Zeisel
Zeisel
Polysius
GOOD PROCESS
+ = GOOD QUALITY PRODUCT
GOOD MACHINERY
GOOD PROCESS
+ = AVERAGE QUALITY PRODUCT
BAD MACHINERY
BAD PROCESS
+ = POOR QUALITY PRODUCT
GOOD MACHINERY
BAD PROCESS
+ = CATASTROPHE
BAD MACHINERY
STOCK TAKING:
CASE STUDY
1. Introduction
2. Results of grindability test in Polysius laboratory
3. Operational data before optimisation
4. Inspection Results and Modifications
4.1 POLYCOM
4.2 SEPOL POLYCOM
4.3 SEPOL Ball Mill
4.4 Ball Mill
5. Measurement and sampling points
6. Measurement and sampling results
7. Operational data after optimisation
8. Further optimisation options
- Clinker samples were send to Polysius for grindability test and were
registered in Polysius laboratory on 03.01.2011
- On 05.01.2011 detailed operation data were submitted by plant engineer
(production data on that day is in the range of 105 t/h to 120 t/h)
Evaluation
45
30
25
Number
Clinker A
44
20 42
Clinker B
33 34 32
15
26 28 28
23
39,1 kWh/t 44,7 kWh/t
10 22
18
Original plant
5 9 8
design: 33,8 kWh/t
7 8 8 7
3 4
2 2 1
0 0 0 0 0
< 26 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - > 50
27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Grindability [kWh/t]
Conclusion:
- Present type of clinker is very difficult to grind.
- Additional investigations in Polysius R&D centre revealed a high amount of Belite and free lime
- The analysed samples indicated a very exceptional clinker
- Production of 140 t/h is not achievable using the analysed types of clinkers
Before Optimisation
average
from to from to from to
Date 26.02. 27.02. 27.02. 27.02. 01.03. 01.03. 26.02. 01.03.
Time 07:00 06:00 07:00 18:00 14:00 00:00
Operation Time [h] 24 11 10 45
Silo 1 [%] 10 10 40
Silo 2 [%] 30 30
Silo 3 [%] 60 60 60
Total feed [t/h] 115,3 120,0 103,1 113,7 *
Clinker [%] 91,0 89,9 92,6
Gypsum [%] 5,4 5,4 5,5
Limestone [%] 3,5 4,7 1,9
Fineness
Blaine [cm²/g] 3132 3083 3042 3086
R 45 µm [%] 14,8 16,7 14,8 15,4
Power draw
Ball mill [kW] 2110 2110 2110
Polycom Fix [kW] 390 346 368
Polycom Mov [kW] 249 208 229
- Average production output of 113,8 t/h was achieved for a span of 45 hours
- Stable operation periods with production of 103 t/h as well as 120 t/h were
recorded using basically the same plant setup
Almost no concave
wear pattern visible
- Material deposits
indicate a not optimum
mixing of feed components
Polycom – Wear pattern is higher on the fixed side roller as a result of not optimal mixing of
fresh feed material and separator reject material
- Material deposits
indicate a not optimum
mixing of feed components
Intermediate
Profiling recommended
Fix roller
Intermediate profiling
recommended
Intermediate profiling
recommended
Motor ampere reading revealed a much lower difference in power draw of ~ 15% only
Transducers for both roller drives were exchanged, as measurement range of new transducers
was different compared to old ones
Old: 0 – 800 kW
New: 0 – 952 kW
Result:
Indicated power draw difference
came down to ~ 15 %, which
is still on the higher side
Clinker Rejects
Modification carried out in 2001 – Installation of restriction plate in Polycom feed chute
clinker rejects
Restriction plate is still in good shape – view from Polycom roller upwards
Restriction Plate
clinker rejects
Diameter: 50 mm
High wear resistant steel
Same material as installed
in Limestone hopper
Result:
Polycom roller power draw
almost equal after installation
of rods
16 mm 18-19 mm 16 mm
Polycom : 15/8-5
Material : clinker Combi Grinding 160 280
Diameter : 1500 mm 1500 mm
Width : 800 mm 800 mm
150 270
vu : 1,53 m/s 1,53 m/s
Size (0 - 9) : 5 5
80 200
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
working gap [mm]
hydr. pressure at pmax allow. actual hydr. Pressure grinding pressure pmax actual
90 210
80 200
Operation with increased grinding force 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
hydr. pressure at pmax allow. actual hydr. Pressure grinding pressure pmax actual
Material deposits
indicate improved
material mixture
Fan impeller
Exchanged and in
operation since 06/2010
Separator – ID Fan
Excessive dust
deposits on impeller
Separator – ID Fan
Fan impeller
Separator – ID Fan
Cyclone inlet
Worn areas were repaired by patching plates from outside (reject side) on 04.03.20011
Damage on SEPOL
Cyclone dip tube
Rotor cage
Activities:
Results Step 1:
Size Part
[mm] [%]
20 40
17 40
15 20
Polycom SEPOL:
Feed, Rejects, Fines
(intermediate product)
Measurements:
Volumetric flow
Static pressure
Filter dust sampling Temperature
measured
Ball mill dedusting via bag house filter E.P. off Volumetric flow bag filter inlet: 146. 072 m³/h
Volumetric flow downstream Sepol: ~ 140.000 m³/h
Design volumetric flow of SEPOL: 164.000 m³/h
Result: separation air too low, which reduces efficiency
Title: Technical Training – 2011 @ Singapore
Date: 06th & 07th July 2011
Presented By: Vijay, Arumugam
83 Polysius
Measurement and sampling – First findings
Cycle time:
Old: 10 s Pressure Drop reduced from 24 mbar to 16 mbar
New: 5 s - Increased separation air volume
- Separator efficiency increased,
Pulsing time: - Reject Blaine reduced from 1400 to 1040 Blaine
Old: 70 ms
New: 100 ms
measured
Ball mill dedusting via E.P. Volumetric flow bag downstream SEPOL: 158.751 m³/h
Bucket elevator is suitable for operation with 20% increased circumferential roller speed
Ball mill E.P. OFF, ball mill dedusting via ball mill Sepol baghouse filter, reduced separation air ON, E.P. in operation E.P. OFF
Ball mill dedusting [m³/h] ~ 7.000 ~ 4.000 ~ 7.000
Gypsum feed Gypsum feed to ball mill Gypsum to Polycom
- Average production output of 131,28 t/h was achieved for a span of 72 hours
-Stable operation periods with an average production of around 130 t/h were
recorded using different plant setups
-As filter dust fineness is around 3200 Blaine only, which is much below cement fineness when
grinding masonary cement the installation of a static separator before E.P. is recommended.
- Install dam ring on ball mill SEPOL feed section (drawing handed over to client)
- Change of smaller ball charge in chamber 1 together with installation of Diapol intermediate
diaphragm and outlet diaphragm.
- Installation of VFD drive for Polycom motors to attain higher circumferential speed
and higher power draw on Polycom drives.