Division of Iligan City

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region X- Northern Mindanao
DIVISION OF ILIGAN CITY
Gen. Aguinaldo St., Iligan City www.depediligan.weebly.com
Telefax No. (063) 221-6069 depediligancity@yahoo.com

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE
Name of Employee: __________________________ Name of Rater: ALLAN G. FARNAZO, CESO V
Position: Schools Division Superintendent Position: Regional Director
Office: Division of Iligan City Date of Review: ___________________________
Rating Period: Target Setting
TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED UP DURING
EVALUATION
Weight Performance Indicators Actual RATING Ave SCORE
per
MFO KRAs/ OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Results Q E T
Obj.
Weight
1.Implemented Division Education 1% 5 (0) - Six (6) of the mentioned activities were
Development Plan (DEDP) goals, implemented
objectives and targets during the 4 (VS) - 5 activities were implemented
rating 3 (S) - 4 activities were implemented
period thru: 2 (US) – 3 activities were implemented
A.Strategic a. Communicated DEDP to 1 (P) - 2 activities were implemented
Planning stakeholders, NGO’s, LGU’s
and school community
(40%) b. Organized DEDP Team and SIP
Monitoring Team
c. Conducted quarterly Division
Monitoring and Evaluation
Adjustment (DMEA)
d. Required schools to
conduct quarterly SMEA
e. Aligned all programs, activities
and projects (PAPs) in the CID,
SGOD, SDO and schools SIP
with the DEDP.
f. Conducted Division Annual
Performance Review
2. Planned the effective and
efficient performance of the
Division under Quality, Access
and Efficiency:
a. Improved Quality of Learners
Performance:
a.1. Elementary NAT/ :
a 5.43% increased from 2% 5 (0) –100% or an increased of 5.43%
69.57 to 75.0%. 4 (VS) – 80% or 4.34% increased
3 (S) - 60% or 3.26% increased
2 (US) – 40% or 2.20% increased
1 (P) - 20% or 1.09% increased

a.2. Secondary NAT : A 9.88% 2% 5 (0) –100% or an increased of 9.88%

From 47.62 to 57.5% 4 (VS) – 80% or 7.9% increased
3 (S) - 60% or 5.93% increased
2 (US) – 40% or 3.95% increased
1 (P) - 20% or 1.98% increased

a.3. Senior High School Learners 2% 5 (0) –100% SHS learners passed the Exit Assessment
passed the Exit Assessment during the Assessment period.
during the Assessment 4 (VS) – 75%-99% passed
period. 3 (S) - 50%-74% passed
2 (US) – 25%-49% passed
1 (P) - 1%-24% passed

a.4. Improved ELLNA Performance 2% 5 (0) –70.23% to 71.23% increased

of learners in all areas: 4 (VS) – 69.23% to 70.23% increased
Sinugbuanong Binisaya, 3 (S) - from 63.23% to 68.23% increased
English, and Tagalog from 2 (US) – 63.23% to 62.23% decreased
63.23% to 68.23%. 1 (P) - 62.23% to 61.23% decreased

a.5. Decreased the number of 2% Grade 1: decreased by 75% from ____ to ____ during the
Frustration Readers in: rating period
Grade 1 decreased by 75% Grade 2: decreased by 85% from ____ to ____
Grade 2 decreased by 85% Grade 3: decreased by 100% from ____ to ____
Grade 3 decreased 100%
a.6. ALS A&E:
a.4.1. Increased in the number 2% 5 (0) –5% increased in the number of ALS A&E
of ALS A&E passers in: passers during the assessment period
Elementary: A 3 % increased 4 (VS) – 4% increased
from 35% to 38% in the 3 (S) - 3% increased
number of passers during the 2 (US) – 2% increased
assessment period. 1 (P) - 1% increased

Secondary: A 3% increased 2% 5 (0) –7% increased in the number of ALS A&E

from 60% to 63% the number passers during the assessment period
of passers during the 4 (VS) – 5% increased
assessment period. 3 (S) - 3% increased
2 (US) – 2% increased
1 (P) - 1% increased

b. Provided Education Access to

Every Child:
b.1. 2% Increased in the following 1% b.1.1. GER from 121.6% to 124.00%
KPIs: (Elementary) b.1.2. NER from 95.8% to 97.7%
b.1.1. GER b.1.3. Completion rate from 92.5% to 94.35%
b.1.2. NER b.1.4. Cohort Survival rate from 93.5% to 95.4%
b.1.3. Completion rate
b.1.4. Cohort Survival rate

b.2. 2% Increased in the following 1% b.2.1. GER from 70.5% to 71.9%

KPIs: (Secondary) b.2.2. NER from 62.45% to 63.7%
b.2.1. GER b.2.3. Completion rate from 86.02% to 87.7%
b.2.2. NER b.2.4. Cohort Survival rate from 88.04% to 89.8%
b.2.3. Completion rate
b.2.4. Cohort Survival

b.3. 10% decreased in the following 1% b.3.1. School Leavers from 1.26% to 1.13%
KPIs : (Elem.) b.3.2. drop out from 0.69% to 0.621%
b.3.1. School Leavers
b.3.2. drop out

b.4. 10% decreased in the following b.4.1. School Leavers from 3.54% to 3.186%
1%
KPIs : (Sec.) b.4.2. drop out from 1.09% to 0.981%
b.4.1. School Leavers
b.4.2. drop out

b.5. 2% decreased in the following b.5.1. School Leavers from ___ to ___
1%
KPIs : (SHS) b.5.2. Completion Rate ___ to ___
b.5.1. School Leavers
b.5.2. Completion Rate
3. Ensured compliance with 2% 5 (0) –Efficiently complied/implemented 18 of the
quality education standards of the identified curricular programs with the submission
identified curricular education of Completion Reports during the rating period.
programs such as: ELLN, ALS, 4 (VS) – 12-17 programs
ADM, IPED, Multigrade, SPED, STE, 3 (S) - 8-11 programs
SSES, MTB- MLE, TechVoc, SPA, 2 (US) – 4-7 programs
Research, Contextualization/ 1 (P) - 1-3 programs
Localization, ALIVE, ICT
Integration, SHS, Journalism with
the submission of Completion
reports within the specific
timeline during the rating period.

4. Ensured implementation with

quality standards Schools
Governance programs/
projects/activities such as:
A. Human Resource Training and
Development:
A.1.
Coordinated/Facilitated/initia 1% 5 (0) –Coordinated/Facilitated/initiated 10 professional
ted professional development development trainings for SHs, teaching and
trainings for SHs, teaching non-teaching personnel, and division Office
personnel during the rating
and non-teaching personnel
period.
and Division Office personnel 4 (VS) –8 trainings
during the rating period. 3 (S) - 5 trainings
2 (US) - 3 trainings
1 (P) - 1 training

A.1. Induction Program

-Newly hired teaching and 1% 5 (0) –100% of newly hired teaching and non-teaching
personnel were inducted during the rating period.
non-teaching personnel were
4 (VS) –80% were inducted
inducted during the rating 3 (S) - 60% were inducted
period. 2 (US) - 40% were inducted
1 (P) - 20% were inducted
B. School Health and Nutrition
Program:
-1. Monitored schools and 5 (0) –100% of the Schools and Learning Centers were
1%
learning centers on Drug Monitored on the implementation of the National
Related activities during the Drug Education Program (NDEP) during the rating
rating period. period.
4 (VS) –80% of the Schools and Learning Centers
 3 (S) - 60% of the Schools and Learning Centers
2 (US) - 40% of the Schools and Learning Centers
1 (P) - 20% of the Schools and Learning Centers

-2. Oriented Junior and SHS 1% 5 (0) –100% of Junior and Senior High School learners
learners on Adolescent were oriented on Adolescent Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health during during the rating period.
4 (VS) –80% of Junior and Senior High School learners
the rating period.
3 (S) - 60% of Junior and Senior High School learners
2 (US) - 40% of Junior and Senior High School learners
1 (P) - 20% of Junior and Senior High School learners

-3. Schools and Learning 5 (0) –100% of the Schools and Learning Centers
Centers implemented the implemented the Water Hygience and Sanitation
Water Hygiene and Sanitation 1% (WaHS) Program during the rating period.
4 (VS) –80% of the Schools and Learning Centers
in Schools (WinS) Program
3 (S) - 60% of the Schools and Learning Centers
during the rating period. 2 (US) - 40% of the Schools and Learning Centers
1 (P) - 20% of the Schools and Learning Centers

1% 5 (0) –100% decreased from ___ to ___ in the number of

-4. Improved the nutritional
severely wasted and wasted pupils during the
status of pupils from ____ to feeding period.
____ through the School- 4 (VS) –80% decreased from ___ to ___
Based Feeding Program at the 3 (S) - 85% decreased from ___ to ___
end of the feeding period. 2 (US) - 40% decreased from ___ to ___
1 (P) - 20% decreased from ___ to ___

1% 5 (0) –dewormed 100% of the learners during the

-5 Conducted deworming to
Deworming schedule.
learners during the given
4 (VS) –90% of the learners
schedule.
3 (S) - 80% of the learners
2 (US) - 40% of the learners
1 (P) - 10% of the learners

-6. Provided immunization to 1% 5 (0) –100% of the learners were immunized during the
learners during the given given schedule.
schedule. 4 (VS) –90% of the learners
3 (S) - 80% of the learners
2 (US) - 40% of the learners
1 (P) - 10% of the learners

7. Gulayan sa Paaralan 1% 5 (0) –100% of the schools implemented the Gulayan sa

-Implemented the Gulayan sa Paaralan Program (GPP) during the rating period.
Paaralan Program during the rating 4 (VS) –80% of the schools
period. 3 (S) - 60% of the schools
 2 (US) - 40% of the schools
1 (P) - 20% of the schools
C. Sports:
-1. Increased the Division 1% 5 (0) –Placed 3rd during the regional competition.
standing in the Regional 4 (VS) – Placed 4th
Athletic Meet- Elementary 3 (S) - Placed 5th
level during the competition 2 (US) – Placed 6th
period. 1 (P) - Placed 7th

-2. Increased the Division 1% 5 (0) – Placed 3rd during the regional competition.
standing in the Regional 4 (VS) – Placed 4th
Athletic Meet- Secondary 3 (S) - Placed 5th
level during the competition 2 (US) – Placed 8th
period. 1 (P) - Placed 9th

D. Research
-Increased the number of 1% 5 (0) – 30 research studies were granted the Basic
BERF recipients during the Education Research Fund (BERF) during the rating
rating period from 10 to 20 period.
research studies 4 (VS) –25 research studies
3 (S) - 20 research studies
2 (US) – 10 research studies
1 (P) - 5 research study

E. Gender and Development: 1% 5 (0) –100% of Division office personnel attended

E.1. Division Office Personnel trainings on Gender and Development during the
attended trainings on Gender rating period.
and Development during the 4 (VS) –80% of Division office personnel
rating period. 3 (S) - 60% Division office personnel
2 (US) - 40% Division office personnel
1 (P) - 20% Division office personnel

F. Disaster Risk Reduction 2% 5 (0) –9 of the mentioned activities were facilitated/

Management Program: initiated/ conducted during the rating period.
-Implemented the following 4 (VS) –7 of the mentioned activities
DRRM activities: creation of 3 (S) - 7 of the mentioned activities
Division Quick Response 2 (US) - 3 of the mentioned activities
Team; Earthquake drill; fire 1 (P) - 0nly 1 of the mentioned activities
drill; flood drill; provided TA
in the preparation of
evacuation plan; monitored
the posting of safety signages,
conducted DRRM related
trainings, facilitated the
conduct of student led school
watching and hazard
mapping; facilitated the
 promotion of family
earthquake preparedness.

G. Brigada Eskwela
J.1. Implemented the Brigada 1% 5 (0) –100% of the schools implemented the Brigada
Eskwela activities during the Eskwela activities (GPP) during the Brigada Week.
Brigada week with the 4 (VS) –80% of the schools
submission of Brigada 3 (S) - 60% of the schools
Report/Documents. 2 (US) - 40% of the schools
1 (P) - 20% of the schools

H. Career Guidance Program: 1% 5 (0) – 100% of the Junior HSs and schools offering SHS
-Monitored the Implementation Program/s were monitored on the
of Career Guidance Program. implementation of Career Guidance Program
during the rating period.
4 (VS) –80% of the schools
3 (S) - 60% of the schools
2 (US) - 40% of the schools
1 (P) - 20% of the schools

I. LIS, E-BEIS and Early 1% 5- 100% of schools were monitored on the status of
Registration updating, finalizing and submission of LIS/EBEIS and
-Monitored schools Updating, Early Registration reports.
finalizing and submission of 4-80% of schools were monitored
LIS/EBEIS and early 3-60% of schools were monitored
registration reports. 2-40% of schools were monitored
1-20% of schools were monitored
1. Satisfied the financial need of 2% 5 (0) –100% of the schools and learning centers
all schools and LCs following fund allocation were provided following
the guidelines on releases, the guidelines on releases, implementation
implementation and liquidation and liquidation
of funds allocated 4 (VS) - 80% of the schools
3 (S) - 60% of the schools
2 (US) - 40% of the schools
1 (P) - 20% of the schools
2. Ensured that school 2% 5 (0) –Ensured implementation and monitoring of all of the
B. Resource buildings and LCs are: 5 conditions with submission of required reports
a. structurally and physically safe during the rating period.
Manageme to learners and to the public 4 (VS) – 4 conditions implemented and monitored
nt (10%) b. regularly monitored to maintain 3 (S) - 3 conditions implemented and monitored
conducive physical environment 2 (US) – 2 conditions implemented and monitored
for pupils through regular 1 (P) - only 1 condition is implemented and monitored
checking and maintenance.
c. in compliance with Site
Acquisition/ Land titling
d. review program of works of
 proposed bldg. repair and
maintenance
e. monitor the progress of school
bldg. construction implemented by
DPWH
3. Established a system to 1% 5 (0) –100% of funded PPAs submitted utilization
properly monitor funds Report a month after the conduct of the
utilization as against programs, Activity during the rating period.
projects and activities: SBFP, IPED, 4 (VS) - 80% of funded PPAs
SCHOOL REPAIRS, DRRMM, GAD, 3 (S) - 60% of funded PPAs
ALIVE/MADRASAH; 2 (US) - 40% of funded PPAs
1 (P) - 20% of funded PPAs

4. Monitored and supervised private 1% 5(O)- 100% of private schools were monitored on the
schools on the compliance of compliance to standards of K to 12 curriculum during
standards and in the the rating period.
implementation of K to 12 4(VS) -80% of the private schools
curriculum 3 (S) - 60% of the private schools
2 (US) - 40% of the private schools
1 (P) –20% of the private schools
5. Supervised the operations of 2% 5 (0) –All of the 5 conditions were supervised and
the schools and learning implemented with submission of Completion
centers in the Division Report during the rating period.
ensuring the following: 4 (VS) – 4 conditions were supervised
a. effective governance and 3 (S) - 3 conditions were supervised
operations of schools and 2 (US) – 2 conditions were supervised
learning centers 1 (P) - only 1 condition was supervised
b. initiated programs related
to providing education
support to schools and
learning centers
c. Reported the progress on
implementation of Division
planned programs and
projects and achievement
d. Sustained relationships of
partners for increased
support to basic education
e. Provided strategic
Directions for the conduct
of Action Research in the
Division
6. Ensured compliance/ 2% 5 (0) –Complied and implemented all of the 8
implementation of the mentioned activities with the submission of
following activities: the required reports on the deadline.
- Division Work and Financial Plan 4 (VS) – 6 of the mentioned activities
- Division Accomplishment 3 (S) - 4 of the mentioned activities
 Report 2 (US) – 3 of the mentioned activities
-Personnel Work Assignments 1 (P) - 1 of the mentioned activities
- M & E Report
-Governance and Operations
Accomplishments
-CID Accomplishment Report
- Annual Procurement Plan
- Performance Appraisal
1. Ensured full compliance of the
articulated K-12 basic education
curriculum through
a. Management of Curriculum 5% 5 (0) –Complied and implemented all of the 6
Implementation such as: mentioned activities in Management of
a.1-Monitored the Curriculum Implementation with the submission of
conduct of Instructional the required reports during the rating period.
Supervision during the 4 (VS) – 5 of the mentioned activities
rating period 3 (S) - 4 of the mentioned activities
2 (US) – 3 of the mentioned activities
C.
a.2.-Supervised the conduct 1 (P) - 1-2 of the mentioned activities
Curriculum of curriculum
and implementation review

Instruction a.3.-Conducted Quarterly

(30%) Monitoring and Evaluation
Adjustment (MEA) on
Curriculum
Implementation.

a.4.-gathered data on
instructional curriculum
implementation
a.5.-conducted
stakeholders summit
a.6.-consolidated analysis
of curriculum gaps and
needs

b. Curriculum Development, 5% 5 (0) – Complied/Implemented 4 of the mentioned

enrichment and indicators on Curriculum Development,
Localization through: enrichment and Localization to 8 of the learning
b.1.-conducted training areas with the submission of the required reports
workshop/writeshop on during the rating Period.
contextualization/ 4 (VS) - 6 learning areas
location and 3 (S) - 4 learning areas
indigenization per 2 (US) – 3 learning areas
subject area 1 (P) - 1-2 learning areas
b.2.-Compiled accomplished
 LR QA tools per learning
area
b.3.-submitted report on
Curriculum Innovation
and localization per
learning area
b.4.-conducted action
research on curriculum
localization per learning
area

c. Learning Delivery such as: 3% 5 (0) - Five (5) of the mentioned indicators on Learning
-provided Learning Delivery were complied/implemented with the
support/TA to schools submission of the required reports during the
through: LAC sessions (LAC rating period
session Plan @ 3 LAC 4 (VS) - 4 of the mentioned indicators were implemented
sessions per quarter), 3 (S) - 3 of the mentioned indicators were implemented
Capability Building on 2 (US) –2 of the mentioned indicators were implemented
Content and pedagogy, 1 (P) - only 1 indicator was complied/implemented
coaching and mentoring to
SHs on IS (1 per quarter),
Reading program
implementation with
utilization of Library Hub
Books)

d. Learning Resource by 5% 5 (0) –Complied and implemented all of the 6

providing TA in: mentioned activities with the submission of the
d.1.-contextualization/ required reports during the rating period.
localization/indigenization 4 (VS) – 5 of the mentioned activities
of IMs 3 (S) - 4 of the mentioned activities
d.2.- LR Plan 2 (US) – 3 of the mentioned activities
implementation 1 (P) - 1-2 of the mentioned activities
d.3.-harvesting/
downloading of LRs
d.4.-conducted validation/
evaluation of developed
LRS
d.5.-withdrawal and
distribution of Learning
Resource Materials
d.6.-Uploaded effective
practices in the LR Portal
for region-wide/nation
wide adoption per
learning area
 e. Learning Outcomes
Assessment 5% 5 (0) – Conducted unified quarter exam to all grade levels
e.1.-conducted a Division in all learning areas (8 learning areas)
unified periodic test to during the rating period.
validate learnings on the 4 (VS) –6 Learning areas
various competencies 3 (S) - 4 learning areas grade levels
delivered by Quarter to all 2 (US) – 2 Learning Areas
Grades levels in all learning 1 (P) - only 1 Learning areas
areas.

e.2.-Evaluated and 5% 5 (0) – 100% of the consolidated assessment results were

analyzed consolidated evaluated and analyzed during the rating period
report on assessment by 4 (VS) - 80% were evaluated and analyzed
Quarter during the rating 3 (S) - 60% were evaluated and analyzed
period 2 (US) – 40% were evaluated and analyzed
1 (P) - 20% were evaluated and analyzed

2. Required 50% of the schools to 2% 5 (0) –100% of the schools re-submitted for Level 1
adhere accreditation Accreditation
standards - School Based 4 (VS) – 75-99% of the schools
Management (SBM) Level of 3 (S) - 50%-74% of the schools
Practices during the 2 (US) – 25%-49% of the
accreditation period. 1 (P) - 0-24% of the schools

1. Achieved Level 2 in 1% 5 (0) –Achieved Level 2 in RSP, PMS and L&D

Recruitment, Selection and 4 (VS) – Achieved level 2 in RSP and L&D
Placement (RSP) in the EPRIME- 3 (S) - Achieved Level 2 in RSP
HRM during the Assessment 2 (US) – Achieved Level 1`in all Core Areas (RSP,
period. PM, L&D and R&R)
D. Human 1 (P) - Achieved Level 1 in RSP
Resource 2. Reduced unfilled regular 2% 5 (0) –Reduced from 5.65% to 1% the number
Developme plantilla positions items from of unfilled positions
5.65% to 4% during the rating 4 (VS) – Reduced from 5.65% to 3.0%
nt and Period 3 (S) - Reduced from 5.65% to 4.0%
Manageme 2 (US) – Reduced from 5.65% to 4.8%
nt 1 (P) - No reduction of unfilled position

(5%)
 3. Hired, placed and evaluated 2% 5 (0) -100% of the hired teaching and non-teaching
teaching and non-teaching personnel were regularly and promptly
personnel regularly and evaluated based on the mentioned activities
promptly, by: during the rating period
a. Implementing Standards 4 (VS) - 80% of the personnel
per HR System 3 (S) - 60% of the personnel
b. Updating e-BEIS Needs 2 (US) - 40% of the personnel
Analysis 1 (P) - 20% of the personnel
c. Pooling a Registry of
Qualified Applicants, Matrix
of Promotion, Transfers
and Reassignments of
Personnel (Designation
Orders ,Special Orders)
1. 50% of the legal concerns and 3% 5 (0) -100% of legal issues and concerns
issues filed in the Division responded to
Office responded/ resolved as 4 (VS) - 75-99% responded/resolved
of October of the rating period 3 (S) - 50-74% responded/resolved
2 (US) - 25-49% responded/resolved
1 (P) -0-24% responded/resolved
2. 50% of the Proposed allocation 3% 5 (0) -100% of priorities for SEF allocations
from SEF as prioritized during recommended
the first budget meeting were 4 (VS) - 75-99% recommended
recommended 3 (S) - 50-74% recommended
2 (US) - 25-49% recommended
1 (P) -0-24% recommended
3. Produced at least 2 researches 1% 5 (0) –Produced 5 approved researches
among non-teaching 4 (VS) – Produced 3 approved researches
E. Special personnel/ Division Office 3 (S) - Produced 2 approved researches
Tasks/ Personnel during the rating 2 (US) - Produced 1 approved research
Period 1 (P) - No research submitted
Other
Assignment 4. Maintained at least 10 linkages 2% 5 (0) –Maintained 15 linkages with MOA/MOU
in promoting school during the rating period.
s community partnership with 4 (VS) – Maintained 13-14 linkages
MOA/MOU during the rating 3 (S) - Maintained 10-12 linkages
(10%) Period 2 (US) - Maintained 5-9 linkages
1 (P) - Maintained 1-4 linkages
5. Facilitated the evaluation and 2% 5 (0) -100% of the applications for establishment of new
endorsement of 50% of the schools were evaluate and endorsed
applications for establishment 4 (VS) - 75-99% of the applications
and maintenance of new 3 (S) - 50-74% of the applications
schools during the rating 2 (US) - 25-49% of the applications
period 1 (P) -0-24% of the applications
F. Plus 1. Produced at least one 2.5% 5 (0) –Produced 3 nominees for Brigada Eskwela
(1)nominee for National Level National Level Search
in the Brigada Eskwela 4 (VS) – Produced 2 nominees
Factor 3 (S) - Produced 1 nominee
2 (US) – Submitted nominees for Regional
Level Search in all categories
(5%)
1 (P) - Submitted 50% nominees for Regional
Level Search
2. A 30% increased in the number 2.5% 5- 50% increased from 2,200 to 3,300 in the
of teachers donated blood number of teachers donated blood in the
during the Dugong Guro Dugong Guro Program.
Program from 2,200 to 2,860 4- 40% increased from
during the bloodletting period. 3- 30% increased from 2,200 to 2,860
2- 20% increased from 2,200 to 2,640
1-10% increased from 2,200 to 2,420
Total

Over-all Rating

Adjectival Rating

Ratee: Approving Authority:

__________________________ ALLAN G. FARNAZO, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent Regional Director