0% found this document useful (0 votes)
171 views3 pages

Example of The Use of Stokes Theorem

The document computes the line integral _C F · dr in three ways where C is a circle on the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 and F = (z - y)i - (x + z)j - (x + y)k. 1) Directly parametrizing C as a circle and computing the integral. 2) Applying Stokes' theorem, expressing C as the boundary of a surface S, computing ∇×F and the surface integral. 3) Again using Stokes' theorem but without explicitly setting up the surface integral, using properties of F and S. All three methods give the same result of -4√2π.

Uploaded by

Sam Fraser
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
171 views3 pages

Example of The Use of Stokes Theorem

The document computes the line integral _C F · dr in three ways where C is a circle on the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 4 and F = (z - y)i - (x + z)j - (x + y)k. 1) Directly parametrizing C as a circle and computing the integral. 2) Applying Stokes' theorem, expressing C as the boundary of a surface S, computing ∇×F and the surface integral. 3) Again using Stokes' theorem but without explicitly setting up the surface integral, using properties of F and S. All three methods give the same result of -4√2π.

Uploaded by

Sam Fraser
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Example of the Use of Stokes Theorem

In these notes we compute, in three dierent ways,


_
C

F dr where

F = (z y) (x + z) (x + y)

k
and C is the curve x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
= 4, z = y oriented counterclockwise when viewed from above.
Direct Computation
In this rst computation, we parametrize the curve C and compute
_
C

F dr directly. The plane z = y


passes through the origin, which is the centre of the sphere x
2
+y
2
+z
2
= 4. So C is a circle which, like the
sphere, has radius 2 and centre (0, 0, 0). We use a parametrization of the form
r(t) = c + cos t

+ sint

0 t 2
where c = (0, 0, 0) is the centre of C, = 2 is the radius of C and

and

are two vectors that (a) are unit


vectors, (b) are parallel to the plane z = y and (c) are mutually perpendicular. The point (2, 0, 0) satises
both x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
= 4 and z = y and so is on C. We may choose

to be the unit vector in the direction


from the centre (0, 0, 0) of the circle towards (2, 0, 0). Namely

= (1, 0, 0). Since the plane of the circle is


z y = 0, the vector

(z y) = (0, 1, 1) is perpendicular to the plane of C. So

k

=
1

2
(0, 1, 1) is a
unit vector normal to z = y. Then

=

k

=
1

2
(0, 1, 1) (1, 0, 0) =
1

2
(0, 1, 1) is a unit vector that
is perpendicular to

. Since

is also perpendicular to

k

, it is parallel to z = y. Subbing in c = (0, 0, 0),


= 2,

= (1, 0, 0) and

=
1

2
(0, 1, 1) gives
z
y
x

r(t) = 2 cos t (1, 0, 0) + 2 sint


1

2
(0, 1, 1) = 2
_
cos t,
sin t

2
,
sin t

2
_
0 t 2
To check that this parametrization is correct, note that x = 2 cos t, y =

2 sint, z =

2 sint satises both
x
2
+y
2
+z
2
= 4 and z = y. At t = 0, r(0) = (2, 0, 0). As t increases, r(t) moves toward r
_

2
_
= (0,

2,

2).
This is the desired counterclockwise direction. Now that we have a parametrization, we can set up the
integral.
r(t) =
_
2 cos t,

2 sint,

2 sint
_
r

(t) =
_
2 sint,

2 cos t,

2 cos t
_

F
_
r(t)
_
=
_
z(t) y(t), x(t) z(t), x(t) y(t)
_
=
_
2 sint

2 sint, 2 cos t

2 sint, 2 cos t

2 sint
_
=
_
0, 2 cos t +

2 sint, 2 cos t +

2 sint
_

F
_
r(t)
_
r

(t) =
_
4

2 cos
2
t + 4 cos t sint

=
_
2

2 cos(2t) + 2

2 + 2 sin(2t)

_
C

F dr =
_
2
0

F
_
r(t)
_
r

(t) dt
=
_
2
0

_
2

2 cos(2t) + 2

2 + 2 sin(2t)

dt =
_
2 sin(2t) + 2

2t cos(2t)

2
0
= 4

2
1
Stokes Theorem
To apply Stokes theorem we need to express C as the boundary S of a surface S. As
C =
_
(x, y, z)

x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
= 4, z = y
_
is a closed curve, this is possible. In fact there are many possible choices of S with S = C. Three possible
Ss are
S

S
S =
_
(x, y, z)

x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
4, z = y
_
S

=
_
(x, y, z)

x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
= 4, z y
_
S

=
_
(x, y, z)

x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
= 4, z y
_
The rst of these, which is part of a plane, is likely to lead to simpler computations than the last two, which
are parts of a sphere. So we choose to use it.
In preparation for application of Stokes theorem, we compute

F and ndS. For the latter, we apply


the formula ndS = (f
x
, f
y
, 1) dxdy to the surface z = f(x, y) = y. We use the + sign to give the normal
a positive

k component.


F = det
_
_


k

z
z y x z x y
_
_
=
_
1 (1)
_

_
1 1
_
+

k
_
1 (1)
_
= 2
ndS = (0, 1, 1) dxdy


F ndS = (0, 2, 0) (0, 1, 1) dxdy = 2 dxdy
The integration variables are x and y and, by denition, the domain of integration is
R =
_
(x, y)

(x, y, z) is in S for some z


_
To determine precisely what this domain of integration is, we observe that since z = y on S
S =
_
(x, y, z)

x
2
+ 2y
2
4, z = y
_
= R =
_
(x, y)

x
2
+ 2y
2
4
_
So the domain of integration is an ellipse with semimajor axis a = 2, semiminor axis b =

2 and area
ab = 2

2 and
_
C

F dr =
__
S


F ndS =
__
R
(2) dxdy = 2 Area (R) = 4

2
2
Remark (Limits of integration) If the integrand were more complicated, we would have to evaluate the
integral over R by expressing it as an iterated integrals with the correct limits of integration. First suppose
that we slice up R using thin vertical slices. On each such slice, x is essentially constant and y runs from

_
(4 x
2
)/2 to
_
(4 x
2
)/2. The leftmost such slice would have x = 2 and the rightmost such slice
would have x = 2. So the correct limits with this slicing are
x
y
x
2
+ 2y
2
= 4
__
R
f(x, y) dxdy =
_
2
2
dx
_

(4x
2
)/2

(4x
2
)/2
dy f(x, y)
If, instead, we slice up R using thin horizontal slices, then, on each such slice, y is essentially constant and
x runs from
_
4 2y
2
to
_
4 2y
2
. The bottom such slice would have y =

2 and the top such slice


would have y =

2. So the correct limits with this slicing are


x
y
x
2
+ 2y
2
= 4
__
R
f(x, y) dxdy =
_

2

2
dy
_

42y
2

42y
2
dx f(x, y)
Note that the integral with limits
x
y
_

2

2
dy
_
2
2
dx f(x, y)
corresponds to a slicing with x running from 2 to 2 on every slice. This corresponds to a rectangular
domain of integration.
Stokes Theorem, Again
Since the integrand is just a constant and S is so simple, we can evaluate the integral
__
S


F ndS
without ever determining dS explicitly and without ever setting up any limits of integration. We already
know that


F = 2 . Since S is the level surface z y = 0, the gradient

(z y) = +

k is normal to
S. So n =
1

2
( +

k) and
_
C

F dr =
__
S


F ndS =
__
S
(2 )
1

2
( +

k) dS =
__
S

2 dS =

2 Area (S)
As S is a circle of radius 2,
_
C

F dr = 4

2 , yet again.
3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy