 , 2 , … , N , and Φ ( ξ ) satisfies the specified ordinary differential equation.
Φ ′ ( ξ ) = ρ + h Φ 2 ( ξ ) + Φ 4 ( ξ ) ,
where h and ρ stand for real constants awaiting evaluation, while the value of N is ascertained by applying the homogeneous balancing principle. Balancing the terms φ 1 ″ and φ 1 3 of Equation (10), we find N = 1 . Thus, Equation (11) is converted into:
φ 1 ( ξ ) = Ω 0 + Ω 1 Φ ( ξ ) .
To proceed, differentiate Equation (13) twice and substitute it into Equation (10). This process yields a set of algebraic polynomials. The solutions to these polynomials, obtained using Mathematica software, are as follows:
σ → − h n 2 − ω , Ω 0 → 0 , Ω 1 → − 2 n − α β f 2 + 1 .
Using the solution set, we derive the following solutions.
Case-1 If h , ρ < 0 , we have
φ 1 , 1 ( x , t ) = − 6 n − a m n g sec 3 − a g n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 2 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − h m n csc − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-2
If h > 0 and ρ = 0 , we obtain
φ 1 , 3 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − h m n sec h h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 4 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − h m n csc h h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-3
If h < 0 and ρ = h 2 4 d , we obtain
φ 1 , 5 ( x , t ) = − − h n tanh − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 6 ( x , t ) = − − h n coth − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 7 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − h tanh 2 − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 + i m n sec h 2 − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 8 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − h coth 2 − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 + i m n csc h 2 − h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 9 ( x , t ) = − 2 n − b tanh − b n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 2 2 2 + i m n coth − b n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 2 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-4
If h > 0 and ρ = h 2 4 d , we have
φ 1 , 10 ( x , t ) = − − b n tan h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 11 ( x , t ) = − − b n cot h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 12 ( x , t ) = − − b n tan 2 h n x γ γ − b t δ δ + sec 2 h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 13 ( x , t ) = − − b n cot 2 h n x γ γ − b t δ δ + csc 2 h n x γ γ − b t δ δ − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 1 , 14 ( x , t ) = − h n tan h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 2 + cot h n x γ γ − b t δ δ 2 2 2 − α β f 2 + 1 .

3.2. Application of the IGTHFT

In this context, the solution of Equation (10) is as follows:
φ 1 ( ξ ) = p 0 + ∑ r = 1 N p r Θ r ( ξ ) + ∑ r = 1 N q r Θ r ( ξ ) ,
where q r and p r , with r = 0 , 1 , 2 , ⋯ , N , denote the coefficients essential for the solution, while Θ ( ξ ) adheres to the prescribed Riccati differential equation.
Θ ′ ( ξ ) = Θ 2 ( ξ ) + v ,
where v represents a constant that determines the value of N. We utilize the homogeneous balancing principle to determine N. Balancing the terms φ 1 ″ and φ 1 3 of Equation (10), we find N = 1 . Thus, Equation (11) is transformed into
φ 1 ( ξ ) = p 0 + p 1 Θ ( ξ ) + q 1 Θ ( ξ ) .
To proceed, differentiate Equation (31) twice and substitute the desired values into Equation (10). This process yields a set of algebraic polynomials. The outcomes derived from solving these polynomials with Mathematica software are as follows:
Set-1
p 0 → 0 , p 1 → − 2 n − α β f 2 + 1 , q 1 → − 2 n v − α β f 2 + 1 , ω → − 4 n 2 v − σ 2 .
According to the solution set, we have the following solutions.
Case-1
If μ < 0 , we obtain
φ 2 , 1 ( x , t ) = 2 3 n v coth − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 − μ − α β f 2 + 1 + − μ n tanh − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 2 , 2 ( x , t ) = 2 3 n v tanh − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 − μ − α β f 2 + 1 + − μ n coth − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-2
If μ = 0 , we obtain
φ 2 , 3 ( x , t ) = 2 3 − α β f 2 + 1 x γ γ − b t δ δ − n 2 v x γ γ − b t δ δ 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-3
If μ > 0 , we have
φ 2 , 4 ( x , t ) = 2 3 n v coth μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 μ − α β f 2 + 1 + μ n tanh μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 2 , 5 ( x , t ) = 2 3 n v tanh μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 μ − α β f 2 + 1 + μ n coth μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Set-2
p 0 → 0 , p 1 → 2 n − α β f 2 + 1 , q 1 → 2 n v − α β f 2 + 1 , ω → − 4 n 2 v − σ 2 .
According to the solution set, we obtain the following solutions.
Case-1
If μ < 0 , we obtain
φ 2 , 6 ( x , t ) = − 2 3 n v coth − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 − μ − α β f 2 + 1 − − μ n tanh − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 2 , 7 ( x , t ) = − 2 3 n v tanh − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 − μ − α β f 2 + 1 − − μ n coth − μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-2
If μ = 0 , we have
φ 2 , 8 ( x , t ) = − 2 3 − α β f 2 + 1 x γ γ − b t δ δ + n 2 v x γ γ − b t δ δ 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .
Case-3
If μ > 0 , we obtain
φ 2 , 9 ( x , t ) = − 2 3 n v coth μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 μ − α β f 2 + 1 − μ n tanh μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 ,
or
φ 2 , 10 ( x , t ) = − 2 3 n v tanh μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 μ − α β f 2 + 1 − μ n coth μ n x γ γ − b t δ δ 6 3 − α β f 2 + 1 .

4. Results and Discussions

This section demonstrates the uniqueness and importance of our research by meticulously comparing our obtained results with previously established findings. Notably, Tang and Chen introduced the complete linear discriminate scheme method for classifying single traveling wave solutions, while Wang and Wang utilized the fractional-order Riccati approach and the fractional-order dual-function method. In this study, we extend these methodologies by employing the SSRT and IGTHFT. A detailed scrutiny of these prior investigations underscores the uniqueness of our results, which have not been documented in the previous literature. These novel findings, distinctly labeled, represent significant contributions to the field. Furthermore, we posit that our derived solutions offer valuable insights for understanding various physical phenomena.
The graphical representations provided in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14 offer a comprehensive overview of the diverse types of solutions derived from the equations detailed in the text. We verify that all obtained soliton solutions satisfy Equation (1). Figure 1 illustrates the bright soliton solution derived from Equation (15), showcasing the localized, coherent wave packets characteristic of bright solitons. Figure 2 and Figure 3 depict bright periodic singular soliton and bright singular solutions, respectively, each derived from Equations (16), (23) and (24), and Equation (17). Figure 4 presents a series of singular bell-shaped soliton solutions, exhibiting the characteristic bell-shaped profiles with singular features, obtained from Equations (18), (20), (22), (25), (27), and (28). Moving to Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7, dark soliton, singular bell-shaped periodic soliton, and dark periodic singular soliton solutions are displayed, each capturing distinct features of Equations (19), (21), and (26), respectively. Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12 delve into solitary wave solutions, with Figure 8 showcasing periodic kink solitary waves from Equations (33) and (41), and Figure 9 depicting the combination of singular kink periodic solitary wave solutions derived from Equations (34) and (42). Additionally, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12 present dark kink singular solitary wave, singular kink fusion solitary waves, and kink singular solitary wave solutions, respectively, each exhibiting unique characteristics, as dictated by their corresponding equations. Finally, Figure 13 and Figure 14 provide visual representations of singular kink fusion solitary wave solutions obtained from Equations (42) and (43), further enriching the understanding of the complex dynamics and interactions present in the studied nonlinear system. These detailed graphical representations serve as valuable tools for elucidating the behavior and properties of the derived solutions, offering insights into the rich and varied dynamics of the nonlinear fractional-order Schrödinger model under investigation.
The graphical representations provided in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14 offer a comprehensive overview of the diverse types of solutions derived from the equations detailed in the text. We categorize these solutions into distinct classes based on their characteristics:
  • Bright Soliton Solutions:
    –
    Figure 1: Bright soliton solution derived from Equation (15), showcasing localized, coherent wave packets characteristic of bright solitons.
  • Bright Periodic Singular Soliton Solutions:
    –
    Figure 2: Bright periodic singular soliton solution derived from Equations (16) and (23).
    –
    Figure 3: Bright singular solution derived from Equations (24) and (17).
  • Singular Bell-Shaped Soliton Solutions:
    –
    Figure 4: Series of singular bell-shaped soliton solutions obtained from Equations (18), (20), (22), (25), (27), and (28).
  • Dark Soliton Solutions:
    –
    Figure 5: Dark soliton solution derived from Equation (19).
  • Dark Periodic Singular Soliton Solutions:
    –
    Figure 6: Singular bell-shaped periodic soliton solution obtained from Equation (21).
    –
    Figure 7: Dark periodic singular soliton solution derived from Equation (26).
  • Solitary Wave Solutions:
    –
    Figure 8: Periodic kink solitary wave solution derived from Equations (33) and (41).
    –
    Figure 9: Combination of singular kink periodic solitary wave solutions obtained from Equations (34) and (42).
    –
    Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12: Dark kink singular solitary wave, singular kink fusion solitary waves, and kink singular solitary wave solutions, each exhibiting unique characteristics, as dictated by their corresponding equations.
  • Singular Kink Fusion Solitary Wave Solutions:
    –
    Figure 13 and Figure 14: Singular kink fusion solitary wave solutions obtained from Equations (42) and (43).
These detailed classifications and labels serve to clearly distinguish the various types of soliton solutions presented in the graphical representations, facilitating a better understanding of their characteristics and implications in the studied nonlinear fractional-order Schrödinger model.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the fractional-order nonlinear Schrödinger model serves as an example of a globally recognized nonlinear model that accommodates various physiological nonlinearities. Utilizing two efficient techniques, the improved generalized tanh-function method (IGTHFM), and the Sardar-subequation method (SSEM), a diverse array of cases has been examined. Observations include bell-shaped, dark singular, periodic singular, and combination singular bright solitons. Additionally, periodic solitary waves, singular periodic, multi-waves, and combinations of multi-kink singular solitary wave solutions have been identified, broadening the scope of known solutions. To enhance understanding, graphical representations elucidating the dynamical behavior of dominant models characterizing pulse interaction concerning soliton variables have been provided. These solution sets exhibit reliability and productivity, showcasing the effectiveness of the employed methods. Furthermore, these calculated data hold the potential to expedite the evaluation and enhancement of optical fiber wave solution efficiency. In summary, the findings contribute to advancing the understanding of nonlinear phenomena, offering valuable insights into the behavior of fractional-order nonlinear Schrödinger models and guiding future research efforts in this domain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P.A.; Data curation, A.K.; Funding acquisition, P.O.M. and R.P.A.; Investigation, R.P.A. and M.A.; Methodology, I.B.; Resources, M.A.Y.; Software, M.A.; Supervision, I.B.; Validation, P.O.M. and M.A.Y.; Visualization, A.K.; Writing—original draft, P.O.M., I.B. and M.A.Y.; Writing—review and editing, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R136), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R136), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Zulfiqar, A.; Ahmad, J. Soliton solutions of fractional modified unstable Schrödinger equation using Exp-function method. Results Phys. 2020, 19, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fatima, M.; Agarwal, R.P.; Abbas, M.; Mohammed, P.O.; Shafiq, M.; Chorfi, N. Extension of Cubic B-Spline for Solving the Time-Fractional Allen–Cahn Equation in the Context of Mathematical Physics. Computation 2024, 12, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ehsan, H.; Abbas, M.; Nazir, T.; Mohammed, P.O.; Chorfi, N.; Baleanu, D. Efficient analytical algorithms to study Fokas dynamical models involving M-truncated derivative. Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst. 2024, 23, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yousaf, M.Z.; Srivastava, H.M.; Abbas, M.; Nazir, T.; Mohammed, P.O.; Vivas-Cortez, M.; Chorfi, N. A Novel Quintic B-Spline Technique for Numerical Solutions of the Fourth-Order Singular Singularly-Perturbed Problems. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, K.J. Variational principle and diverse wave structures of the modified Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation arising in the optical illusions field. Axioms 2022, 11, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zulfiqar, A.; Ahmad, J.; Ul-Hassan, Q.M. Analysis of some new wave solutions of fractional order generalized Pochhammer-chree equation using exp-function method. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2022, 54, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Islam, S.R.; Arafat, S.Y.; Wang, H. Abundant closed-form wave solutions to the simplified modified Camassa-Holm equation. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2022, 8, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shakeel, M.; El-Zahar, E.R.; Shah, N.A.; Chung, J.D. Generalized Exp-Function Method to Find Closed Form Solutions of Nonlinear Dispersive Modified Benjamin–Bona–Mahony Equation Defined by Seismic Sea Waves. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Joseph, S.P. Exact Traveling Wave Doubly Periodic Solutions for Generalized Double Sine-Gordon Equation. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 2022, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Athron, P.; Fowlie, A.; Lu, C.T.; Wu, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, B. Hadronic Uncertainties versus New Physics for the W boson Mass and Muon g-2 Anomalies. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seidel, A. Integral Approach for Hybrid Manufacturing of Large Structural Titanium Space Components. Ph.D. Thesis, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Saifullah, S.; Ahmad, S.; Alyami, M.A.; Inc, M. Analysis of interaction of lump solutions with kink-soliton solutions of the generalized perturbed KdV equation using Hirota-bilinear approach. Phys. Lett. A 2022, 454, 128503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, S.Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.J. The Fokas–Lenells equations: Bilinear approach. Stud. Appl. Math. 2022, 148, 651–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khater, M.M. Prorogation of waves in shallow water through unidirectional Dullin-Gottwald-Holm model; computational simulations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2022, 37, 2350071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muniyappan, A.; Sahasraari, L.N.; Anitha, S.; Ilakiya, S.; Biswas, A.; Yıldırım, Y.; Triki, H.; Alshehri, H.M.; Belic, M.R. Family of optical solitons for perturbed Fokas–Lenells equation. Optik 2022, 249, 168224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, T.; Li, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Miao, L.; Lu, Y.; He, Y. Multi-component ZnO alloys: Bandgap engineering, hetero-structures, and optoelectronic devices. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2022, 147, 100661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahmood, A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Abbas, M.; Abdullah, F.A.; Mohammed, P.O.; Baleanu, D.; Chorfi, N. Optical soliton solutions of the coupled Radhakrishnan-Kundu-Lakshmanan equation by using the extended direct algebraic approach. Heliyon 2023, 9, e20852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Min, R.; Hu, X.; Pereira, L.; Soares, M.S.; Silva, L.C.; Wang, G.; Martins, L.; Qu, H.; Antunes, P.; Marques, C.; et al. Polymer optical fiber for monitoring human physiological and body function: A comprehensive review on mechanisms, materials, and applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 147, 107626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lechelon, M.; Meriguet, Y.; Gori, M.; Ruffenach, S.; Nardecchia, I.; Floriani, E.; Coquillat, D.; Teppe, F.; Mailfert, S.; Marguet, D.; et al. Experimental evidence for long-distance electrodynamic intermolecular forces. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabl5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tarla, S.; Ali, K.K.; Yilmazer, R.; Yusuf, A. Investigation of the dynamical behavior of the Hirota-Maccari system in single-mode fibers. Opt. Quan. Electron 2022, 54, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, J. Dispersive multiple lump solutions and soliton’s interaction to the nonlinear dynamical model and its stability analysis. Eur. Phys. J. D 2022, 76, 14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dubey, S.; Chakraverty, S. Application of modified extended tanh method in solving fractional order coupled wave equations. Math. Comput. Simul. 2022, 198, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Siddique, I.; Mehdi, K.B.; Jarad, F.; Elbrolosy, M.E.; Elmandouh, A.A. Novel precise solutions and bifurcation of traveling wave solutions for the nonlinear fractional (3+ 1)-dimensional WBBM equation. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2022, 37, 2350011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ansar, R.; Abbas, M.; Mohammed, P.O.; Al-Sarairah, E.; Gepreel, K.A.; Soliman, M.S. Dynamical Study of Coupled Riemann Wave Equation Involving Conformable, Beta, and M-Truncated Derivatives via Two Efficient Analytical Methods. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, Y.; Wang, F.; Salama, S.A.; Botmart, T.; Khater, M.M. Computational investigation on a nonlinear dispersion model with the weak non-local nonlinearity in quantum mechanics. Results Phys. 2022, 38, 105583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bilal, M.; Rehman, S.U.; Ahmad, J. The study of new optical soliton solutions to the time-space fractional nonlinear dynamical model with novel mechanisms. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jan, A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Khan, A.; Mohammed, P.O.; Jan, R.; Hamed, Y.S. In Vivo HIV Dynamics, Modeling the Interaction of HIV and Immune System via Non-Integer Derivatives. Fractal Fract. 2023, 7, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, W.; Sun, H.; Li, X. Fractional Derivative Modeling in Mechanics and Engineering; Springer: Beijing, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  29. Abouelregal, A.E.; Fahmy, M.A. Generalized Moore-Gibson-Thompson thermoelastic fractional derivative model without singular kernels for an infinite orthotropic thermoelastic body with temperature-dependent properties. ZAMM-Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 2022, 102, e202100533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, Y.; Tang, T.; Zhao, S.; Joralmon, D.; Poit, Z.; Ahire, B.; Keshav, S.; Raje, A.R.; Blair, J.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Recent Advancements and Applications in 3D Printing of Functional Optics. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 52, 102682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Q.; Shan, W.; Wang, P.; Cui, H. Breather, lump and N-soliton wave solutions of the (2+ 1)-dimensional coupled nonlinear partial differential equation with variable coefficients. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2022, 106, 106098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bilal, M.; Ahmad, J. A variety of exact optical soliton solutions to the generalized (2+ 1)-dimensional dynamical conformable fractional Schrödinger model. Results Phys. 2022, 33, 105198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aniqa, A.; Ahmad, J. Soliton solution of fractional Sharma-Tasso-Olever equation via an efficient (G/G)-expansion method. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, K.J.; Liu, J.H.; Wu, J. Soliton solutions to the Fokas system arising in monomode optical fibers. Optik 2022, 251, 168319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohammed, P.O. Some positive results for exponential-kernel difference operators of Riemann-Liouville type. Math. Model. Control. 2024, 4, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rezazadeh, H.; Sabu, J.; Zabihi, A.; Ansari, R.; Tunc, C. Implementation of soliton solutions for generalized nonlinear Schrodinger equation with variable coefficients. Nonlinear Stud. 2022, 29, 547–559. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, J.; Li, B. Mix-training physics-informed neural networks for the rogue waves of nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Chaos Solit. Fractals 2022, 164, 112712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Y.; Li, B. N-soliton solutions for the novel Kundu-nonlinear Schrödinger equation and Riemann–Hilbert approach. Wave Motion 2024, 127, 103293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, X.S.; Li, B. Optical solitons and stability analysis for the generalized fourth-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 33, 1950333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rezazadeh, H.; Inc, M.; Baleanu, D. New Solitary Wave Solutions for Variants of (3+1)-Dimensional Wazwaz-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony Equations. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahmad, S.; Mahmoud, E.E.; Saifullah, S.; Ullah, A.; Ahmad, S.; Akgül, A.; El Din, S.M. New waves solutions of a nonlinear Landau–Ginzburg–Higgs equation: The Sardar-subequation and energy balance approaches. Results Phys. 2023, 51, 106736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ullah, N.; Asjad, M.I.; Awrejcewicz, J.; Muhammad, T.; Baleanu, D. On soliton solutions of fractional-order nonlinear model appears in physical sciences. AIMS Math. 2022, 7, 7421–7440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alsharidi, A.K.; Bekir, A. Discovery of New Exact Wave Solutions to the M-Fractional Complex Three Coupled Maccari’s System by Sardar Sub-Equation Scheme. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tang, L. Exact solutions to conformable time-fractional Klein–Gordon equation with high-order nonlinearities. Results Phys. 2020, 18, 103289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zaman, U.H.M.; Arefin, M.A.; Akbar, M.A.; Uddin, M.H. Utilizing the extended tanh-function technique to scrutinize fractional order nonlinear partial differential equations. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2023, 8, 100563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mamun, A.A.; Ananna, S.N.; An, T.; Shahen, N.H.M.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Foyjonnesa. Dynamical behaviour of travelling wave solutions to the conformable time-fractional modified Liouville and mRLW equations in water wave mechanics. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mamun, A.A.; Ananna, S.N.; Gharami, P.P.; An, T.; Asaduzzaman, M. The improved modified extended tanh-function method to develop the exact travelling wave solutions of a family of 3D fractional WBBM equations. Results Phys. 2022, 41, 105969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sadiya, U.; Inc, M.; Arefin, M.A.; Uddin, M.H. Consistent travelling waves solutions to the non-linear time fractional Klein–Gordon and Sine-Gordon equations through extended tanh-function approach. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2022, 16, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khalil, R.; Al Horani, M.; Yousef, A.; Sababheh, M. A new definition of fractional derivative. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2014, 264, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Symmetry 16 00553 g001
Figure 1. The bright soliton solution of (15), where a = 2.4 ,   α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   g = 0.4 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 1. The bright soliton solution of (15), where a = 2.4 ,   α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   g = 0.4 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g001
Symmetry 16 00553 g002
Figure 2. The bright periodic singular soliton solution of (16), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 2. The bright periodic singular soliton solution of (16), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g002
Symmetry 16 00553 g003
Figure 3. The bright singular solution of (17), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 3. The bright singular solution of (17), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g003
Symmetry 16 00553 g004
Figure 4. The singular bell-shaped soliton solution of (18), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 4. The singular bell-shaped soliton solution of (18), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g004
Symmetry 16 00553 g005
Figure 5. The dark soliton solution of (19), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 5. The dark soliton solution of (19), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g005
Symmetry 16 00553 g006
Figure 6. The singular bell-shaped periodic soliton solution of (21), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 6. The singular bell-shaped periodic soliton solution of (21), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g006
Symmetry 16 00553 g007
Figure 7. The dark periodic singular soliton solution of (26), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Figure 7. The dark periodic singular soliton solution of (26), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 ,   n = 1 and h = − 0.3 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g007
Symmetry 16 00553 g008
Figure 8. The periodic kink solitary waves solutions of (33), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 8. The periodic kink solitary waves solutions of (33), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g008
Symmetry 16 00553 g009
Figure 9. The combo of singular kink periodic solitary wave solutions of (34), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 9. The combo of singular kink periodic solitary wave solutions of (34), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g009
Symmetry 16 00553 g010
Figure 10. The dark kink singular solitary wave solution of (35), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   g = 0.4 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 10. The dark kink singular solitary wave solution of (35), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   g = 0.4 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g010
Symmetry 16 00553 g011
Figure 11. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (37), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 11. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (37), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g011
Symmetry 16 00553 g012
Figure 12. The kink singular solitary wave solution of (39), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 12. The kink singular solitary wave solution of (39), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g012
Symmetry 16 00553 g013
Figure 13. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (42), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 13. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (42), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g013
Symmetry 16 00553 g014
Figure 14. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (43), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Figure 14. The singular kink fusion solitary waves solution of (43), where α = 0.1 ,   m = 0.5 ,   β = 3.1 ,   b = 1.4 ,   γ = − 1.7 ,   f = 0.2 ,   δ = 0.5 and n = 1 .
Symmetry 16 00553 g014
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohammed, P.O.; Agarwal, R.P.; Brevik, I.; Abdelwahed, M.; Kashuri, A.; Yousif, M.A. On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model. Symmetry 2024, 16, 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050553

AMA Style

Mohammed PO, Agarwal RP, Brevik I, Abdelwahed M, Kashuri A, Yousif MA. On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model. Symmetry. 2024; 16(5):553. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohammed, Pshtiwan Othman, Ravi P. Agarwal, Iver Brevik, Mohamed Abdelwahed, Artion Kashuri, and Majeed A. Yousif. 2024. "On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model" Symmetry 16, no. 5: 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050553

APA Style

Mohammed, P. O., Agarwal, R. P., Brevik, I., Abdelwahed, M., Kashuri, A., & Yousif, M. A. (2024). On Multiple-Type Wave Solutions for the Nonlinear Coupled Time-Fractional Schrödinger Model. Symmetry, 16(5), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy