IntroductiontoMagnetometerTechnology1 2
IntroductiontoMagnetometerTechnology1 2
10/11/08
1. Foreword
The concepts and facts described in this paper are not new and they are probably quite obvious to
specialists in geomagnetism. However, they were quite mysterious for the standard hobbyist like myself.
This description tries to demystify some of these, making the difference between the critical working
conditions and the auxiliary aspects only subject to some optimization.
It should be taken by the reader as MY current understanding of the most important concepts required for
the building of a magnetometer. I am quite sure that I missed some points and that I even misunderstood
others. In advance, I apologize for any possible incoherence or misunderstanding and I am completely
open to any remarks and comments from knowledgeable people.
This was the result of reading a lot of papers on the Web (the best and the most accurate being the paper
of James Koehler available here) and numerous experiments that I have done in the last months but also
a lot of precious information from my temporary or permanent project team members, more specially:
My French friend Philippe Marie with whom I designed and implemented an all-digital PI
metal detector with discrimination properties.
Steve Brekke, my best Californian partner who designed our current PPM amplifier chain and
guided me on the routes of FFT calculation.
Joe Geller, my occasional partner near Albany,NY with whom I exchanged very interesting
messages comparing his design with ours.
John Oldham, a precious Canadian partner with a long experience and actual practice of
magnetometers in the field (the sea). He has given me so much good advice during my long
period of unsuccessful testing, when the damned precession signal was not showing up.
Carl Moreland, our well-known mag technical site and forum hosting partner who has
gathered so many pieces of data giving so many people a playground around which to share
their experiences (good and bad) on the technical aspects of all kinds of treasure hunting.
The version 1.2 of this document reports the result of the experience acquired during the last two years on
this subject.
I want to specially add my thanks to:
James Koehler, my best Canadian partner and now friend with whom I spent the last two
years improving our PPM project putting our two long past experiences in common for the
sake of this hobby project.
Paul Cordes, my second partner working with me on an alternative PPM instrument
implementation selecting different hardware and software solutions. See more about that in
Part 3 of the whole document.
In advance, I am grateful to those who will accept to proofread this paper and remove its most visible
conceptual and syntactical bugs.
10/11/08
The East - West component causes what is called declination, or the compass pointing to "magnetic
north" instead of true North. The true North component is in the horizontal plane, but the down
component is much stronger than the North component!. If a compass is not level then it will have a large
error because it is starting to read the down component of the Earth's field. Thats the reason why
conventional compasses should always be kept perfectly level.
The total value of the vector resulting from these three components depends on the geographical
location with its maximum values around the two Poles and minimum values along the Equator - look at
figure 4 on page 9 of the ampm-opt.pdf document.
The direction of this total vector is North-South with an inclination from the horizontal also depending
only on the location on Earth (50 to 70 North in Europe and Northern America but 0 on the Equator) look at figure 3 on page 8 of the ampm-opt.pdf document.
If you want to see the nominal value of the earth magnetic field in your region, go first on this link:
How to Get Your Local Field Value.pdf
Other sources of earth magnetic field modeling are the following:
http://geomag.usgs.gov/geomag/geomagAWT.html
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/geomag/data.shtml
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/geomag/jsp/IGRFGrid.jsp
10/11/08
Natural space-dependent magnetic anomalies are caused by the juxtaposition of soils and
stones with highly contrasting magnetic properties produced by earlier volcanic activities. These
characteristic features are detected by geologists to find specific underground or underwater minerals
or metals (even gold since gold deposits are usually accompanied with "black sand"-magnetite
deposits) or, in petrology to locate gas or oil pockets kept within porous stones.
Artificial (man-made) magnetic anomalies are generated by:
o Buried or sunken objects containing a large proportion of ferromagnetic metal (iron or steel)
o Soil disturbances like filling holes with a soil of different magnetic characteristics than the
local ground or unfilled holes like tombs or wells.
o Burned features like fire pits, baked clay objects, ashes
o Permanent magnets buried specially to be easily located later on by geologists or
archaeologists.
10/11/08
4
In summary, magnetometers are able to detect the presence of Ferro-Magnetic material (Iron, Steel, Cobalt,
Nickel, Magnetite,) because they disturb the value and direction of the earth magnetic field.
However, magnetometers are COMPLETELY insensible to any other metals, they can not be used as metal
detectors even if they are sometimes used as complements in the research of targets.
Magnetometers also can not easily detect deeply buried (or sunken) small objects except with a highly
sophisticated instrument. Look at the figure 46, page 43 of the ampm-opt.pdf document, it shows that 1
pound of pure iron (not exactly a small object, equivalent to an ordinary hammer head) could be detected at 3
meters BUT would only generate a field gradient of 1nT. If you only own a mag with a sensitivity of 10 to 25nT
(typical of fluxgate and differential mags), then the same mass of iron could only be detected at 1 meter or
less IF and only IF your line of survey passes right above it. It is useful to remember that the field produced by
a given magnetic moment falls off as the inverse cube of the distance, not the inverse square.
10/11/08
10/11/08
4. Types of magnetometers
There are now a number of types of portable magnetometers based on different physical principles:
Instruments based on Magneto resistive and Hall effect sensors are not used to
measure the earth magnetic field even if they are sensitive to the value of magnetic
fields. They are used in the industry to detect ferromagnetic objects at short distances
or to measure higher magnetic fields. We shall not go in more details about them
here.
The fluxgate sensor has a special magnetic core (high-Mu material) being saturated
within the magnetic field to measure a single axis vector of this field. The basic
principle is to compare the drive-coil current needed to saturate the core in one
direction as opposed to the opposite direction. The difference is due to the external
field. Full saturation is not necessary; any non-linearity will do. As the core
approaches saturation, the signal picked up in the sense coil will show the nonlinearity. Flux-gate magnetometers are widely used in geophysical research to
monitor the earths magnetic field at observatories located throughout the world. At
each observatory, three separate flux-gate magnetometers are used; one oriented in
each of three orthogonal directions. For amateurs, there are single flux-gate
magnetometers commercially available; the most common of these are manufactured
in England and which have an output in the form of a frequency-modulated waveform;
the output frequency is proportional to the magnitude of the component of the earths
magnetic field which is parallel to the sensor. Amateur magnetometers built using
these elements usually are built in the Gradiometer Configuration to measure
Vertical Field Gradients. In actual practice, they can detect field gradients of no better
than about 100nT.
The standard Proton Precession magnetometer is to be discussed in more details
in the following chapters. In short, the protons of a proton-rich fluid are magnetized to
align in the same direction and stop their normal precession. When they are released,
they resume their precession in phase and induce a voltage at a frequency
depending upon the ambient magnetic field. This frequency is measured and the
corresponding field value is calculated. This type of mag can give sensitivities better
than 1 nT with a relatively low sampling rate of 1 measurement every 1 to 3 seconds.
An Overhauser PPM uses a proton-rich fluid mixed with a very small quantity of a
special chemical component containing free radicals. A constant magnetic field of RF
frequency (around 60MHz) is applied on the fluid. This produces what is called the
Overhauser effect providing the same polarization effect from a polarizing field much
smaller than in standard PPM and in much less time. The net effect is that
Overhauser mags take 4 times less power consumption than normal PPMs and can
give up to 100 times better signals and faster sampling rates (more than two
measurements per second).
Cesium is the most widely available optically pumped alkali vapor magnetometer. It
can give sensitivities better than 0.1 nT with a very fast sampling rate but this
technology remains completely out of reach from standard hobbyists for its
complexity and the cost of required special material and professional adjustment
instruments.
In summary, the types of mags that can practically be built by hobbyists are essentially
the Fluxgate and the PPM.
10/11/08
10/11/08
A Differential PPM uses two sensors mounted on the two extremities of a long staff and connected
in series to a single amplifier chain. The signals of the two sensors add together, are amplified and
feed headphones. If the area being tested has a constant magnetic field, the precession frequency
induced in both sensors is the same and the operator hears a gradually decreasing in amplitude but
steady tone which disappears within the relaxation time. In the presence of an anomaly, however, the
magnetic field at each sensor is not the same and signals of different frequency are produced. As
these signals are added together, they interfere to produce a wavering tone, increasing and
decreasing in amplitude until it finally dies out. This is an amplitude beat whose frequency depends on
the field gradient between the two sensors; the more beats are heard per unit of time, the stronger is
the magnetic anomaly causing them. This configuration is the simplest and lowest cost you can find
but, because the measurements are non-quantitative and because the human ears are used as tone
amplitude measuring devices, it is also quite crude in sensitivity. You could not expect this
configuration to detect any anomalies creating gradients much lower than 25nT. Why is that?
Because the imperfect human ears are good at detecting tiny changes of frequencies but are very bad
at detecting amplitude changes (Thats the main reason why the vertical scale of Audio Spectrum
Diagrams is logarithmic = dB).
This is an example of signal going out of such a configuration. It is the signal sample posted by Phil
Barnes on his web site. It gives a beat of around 3 Hz corresponding to a gradient of about 70nT. phil
barnes.wav. As you can see on this PCM stream picture, the magnitude of the signal shows some
clear beats for about 1 second.
This FFT curve of the same second of signal duration shows a large and relatively wide peak at
around 2KHz.
The best configuration used by professionals to survey large area with great precision is made of two
complete and identical magnetometers:
o One is put on a local recording base station, i.e., diurnal station monitor, near but outside
the surveyed area. This mag records, with precise time stamps, the total earth field values,
including its diurnal variations, during all the duration of the survey.
o The second one is the mobile station making the real measurement on the crossings of the
survey grid and recording them with time stamps as well.
At the end of the survey, the two data stream are merged based on the time stamps and the field
values captured at the fixed station are subtracted from the raw measurement values captured at the
same time, thus canceling the bad effect of the time-dependent variations of field. The net result is a
10/11/08
9
10/11/08
10
11
Sensor
Coil(s)
AntiRinging
Circuit
Polarization
Control
Sensor
Tuning
Low noise
Pre-Amplifier
Band-Pass
Filter
Amplifier
Analog
Output
Gel Cel
Polarization Battery
Test PC
Digital Power
Supply
Zero-Crossing
Counter/
Timer
Comparator
Analog
Output
Local
Recording
&
Display
Digital
Output
PC Link
11
10/11/08
12
13
8. Sensor Types
8.1. Single Solenoid Coil
This is the simplest sensor type and the easiest to build by Hobbyists even if it is also the one picking
up most of the electromagnetic noise around except if it is shielded inside a large box.
A cylindrical form is selected with a inside diameter fitting a small non-magnetic recipient like a glass
or polythene bottle containing a proton-rich fluid.
A relatively thick magnet wire is wound on this form. The wire diameter and the number of turns are
not very critical, usually around 1500 to 2000 turns of wire AWG 16 to 22. The DC resistance should
preferably be kept under 10 ohms to get a DC polarization current of more than 1 Amp from a 12V
gel cell battery. If a higher voltage battery is being used, it is possible to wind the coil with thinner wire.
The Inductance of the coil should be around 30 to 50 mH. The magnetic field generated in the coil
(and on the protons of the fluid) by the polarization should be a minimum of 100 Gauss.
A Solenoid coil sensor calculator has been written by Jim Koehler and posted by Carl Moreland. It
calculates the approximate inductance, resistance and polarization current given the dimensions of
the coil, the voltage of the battery and the diameter of the wire. It also evaluates the length of wire to
plan. The other calculated parameters of the sensor will be discussed in more details later.
A Solenoid sensor should preferably be positioned perpendicular to the local vector of the earth
magnetic field. For regions where the inclination of the local field is greater than 45, the main axis of
the sensor should be horizontal while if <45, it should be held vertical. If the field has a (quasi-)
vertical direction, then the horizontal direction of such a sensor is not important but, in equatorial
regions, where the earth field is much more horizontal, the sensor should point to the North to get a
maximum magnitude of signal.
Note that if a Solenoid coil is positioned in the general direction of the local earth field, the precession
signal will be null.
10/11/08
13
14
2. Two separate coils are wound on the same axis around the same bottle. There must be a wide
gap between the two coils because the two polarization fields cancel each other there. They are
connected in series and in opposition (wound in the opposite direction) to get the same effect
Coil1
Coil2
Bottle
Sides
Connecting
Wires
as in 1. Above.
10/11/08
15
16
End of Document
10/11/08
16