Scribd
Upload
288 views5 pages

CrimPro Course Outline by J.Bacorro-Villena

1) The document outlines the course on Criminal Procedure based on Philippine law. It discusses topics such as jurisdiction, arrest, search and seizure, bail, preliminary investigation, commencement of court action through information or complaint, prosecution of civil actions, rights of the accused, motion to quash, arraignment, pre-trial, trial, and judgment. 2) Key aspects of each topic are defined and relevant cases are cited, such as Miranda v. Tuliao on jurisdiction and rules on arrest, search and seizure. The stages of preliminary investigation and required procedures are also explained. 3) Trial procedures including the duties of lawyers, prosecutors and judges are laid out, alongside discussion of related laws such as

Uploaded by

Claire Roxas
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
288 views5 pages

CrimPro Course Outline by J.Bacorro-Villena

1) The document outlines the course on Criminal Procedure based on Philippine law. It discusses topics such as jurisdiction, arrest, search and seizure, bail, preliminary investigation, commencement of court action through information or complaint, prosecution of civil actions, rights of the accused, motion to quash, arraignment, pre-trial, trial, and judgment. 2) Key aspects of each topic are defined and relevant cases are cited, such as Miranda v. Tuliao on jurisdiction and rules on arrest, search and seizure. The stages of preliminary investigation and required procedures are also explained. 3) Trial procedures including the duties of lawyers, prosecutors and judges are laid out, alongside discussion of related laws such as

Uploaded by

Claire Roxas
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

COURSEOUTLINE I.'?

CRIMINAL PROCEDURB by Judge Jean Marie A, Bacorm-Villena


I. Introduction Definition Systems of Criminal Jurisdiction(Atr\,f) PrincipleofDue Process Requisites for ttrevalid exercise of criminal jruisdiction (PST) Cases: *Mirandau. Tuliao,3l March 2006. *Tiiamv. Sibonghanoy, LSApril 1968. e. GsnralPrincipleson Jurisdiction *Lacsonv.Executive Secretary301 SCRA298 f. Jurisdictionof diferent courts BP 129,The JudioiaryReorganization Act RA8249 il. WarrantlessArrest and Inquest Rule 113,Sections 5,8,9 RepublicAct No. 7438 Article trI, Sec 12,Constitution Rule 112,Section 7 Cases: f--qffiit--] Gov. CA,11 Feb'ruary 1992 L-sts!:19!4 Peopleu. Molina, f9 February 2001 D avid u.Arroyo, April 2006
I rbrre

a. b. c. d.

rnl @ ,Pry
J
I

People u.Mengote,zlMty 1994 Havey u CID,162 SCRA 840 People u. Tangliben, 184 SCRA 220 Peopleu.Malmstedt,19 Jme 1991 Peopleu. Chua,17 June 1999 Peoplev.Satrcedo, fune 17, 1997

III. s"archandseizure
Rule126 Art IIl, Sec 2, 1987Consti Cases: People v. Mariacos-16 Jrme 2010 Roanv. Gonzales 25 November 1986 Solid TriangleSales v. SanlyCorp. 23 November2001 Sps. ldarimlav. People,16October20019 Peoplev. CA, 8 Decernbsr 2000

IY.

Bail
Rule114 RA 7659 fDeathpenalty Law]

RA9346 (Prohibiting Imposition of DeathJ fusticeandfuvenileAct of 2006 Child and YouthWelfareCode Ruleof fuvenile In Conflictwith the Law RA6036 &. Definition
I

D. Purpose
I

C. Where to post? O. Bail,as a matter of right and of disretion e. Kinds Cases: USAv. PURUGGAIiAII, 389 SCRA623 CTOVERNMENT OF HONGKONGV. OLALL\ 19 Apn12W7 PAIITILAV. CA-31 July 1996 PADERAI.{GAV. CA. 247 SCRA741 MIRAIIDAV. TULIAO - 31 March 2006 1997 OBOSAV.CA- 16 January BASCO V. RAPAXALO.5 Ldarch1997

V.

Preliminary Investigation r-@iri--) krle 112 RA 8249 (3 October2005) A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC
t ,w.bb6.m I

,Fm v-x

a. Scope b. Procedure Cases: cOV. CA- ll Febnnry 1992 2001 YUSOPv. SAIIDIGAIIBAYAI,{- 22 Feb'ruary 1998 DUTT,RTE v. SAI.IDIGAIIBAYA]*I- 27 April BAUTISTAv. CA- 6 Juty 2001 \llEBB v. DE LEON 23 August 1995 HO v. PEOPLE- 9 October1997 fl. Definition
I

D. Purposes

C. Scope d. N"trt. of the rightto preliminaryinvestigation . EffectofabsenceofPl f. Officersto conductPI . (October 3, 2005) NoteA.M. No. 05-8-26-SC g. Procedure (section3)

h. Stages

VI.

Commencementof CourtAction: lnformation v. Comptaint Rule110

&. Whereto file - [Rule110,Section] 2; Section 4J b. Irrfor*ation (Section 2 and 3) C. Complaint(sections subscribedby the -sworn statement,written, charginga personwith an offense;, offendedparty with any peaceofficer par!y''- to whom the offenderis civilly liable;seeArt 100 and 101 of the "offended RPC d. S.,ffi.i*nry of tnfo or Complaint Place ApproximateTime Nameof theAccused Designation of the Offense Actsor Omissions Nameof the OffendedParty of Accusation . Cause . .

IPJ

f r-Y,f@

must be sfated Quali$ringand aggravatingCirf*_*ffi;-Fces RA 7659 fDeath PenaltyLaw; HeinousCrimeAct]

Cases Crespo v.Mogul, 151SCRA462 2007 Ricsze v. Court ofAppeals,9February 2008 DOJ,29 January Santos-Conciou Zald*tau. Reyes,3July 1992 Peopleu.Aquino,6 August2002 CA,287SCRA58f Larranagav. Agastin u.Pamintuan,22 Augttst2005 People u.Feloteo,5June1998 2A07 Pacoyu. Umali, 28 Septembet Peopleu Catubig,23August2001

VII.

of Civil A,ction Prosecution Rule 111 Art 100,RPC - Arts. 1157,21762177,1902-1910, 32-34, Civil Code Casos: Laroya,26 August2002 Casupananv. Hanbonu.CA,MarchL7,20O3 Janiolq 30 June2009 DreamworkCon.structianu Manlilic v. Calaunan,25 Jmuary 2A07 2,1994 Peopleu Bayotas,September

Madarangv. CA,14 July 2005 Sps. Jue v. Sps.Suarez,30 June2008 Marbella-B&ts u.Bobis,3l Juty2000 Peaple u.Aragon,g4 Phil.357

a. b.

c. d.

Definition, concptof civil action? of Civil Obligations Sources Art. 1756,NCC: Arts. 100-103 RPC@urelyex-delicto) How institutsd? PrejudicialQuestion

VIII. Rights oftheAccused kile 115 a. Right to be informed in personandby cormsel b. Right to be presentanddefended 12(2), 1987Consti) -T rial in absentia(Afim, Sectioar and cross-examine to on his behalf Ri$ht not testfi c. d. Rigltt not to be compelledaswitnessagainsthimself rigltt but may b waived substantial e. Right to Cross-xamine; trial (seeSpeedy TFtalAct of 1997) Rieht to speedy g. Public frial

Cases: f*-*ffiT-l SCRAI Nazareno,160 Gimenezv. Peoleu.Alvarez, 201 SCRA264 u. CA, 24 SCRA663 Chartez 29 Decmbet1962 Cabalu.Capunan, Peopleu Teeha*ea,6 October1995

D(.

Motion to Quash RuIe117 Art m, Section21,1987Consti. Cases: AGUILAR v. SAN PEDRO PEOPLEV SAIIDIGAI\IBAYAhI PACOYV. CAJIGAL, . PEOPLEV. TAhI, V. LACSON PEOPLE 17,2010 September March 2l,20ll 28,2W7 September Jttly 26, 2010 October 7,2003

X.

Arraignment Rule110* comductedHow arraignment

a.

-a
b. c. d" e. f.
)il. )ilI. of Arraigrrnent Suspension Duties oflawyero Duties o'fProsecutofs Duties ofJudges/Corts questions Searching Pre-Trial* Trial $ Rule119 Rule 132(PresentdionofEvidence) Trial Act of 1998) RA 8493(The Speedy RA 6981(WitnessProtectionProgun) 1988 SC Circ. No. 4, 22 September 1989 SCCirc. No. 1-89,19January Peoplev. Latroylxlroy, 38 Phit 330 21 tvlaroh2011 Pooplev. Smdiganbayarq 2011 30lvlarc'h People v. Cristobal, )ilIL )ilu.

Judgment* Rule 120 Enguerrav.people,108Phil 1078 Peo,ple


untr4lt
t7 -4EJ f--qtu,is---l

*List ofreleliant cassto follow

w.hkb..m

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy