Scribd
Upload
211 views3 pages

Detailed Criteria and Mark Scheme: Office Administration School Based Assessment 2017

This document provides the criteria and marking scheme for an office administration school-based assessment project in 2017. It outlines six criteria for the project with detailed descriptors and mark allocations for each. The criteria cover preparation, gathering data, and compliance with relevant regulations and policies. For preparation, marks are awarded for including a title page, table of contents, stating the project title and aims, and preparing a letter requesting permission. For data gathering, marks are given for describing methodology, listing questions, submitting a schedule of activities, and providing evidence of relevant regulations. The maximum total marks for the assessment are 28.

Uploaded by

Yuvita Prasad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
211 views3 pages

Detailed Criteria and Mark Scheme: Office Administration School Based Assessment 2017

This document provides the criteria and marking scheme for an office administration school-based assessment project in 2017. It outlines six criteria for the project with detailed descriptors and mark allocations for each. The criteria cover preparation, gathering data, and compliance with relevant regulations and policies. For preparation, marks are awarded for including a title page, table of contents, stating the project title and aims, and preparing a letter requesting permission. For data gathering, marks are given for describing methodology, listing questions, submitting a schedule of activities, and providing evidence of relevant regulations. The maximum total marks for the assessment are 28.

Uploaded by

Yuvita Prasad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

OFFICE ADMINISTRATION

SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT 2017


DETAILED CRITERIA AND MARK SCHEME
CRITERIA 1
Preparation Total 13
marks
The candidate has:
1. Included a title page;
(maximum 1
mark)

Descriptor

Marks
Allocat
ion

Title page includes project title and


names of candidate, school and
teacher, territory, candidate number.

Title page is incomplete

Table of contents includes:


(a) A heading and a list of topics;
(b) Page numbers

1
1

Title of the project is related to the


objectives in the syllabus and to the
business being studied.

Title of the project is outside the


scope of the syllabus or not clearly
stated.

4. Listed TWO aims of


the project;
(maximum 2
marks)

Two aims of the project are relevant,


unambiguous and clearly stated

One aim of the project is irrelevant,


ambiguous and not clearly stated.

5. Listed TWO functions


of the relevant
department of the
firm chosen for the
project;
(maximum 2
marks)
6. Prepared ONE piece of
correspondence
requesting permission
to conduct the
project;

2 functions accurately listed

1 function accurately listed

Correspondence incorporates all


aspects of a business letter including:

2. Included a table of
contents;
(maximum 2
marks)
3. Stated the title of the
project;
(maximum 2
marks)

(a) Matching salutation/ complimentary


close;

Mark
s
Allott
ed

(maximum 4
marks)
NB. No marks will be
awarded for
correspondence not
composed by the
student as evidenced
by official circular
letter from teacher or
principal.

(b) Correct grammar/ spelling (no


errors);
(c) Relevant content;
(d) Appropriate presentations

TOTAL
CRITERIA 2
Gathering Data
Total 15 marks
The candidate has:
1. Described the
methodology
employed for the
project;
(maximum 3
marks)

Descriptor

1
1
1

13
marks
Marks
Allocat
ion

A specimen of a data gathering


instrument is submitted.

An explanation of why the particular


instrument was chosen above all
others is given.

An explanation of how the instrument


was used is given.

2. Listed FIVE questions


asked of personnel of
firm selected for the
project;
(maximum 3
marks)
NB. The questions may
be taken from the data
gathering instrument.

Five questions are relevant to the


aims of the project, clear and
unambiguous.

One to two questions are relevant to


the aims of the project, clear and
unambiguous.

3. Submitted a schedule
of activities for
conducting the
project;
(maximum 5
marks)

Table provided with the headings


showing Dates, Activities and
Comments with 10 12 activities
listed.

Sequence of activities are relevant to

Three to four questions are relevant


to the aims of the project, clear and
unambiguous.

1-4

Mark
s
Allott
ed

the project and comments support


the follow up actions or the decisions
made every 3 activities 1 mark.
4. Submitted evidence of
regulations and
Policies governing the
firm selected for the
project.
(maximum 4
marks)

ONE piece of legislation governing


the work place is referenced.

An explanation of how the candidate


became aware of the legislation is
given.

ONE of the health and safety


practices observed when carrying out
the Project is stated.

1
ONE staff rule with which the
candidate had to comply in carrying
out the Project is stated.
TOTAL

15
marks

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy