User talk:Blaze Wolf/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Blaze Wolf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Re Message on my talk page
How is my edit vandalism? I usually add that same hidden message where that part is too because people tend to also change that up to the team he signed/or got traded for. It is not vandalism, its the same message you put under "current team"? Swagging (talk) 19:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I've changed my warning to level 1. YOu added the guy's death date when he is very clearly still alive. You also undid my grammar edit. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I did not do that death edit. Idk who it was but I was trying to revert it until you did. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Swagging (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Looking at it I think you may have just been editing the wrong version. My apologies. You can remove the warning from your talk page, and apologies for the only warning, I thought you were jsut a new user that IP created to try and continue their vandalism without people noticing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- You're all good lol. Everyone makes mistakes. Swagging (talk) 19:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Looking at it I think you may have just been editing the wrong version. My apologies. You can remove the warning from your talk page, and apologies for the only warning, I thought you were jsut a new user that IP created to try and continue their vandalism without people noticing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I did not do that death edit. Idk who it was but I was trying to revert it until you did. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Swagging (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
4im warnings
Hello, the -4im set of warnings are for severe defamation and vandalism only. They are not to be used for test edits, misguided edits, or edits against consensus. Thanks, and please don't bite the newbies next time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Can you accept my discord friend request?
I am The Great Waluigi Hunter#7509 and I want to talk with you about an edit I made Monsters Fight (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- No. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I do not discuss edits over Discord. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Question from Jamilahknox (00:42, 1 November 2022)
hello my name is jamilah and i am a los angeles based photographer and it would be great to have my ork put on wikk --Jamilahknox (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Jamilahknox: Hello Jamilah! See the File Upload Wizard to upload images you want to use here on Wikipedia! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
EF
Are you able to view logs for this filter? (The filter itself is private, wasn't sure if logged-in users could view a list of hits).OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- @OhNoitsJamie: Nope. I get this message when I try: "One or more of the filter IDs you specified are private." ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:42, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Damn, I wish there was a way to allow logged-in users to view filter hits and diffs without revealing the contents of the filter (which in many cases would make the filter easier to circumvent). In any case, I have a couple of "grab-bag" filters that I update frequently with active LTA triggers. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:53, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Hi sir can you help me, can you vote for my wikipage to keep Kingkong76om (talk) 18:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
- @Kingkong76om: No. By asking me to do so you have just violated WP:CANVASS. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Sorry I'm new here I did not know that. Asking is also can be a violation. Sorry for that Kingkong76om (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- You specifically asked me to vote "keep". Why would you think that is appropriate? You are attempting to bias the discussion in your favor by requesting me to vote keep. If you had asked a related WIkiproject to vote in this discussion that would've been fine, but asking specific people to vote specific things is in no way appropriate at all. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Sorry I didn't know about that. I think I need to read more about it Kingkong76om (talk) 19:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- If you had read the section about the proper etiquette for AFD discussions on the page for AFD then you would've known this was not ok. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Shit I did a big mistake. Sorry Kingkong76om (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Amusing. Streisand effect applies. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- I mean, they made no attempt to hide it. I just simply made it more public by making people aware of it on the AFD for transparency's sake. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Difference from draftspace and userspace
What’s the difference from draftspace and userspace? SikiWtideI (Speak to the backwards police) 00:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)SikiWtideI
- Draftspace is where you incubate a draft. Userspace contains stuff like your userpage and your user talk page and shouldn't be used for incubating a draft generally. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for the help... yet again. :) — Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC) |
Cool off
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Cool off, that comment of yours was not appropriate. Cool down and treat others with respect. The only reason why they went off is because you were absurdly rude in your assumptions. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. Cause claiming "corruption" is definitely not a political opinion. Personal attacks are OK now if the other user gives one first? Ok then, cause that makes sense. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- I think you're fine, political situation can get heated quickly and you aren't in the wrong for telling a corruption conspiracist that their beliefs are a COI, they shouldn't edit something that they have a controversial opinion to. Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedian and keep doing what you're doing. 𝘾𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙢𝙖𝙣2917 (talkpage) 18:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- It's not really fine, what that IPuser said is not justifiable in calling someone out for a COI and conflagrating the situation. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- I think you're fine, political situation can get heated quickly and you aren't in the wrong for telling a corruption conspiracist that their beliefs are a COI, they shouldn't edit something that they have a controversial opinion to. Thanks for being an awesome Wikipedian and keep doing what you're doing. 𝘾𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙢𝙖𝙣2917 (talkpage) 18:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
For you
Spread the goodness of wolves by adding {{subst:Wolves}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Allaoii talk 21:42, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Question from Usman mayafi (23:04, 7 November 2022)
How can i post a picture --Usman mayafi (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes as long as you follow Wikipedia:Uploading images and as long as it is in the Public domain, you have permission/you own it, or it is under Fair use. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:18, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer they're question. They weren't asking if they could, they were asking how. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I misread it you can use Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard post a picture or if you want to get it done quickly then you can use Special:Upload though if you are a new editor I think you should use the first option. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 00:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer they're question. They weren't asking if they could, they were asking how. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Re: UserBox Nintendo Switch
Sure thing, you can alter it whatever you like to make it better :) Chepry˙˚° 08:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Cool thanks! Just wanted to make sure it was alright with you first. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:00, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Primefac (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
WHOA!!! DO NOT RETIRE!!! PLEASE!!!
You are the best talk page stalker I've ever had. PLEASE do not retire!!! I just saw that notice just now! We love you and you would be missed! — Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:37, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- As the template says (and as I stated in the pinned post above) nothing is set in stone as of now. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:38, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- I know, but seriously. We can't afford to lose great editors such as yourself. Please stay. It would be a tremendous loss for the encyclopedia and community. TY. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
My TP
If you look, I added that vandalbox, but it looks all disoriented. I don't know how best to reorient the page so that the vandal box is not oddly pushing the "Contents" to the side like that (at least how it shows up on my computer screen on my TP). If you are able to help or fix it, please go right ahead. TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 22:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Am here if you need to chat
Hey there, I missed the background context but I see other editors have not been treating you with the respect or appreciation that you deserve. I strongly encourage taking WP:Wikibreaks and cooling off but I speak for many when I say I would be sad to see you leave. Your answers in Teahouse and your generosity with editors should not come at expense of your own well-being. If you ever want to email/chat, I am around. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi there
Hello @Blaze Wolf: can you indicate which userbox causes technical problems, I can discard it if you like. By the way I read that you need some time to cool off. I appreciate your decision, personally I also took some time to cool off and luckily I have found some new topics that energises me & I keep going. Best luck to you, regards...Ogün Eratalay message 06:33, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Ertly: Hello Ertly. I fixed the technical problems by going to the userbox itself and just marking the MFD template on it with noinclude tags, however the userbox is User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right_To_Resist since you asked. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
"(that poor keyboard)"
That made me laugh today. :-D — Moops ⋠T⋡ 17:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm glad. I've actually had a keyboard I broke because crumbs got under the keys and said keys stopped working. The keyboard that replaced that is still perfectly functioning which shows just how good and robust it is. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
Just for always being awesome. Each and every day. :) — Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Oh and please don't retire. ;) — Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, and I'm still considering retirement, but like I said it's only a consideration (not necessarily strong like the template says which I don't like) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
excuse me
I am a Christian and I KNOW that the resurrection of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior is not a myth. 2601:182:300:BF90:EC2F:623E:7F88:6572 (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Well I'm a Mormon and I also know it's not a myth. But those are just beliefs and not facts. If you think it should be changed to truth go ahead and propose it on the talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Help on a new Wikipedia Page
Hello Blaze,
Nice to meet you. I'm new in Wikipedia, so I'm sorry in advance if my understand of the Wikipedia standards is not good. I'm currently working on the Wiki page of - Disques Nuits d'Afrique - . I've made some changes in order to repond to the messages suggesting those changes. Do you have the time to take a look at this page and suggest me some changes or specifications a little more specific, as some suggestions that I'm receiving now may be a little general. (I'm a French speaker, living in Quebec.)
Thanks a lot!
Romain RomainWiki79 (talk) 17:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Black Adam mid-credits scene
The Future section of the article explicitly mentions that there will be a Superman vs Black Adam duel. Also see this for example where he teases about the clash due to the scene at the end [1]. Please stop removing it. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Good Friend Award | ||
Thank you for being the first to welcome me to Wikipedia, and being a consistent help in the nearly three months since. It's a shame you're considering retirement, but no matter what the outcome is: thank you for helping me learn about and get accustomed to Wikipedia, as well as just being a good friend. DecafPotato (talk) 02:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks Decaf. I'm glad I've been such a good help to you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Question from Chtayyib2 on Mahendra Narayan Nidhi Deprived Housing Scheme (16:45, 19 November 2022)
How to add undocumented template --Chtayyib2 (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think there is such a thing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Restoring the edits of a banned user
You are correct that any editor in good standing can restore the edits that have been reverted per WP:BANREVERT; note however that if you read through the entire "Evasion and enforcement" section of the banning policy, it also states that "Editors who reinstate edits made by a banned or blocked editor take complete responsibility for the content". So if you reviewed the material that was added and ensure that the citations support the information added, then that's fine. Otherwise, you are responsible for any errors or BLP violations (which this LTA sockmaster has a very long history of) that you've restored. They also like to make threats of violence and enjoy personally attacking other editors to the point where I automatically remove talk page access when I block them, so that's fun! So, yes, if you see edits reverted due to socking, you can restore them, just please ensure you are verifying all of the content you are reinstating.-- Ponyobons mots 19:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Alright sounds good. The refs seemed correct (And they also changed a normal dash to an en dash which is correct per the MOS). I'll go over the refs in the edit and ensure I'm not making a stupid mistake (if I am I'll revert myself) but thanks for letting me know. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:13, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- But does WP:BLP actually apply to articles on a fictional character? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Mr. Blobby isn't real?!? I was just mentioning the policy for restoring the edits of banned users in general. Since this LTA often tries to add contentious material to BLPs with poor sourcing, I thought it worth mentioning. This is who we're dealing with, if you're curious. That's a portion of their accounts; many checkusers don't bother tagging them anymore per WP:DENY.-- Ponyobons mots 19:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure anyone can WP:label fictional characters however they want as long as it's verifiable or has due weight. ~~ lol1VNIO🎌 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 20:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Question from Nicholas Bobby Chadee (02:09, 25 November 2022)
How can I add information about myself so that others may know about me? --Nicholas Bobby Chadee (talk) 02:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Nicholas Bobby Chadee: Well, are you notable according to our definition? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Alright fine...
Alright fine, I get it. But does this mean that I cannot know any fellow Wikipedians better by asking about their personal interests and knowing a bit about their background? I do see that some Wikipedians are very friendly and are totally alright with people chatting with them though... Bertlookslikebowler (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bertlookslikebowler 🙂 Vincent-vst🚀 (talk) 20:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bertlookslikebowler: Most of the time no. You can ask about that stuff on the Discord. And while some Wikipedians are fine with it, the general rule on Wikipedia is that stuff like that is not appropriate per WP:NOTAFORUM. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:10, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf: Alright, that sounds fair enough. Anyways, take it lightly! Some rules, are meant to be broken :) Bertlookslikebowler (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bertlookslikebowler: Not on Wikipedia. There are situations where you have to break a rule to improve the encyclopedia, however simply engaging in general chit-chat is never one of those situations. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:15, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Bertlookslikebowler: The edit of yours Blaze Wolf reverted was at best inappropriate. This edit you made to User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU was worse. I consider it trolling. I didn't revert it because it's not vandalism and because CAPTAIN RAJU is a very experienced editor and can deal with it how they see fit. However, if you persist in making these kinds of edits, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Blaze Wolf Bbb23 Yeah, you guys got a point. Seems like Wikipedia isn't the place to chill a bit, there are so many strict rules to abide by here.. Anyways, in your opinions, do you think these sort of rules like WP:NOTAFORUM are essential? I wish I can abolish this rule though :) Bertlookslikebowler (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- @bertlookslikebowler: quoting from an essay by an administrator: "wikipedia is an encyclopedia. the primary job of wikipedians is to write it. everything else is secondary." → lettherebedarklight → 晚安 → おやすみ → 14:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- Blaze Wolf Bbb23 Yeah, you guys got a point. Seems like Wikipedia isn't the place to chill a bit, there are so many strict rules to abide by here.. Anyways, in your opinions, do you think these sort of rules like WP:NOTAFORUM are essential? I wish I can abolish this rule though :) Bertlookslikebowler (talk) 09:13, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf: Alright, that sounds fair enough. Anyways, take it lightly! Some rules, are meant to be broken :) Bertlookslikebowler (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2022
- News and notes: English Wikipedia editors: "We don't need no stinking banners"
- In the media: "The most beautiful story on the Internet"
- Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
- Book review: Writing the Revolution
- Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
- Essay: The Six Million FP Man
- Tips and tricks: (Wiki)break stuff
- Recent research: Study deems COVID-19 editors smart and cool, questions of clarity and utility for WMF's proposed "Knowledge Integrity Risk Observatory"
- Featured content: A great month for featured articles
- Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
- CommonsComix: Joker's trick
Hello
I am glad that you are still editing. I see that you are going through some stress. Whether or not you choose to retire, I want to let you know that I appreciate your contributions here, and wish you the best in your future. It has been interesting seeing your contributions improve as you have learned more about this encyclopedia. Cullen328 (talk) 03:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you Cullen. I always strive to do the best I can and improve wherever possible. If I don't try and improve then I never will. I try and keep this same mentality with everything I do. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I hope that you stay, but the final decision is up to you. Cullen328 (talk) 03:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
I made a comment
I added a comment to the closed RFC. I believe this is more than a style guide but also a WP:BLP issues as it can offensive to not include the full name, stylized correctly, to individuals who have articles concerning them such as these changes to Elder Cook and others. VVikingTalkEdits 17:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. I took a look at who was notified and for whatever reason, the WIkiProject dedicated to the Church was not notified which makes absolutely no sense to me. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:29, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Farewell, Old Friend
"People who refuse to rest honorably on their laurels when they reach retirement age seem very admirable to me." -Helen Hayes
I see you're considering retirement. That'd be great! Enjoy some family time if you have one, or just travel and see some new things. It's always great to expand your horizons. All the best in your future, BlazeWolf! 209.237.114.55 (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm a little confused. Only a few weeks ago someone on this IP was vandalizing articles, and yet now you refer to me as an old friend? I mean... thanks for the quote, I finally have another one to put on my userpage. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Frankly, Blaze Wolf, I think it's the same IP, and their post here is nothing but heavy sarcasm. I suspect they would be happy if you retired because they'd have one less editor to revert their vandalism.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I can't really tell. Regardless it's a good quote, even if it's a bit rude. (might as well just make that section on my talk page just a collection of various quotes, good or not. I mean, it does say that quotes can be interesting). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Frankly, Blaze Wolf, I think it's the same IP, and their post here is nothing but heavy sarcasm. I suspect they would be happy if you retired because they'd have one less editor to revert their vandalism.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Regarding edits to Barbarian(2022 Film)
Hey, I wanted to talk a bit more about the disambiguation. A new disambiguator was not added, but rather, a disambiguation link was added. This was done as that specific page was coming up a lot more on Google search results and I couldn't find the exact article "Barbarian" coming up on google search results, so i felt a disambiguation link was necessary.
103.14.72.132 (talk) 02:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
NPA
Well, this was interesting. Uncalled for. Sarrail (talk) 17:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please remember WP:DENY as well as WP:BRI (Block, revert, ignore). Yes it was uncalled for but that doesn't mean we need to continue to acknowledge this. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, situation escalated quickly. I'll find myself 99.9% at fault for a denial accident. I'll find an insurance provider... Sarrail (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I reported them to AIV after their first revert of their personal attack and continue reverting them for a bit hoping they'd get bored and stop and when it was clear they wouldn't I just stopped and was enacting "IBRL" (ignore but revert later). I didn't engage with them on their talk page since they clearly refused to understand. YOu simply encouraged them by giving them the attention they needed. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I know, I know. Don't worry, I'll note WP:DENY and WP:STICKKYSTICK. Sarrail (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Good. You should've already known this since you're a rollbacker so I'm a little bit disappointed in your behavior. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you become an admin, I expect you to remove my permissions once I misuse/forget WP:DENY. Though this is optional :) Sarrail (talk) 18:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- That is unlikely to happen. I am fairly forgiving, although a bit too forgiving occasionally. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you become an admin, I expect you to remove my permissions once I misuse/forget WP:DENY. Though this is optional :) Sarrail (talk) 18:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Good. You should've already known this since you're a rollbacker so I'm a little bit disappointed in your behavior. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I know, I know. Don't worry, I'll note WP:DENY and WP:STICKKYSTICK. Sarrail (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- I reported them to AIV after their first revert of their personal attack and continue reverting them for a bit hoping they'd get bored and stop and when it was clear they wouldn't I just stopped and was enacting "IBRL" (ignore but revert later). I didn't engage with them on their talk page since they clearly refused to understand. YOu simply encouraged them by giving them the attention they needed. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well, situation escalated quickly. I'll find myself 99.9% at fault for a denial accident. I'll find an insurance provider... Sarrail (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
Great job answering questions! Elijah Wilder (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:31, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse
- I actually was a host in the past, however I was very inexperienced and didn't quite have enough knowledge to correctly answer questions, so I was removed. I haven't added my name back since, well, I don't need to. I'm technically a host just by answering the questions. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, OK.
- Elijah Wilder (talk) 16:37, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Logo
Hi, i read what you said to me about the image of "The Flash" logo. I was trying to upload it correctly, but i can't. This is the link;https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=472614671737241&set=a.441896974809011 201.188.151.124 (talk) 04:19, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- I suggest you ask at the Teahouse. They'll be able to help you better than I can. It's also late where I am right now so I don't have the time to help you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:21, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from Seomaz (06:40, 3 December 2022)
Hi Blaze; I am a newbie here can you please guide me on how can i initiate here to contribute values to society or learn something new to gain knowledge? Thanks, Mentor Arslan Seomaz --Seomaz (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Seomaz: Hello Seo! That would depend on what you are wanting to do. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 12:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Seomaz, "contribute values to society" sounds to me like you want to share your knowledge, particularly in the moral sphere. This is contrary to the values of Wikipedia. If you wish to research a subject and add material you find in reliable sources, that is your best approach here. Being a "Mentor" to the world, not so much. If you wish to learn and gain knowledge, you should read articles, read the articles' talk pages, read the footnoted sources, read the WP:Teahouse and read the Help desk daily. Happy editing! Quisqualis (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations on your Probationary AFC reviewer appointment
I hope you enjoy it and don't get so involved that you suffer from burnout. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- I probably won't suffer from burnout. I've really only gotten burnt out once and that was with a video game. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Helping me with my Wiki
I was wondering if you could help me with my Wikipedia im working on Calderonrivera (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- See the comments left on your talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Misunderstanding
Hello. I made an edit on Matt Walsh's page, removing the left-wing bias, making it neutral. Right after, someone removed my edit without explanation. I reverted it back, and left a message on his talk page. You removed my reversion, claiming I didn't elaborate on why I reverted it back. Colejohanson12 (talk) 23:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-49
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Wikisources use a tool called ProofreadPage. ProofreadPage uses OpenSeadragon which is an open source tool. The OpenSeadragon JavaScript API has been significantly re-written to support dynamically loading images. The functionality provided by the older version of the API should still work but it is no longer supported. User scripts and gadgets should migrate over to the newer version of the API. The functionality provided by the newer version of the API is documented on MediaWiki. [2][3]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 December. It will be on all wikis from 8 December (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Question about rejection of article
Hi there, I got your rejection of my submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Realm-protector/sandbox) I do get your point that this seems to hard to maintain as the list will (slowly) grow larger over time.
Reason I am adding this is that old line ups of this sportsteam are hard to find - media articles online seem to disappear over time.
As the umbrella sports organisation of this national team provides line ups from 2018 on - would it be okay to publish this as a closed list for the time bracket 2003-2017. (and refer to the line ups from 2018 onward to the website of the sport organisation).
There is no list like this available anywhere online - it would be great to have this available as a record of historical information about this sportsteam. Maintenacne won't be an issue as the list is closed.
Thank you! Realm-protector (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I would suggest a specific time period like 2003 - 2010. I recommend asking the relevant Wikiproject what they think would be good. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viacom18, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well that's new. Most likely just me reverting vandalism. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Newsletter
Anywhere in particular that I can help out? I'm done with my current project and I'd like to help where I can. ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @The Night Watch: I'd really appreciate help in adding the DYKs for all the video game articles up to November 30. I've sort of stopped work on it because I've gotten a bit busy and also don't wanna be in pain looking at every single DYK to try and figure out which one is a DYK and which one isn't. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Waging an edit war by a "Wikieditor" member
Blaze Wolf. A person named "WikiEditor" is vandalizing and reversing my edits to an article about the attack on Nazran. Please protect this page from vandalism. The raid on Nazran is an attack by the armed forces of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria. And Ichkeria is not a bunch of militants, but a state with its own structures, including the military. The state that fought for its freedom from Russia during the Russian invasion... Please block this member or he will not stop fighting the edit war in this article. He even insulted me and addressed me in the feminine gender with the words "You are a big liar." Russian viki (talk) 16:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Don't bother me with edit wars. You need to discuss this with the user. I'm not here to take sides. Also if you need to use Google Translate then I suggest you edit on the Wiki of the language you speak natively. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Please excuse my English. I translated through google translator. Russian viki (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Request on 08:58:06, 6 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Swordofneutrality
In your review of List of PlayStation games for PlayStation 4 and 5 you say that "The first source is just a blog", but this source is playstation.com, the official outlet for news on the brand, so you might have assessed its reliability incorrectly. Swordofneutrality (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Swordofneutrality (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- No. It's the PlayStation blog. Regardless it's a primary source so it doesn't count for notability. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a secondary source but the notice on the draft mentions reliable sources as well. I would have thought that blog.playstation.com would be considered appropriate as a reliable source. Swordofneutrality (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- IT's a blog so most liekly not. Also, being a primary source does not always indicate it's reliable. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a secondary source but the notice on the draft mentions reliable sources as well. I would have thought that blog.playstation.com would be considered appropriate as a reliable source. Swordofneutrality (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Catholic University School and Tottenham
Hi, just saw your message. I think you may have me mistaken as I am not a Wikipedia editor, I only read the articles. I would never consciously vandalise an article on any wiki, I have no idea how my IP ended up here. 31.187.2.127 (talk) 13:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Your IP is most likely a shared or dynamic IP, meaning someone other than you had your IP and vandalized the article. The Shared IP message appears to be missing from the warning however. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for rejecting that draft. Multiple authors, possibly sockpuppets of the same person, have been attempting to create a promotional article about him on the English Wikinews. Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Augusthorsesdroppings10: (I thought you were a troll at first with your odd username choice) No problem! I only rejected it cause it had been rejected previously and then resubmitted. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:32, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think I get that a lot. My username change request at Meta-Wiki has been pending. Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah alright. I'm just so used to trolls harassing me on my talk page that I've just learned to automatically assume any new talk page message is a troll harassing me. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think I get that a lot. My username change request at Meta-Wiki has been pending. Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Years in other calendars
Hi there Blaze Wolf, I just wanted to give you a heads-up with regard to an edit you made a few days ago. It is actually OK to include the year in a local calendar, as long as there is also an AD or CE style year. That's something I think many editors are not aware of, but MOS:ERA does allow for it – it's the last bullet point, "Other era systems". Since the date you removed didn't have a wikilink to the relevant calendar (Bikram Sambat, abbreviated B.S.) it didn't conform to the MOS, and I completely understand why you thought it wouldn't be appropriate info to include. It's a pretty obscure part of the MOS, but since this is something that crops up every now and then in drafts, I just wanted to make you aware of it. All the best, --bonadea contributions talk 11:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bonadea: Thanks for making me aware! I honestly had no clue what the heck "B.S." was as it sounded like
complete BS (pun absolutely intended)it was made up. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Failed Submission
Dear Blaze,
I am upset to see you disliked my article on environmentalism. After reading your responce, I need clarification on which part of my article is "opinion". I did not include much personal thought outside the direct application to my major.
Best,
Thomas ThomasBrosnihan (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Aww, you reverted it
I thought it would be funny if I answered that one. Ah well. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I almost reverted you just now since I've been harassed by IPs vandals and whatever. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Fighting vandals often means winding up in their crosshairs, sadly. Take a break if you need one - others will keep fighting the good fight. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 18:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Hot stars vs not as hot stars
In your modification of the article on the star Betelgeuse you said "stars are hot. If a star were cold it wouldn't exist or be a star" That is true of course, but the descriptions of stars assumes they are all hot enough to be a star. But there is a range of heat, and those that are hotter than other (blue stars are much hotter than red stars, for example) are described as "hot". See Blue supergiant, Stellar classification and Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. I am not sure if it is correct to describe Betelgeuse as "hot" (it is red, but perhaps it is a hot red, an hence the use of the word) but it is not uncommon to see the word "hot" used to describe particular stars. Blakestern (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
here you go
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03vm7kq, you can clearly see shes officially credited as Megan Webb. This source is taken from the offical BBC website. 75.84.217.156 (talk) 19:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Great work at WP:AFC you've overtaken me this week [4] Theroadislong (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC) |
why did you revert it
it is false that cats are always sleepy. could you explain you reversal Beretes (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Because commenting on 11 year old comments from an IP is necroposting and disruptive. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- ok Beretes (talk) 17:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- shouldn't comments this old be archived, or something similar? Beretes (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Typically yes, but sometimes talk pages don't receive enough activity for it to be logical to archive them regularly. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I see Beretes (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Typically yes, but sometimes talk pages don't receive enough activity for it to be logical to archive them regularly. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from TheNicheWebster (17:59, 12 December 2022)
Hi, I was recently reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinnamon_Love and they link to the website https://www.slixa.com/ but there isnt a page on Wikipedia to give more information about Slixa. Would I be able to create a page for Slixa or is there boundaries as they are an adult site? --TheNicheWebster (talk) 17:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TheNicheWebster: As long as Slixa is notable according to Wikipedia's definition you can create an article on them. Being an adult website is never a boundary per WP:NOTCENSORED. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-50
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- An A/B test has begun at 15 Wikipedias for DiscussionTools on mobile. Half of the editors on the mobile web site will have access to the Reply tool and other features. [5]
- The character
=
cannot be used in new usernames, to make usernames work better with templates. Existing usernames are not affected. [6]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 December. It will be on all wikis from 15 December (calendar).
- The HTML markup used by DiscussionTools to show discussion metadata below section headings will be inserted after these headings, not inside of them. This change improves the accessibility of discussion pages for screen reader software. [7]
Events
- The fourth edition of the Coolest Tool Award will happen online on Friday 16 December 2022 at 17:00 UTC! The event will be live-streamed on YouTube in the MediaWiki channel and added to Commons afterwards.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Richard Rhodes (writer)
Hi Blaze: This is Richard Rhodes. I wanted to let you know that the box around my picture lists the wrong website address. It's given as RichardRhodes.com but should be RichardRhodes.net. I let the .com address lapse, someone bought it, tried to sell it to me, and when I didn't buy it linked it to some obscure Asian gambling website. Check it out and you'll see. Please correct to RichardRhodes.net, which is maintained for me by the Authors Guild. Thanks--Richard Rhodes Rrhodes (talk) 23:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I found an image https://www.bhaskar.com/local/chhattisgarh/kanker/news/agricultural-college-will-now-be-known-as-ramprasad-potai-who-was-a-member-of-the-constitution-committee-129907747.html will it will work or not. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 14:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- That would be worse since it's such low quality. I don't know where they're getting these images but they don't look real. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Can I submit it to AfC without adding image. What I can do. Please help me and also review my this article Draft:Balwant Singh Mehta. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 14:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
No homo
Hi Blaze Wolf! With regard to this, I didn't know about that phrase. Apparently we even have an article about it. It still strikes me as homophobic though, and our article confirms that I'm at least not alone in this. In any case, the user was disruptive in other ways, so it's good that they're now blocked.
I'm often dubious though whether I should report at WP:UAA or not. Purely based on the username itself, do you think I should have gone for a {{Uw-username}} in this case? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 18:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly I'm not entirely sure. TO me it's one of those joke usernames that immediately make it clear they will be WP:NOTHERE like "peepeepoopoo". In my opinion it would qualify as an Offensive username which Twinkle states "Offensive usernames make harmonious editing difficult or impossible." ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) In my experience, the fates of ‘peepeepoopoo’-esque names depend on the admin going over the report. Some will block, some won’t. That's understandable— while the username policy forbids names that
imply the intent to troll, vandalize, disrupt, advertise, or spam Wikipedia
(and lists numerous examples), it forgot to mention ‘peepeepoopoo’ names, so there’s some grey area. (if there hasn’t already been one, there should really be an RfC on those.) Personally I feel that they fall under an intent to disrupt and report them when I see them. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 03:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)- From the point of view of an administrator who regularly patrols UAA, there are some usernames that that are so egregious that I block without needing to see disruptive edits. Then there are the borderline cases. There are certain usernames that I note in my own mind that I will block immediately at the slightest trace of disruptive editing. If such an account never edits, then there is no need for a block because there is no disruption of the encyclopedia. Drawing the line is not easy, but if the username is obviously sexualized and aggressive, or attacking and obviously trolling, I block instantly. If a borderline account disrupts, I block instantly. On the other hand, I did not block HelenDegenerate when I first noticed the username despite its risqué connotations, because I took a look at their contributions which were positive and have seen since then that Helen has proven to be among the very best at UAA reports, and Blaze Wolf is very good as well. Cullen328 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense. To me its usually "Would a person who wants to be a regular contributor want to actually be referred to by this name?" to which most of the time the answer is no (although, an admin from another WIki thanked me for something I did and they had such a strange username that I almost thought they were a troll). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- So yeah I guess that the username I reported here (Ilikemennohomo) was a borderline case, but because their editing was also disruptive directly reporting at UAA was the right move? Now that I think about it, if they did not edit disruptively I probably would just have asked them about it at their talk. Thanks all for your input, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 21:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense. To me its usually "Would a person who wants to be a regular contributor want to actually be referred to by this name?" to which most of the time the answer is no (although, an admin from another WIki thanked me for something I did and they had such a strange username that I almost thought they were a troll). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- From the point of view of an administrator who regularly patrols UAA, there are some usernames that that are so egregious that I block without needing to see disruptive edits. Then there are the borderline cases. There are certain usernames that I note in my own mind that I will block immediately at the slightest trace of disruptive editing. If such an account never edits, then there is no need for a block because there is no disruption of the encyclopedia. Drawing the line is not easy, but if the username is obviously sexualized and aggressive, or attacking and obviously trolling, I block instantly. If a borderline account disrupts, I block instantly. On the other hand, I did not block HelenDegenerate when I first noticed the username despite its risqué connotations, because I took a look at their contributions which were positive and have seen since then that Helen has proven to be among the very best at UAA reports, and Blaze Wolf is very good as well. Cullen328 (talk) 04:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) In my experience, the fates of ‘peepeepoopoo’-esque names depend on the admin going over the report. Some will block, some won’t. That's understandable— while the username policy forbids names that
Question from TheNicheWebster (09:41, 14 December 2022)
Hi Blaze, sorry to pester you. My first contribution was removed and I am just wondering why. I tried to keep to the guidelines as much as possible and add a source to the information. Could you let me know where I went wrong please --TheNicheWebster (talk) 09:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TheNicheWebster: I'm not sure what you mean. Your only 2 contributions are this one and another one to my talk page. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- I made an edit to a Tina Kay page, but it was removed. I thought you might have been able to see why. It fine, if you cant TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TheNicheWebster: There is no article called Tina Kay though. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:18, 14 December 2022 (U Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)TC)
- I made an edit to a Tina Kay page, but it was removed. I thought you might have been able to see why. It fine, if you cant TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tina_Kay TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) That's the Spanish Wikipedia which is an entirely separate project.Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh really, sorry I didn't know. My apologies for taking up your time TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- TheNicheWebster, your edit to the Spanish article was reverted by a user called Pichu VI. Why not ask them about it? Bishonen | tålk 16:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC).
- I don't know how to, to be honest. I did have a look on his page, but it's literally my first time trying to contribute to Wikipedia and I thought the best person to ask was my mentor TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't contribute to Spanish Wikipedia. I don't speak Spanish. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know how to, to be honest. I did have a look on his page, but it's literally my first time trying to contribute to Wikipedia and I thought the best person to ask was my mentor TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- TheNicheWebster, your edit to the Spanish article was reverted by a user called Pichu VI. Why not ask them about it? Bishonen | tålk 16:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC).
- Oh really, sorry I didn't know. My apologies for taking up your time TheNicheWebster (talk) 16:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) That's the Spanish Wikipedia which is an entirely separate project.Theroadislong (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Densiometer redirect (16 December 2022)
Thanks for pointing me to the right spot to create a redirect! Highly appreciated, sorry for the bother. Second Sender (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Wawmart
Thanks for removing that intrusive article from the Help Desk. I was tempted to, but it seemed a bit extreme. But I see that Kingofthearmy has now been blocked as a sockpuppet anyway. ColinFine (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- No problem! They didn't have a question before or after the article, they simply just copy pasted the article to the help desk so there was no point in just hatting it as they weren't asking a question. 17:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Regarding the Rejection of profile of Rehnuma Mostafa.
Hi, Bro How are you,this is Rihabnahmed2020 from Bangladesh.I am a new user.I hope you will understand my lackings.I will try to improve my referencing capability day by day.Hopefully you will help me to publish my first page,though most of he references from Bangla newspaper ,I think you will understand everything by translation.All those information are collected from National news paper of Bangladesh.. Thanks,brother for your effort. RihanAhmed2020 (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- I have not rejected it yet. However if you continue to resubmit the article without attempting to address the concerns listed in the decline reasons (declining means you can resubmit it, rejecting means resubmission is not an option) then it will most likely be rejected. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you very much for sticking with it and helping me out there.
Please reconsider 'retirement' too... I would be devastated if you retired! Please don't! :) — Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC) |
- I really don't like how that template words things. I'm no longer "strongly" considering retirement, but I have no choice to change the wording. I would make the "strongly" an optional parameter but I haven't quite figured out how to do that yet... maybe looking at that userbox's coding would give me the answer since the number is optional. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Error in url
Hi.
I saw that it reverted my edit to Bluetooth.
I am contacting you as a way of demonstrating good faith.
I'm translating the article to the Portuguese-speaking Wikipedia, and I open all the links to use as a source, and it occurred to me that when I opened the file link I moved, the link returned an error message.
When I open the page, the following message appears in the place where the theme should be:
"We're sorry, but we were unable to service your request. You may wish to choose from the links below for information about Microsoft products and services."
This by accessing that link already present in the article.
Now with what I put, the material that I believe is the right one that had to appear appears.
I take the opportunity to apologize for my English, I'm using Google Translate to send this message here, as I speak Portuguese, and also apologies for the large text. Elder N (talk) 17:20, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: Hello Elder! Is it not automatically sending you to the archive? The link is marked as dead so it should automatically send you there. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- The file used in the article is dated January 1, 2008, but when accessed it sends it to December 28, 2008.
- The file I had inserted puts it on June 21, 2004.
- In fact the original link is dead, but luckily we have the file link that we should use to verify, and this is where the problem lies, the file link itself doesn't open where it should. Elder N (talk) 17:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: It appears you may have a translation error. It seems that what you're referring to as a file is actually just the archive URL. Also, to change the archive URL instead of changing the link in the "|url=" parameter you need to change the link in the "|archive-url=" parameter. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Good friend, I took another look at my edit and reversal made by you.
- And really that's right, there was an error on my part, I changed the |url= instead of the |archive-url=.
- And anyway, both don't open in the right place anyway.
- I must have mixed up the links when I moved that part, because the |url= is usually to have the original link, and in this article there is a file in its place. Elder N (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: It's alright, it can get a bit confusing when looking at it (also once again "file" isn't the right word here, it's "archive URL"). I'll take a look at it when I get home and see if it might be a permanent dead link if the archives don't work. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Right friend.
- Thank you for now, and I also thank you for the nomenclature correction, I have the habit of saying only file when referring to the link to archive URL.
- From what I tested from URL to file, the oldest one I got was the one from June 21, 2004, I believe there are others that work, it was just my choice to put an older one, now to avoid having problems with not opening. Elder N (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Really it would be best to go with the one closest to the access date to ensure the version is the one that's intended. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: It's alright, it can get a bit confusing when looking at it (also once again "file" isn't the right word here, it's "archive URL"). I'll take a look at it when I get home and see if it might be a permanent dead link if the archives don't work. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: It appears you may have a translation error. It seems that what you're referring to as a file is actually just the archive URL. Also, to change the archive URL instead of changing the link in the "|url=" parameter you need to change the link in the "|archive-url=" parameter. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-51
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 9 January 2023.
Recent changes
- On a user's contributions page, you can filter it for edits with a tag like 'reverted'. Now, you can also filter for all edits that are not tagged like that. This was part of a Community Wishlist 2022 request. [8]
- A new function has been used for gadget developers to add content underneath the title on article pages. This is considered a stable API that should work across all skins. Documentation is available. [9]
- One of our test wikis is now being served from a new infrastructure powered by Kubernetes (read more). More Wikis will switch to this new infrastructure in early 2023. Please test and let us know of any issues. [10]
Problems
- Last week, all wikis had no edit access for 9 minutes. This was caused by a database problem. [11]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week or next week.
- The word "Reply" is very short in some languages, such as Arabic ("ردّ"). This makes the Discussion tools button on talk pages difficult to use. An arrow icon will be added to those languages. This will only be visible to editors who have the Beta Feature turned on. [12] [13]
Future changes
- Edits can be automatically "tagged" by the system software or the Edit filter configuration system. Those tags link to a help page about the tags. Soon they will also link to Recent Changes to let you see other edits tagged this way. This was a Community Wishlist 2022 request. [14]
- The Trust & Safety tools team have shared new plans for building the Private Incident Reporting System. The system will make it easier for editors to ask for help if they are harassed or abused.
- Realtime Preview for Wikitext is coming out of beta as an enabled feature for every user of the 2010 Wikitext editor in the week of January 9, 2023. It will be available to use via the toolbar in the 2010 Wikitext editor. The feature was the 4th most popular wish of the Community Wishlist Survey 2021.
Events
- You can now register for the Wikimedia Hackathon 2023, taking place on May 19–21 in Athens, Greece. You can also apply for a scholarship until January 14th.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
About my submission
Hi Blaze Wolf, I am not being paid for this article, as specified, this is a former (past) client of mine and no longer. I am writing this Wikipedia article as a courtesy, after looking for a page and discovering there was none. 75.83.82.221 (talk) 19:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello IP! Would you mind clarifying what submission you are referring to? You have no other edits besides this one. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
about my submission
hi blaze wolf you declined a article Ceno (rapper), said it was a duplicate however. the coverage source was added, as the first draft was declined said it needed better sources. please shed some light on this issue Es87gcwriter (talk) 21:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Es87gcwriter: You should not submit multiple drafts on the same topic. Pick one (preferably Draft:Ceno (rapper)) and submit that. You can resubmit the same draft after a decline (once you address the reasons it was declined), there's no need to create a new page which results in two drafts as we have here. Add {{db-self}} to the top of the draft that you do not want to move forward with in order to request its deletion. ––FormalDude (talk) 21:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC) (talk page watcher)
Question from Oldcts1 (18:20, 21 December 2022)
Hello--In the Article on the Camp Lejeune Water Claims...there is no mention of already deceased Marines whose families have a right to being compensated. My brother spent his entire career at Lejeune, lived in barracks at Hadnot, took two showers a day, drank water, developed 5 ills on list from 1965 until his death in 2017--including Parkinsons from mid-80's until death. If a claim is filed and is successful, is their State and Federal Taxes including inheritance taxes on the award(s)? I am his Personal Rep and this info important...I always contribute to you folks and need your help, and so does a lot of families harmed by this. The Lawyers get 40%, the Tax Folks get 35%, and the survivors get what? Is this compensation taxable? VA benefits are NOT Thanks. --Oldcts1 (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Oldcts1: Ask them not me. I'm not a lawyer. This is Wikipedia not the courthouse. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:35, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Draft:Single-molecule pull-down (SiMPull)
FYI "Assay" is a teen of art in chemistry and other sciences like metallurgy referring to testing. -- Whpq (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh ok. My bad. I figured it was simply just a misspelling of "essay". ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas, Blaze Wolf | |
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! |
- @Onel5969: Thank you so much Onel! Merry Christmas to you as well. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Mannheim Steamroller Members
Hi Blaze, we need to come to a consensus on the members that belong in the Infobox for the Mannheim Steamroller ensemble. The citation that I included with the current members of the ensemble (that you reverted) listed every member currently in the ensemble and was current for 2022-2023. Your comment, when you reverted the edit, stated "Besides, this source doesn't mention all of them" -- by "them", I assume you are referring to the names listed in the Infobox when I updated the list? But that actually isn't true. If you check the cite, you will see that the members of the ensemble that were listed in the Infobox were exactly (no more no less) the members of Mannheim Steamroller noted in the link from the citation. That citation linked to the official 2022-2023 touring roster. How is that not sufficient enough to list the members?
I would like to expand on the rationale of your edit a little more. First, let me note that your original edit to the page back in November was a good first move to clean up what had been an old and antiquated list of members. I agree with your edit back in November. I also agree with you that the ensemble changes members as often as every year for its annual tours. However, I disagree with you that "We should really only list the ones that are almost always there." American Gramaphone, the record label that releases Mannheim Steamroller's music, and is also the trademark owner of Mannheim Steamroller and is owned by Chip Davis, has made it quite clear on its website and via its social media announcements, that the ensemble, by nature of it being a classical-crossover ensemble, changes its members every year. American Gramaphone markets Mannheim Steamroller as an ensemble, not as a band, and for this reason your rationale that we should only include "the ones that are almost always there" doesn't really apply anymore.
However, and having said that, there are members beyond Chip who "are almost always there" in the present day and should be considered current members of the ensemble. For example, Roxanne Layton, who joined the ensemble in 1995, is still a member, has recorded on every Mannheim album since 1996, and still tours. Becky Kia joined in 2003 and has recorded on their albums since 2010 and still tours. Logan Penington has been with the group since 2006. All three of these members are listed in the citation that I provided and that you removed.
Now, I will say, outside of Wikipedia, that there is some controversy between the fans of Mannheim Steamroller and American Gramaphone about who constitutes the members of the Steamroller. Some subset of fans are saddened that the original members of the group have retired or, tragically in some cases, passed away. I don't know if you are reverting for this reason, and I'm not trying to say that you're reverting for this reason, but it is something that American Gramaphone is aware of and they are actively trying to re-brand Mannheim Steamroller for this reason. Most of the original members of the group are now in their 70s and 80s. Chip is 75 years old. The point I'm trying to make here is that American Gramaphone is deliberately trying to brand Mannheim Steamroller as an ensemble, and to make apparent that the members of the ensemble will change over time. As Wiki editors, I think it therefore makes sense to properly acknowledge that intent by listing the current members of the group, even if those current members change every year (and they likely will change every year). We should take the responsibility to examine the Steamroller's tour roster every year, and update the members listed in the Infobox appropriately.
Let's discuss and hopefully come to consensus. Like I said earlier, I appreciate and respect the initial edit that you made to the page. But we should come to a consensus on this. Montreux4 (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Montreux4: Hello Montreux! "Some subset of fans are saddened that the original members of the group have retired or, tragically in some cases, passed away. I don't know if you are reverting for this reason, and I'm not trying to say that you're reverting for this reason" I am definitely not reverting for this reason. However I was not aware that the only member who is almost always there now is Chip himself. Maybe instead we should list the most common ones? I don't think it would be a good idea to list the ones for each year since that would get a bit tedious to update. Or maybe we could just list Chip with an EFN stating that the other members change every year. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Blaze. I think this could work. What about this: what if we include a short list of artists who are part of the current tour and were involved with the most recent published recording of the ensemble that is not a compilation album. That would be their live album from 2015. The artists who were on that album, and are still touring with the group, are the artists that I mention above. That is, in addition to Chip, Roxanne Layton, Becky Kia-Mills, and Logan Penington. I agree with you that it would be important to footnote that Mannheim Steamroller works with a rolling roster of musicians for each of its annual tours. I've even seen on some Wiki pages, that the infobox will list a certain number of musicians in the box, then, at the end of the list, use a parenthetical and say "(Many Others)". We could do that here and then EFN about a changing roster of touring musicians. Let me know what you think, and I can work to update the Infobox. Thanks. Montreux4 (talk) 05:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Montreux4: "what if we include a short list of artists who are part of the current tour and were involved with the most recent published recording of the ensemble that is not a compilation album. That would be their live album from 2015. The artists who were on that album, and are still touring with the group, are the artists that I mention above. That is, in addition to Chip, Roxanne Layton, Becky Kia-Mills, and Logan Penington." I like this idea along with the footnote while still adding "many others". That way it isn't a huge giant infobox but we aren't leaving anyone out. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Blaze Wolf. Thanks. I agree. I'll work on an edit and let you know once it is up if you want to make any further contributions. Montreux4 (talk) 22:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Montreux4: "what if we include a short list of artists who are part of the current tour and were involved with the most recent published recording of the ensemble that is not a compilation album. That would be their live album from 2015. The artists who were on that album, and are still touring with the group, are the artists that I mention above. That is, in addition to Chip, Roxanne Layton, Becky Kia-Mills, and Logan Penington." I like this idea along with the footnote while still adding "many others". That way it isn't a huge giant infobox but we aren't leaving anyone out. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Blaze. I think this could work. What about this: what if we include a short list of artists who are part of the current tour and were involved with the most recent published recording of the ensemble that is not a compilation album. That would be their live album from 2015. The artists who were on that album, and are still touring with the group, are the artists that I mention above. That is, in addition to Chip, Roxanne Layton, Becky Kia-Mills, and Logan Penington. I agree with you that it would be important to footnote that Mannheim Steamroller works with a rolling roster of musicians for each of its annual tours. I've even seen on some Wiki pages, that the infobox will list a certain number of musicians in the box, then, at the end of the list, use a parenthetical and say "(Many Others)". We could do that here and then EFN about a changing roster of touring musicians. Let me know what you think, and I can work to update the Infobox. Thanks. Montreux4 (talk) 05:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Smash 3ds and wii u
Hey, hi there hello. I'm simply making a correction both these titles are the 4th and fifth games with ultimate being the 6th. This is all confirmed by the creator himself
I'd like to know how my corrections is considered "not neutral" LuigiMain (talk) 15:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- @LuigiMain: Because it doesn't match most sources. We don't go by what 1 person thinks. We go by what most sources think. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:33, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Links not opening
Hello friend.
I had a question, and since you've helped me in the past, you'll know what I can do now.
Anyway, I found, I think, a couple of links that don't open in the article Bluetooth, in this case it's the original links present in |url=
, however, the link present in |archive-url=
opened normally, and I was able to view the content I needed.
In these specific cases, if I encounter problems and manage to edit the article, should I update the |url-status=
from live to dead or leave it as it is and report it on the talk page?
I ask this so I don't have problems with reversed edits, and as I said before, I don't speak English and I use a translator, but whenever I'm checking the fonts I find some with problems, like one of the ones I tried to open and it gave a 403 error. Elder N (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Elder N: Hello Elder! Would you mind providing me with one of these cases? Error 403 doesn't necessarily mean that the link is dead but it might. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- In Bluetooth 4.1 font number 106 does not open, this is error 403.
- In the same section there is source 107 with error 404.
- These are marked with the
|url-status=live
- I also couldn't open source 109 of Bluetooth 4.2, this one even loads here for me in the browser, but there's that chrome error screen, with the message "ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT", and asking to do some checks on my connection, proxy and run Windows network diagnostics, but it couldn't be a problem with my computer or connection, since all other links open normally, the link present in
|archive-url=
opened for that site. Elder N (talk) 23:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)- @Elder N: Source 109 was already marked as dead. However i have no changes sources 106 and 107 to be dead. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 00:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For sticking with my un-understandable self and helping me out with making a signature till the end. (Not that it’s made yet) PS: I couldn’t wait till it was made and it’s Christmas so I had to. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC) |
Thank you
Blaze, thank you for watching over my talk page as diligently as you have. I appreciate you and value the contributions you have made, from standard edits to articles and article creation to protecting the encyclopedia (both mainspace and talkspace) and for your responses at the TeaHouse. I can tell you have grown a lot since your very first days and I have appreciated seeing your development from a distance. No matter what you decide, I would be remiss not to let you know you are valued. From one wolf to another, I hope you have had and continue to have an amazing Winter break and that your 2023 is more healthy and prosperous than ever before. --ARoseWolf 15:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Signature
Uhh I found out I could get a signature made here? If you can please do InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hello Infernal! I can definitely make a signature for you. What do you want it to look like? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good question. Maybe a black and red or a little techy blue would be nice, Thanks. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Either one works InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Alright. Any specific shape or do you want it similar to mine? Do you want a gradient of red to techy blue (if I can figure that out which will probably just be stealing someone else's signature with a gradient to reference). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Whatever you think is best works InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: I'm not really all that creative so I have a hard time coming up with stuff on the fly. What specific shape do you want it or do you want it to look similar to mine? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Similar to yours works (I’m not creative either) InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hey! So in regards to the link to your talk, is there anything you want underneath the link or is it fine as is? If so would you like the parentheses removed and any custom formatting around the link? Do note that I am limited to 255 characters total so it has to fit within that limit. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nope it’s fine like this. Sorry I haven’t been able to reply. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nah it's alright. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also, I’m probably gonna sound really dumb staying this but when will the signature be made? (Assuming it’s not already made) InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- And another thing (unrelated to the signature) is that discord user box outline how did you get it? InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Answer to your first question: Should be done sometime today assuming I'm not lazy. Answer to your second question: It's a template. Specifically User:Levi_OP/Discord Profile. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the answer, I’ll be looking forward to the signature! InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Lemme know when it’s done InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also @Blaze Wolf how do you find these cool templates? It’s not like you just found the template in the template menu or anything InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also,(again) Japanese test for you. こんにちは、ぼくのほんとのなまえは、のあです(I’m half Japanese, don’t question the horrendous grammar) InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also @Blaze Wolf how do you find these cool templates? It’s not like you just found the template in the template menu or anything InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Lemme know when it’s done InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the answer, I’ll be looking forward to the signature! InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Answer to your first question: Should be done sometime today assuming I'm not lazy. Answer to your second question: It's a template. Specifically User:Levi_OP/Discord Profile. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- And another thing (unrelated to the signature) is that discord user box outline how did you get it? InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also, I’m probably gonna sound really dumb staying this but when will the signature be made? (Assuming it’s not already made) InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:29, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nah it's alright. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- Nope it’s fine like this. Sorry I haven’t been able to reply. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Hey! So in regards to the link to your talk, is there anything you want underneath the link or is it fine as is? If so would you like the parentheses removed and any custom formatting around the link? Do note that I am limited to 255 characters total so it has to fit within that limit. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:34, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Similar to yours works (I’m not creative either) InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: I'm not really all that creative so I have a hard time coming up with stuff on the fly. What specific shape do you want it or do you want it to look similar to mine? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Whatever you think is best works InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: Alright. Any specific shape or do you want it similar to mine? Do you want a gradient of red to techy blue (if I can figure that out which will probably just be stealing someone else's signature with a gradient to reference). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Either one works InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hmmm, good question. Maybe a black and red or a little techy blue would be nice, Thanks. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
In response to the Japanese test, all I can understand is the first part which is "Konnichiha" or "hello. Other than that I have no clue what the rest says. I'm still at a very basic level lol. Also, the way I found the cool template on my talk page was that I think I remember seeing it on someone else's userpage before it was a template and the guy (who I think is now inactive) made it into a template since I wanted it on my userpage as well. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh okay… I was hoping for some magic website that gave you the greatest templates or whatever. No big deal tho.(this is a joke) The full translation is, Hello, my name is Noah. Simple InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- This conversation is veering really far from signature. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am very sorry that I have to be like this. If you feel annoyed( and I know you do) you can stop helping me at any time. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- And even after that apology I feel intreged to ask. How Are you learning Japanese. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I spelt that wrong I just know it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: It's spelled intrigued and I'm learning it via multiple different ways. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- That’s cool! Good luck. InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oh my god I just looked in your signature sandbox by accident (I was trying to find out if my username had 2 is or not and saw it so I had to, I’m sorry) And it looks so cool! Thanks a lot for the help in making it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- That’s cool! Good luck. InfernaIBaze (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @InfernaIBaze: It's spelled intrigued and I'm learning it via multiple different ways. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I spelt that wrong I just know it. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- And even after that apology I feel intreged to ask. How Are you learning Japanese. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:24, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am very sorry that I have to be like this. If you feel annoyed( and I know you do) you can stop helping me at any time. InfernaIBaze (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- This conversation is veering really far from signature. InfernaIBaze (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from Gaday⁰⁰⁶ (11:38, 28 December 2022)
Salam men imoda adam kopeltjek bolyan --Gaday⁰⁰⁶ (talk) 11:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Don’t give me credit but here’s a translation: (I hope) Hi, I'm looking for a friend in imo InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy new year!
Happy new year to you my friend! Also, may this be the year that you finally reconsider that "considering retirement" badge at the top of this page and just re-commit to the encyclopedia! It is a far, FAR better place by being graced by your efforts! TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 16:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from Louister41 (02:31, 31 December 2022)
How can I change my edits, because I had misinterpreted the meaning of "minor edits", and had listed three of my edits as minor when they are in fact quite important aspects of the article. --Louister41 (talk) 02:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hi Louister41! Unfortunately, you can’t mark edits as minor after you’ve hit ‘publish.’ However, if you want to clarify that the edits aren’t minor, I suggest making a dummy edit to explain. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 19:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Question from SikiWtideI (17:35, 30 December 2022)
Hi! When editing, if a reload accidentally happens unlike other wikis, it doesn’t restore the changes. How do you stop this from happening? --SikiWtideI (Speak to the backwards police) 17:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @SikiWtideI: Blaze may be able to find another (possibly on-wiki) solution, but here’s my 2 cents— whenever I make a large edit to a page, I copy the text to my iPad’s clipboard every few minutes. That way, when my technical issues inevitably occur, everything’s backed up and I can just paste my work back in. Hope this helps! ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 19:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
New Year's Wishes!
Yours truly, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 00:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC) (It is now New Year's Day in UTC)
Happy New Year, Blaze Wolf!
Blaze Wolf,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 02:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 02:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Talk page
I would post this to everyone's talk page but that would take too long, so thanks to everyone who helped out with my talk page in my absence, and for all the happy new year wishes on the new year. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I can add an official website like a reference link?
In the draft I published recently I wanted to include a link to Instagram with the first contact the subject had with the Internet, and if I had any doubts about doing so, I am still a bit of a novice and I see that it was a mistake.
So I want to know if a direct reference to the official website would be valid as a valid reference, since the same topic is discussed.
Sorry for the problems, happy new year! Aesthezel (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Aesthezel: Hello Aesthezel! Unforutnately a direct reference to the official website would not be any better as that would also be a WP:PRIMARY source. Since it's a video game I suggest looking at WP:VGRS to see a list of sources that are generally regarded as reliable for video games. I'd also recommend using WP:VGSE to search for video game related sources. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll be studying a little bit about it Aesthezel (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Aesthezel: No problem! If you need any further help feel free to ask me or the folks at WT:VG for help. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll be studying a little bit about it Aesthezel (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Check DMs
Check your Discord DMs please
-- Justyouraveragelechuga talk — Preceding undated comment added 10:53, 06 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the custom signature! Justyouraveragelechuga talk contribs 22:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! Glad I Could help! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey
Hi I'm also an autistic furry who knows Japanese- wanna talk? Zaxalightning2 (talk) 01:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Zaxalightning2: Hello Zaxalightning. I'd love to talk, but not here as that would be contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Password game show
I responded on my talk page. See if it looks okay to you, my rationale and the corrected article please. FeralOink (talk) 05:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
This Edit
Sorry about this, I'm using Huggle and I must have clicked too fast. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 23:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)