| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thinker78. |
 | This user is banned from editing the English Wikipedia. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions · discussion at ANI) |
Thinker78 is a user, since late 2015, of a mesopedian editor of Wikipedia who started editing anonymously when the project came out in 2001. His first account was User:WonderingAngel-aesc78, but sadly he didn't continue editing with it and has since lost the password. He believes in doing an excellent job, fairness, rational and honest debate, admitting mistakes, and the necessity of giving explanations for one's actions. He doesn't like argumentum ad verecundiam, abuse of authority, nor undue censorship.
Among other things, he is an investigator,[a] a translator,[b] a former union official, an empath, a syncretist veg'n, and a free thinking skeptic. In college he was one of the top students in classes of Logic, Math, and Statistics. At one of his jobs, he was one of the best among 1,000 employees and top of his division.[c] Since he was a kid he has felt passion for the written word and its analysis. Sometimes in his life outside of Wikipedia he gets threats of torture or death for unknown reasons.[d] Maybe he tries to be too insightful, open-minded, and vocal for his own good.
NPOV and objectivity
edit
Due to Thinker78's trying to be impartial and unbiased in his analysis and editing, sometimes editors tend to accuse him ironically of being partial and biased, more specially in controversial topics. This is because he tries to think and analyze independently, questioning what he thinks needs to be questioned and playing the Devil's advocate.
This, without trying to adopt, or make exception to his skepticism, the majority's position only because it is the majority's or popular position. This is not to say he won't adopt the majority or minority position if he thinks it is the proper thing to do based on logic and Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. These two latter for some reason in his opinion seem to be often ignored in favor of a single page's status quo or editors' personal opinions.
Basic information
edit
 | The person behind this user has been a registered user of Wikipedia since at least 29 January 2008. |
| | This user has been registered in Wikipedia since November 29, 2015. |
 | This user has made over 20,000 edits to Wikipedia. |
 | This user is one of the 10,000 most active English Wikipedians of all time. |
| ESU | 99.2% for major edits and 99.5% for minor edits. – Last update: 30 July 2023. |
| This user was blocked, but is blocked no longer. |
Skills
edit
| es- gt-5 | Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel profesional del español chapín. |
| en-5 | This user can contribute with a professional level of English. |
 -  | This user is a translator from Spanish to English on Wikipedia:Translation. |
To do
editRegular actions
editCheck daily:
- change online and mood statuses
- reset checklist
- watchlist
- tasks working on
- pending consensus
- pending other action
- planned tasks
- updated edits and bar
| Action | Checked | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Change status | x | x |
| watchlist | x | x |
| checked/updated edits and bar | x | 0 |
| tasks working on | x | |
| pending consensus | x | e |
| pending other action | x | e |
| RFC | x | e |
| planned tasks | x | 0 |
Tasks in process
editThese are some tasks I am currently working on, but not necessarily include all. Try adding no more than 3-5 at a time to avoid a long list.
Time sensitive
edit
Discussions and RFC
editIn requests for comments, be concise, understandable, and provide option A and B if applicable. Before ending it, post about the consensus you think was reached, maybe pinging all editors who contributed. Follow "Pending consensus" procedure.
- EMPTY
Categories for Discussion
edit- EMPTY
Other
edit- EMPTY
Not time sensitive
edit
Discussions and RFC
edit- EMPTY
Other
edit- Revert conspiracy theory revert. 22 Oct 2023
Pending
edit- EMPTY
Pending consensus
editImplement changes after 7 days if there is consensus. After 7 days, if there is no editors' input in the relevant talk page thread and no sign of opposition to my latest entry, post a notice that change will be implemented in 7 days, per WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS.[e] But remember, per WP:TALKDONTREVERT, "Consensus cannot always be assumed simply because editors stop responding to talk page discussions in which they have already participated."
- EMPTY
Pending other action
editTasks to do pending other action.
- EMPTY
Planned tasks
editIf you are a visitor in my profile page, you are most than welcome performing these tasks.
2019-2021
edit- Add section of the effects of United States foreign aid[2]
- Work on all the lists of English and Spanish language newspapers (long term project) 03:36, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Make table at List of newspapers in Mexico 16:19, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Take picture of asentamiento in Guatemala
- Merge Universidad Santo Tomás de Aquino and Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo 01:05, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- Discuss rule change to allow administrator, arbitrator, Wikimedia and similar elections canvassing and recommendation of candidates 13:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Guatemala City twin cities 18:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
January to June 2022
edit- Request inclusion of Wikiprojects in welcome templates to have more specialized support from new editors. 19:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Add persecution section to article Jainism. 17:19, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
July - December 2022
edit- Open thread in relevant talk page to discuss adding guideline or information page advising that articles about politicians should have certain sections and information. 15:34, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Discuss in relevant venue whether Wikipedia:Closing discussions applies also to regular talk page discussions, per closure challenge. 00:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Cerebellum.17:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
- Open a discussion in relevant talk page about process of closing regular talk page discussions. 23:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Add example for MOS:PRONPLACEMENT 15:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Work on article Yin and yang 19:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sample size determination 20 Sep 2022
- Addition of info of calls to regulate safety of masks and regarding titanium dioxide 30 Sep 2022
- Analyze if there is correlation between COI edit request length and time in queue. 9 Nov 2022
- Ask about adding info about Elliot interview in Roosevelt. 29 Nov 2022
- Help modify Guatemalan laws about copyright, including adding freedom of panorama[3]. 12 Dec 2022
January - June 2023
edit- EMPTY
July - December 2023
edit- Work on the lead of Jorge Carpio Nicolle - 9 July 2023
- Fabrikator request - 15 July 2023
- Work on the first paragraph of Circassia - 16 July 2023
- Populate Category:Medieval assassinated people with politicians by century. - 17 July 2023
- Talk:Russia#Removal of maps - 29 July 2023
- Talk:France#Removal of map - 11 July 2023. Create RFC on the relevant infobox talk page.
- Bring Jorge Ubico to Good Article class. 14 Sep 2023
- Help talk:Category#Wikilink to Template:DEFAULTSORT
- Analyze and make practice close of Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Layout/Archive 12 April 2, 2023
- Tezcatlipoca - Correct old-style in-text citations so they link to the relevant reference. 9 Feb 2023
- Silvia Valdés.
Done Add latest info 5 August 2022 (UTC) 12 Aug 2022- Add neutral info like personal life, awards, achievements, etc. 12 Aug 2022
- Add positive info to balance. 12 Aug 2022
- Follow up on Talk:Europe#Infobox map revert. 30 Aug 2023
- Draft:MOS:LEADLENGTH table modification. 17:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Done Make statistical analysis using whatamidoing data.Make statistical analysis of articles per types. 19:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Make statistical analysis with relevant formulas to develop another lead size table.
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps#Extensive map effort 14 May 2023
- Work on Egor Burkin - 7 Dec 2023
- Marlene Raquel Blanco Lapola first woman chief of police in Guatemala - 20 Dec 2023
January - June 2024
edit- Create article about executions of Burrows and Tacklyn (killers of Richard Sharples) last ones worldwide under British rule. 19 January 2024
- Follow up on ip's NPOV: Guardianship of article and censorship of talk page - 25 Jan 2024
- Work on modifying Non-defining characteristics. 27 Jan 2024
- Publish in Village Pump ideas.
- Use as general template the former 2007 guideline
- Publish in Village Pump ideas.
- Discuss WP:TRIVIALCAT's section on persons' deaths. 28 Jan 2023
- The Hill: "Fauci met with Wuhan gain-of-function scientist in '17, admits lab leak not a conspiracy" - 22 Jan 2024
- Find actual quote of what Fauci stated.
- Add lead of years most important events. 20 Mar 2024
- Modify years lead template. 20 Mar 2024
Tasks done
editThese tasks only reflect some edits I planned on doing for later, which may be just a fraction of my total edits overall.
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Discussionsedit
Categories for discussionedit
|
Done Make map of Petén and its neighbors - 14 March 2024 - 15 March 2024
- Category:Assassinated politicians by method - 27 Jan 2024
- Category:Assassinated politicians by political orientation - 29 Jan 2024
Templates
editPage and talk
edit- Footnote (pron is short of pronunciation)
{{#tag:ref|Pronounced variously {{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɡ|r|ɛ|n|ɪ|tʃ}} {{respell|GREN|itch}}, {{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɡ|r|ɛ|n|ɪ|dʒ}} {{respell|GREN|ij}}.<ref name=ahd/>|group=pron}}- Add <references group=pron/> or {{reflist|group=pron}} to Notes section (substitute pron with relevant text).
- Remove
<ref name=ahd/>if the reference is not going to be used elsewhere. If included and there is no such named reference an error will appear about an invoked ref not defined.
- Wikitext citation:
<ref>{{Cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}</ref>
- or
<ref name="name">{{Cite web|url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}</ref>
- To invoke the named footnote:
<ref name="name" />
{{sfn}}To link abridged in-line citation to full citation.- [[w:es:artículo]] interwiki link to Spanish Wikipedia
- <!-- hidden comment -->
{{Quote frame}}{{Disputed inline|Talk page section}}{{Ordered list|Item 1|Item 2}}No indent in ordered list.- MediaWiki API result - to check the coding syntax of an edit summary (add numeric id of the edit in the address bar)
Page
editTalk
edit{{Reflist-talk}}{{Talk quote block|text|by}}{{subst:Unsigned|USER NAME OR IP|DATE AND TIME}{{od}}(to restart indent in threads){{Talkback|user1|section}}
Categories
edit{{Navseasoncats}}Adds bar in a category page to facilitate navigation.{{Irregular chronology category navigation|prefix|suffix|season1|season2|season3|...}}{{Non-diffusing subcategory|parent|specific}}Adds template to category page stating it's a non-difussing subcategory.{{Category see also|A}}{{container}}Adds template notifying it should only contain subcategories.
More templates
edit{{tick}}{{cross}}{{done}}{{not done}}- {{color}}
[[File:Pictogram voting comment.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]- Various icons
Wikilinks
edit- Permanent link:
[[Special:Permalink/402359171]]- For
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=402359171
- For
Issues and discussions
edit- Article examples
- Overly long first sentence
- Talk:Mahatma Gandhi#First sentence seems to be too long 25 March 2023
Wikipedia philosophy and learning
edit
|
This user finds censorship offensive. |
 | This user believes that edits need |
 | This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know. |
| <ref> | This user recognizes the importance of citing sources. |
 | This user believes that new editors who commit vandalism should be treated with love, patience, tolerance and understanding. |
 | This user believes that an editor should be humble, and weigh arguments by their rationality and not solely by the seniority of the other editor. |
 | This user thinks it is a sad day when an editor, specially an administrator, doesn't want to seek consensus and unreasonably refuses to provide verifiable evidence of what they say. |
 | This user realizes that a single short edit can take an hour or more of work |
 | This editor has learned not to copy edit unsourced information. |
| | This user realizes that it can take eight hours of work to copyedit a short article of 2000 words. |
| | This editor has learned to read article's tags before copyediting. |
 | This user has discovered that some contributors have been Wikipedia editors for more than ten years with thousands of edits, and they still use unreliable sources... |
 | This editor has learned that a single revert may be edit warring. |
| This user has learned to have in mind specific examples before making proposals to modify policies or guidelines. |
 | This user pledges to return to Old-fashioned Wikipedian values. |
| This user has scored 189 in the Wikipediholic test. |
Opinion about administrators
editAdministrators are users who volunteer their time and who go beyond what a regular editor does. For that alone they deserve praise. But as any person imbued with authority, some administrators act in undesirable ways. For example, they may display the badge when there is absolutely no need to, specially when doing regular edits as any other editor. They may feel entitled to not be pointed out Wikipedia guidance by regular editors and may get annoyed, offended, or angered when an editor dares to do so, or worse if a regular editor dares to criticize them.
They may take unfair adverse actions against editors who they don't like or who criticized them or a fellow administrator, when the context permits it (like denying certain rights or permissions). And they may cover for each other just like police departments do. In some situations, even non-administrators may pile on editors who commit the sin of pointing out policies or guidelines to an administrator, like if they know it all, are above rules and can't make mistakes.
After all, administrators and the Wikipedia community are people too, and as people they have the same qualities and defects as society at large.
Consensus vs no consensus
editConsensus in a discussion is the agreement or support of a proposal by at least a majority of participants who provided non-repeated reasonable arguments. This ideally reflecting objectively more weight of said arguments, which provides proper basis for a consensus decision.
No consensus occurs when there is an unclear balance in the weight of reasons regarding an action in a good faith discussion.
Good advice from an administrator
editSometimes, people just disagree. There is no one, singular Right® way, it is a matter of editorial preference. If you find that the majority disagree with you, you just accept it and move on. It doesn't matter that you disagree or why. Plenty of times I disagree with the consensus/majority, but it is just my life experience, my viewpoint, the way I learned to use the English language. Not everyone has the same background or preferences. Once it is clear that you are in the minority, it is best to just thank them for participating, and bow out. Everyone is on minority side of consensus from time to time.If I could offer some advice, it would be to work on being more concise. People are more willing to consider your perspective when you only use one or two paragraphs and keep it simple. Quoting policy or MOS doesn't really help; people like what they like. So present the before and after, and keep the "why I like this" down to a sentence or two, in plain English. Then they are more likely to read everything you wrote, rather than gloss over the extended reasoning and form an opinion prematurely. The point by point edits did you no favors. It is also more effective to say why your way is better, rather than focus on why the other way is wrong. Positivity often rules the day. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
The status quo sometimes is wrong
editFor a long time, years in fact, the page Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal had as status quo a first sentence that didn't reflect guidance of MOS:FIRST. It was more fit for the biographical page of Jimmy Savile and inappropriate for the article at hand because it didn't even mention the main topic, the scandal. When I changed it to follow the guideline, I was reverted. I posted in the talk page about my rationale but there was no input.
I proceeded to summon editors from the community at large in a Wikipedia:Requests for comment, which had a lot of input. The immediate and final consensus agreed with me, that the page had an inappropriate first sentence.
I didn't do something important: seek consensus to officially end the discussion and implement the change. This is recommended to be done even if it's your own rfc and the consensus about the change seems evident. This reduces the risk of outrage and incivility.
The moral of the story is that sometimes the status quo needs to be challenged, but challenged properly.
First female governor in the Americas was from Guatemala
edit
I learned that Beatriz de la Cueva was the first female governor in North America and all the Americas. She was born in Spain and was governor of the Captaincy General of Guatemala. Apparently, reading the List of first women governors and chief ministers, there was no other female governor in the Americas, for almost 400 years.
Talk page guidance
editArbitration principles
editPolicies
editGuidelines
editEnforced essays
editOther essays
editNew words learned in Wikipedia
editBetoken: To give evidence of.[4] [f] 21:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Bowdlerization or expurgation: Form of censorship that involves purging anything deemed noxious or offensive from an artistic work, or other type of writing or media. 22:04, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Guillemet: Pair of punctuation marks in the form of sideways double chevrons, « and », used as quotation marks in a number of languages. 22:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Grognard: Veteran and most prestigious elements of Napoleon's Imperial Guard and Army.
Metonymy: Figure of speech in which a concept is referred to by the name of something closely associated with it.
Mirabilia: Plural of mirabile. Marvels or wonders.
Synecdoche: Metonymy in which a term for a part of something is used to refer to the whole.
Gadfly: Person who interferes with the status quo of a society or community by posing novel, potentially upsetting questions.
Etymon: Earlier origin word of another one (plural: etyma).
Metathesis: Transposition of sounds or syllables in a word, or of words in a sentence.
Panegyric: Formal public speech or written verse, delivered in high praise.
Psychopomp: Entity believed to escort deceased souls to an afterlife. 8 Feb 2023
Argufy: To argue without any aim. 29 March 2023
Deracinate: Uproot people. 29 March 2023
Ides: Middle of the month in the Roman calendar. 26 April 2023
Therianthropy: Mythological capacity to shapeshift.
General philosophy
edit| V | This user is vegan. Share the compassion! |
 | This user is an antinatalist, who believes people should choose not to have children. |
 | This user may be an antinatalist, but he strongly believes people should have the right to have the number of children they want. |
 | This user is a skeptic, who believes a true skeptic questions everything, not just minority views. |
 | This user is a freethinker, but mainly a free thinker. |
| DEATH | This Wikipedian thinks that one strong possibility is that there is nothing after death. Although one never knows. |
 | According to the Political compass, this user is Economic Left (−4.13) and Social Libertarian (−5.74). |
 | This editor is an agnostic who nevertheless beseeches supreme entities of Good and Justice. |
Memberships and roles
edit | This user is a participant in WikiProject History. |
 | This user is a participant in the Royalty and Nobility task force. |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Politics. |
 | This user is a member of Wikiproject Religion. What's the truth? |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Categories. |
 | This user participates in the Lead Improvement Team. |
 | This user is a recent changes patroller. |
 | This user is a member of the Welcoming Committee of Wikipedia! |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Guatemala. |
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Maps Map Workshop (watch) |
More wikiprojects
edit | This user volunteers at the Wikipedia Help Desk. |
 | This user is a member of the WikiProject Unreferenced articles. |
 | This user participates in WikiProject User Warnings. |
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Cleanup. |
 | This user is a member of the Guild of Copy Editors. |
| This user is a participant in the Grammar WikiProject. |
 | This experienced editor is seeking to adopt new users. (Users requesting adoption) |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Central America. |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Latin America. |
 | This user is a participant in WikiProject Russia. |
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Maryland. |
 | This user is a member of the Montgomery task force. |
 | This user is a Wikipedia tipster. |
 | This user is a member of the Kindness Campaign. |
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism. |
 | This user is a member of Wikipedians against censorship. |
| This user is a member of the Birthday Committee! |  |
Special forums or talk entries
editTalk pages, administrators' noticeboard, arbitration, other forum.
- Challenging closure of Political legacies thread
- User talk:Fastily#Only the negative 15 Aug 2023
- User talk:David Eppstein#Undue warning of a block [1] - 10 Jan 2024
- Talk:World War I#The Great War - 19 June 2023 - 16 Dec 2023
Milestones and deeds
edit
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
Service progress
edit| On 20 February 2023, this user reached 8,000 edits. |
| On 6 June 2023 this user reached 10,000 edits, with the article Paul Doumer. |
Update biweekly in the calends and ides (last updated 3 March 2024; next, 15 March 2024).
10.1% completed
Wikiawards
edit
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Hey there! This is for how nice you were on my page to such a newbie. Good on ya! Rexlikescheese (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| For cleaning up Dhvani Desai. Keep contributing. :) Nizil (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Thinker78 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2018 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 20:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Civility Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to Thinker78 for his calm under pressure and noble work on wikipedia. Keep up the good work sir! May1787 (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| I have a great appreciation for editors who can put their biases aside. It should be applauded any time it's recognized. Keep up the good work. Nemov (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
Articles created or translated
edit- Miguel Aldana Ibarra
- Marquisate of Villena (redirected)
- Pedro Perebal (deleted)
- Xocomil (weather) (redirected)
- Álvaro Arzú Escobar 14:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- Allan Rodríguez 05:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- Silvia Valdés 18:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Mario Méndez Montenegro 17 February 2022
- Eunice Dwumfour 27 May 2023
- Roy McGann 30 May 2023
- Ana Catalina Soberanis - 6 Sep 2023
- Beatriz Ofelia de León - 21 Dec 2023
First sentences edited
edit
Guidance
editFA
editGA
editOthers
editTimekeeping
edit- It took me almost 12 hours throughout a week to work 22 edits or 246 words of "readable prose size" of the article 1990s—on average, about 2 edits per hour, half an hour (0.5h) per edit (including research), or 20 words per hour, 3 minutes per word. 22 April 2022
- It can take me 2 hours of analysis to reply to a talk page post.
Challenges
editJune 22, 2018: Transclusion. In Talk:Noah's Ark#Myth vs account or story controversy, it took me more than two and a half hours to figure out how to properly format it, given that initially text was just copied from the help desk to the talk page of Noah's Ark. Initially I was just looking at which way was more proper to indicate that text was "moved". I thought about hatnotes, but I spent a long time analyzing the guideline to see if it was proper use. I figured out that I could use a transclusion hatnote. But soon I got embroiled in finding a way to indicate which text was actually moved, because a new discussion was started. I found out about boxes. But then I realized I would have to actually transclude the text. Which I finally managed to do, transcluding the text. Yay!
Hall of fame
editIn memoriam
editUser:Ed, reportedly a 14 year-old editor with thousands of edits, founder of Wikipedia:Esperanza, WikiProject International relations, WikiProject Lists. Inspiring!
Longest threads I have walked in
edit- Edit dif 1104699210 and its related RfC: A TikToker, associates, other accused constitute 'Public figure' or not? By User:Bookku. More than 14,500 words. Update: 1,800 more words! With User:USaamo in continuance of the saga! (15 Oct 22).
- A mountain out of molehill? By 45.136.197.235 and mention of Sideswipe9th and Softlemonades. Around 7,000 words.
Interesting images
edit
Funny!
edit- "Moose? A 'common household pest'. Really? All over the livingroom, are they?" Comment made by Anna Frodesiak (talk) on List of common household pests, on 26 January 2016 (UTC).
- "Hello.! Im Lucas and im new here. I just wanted to know, how to contact sumerians, ive got few questions to them and was just wondering how you talk ti them." Anonymous IP. 01:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC). At User talk:Acroterion
- Supershow (talk · contribs)
Warnings
edit
|
|
|
Historical
editIgnorance and murderous savagery
editContemporary accounts state Mongol soldiers looted and then destroyed mosques, palaces, libraries, and hospitals. Priceless books from Baghdad's thirty-six public libraries were torn apart, the looters using their leather covers as sandals.[8] Grand buildings that had been the work of generations were burned to the ground. The House of Wisdom (the Grand Library of Baghdad), containing countless precious historical documents and books on subjects ranging from medicine to astronomy, was destroyed. Claims have been made that the Tigris ran red from the blood of the scientists and philosophers killed.[9][10] Citizens attempted to flee, but were intercepted by Mongol soldiers who killed in abundance, sparing no one, not even children.
Notes
edit- ^ Non-government investigator, not a university-educated scientist, not a private investigator in the mainstream concept (https://web.archive.org/web/20200430051544/https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/investigator).
- ^ By training but not certified (didn't do the exam)
- ^ Even though constantly in conflict and at loggerheads with management due to his union position and duties, management itself recognized his work as one of the best in the organization. Following the status quo sometimes leads to usual and mediocre outcomes. Innovation and controversy is sometimes a most to improve things.
- ^ An example: A random stranger on the street approached him and chitchats. Eventually the stranger told him to think things before getting left without skin.
- ^ "An edit has presumed consensus until it is disputed or reverted. Should another editor revise that edit then the new edit will have presumed consensus until it meets with disagreement."
- ^ Infinitive: to betoken, preterite: betokened, past participle: betokened[5]
References
edit- ^ |https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=qDgLy1HtviU&list=OLAK5uy_mQBNroOc13yhkaCSMobdJebtiTUeljVeQ
- ^ http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-1009-foreign-aid-20171005-story.html
- ^ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FOP_guatemala_is_all_wrong%2C_part_2
- ^ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/betoken
- ^ https://conjugator.reverso.net/conjugation-english-verb-betoken.html
- ^ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/wikipedia-editor-allegedly-forced-by-french-intelligence-to-delete-classified-entry/
- ^ Belanger, Ashley (6 Jan 2023). "Wikipedia admin jailed for 32 years after alleged Saudi spy infiltration". Ars Technica. Retrieved 8 Jan 2023.
- ^ Murray, S.A.P. (2012). The library: An illustrated history. New York: Skyhorse Publishing, pp. 54.
- ^ Frazier, I., "Invaders: Destroying Baghdad," New Yorker Magazine, [Special edition: Annals of History], April 25, 2005, Online Issue Archived 2018-06-12 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Szczepanski, Kallie. "How the Mongols Took Over Baghdad in 1258." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/the-mongol-siege-of-baghdad-1258-195801 (accessed February 10, 2021).
External links
edit- Humanity - Music for the spirit or mind
- Hell shall perish - Epic and ecstatic song