SURESH ANGADI EDUCATION FOUNDATION’S

ANGADI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT

(An Integrated Campus)
Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Phase II Report for Structural Project

On
Seismic Analysis of RC Shear Wall in Multi-
Storeyed Building

Submitted
By

AVINASH KUMAR GUPTA USN: 2AG15CV015

PALLAVI KALASANNAVAR USN: 2AG15CV030
SANKALP PARAB USN: 2AG15CV049
AKSHAY PATIL USN: 2AG16CV400

Under the guidance of

Prof. SHRADHA DESAI
Prof. GURURAJ TAVILDAR

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

JNANASANGAMA, BELAGAVI-590009

2018-19

1|Page
 Date: 07/03/2019
1. Subject area of Project: Structural
2. Project Group Details

USN Team Members Name Mobile No. Email ID

2AG15CV015 AVINASH KUMAR 7507845699 avinash7507@gmail.com
GUPTA
2AG15CV030 PALLAVI 9538626232 pallavikalasannavar@gmail.com
KALASANNAVAR
2AG15CV049 SANKALP PARAB 7798054943 sank090996@gmail.com
2AG16CV400 AKSHAY PATIL 7829561974 akshaypatil11004@gmail.com

GUIDE HOD CO-GUIDE

Prof. Shraddha Desai Prof. Amar Byakodi Prof. Gururaj Tavildar

2|Page
 CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 ABSTRACT
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 3 LITERATURE SURVEY
CHAPTER 4 PROBLEM DEFINATION
CHAPTER 5 WORK COMPLETION
CHAPTER 6 PLAN FOR UPCOMING WORK
CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES

3|Page
 ABSTRACT

Structural Engineers are facing the challenge of striving for the most efficient and economical
design with accuracy in solution while ensuring that the final design of a building must be
serviceable for its intended function over its design life - time. This project presents upper
stories RCC framed building analysed under the lateral loading effect of earthquake using
ETABS(Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building system). ETABS is incorporated
with all the major analysis engines that is static, dynamic, Linear and non-linear, etc., and this
Software is used to analyse and design especially the buildings. Because of the facilities
provided in this software at the modelling stage, the buildings can be modelled as per the
arrangement of the members of the project in Practical, and this software considers the beams,
columns as Line members; slabs, walls are as frame members. Taking the horizontal loading
effects of Seismic forces; In the design of this project, I take dynamic loading along with the
Static loading and Live loads as per IS Code 1893:2002, IS 456:2000 and almost all the
members of the project can be analysed and designed as per Indian code using this software,
where ever require to design the members using excel sheets which are prepared by us in this
phase.

4|Page
 INTRODUCTION

The one of the most sensitive issues that the Structural Engineers face is the selection of proper
procedure for estimating the seismic performance of the structure. This is very important when
they are dealing with high rise structures as the improper selection of the method ultimately
leads to the results which are far away from the correct results. Dynamic analysis is one of the
effective procedures for evaluating the seismic performance of the building. The damage
control is one of important design considerations which is increasing its influence and can be
achieved only by introducing dynamic analysis in the design. The dynamic analysis can be
done by soft wares like Etabs, Staad Pro, and SAP. Etabs is one of the leading software which
is presently using by many companies and Structural Engineers for their projects. In this paper
Etabs is used for the dynamic analysis of the multi-storey building. The methodology followed
in Etabs for the analysis is as follows modelling of the multi-storey building, static analysis,
designing and dynamic analysis. For the study, the multi-storey building is being designed to
resist almost all the lateral forces. The tower-area columns are located in the grid of 10.4 ×
10.4 m having square and rectangle sizes. In basement areas, columns are at 8 × 8 m grid
(approx.) and columns with beam-slab system is provided.

5|Page
The wall, in building which resist lateral loads produced by wind or earthquakes are known
as shear walls.
 Shear walls are not only designed to resist gravity or vertical loads (due to its self-weight
and other living or moving loads), but they are also designed for lateral loads of earthquakes
or wind.
 Shear wall is one of the important parts of structure which is generally used in the structure
to control the earthquake effect. These walls are having very high stiffness and strength
which gives the structure to resist large thrust.
 Drift is defined as the lateral displacement. Storey drift is the drift of one level of a multi
storey building relative to the level below. Inter story drift is the difference between the roof
and floor displacements of any given story as the building sways during the earthquake,
normalized by the story height.
Base shear is an estimate of the maximum expected lateral force that will occur due to
seismic ground motion at the base of a structure. Calculations of base shear (V) depend on:
soil conditions at the site. Proximity to potential sources of seismic activity (such as
geological faults).

6|Page
 LITERATURE SURVEY

Anand et al (2010) studied the seismic behavior of RCC buildings with and without shear
wall under different soil conditions. The values of base shear axial force and lateral
displacement where compared between two frames. Lateral displacement, base shear, axial,
to medium and medium to soft for all the building frames. It was concluded that soil structure
interaction must be suitably considered by designing frames for seismic forces.

Amin et al (2011) studied the effect of soft soil on multistoried reinforced concrete building
frame. Four building models (3, 6, 9 and 12 storey) with identical building plan where
considered to investigate the effect of soft soil for multistoried reinforced concrete building
frame. Soft storey level was altered from ground floor to top floor for each model and
equivalent static analysis was carried out using ETABS software.

Kalyanshetti M.G (2015) studied the effect of Shear wall in the seismic Analysis of Building
Frames considering Soil Structure Interaction, shear wall ,natural period ,base shear,
winklerian approach.

Kanhaiya Abhay Zanwar (2016) studied on effect of soil flexibility in the seismic design
building using dynamic analysis considering fixed base condition.

7|Page
 PROBLEM DEFINATION

To study the effect of soil structure interaction on bare Frame (neglecting the stiffness
contribution of infill masonry while considering the mass) for fix based condition and for
considering soil flexibility.
To study the seismic response parameters such as Natural period, base shear and
displacements.
To compare the structural response between fixed based condition and for considering soil
flexibility.

PRESENT STUDY:

The building considered in the project is G+25 storied RC framed building of plan 25m x25m
of spacing 5m along each direction.

Story height = 3.2m

Length = 25m

Breadth = 25m

Height = 80m

Column size = 300mm x 750mm

Beam size = 300mm x 600mm

Rebar Grade = HYSD Grade 500

Shear wall thickness = 200mm

Damping = 5% for buildings using IS 1893:2002

Footing size = 3m x 3m

Slab Thickness = 125mm

Grade = M25

8|Page
 STIFFNESS PARAMETERS

SHEAR MODULUS G TABLE POISON’S RATIO TABLE

SEISMIC PARAMETER (IS 1893)

Zone V
Soil Type II(Medium Soil)
Importance factor(I) 1.00
Building system Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame(R=3)
Eccentric Ratio 0
Seismic zone factor 0.36

9|Page
10 | P a g e
 Fig.1 Typical elevation and Plan of Bare frame model

Fig.2 Typical elevation and Plan of Bare frame model with shear wall

11 | P a g e
 Fig.3 Typical elevation and Plan of Bare frame model with spring

Fig.4 Typical elevation and Plan of shear wall structure with spring

12 | P a g e
 FUTURE PLANS

 Analysis of the models in the ETABS software with different load combinations.
 The seismic response parameters such as Natural period, base shear and
displacements.
 The structural response between fixed based condition and for considering soil
flexibility.

 Comparing the results of the models for safer and critical condition.

13 | P a g e
 REFERENCES
 Anand et al (2010) studied the seismic behavior of RCC buildings with and without
shear wall under different soil conditions. The values of base shear axial force and
lateral displacement where compared between two frames. Lateral displacement, base
shear, axial, to medium and medium to soft for all the building frames. It was
concluded that soil structure interaction must be suitably considered by designing
frames for seismic forces.

 Amin et al (2011) studied the effect of soft soil on multistoried reinforced concrete
building frame. Four building models (3, 6, 9 and 12 storey) with identical building
plan where considered to investigate the effect of soft soil for multistoried reinforced
concrete building frame. Soft storey level was altered from ground floor to top floor
for each model and equivalent static analysis was carried out using ETABS software.

 Kalyanshetti M.G (2015) studied the effect of Shear wall in the seismic Analysis of
Building Frames considering Soil Structure Interaction, shear wall ,natural period
,base shear, winklerian approach.

 Kanhaiya Abhay Zanwar (2016) studied on effect of soil flexibility in the seismic
design building using dynamic analysis considering fixed base condition.
 Dr. Vinod Hosur “ EARTHQUAKE – resistant design of building structure “ ,
WILEY (INDIA)PUBLICATION , NEW DELHI

 IS 456:2000 code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete.

 IS 1904 -1986 General Requirements for design & Construction of foundation and
FEMA 356 (FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY)
 IS 800-1984, Indian Standard code of practice for general construction in steel.
 IS 1893(PART 1): 2002 criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.

14 | P a g e