-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
fix(eslint-plugin): [member-ordering] get accessor member name & take into account abstract
and decorator
#9775
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thanks for the PR, @OlivierZal! typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community. The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately. Thanks again! 🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. |
✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 6fcd519. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 2 targetsSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
Hi @Josh-Cena, @JoshuaKGoldberg, @bradzacher, How can I solve https://cloud.nx.app/runs/xRpPxqp5jU/task/visitor-keys%3Alint ? |
90f1067
to
9869078
Compare
abstract
and decorator
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9775 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.92% 87.91% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 402 402
Lines 13726 13725 -1
Branches 3999 3998 -1
==========================================
- Hits 12069 12066 -3
- Misses 1351 1352 +1
- Partials 306 307 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Could you add real test cases in the |
@Josh-Cena, added tests (and fixed format because this commit broke Now it's ready to merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @JoshuaKGoldberg, is there any step I need to perform after approval is granted? |
if ( | ||
reference.identifier.parent.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.TSTypeReference | ||
) { | ||
if (reference.identifier.parent.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.TSTypeReference) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, why is this changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Josh-Cena, explained there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me :)
It seems wholly unnecessary to enforce up-to-date branches before merging in most cases, FWIW. (Nothing to do with this PR in particular) |
Nothing on your end! Just being excited in general, I suppose. 😄 Thanks for this! Merged & will be released in our weekly release later today. |
PR Checklist
Overview