Experiment 10: H TH H TH
Experiment 10: H TH H TH
2017-04-14
Experiment 10
Objective
This lab will introduce you to the concept of spectrophotometric measurements. You will
analyze water samples and standards for iron using a standard spectrophotometric method. You
will learn how to prepare standards, use an Ocean Optics Spectrophotometer, and make a
calibration curve using Beer’s Law.
Lab 1 Plan ahead. Prepare your top iron standard, the hydroxylamine solution, the 1,10-
phenanthroline solution, and the ammonium acetate buffer solution. You should also plan
how you are going to prepare your working standards.
Lab 2 Bring in your water samples on this day. Prepare the working standards and your sample
solutions for analysis. Obtain and prepare the performance evaluation sample for
analysis. Perform the spectrophotometric measurements. Finish the experiment. Get help
with calculations.
By and large, tap water in the United States is of good quality and safe to drink. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established standards for drinking water quality
and state and local governments work hard to keep drinking water safe. The EPA standards limit
the amount of iron in drinking water to less than 0.3 ppm (0.3 mg/L). Iron is not hazardous to
health, but it can leave reddish-brown stains on laundry and bathroom or kitchen fixtures. In
addition, iron can give the water an unpleasant taste. In this experiment, we will determine the
levels of iron present in the tap water you drink to determine whether or not the water meets the
established standards. You may bring bottles of tap water from home for this experiment.
However, please collect the water in the morning before your class, if possible. You will also
determine the iron in an unknown sample provided in the lab.
One method that is frequently used to determine trace amounts of iron in water involves using
the reaction between Fe2+ with 1,10-phenanthroline (phen). This reaction produces a Fe(phen)32+
complex with a reddish-orange color which absorbs light at 510 nm. This complex is called
“ferroin”:
72
Rev. 2017-04-14
http://www.lookchem.com/cas-147/14708-99-7.html
Ferroin
Iron present in water exists predominantly in the form of Fe3+. Since 1,10-phenanthroline reacts
only with Fe2+, it is necessary to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+. You will add the reducing agent,
hydroxylamine, to your water sample and standards in order to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+. Because
dissolved oxygen in water can reoxidize Fe2+ to Fe3+, an excess amount of the hydroxylamine
reducing agent is needed to keep iron in the +2 state during the course of the experiment. Fe2+ is
quantitatively complexed by 1,10-phenanthroline in the pH range from 3 to 9. An acetate buffer
is used as a buffer to maintain a constant pH at 3.5. Fe2+ can be oxidized to Fe3+ if the pH is >9.
If the pH is <3, H+ competes with Fe2+ for the basic 1,10-phenanthroline to form phenH+. The
determination of the colored Fe(phen)32+ complex is performed with a spectrophotometer at a
fixed wavelength of 510 nm. You will make a calibration curve based on iron standard solutions.
Prelaboratory Assignment
1) The iron concentration in a water sample taken from a site of suspected groundwater
contamination is determined by spectrophotometry. The following results are obtained:
Correct each measured absorbance value for the blank absorbance. Calculate the average
(corrected) absorbance and the standard deviation for each set of measurements. Using Excel, or
another plotting program, plot the average (corrected) absorbance vs. the concentration. Add
error bars to your plot. Error bars simply indicate the uncertainty in a reported measurement.
73
Rev. 2017-04-14
Your error bars will indicate plus/minus one standard deviation of uncertainty. Show the
equation of the calibration line and the R2 value on the plot. Give your plot a title and make sure
the axes are labeled appropriately and have units. Calculate the concentration of iron in the well
water sample from the equation of the calibration line determined using Excel. Use equation 4-
27 in your text to determine the uncertainty in the iron concentration in the well water (hint: read
pgs 83-91 of your text. These calculations are simple when Excel is used. Section 4-9 of your
text has a useful description of how to use Excel for this purpose (pg 89-91).)
74
Rev. 2017-04-14
Apparatus
Chemicals
Hydroxylamine hydrochloride
1,10-phenanthroline monohydrate
Ammonium acetate
Glacial acetic acid
Concentrated HCl
1000 mg/L iron standard solution
Procedure
3. Preparing your “working” standards and blank-- this should be done on the same day
75
Rev. 2017-04-14
you will do the spectrophotometric analyses. Allow a minimum of 10 minutes for color
development in 50 or 100-mL beaker.
a) For the blank: add ~30 mL DI water to a 50 mL volumetric flask. To this, add 1 mL
of the hydroxylamine hydrochloride solution and mix. Then add 10 ml of the buffer
solution and 4 mL of the phenanthroline solution. Mix and then dilute to the mark
with DI water. Mix thoroughly. Note: you can use a 10 ml graduated cylinder to add
the buffer solution, and measuring pipets to add the other reagents. Pour the mixed
solution from the volumetric flask to a small beaker or other container (i.e. test tube).
You need < 5 mL of this solution to do the spectrophotometric analysis. Repeat the
procedure two more times. You should have three samples of the blank (replicates) in
three separate beakers when you have finished. Cover each beaker or container with
parafilm or plastic wrap. Label.
b) Use your top standards (from Step 2, the 20 and/or 200 mg/mL standards) to prepare
at least four working standards that range in concentration from about 1.0 mg/L to
10.0 mg/L. To do this, calculate the volume of a particular top standard needed to
prepare a chosen working standard. Add this volume to 10 mL of DI water in a 50 mL
volumetric flask and add the reagents as in a) above (hydroxylamine hydrochloride,
buffer and phenanthroline) and dilute to the mark. Choose concentrations that are
easy for you to prepare using available volumetric glassware. It is strongly suggested
that you make the most dilute standard first then move up to the next highest
concentration. (*Why?*)You should have three separate replicates for each standard.
If you reuse your volumetric flasks or pipets, rinse them out between samples. Always
prepare solutions starting with the lowest concentration first. Keep your solutions
covered to minimize their exposure to air.
76
Rev. 2017-04-14
References
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater: Including Bottom Sediments
and Sludges. 1998. Published by the American Public Health Association, American Water
Works Association, and the Water Pollution Control Federation.
77
Rev. 2017-04-14
Report
A typed report is required for this experiment (100 points). Each partner must turn in his/her own
report. A professional style of writing is expected. Make sure to use your own words! Plagiarists
will be given a 0 on this report.
1) Title page, with the title of the experiment, the date, the lab section, and the names of your
group members.
2) A short introduction which includes the experimental and educational objectives of the
experiment, a description of your samples, the measurements you made and the technique
you used.
3) A brief summary of the experimental procedures used.
4) Results: you should consider/complete the following:
a) Prepare a table similar to that in the prelab assignment. In your table, provide your raw
data for each trial, and the average, and the standard deviation for each set of trials. Also,
calculate the average corrected absorbance and the standard deviation for each set of
measurements.
b) Using Excel, or another plotting program, create a standard curve by plotting the average
absorbance vs. the concentration. Add error bars to your plot. Show the equation of the
calibration line and the R2 value on the plot. Give your plot a title and make sure the axes
are labeled appropriately and have units. Does your plot contain a nonlinear region? What
should you do if it does? Determine the R2 value for the linear region only and include
this on your plot as well. Because you used corrected absorbances to make your plot, the
intercept should, in principle, be zero or very close to it.
c) Calculate the concentration of iron in the tap water samples and the performance
evaluation sample from the equation of the calibration line determined using Excel. Do
not forget to consider the dilution factor in your calculations! Use the method of least
squares to calculate the uncertainty in the slope, the intercept and to determine the
uncertainty in the iron concentration in the tap water samples and the performance
evaluation sample.
d) Calculate the molar absorptivity of Fe(phen)32+ at 510 nm. Compare your value with the
literature value, 11,100 M-1cm-1. Watch your units! Explain the cause for the difference,
if any is observed.
5) Discussion
a) Discuss, interpret and comment on your results. Do the water samples meet the Federal
standards for drinking water? Are there any significant differences in iron concentration
observed between the water samples your group analyzed? Discuss potential reasons for
differences/similarity in iron concentration. Comment on the accuracy and precision of
your results. Do you have confidence in your data? Why or why not?
If the concentration of iron in the tap water is very low, the absorbance will be very small
(e.g. <0.001) and the concentration may not be determined accurately. Be sure to
mention the two common approaches (that will increase the absorbance) to increase the
accuracy of the measurement. (Hint: think about Beer's law: A = εbc) Note: if the
concentration is below the established limit of detection (LOD) most analytical labs
78
Rev. 2017-04-14
would report iron as “nd” (not detected or detectable) unless you explicitly told them to
try and get a measurement.
b) Discuss any problems you encountered in this experiment and how you addressed these
problems. How would you change the experiment to improve the quality of the data?
c) Discuss advantages and disadvantages of the technique you used in terms of the analysis
of iron concentration in water. What other methods could be used?
6) Conclusions. What conclusions can you draw from your data? Is spectrophotometry an
appropriate tool for the measurement of iron in water? Why or why not?
79