PROJECT OFFICE ADDRESS :

AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

PWD Barapullah Flyover Project.
DTL Land, Near Maharani Bagh Substation
Behind Savita Filling Station
Sarai Kale Khan, New Delhi-110013
[AFCOnS]
AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Shapoorjl Pallonjl

Ret 3564/SKS/1367

To: The Executive Engineer,

Flyover Project Division F-123
Near Gate no. 8, JLN Stadium
MCD Parking, New Delhi-110003

Sub Construction of Elevated Road over Barapulla Nallah starting from

Sarai Kale Khan to Aurobindo Marg near INA Market, New Delhi-
Phase - II from Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium to Aurobindo Marg with
connection at Ring Road, Lala Lajpat Rai Marg and Aurobindo Marg.
SH : Construction of Main Carriageway works, traffic signage and
electrical works etc.

Reg. Submission o f Routine (high strain dynamic) load test report on

working piles.

============================================================================
Dear Sir,

Please find enclosed herewith routine (high strain dynamic) load test report for
MTS/ 10, RE1/4 piles.

Yours faithfully,

For, AF.CONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD

Encl.- As Above
V?ft · .·
~
Regd. Office: Afcons House, 16, Shah Industrial Estate, Veera Desai Road, Azad Nagar P.O., Post Box No. 11978, Andheri(W), Murq.bai-400 053
',Page 1 or 1
Tel. : +91-22-6719 1000 / 2673 0042 Fax: +91-22-2673 0047 / 2673 0026 I www.afcons.com \
CIN No.: U45200MH1976PLC01 9335
CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER
BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II, NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING
ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE NO. RE1-4)

MAIN CLIENT Public Works Department

New Delhi.

CONTRACTOR M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited

Sun Dial Park,
Sarai Kale Khan,
New Delhi

TEST AGENCY M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

'Anand', 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society,
Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Baroda -390 023.
Tele I Fax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205

PROJECT NO. PDA-A312-09

DATE October 7, 2015

o.~
u
 CONIENIS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

3. TEST EQUIPMENT

4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

5. CAPWAP ANALYSIS

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7. CONCLUSIONS

TABLES

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. RE1-4

RV/Dn
 GEO D"YNAM\CS
(9d] "Anand", 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society, Near Atma§y~?ti A.s-hra1'1, E:!!c-rc: P'ark,
Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Te1efax.: +9'l-2d5-233-B'i
E-mail : info@geodynamics.net, Website: W\\''N.goodynamics.net
2393.2DS.

Project No.: PDA-A312-09

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER BARA.PULLA i\li\i,U.AH ?1-!ASE-l!,

NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING ON ONE R. C. BORED Pit!::
PILE NO. RE1-4

1.0 INTRODUCTION

M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. Afcons Infrastructure limited ~o CCind'uci high-strain
dynamic test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.

The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. Tt,e field test
was conducted on 6'h October, 2015. This report presents the results cf dynamic pile; tB.sting and
analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAse Pi!e 'Nave llnalys.is Program
(CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM 04945.

2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

The pile was r. c. bored pile with diameter of 1200mm, details of which are given bciiow. The pile
was tested using 12.0 tons hammer falling from a height of 0.5m & 0.75m.

-
IL
--·
=t
Pile No. RE1-4
I
l
Pile length below gages 34.3 m

Pile length below grade 34.0 m

I
Concrete Grade M 35
I
I
-
I Liner length below grade Unlined i
__,~
Pile Diameter 1200 mm
I
Hammer Weight 12.0 T
-I
I
0.5 m
Drop Height
I
Working Load 475 T i
I
__jl
Test Load
·i
712.5 T I
Soil Data Availability
I Not Available
-d
I
~.-:-~~:\
.{;;
ff Q_;_.-~.,
1 0 r
··-/ \\
-. n .,
II u/ ._-,o \'
\\c-( j~}::
__________M_U_M_B_A_I•_D_E_L_H_I_•_V_A_D_O_D_A_R_A_•_C_H_E_N_N_A_!_•_K_O_L_KA_'_T_A_•_K__o_c_H_I___''..:~i:;" ",_;;}fifif:v'
Regd. Office: 1, Ravideep Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park, Vadodara. 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Tel.: 0265- 23905'13.
Project No.: PDA·A312·09

3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.

Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were
mounted on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the
hammer. The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.

The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer
and stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA
screen.

The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static
pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the
computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.

4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the
restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained
for each hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are
summarized in Table 1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on
the pile. The portion of total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is
determined by the soil damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent
measure of the applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.

The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is
subjected to CAPWAP analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP
refines the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the
CAPWAP analysis.

The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from
. the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A
BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial
action in the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as
recommended by the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile
integrity are presented in table below.

INTEGRITY
COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)

100% OK
80%-99% Minor Defect
60%-80% Some Defect
<60% Major Defect
Project No.: PDA-A312-09

The rDA field capacity is estimated oy either RMX & R:SU for an ;o~ssf.kmt'<i J<;; value ,q<,,;;C2 c>J;
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is !he maximum Cas.<>Go~Je ReS"Jt;1,2fJRre·
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the projeci, site. The 'R.il'&K
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a rea>sonable movement under the il:latil The·
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most ca;secs 1:!1<e> f!l~e
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is ob!i.r.ined fmm ihe
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing prograrn.

5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blovi delivf,red to the pile ~>vas
further analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis invoi•Jed applying the
measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation
model of the pile.

The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in a.n i\emti11e
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.

The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-s:e\l.''tement
curve. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Tabl·:> 2.

6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 Pile No. RE1-4

The CAPWAP analysis results on Pile No. RE1-4 showed that the pile had aChieved r;.n
activated capacity of 724.5 tons at the time of testing. This resistance is more than 1.5 times !:he
design/working load. The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further sc·il s!:r•er;gt'h
changes with time had to be considered.

The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the J?ite at
the hammer impact was about 7.1 N/mmz This stress is within the al!mvable stress limits. The
pile integrity was observed to be OK.

From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 712.5 tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated
to be around 4.8mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. RE1-4 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 724.5 tons at the time of testing which is more than !he required
test load of 712.5 tons. -

2. The pile integrity was observed to be OK.

3. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing.
Project No.: PDA-A312-09 Page4

4. This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing
practices and as per ASTM 04945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The findings provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested
and information made available to us.
TABLES
Project No.: PDA-A312-09

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity Net Total

Sr. (Tons)
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Settlement Comments
No.
(m) RMX RSU (mm) (mm)

Used for
1. 0.5 523 681 1.0 2.5
analysis
RE1-4
Analysis not
2. 0.75 829 1044 1.3 3.4
required

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

Required I
Pile No. RE1-4 Permissible
Limits

Pile Capacity 724.5 tons 1.5 x Design Load

Skin Friction 566.4 tons --

End Bearing 158.1 tons --
Net Displacement 1.0 mm 3-4 mm

Total Displacement 6.2mm --

Compressive Stress 7.1 N/mm 2 0.85fck

Tensile Stress 0.5 N/mm 2 0.12fck

(80%-99%
Pile Integrity
OK classified as minor
(Below Sensor Level)
defect)
 APPENDIX A
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. RE1-4
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS

Total CAPWAP Capacity: 7245.3,- along Shaft 5664.0; at Toe 1581.3 kN

Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Uni.t Smith Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Damping
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) Factor
m rn kN kN kN kN/rn kPa s/m mm

7245.3
1 2.0 1.7 318.6 6926.7 318.6 185.49 49.20 1.313 1.182
2 4.0 3.7 318.6 6608.1 637.2 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
3 6.1 5.8 318.6 6289.5 955.8 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
4 8.1 7.8 318.6 5970.9 1274.4 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
5 10.1 9.8 318.6 5652.3 1593.0 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
6 12.1 11.8 318.6 5333.7 1911.6 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
7 14.1 13.8 318.6 5015.1 2230.2 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
8 16.1 15.8 318.6 4696.5 2548.8 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.115
9 18.2 17.9 318.6 4377.9 2867.4 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.010
10 20.2 19.9 318.6 4059.3 3186.0 157.91 41.89 1.313 0.899
11 22.2 21.9 354.0 3705.3 3540.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.792
12 24.2 23.9 354.0 3351.3 3894.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.691
13 26.2 25.9 354.0 2997.3 4248.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.593
14 28.2 27.9 354.0 2643.3 4602.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.510
15 30.3 30.0 354.0 2289.3 4956.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.417
16 32.3 32.0 354.0 1935.3 5310.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.327
17 34.3 34.0 354.0 1581.3 5664.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.272

Avg. Shaft 333.2 166.59 44.19 1.313 0.860

Toe 1581.3 1398.17 1.313 1.004

Soil MOdel Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Case Damping Factor 0.693 0.193

Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 100 30
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 0
Soil Plug Weight (kN) 83.89

CAPw.AP match quality 4.65 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA - 0

Observed: final set 1.000 mm; blow count 1000 b/m
Computed: final set 0.870 mm; blow count = 1149 b/m
max. Top Camp. Stress 7.0 MPa (T= 24.4 ms, max= 1.026 x Top)
max. Comp. Stress 7.1 MPa (Z= 2.0 m, T= 24.7 ms)
max. Tens. Stress -0.52 MPa (Z= 27.2 m, T= 36.9 ms)
max. Energy (EMX) 1.6.1.8 kJ; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)= 2.47 mm

Page 1 Anal.ysi.s:
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNl\MICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
EXTREMA Tl\BLE

Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.

Sgmnt Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Veloc. Disp1.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s mm
1 1.0 7869.1 -1.7 7.0 -0.00 16.18 0.6 2.710
2 2.0 8076.8 -1.8 7.1 -0.00 16.05 0.5 2.629
4 4.0 7895.0 -1.8 7.0 -0.00 14.82 0.5 2.485
6 6.1 7614.6 -1.7 6.7 -0.00 13.73 0.5 2.369
8 8.1 7347.8 -1.7 6.5 -0.00 12.75 0.5 2.275
10 10.1 7086.0 -1.7 6.3 -0.00 11.84 0.4 2.191
12 12.1 6822.3 -1.5 6.0 -0.00 11.00 0.4 2.118
14 14.1 6558.6 -1.5 5.8 -0.00 10.21 0.4 2.051
16 16.1 6268.3 -30.1 5.5 -0.03 9.46 0.4 1.982
18 18.2 5931.6 -114.8 5.2 -0.10 8.72 0.4 1. 908
20 20.2 5563.4 -172.4 4.9 -0.15 7.98 0.4 1.825
22 22.2 5285.8 -280.3 4.7 -0.25 7.26 0.4 1.736
24 24.2 5089.7 -384.0 4.5 -0.34 6.60 0.4 1.646
26 26.2 4853.1 -437.5 4.3 -0.39 5.99 0.3 1. 606
27 27.2 4463.5 -588.9 3.9 -0.52 5.39 0.3 1. 604
28 28.2 4526.5 -403.6 4.0 -0.36 5.38 0.3 1.604
29 29.3 4064.4 -470.3 3.6 -0.42 4.77 0.3 1. 612
30 30.3 4053.1 -173.1 3.6 -0.15 4.75 0.3 1.617
31 31.3 3478.6 -161.6 3.1 -0.14 4.10 0.3 1. 624
32 32.3 3348.9 -203.7 3.0 -0.18 4.08 0.3 1.623
33 33.3 2687.8 -210.6 2.4 -0.19 3.38 0.3 1. 622
34 34.3 2573.0 -261.6 2.3 -0.23 2.73 0.3 1.610
Absolute 2.0 7.1 (T 24.7 ms)
27.2 -0.52 (T = 36.9 ms)

CASE METHOD
J- 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 7909.2 7362.2 6815.2 6268.2 5721.2 5174.2 4627.2 4080.2 3533.2 2986.2
RX 7928.6 7362.2 6815.2 6268.2 5721.2 5174.2 4627.2 4080.2 3533.2 2986.2
RO 8646.6 8173.4 7700.1 7226.9 6753.6 6280.3 5807.1 5333.8 4860.5 4387.3
RAU = 970.1 (kN); RA2 = 5761.5 (kN)

Current CAPWAP Ru = 7245.3 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.12; J(RX) = 0.12

VMX TVP VTl*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QOS
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN
0.53 23.36 5669.7 7709.6 8373.5 2.469 0.999 1.000 15.5 8924.3

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m cm2 MPa kN/m3 m

0.00 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

34.30 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

Page 2
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200!•!11; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
Toe Area 1.131 m'

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim.

Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff.
m kN/m/s % mm mm m

1 1.01 10736.99 0.00 500.000 0.500 0.000 0.000 3.770

2 2.02 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
6 6.05 13736.99 27.94 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
24 24.21 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
34 34.30 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770

Pile Damping 2.0 %, Time I ncr 0.265 ms, Wave Speed 3800.0 m/s, 2L/c 18.1 ms

Page 3 Anal.ysis:
 6-10AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4; 1200MM; Blow: 1 (Test: 06-0ct-201514:45:)
GEO DYNAMICS
07-Oct-2015
CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
!fi2}
20000 r-kN 20000 rkN
- - ForceMsd - - ForceMsd
- ~ ForceCpt - - Velocity Msd

10000 10000

al 1• ; ,L; ''' I~J;, ,:::=, i': ·

75
o j ~~ I ' ' ' , ~I , , , , r
75 5
0, ,I Z: . , ,I j , , , ' , , , ,I , , . , , ; , 1 ms ir r•Jyt'±l'',,; ,, , , , ; , , , ,, . ,, , , ms
----
,/, ' ' ' 1j • , , , , , 1 ' , 11:
I I I " I. I i
5 Uc 5 Uc

Pile
-10000 -10000

200r----------------------------,
Load (kN) - - - Pile Top
Shaft Resistance
o-.o::----'1_::B;c75:__ _ _3:c7.;.5_::0_ _ __c5_::8;:.25:___ __:_:,7500 - - - Bottom Dis!fi~~.~n_ _ _
0.000 I" 150
"' " .§
"\ Ru = 7245.3 kN
z, 100
'- I Rs = 5664.0 kN
E 2.ooo '---...;:-.JL" Rb = 1581.3 kN 50
5 I

Dy = 5.2 mm
c Dx= 6.2 mm
Ql
0~----~~ULLU~~~----------------------~
E
Ql 'L
g 4.000
'L _ _ _ L' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Pile Force
_at Ru
0. 1875

0"'
,z 3750
- ,-' - -

7r
6.000 -----,-'
5625

~_]v2_:__________
'

7500
6.000 L__ _ _-'.__ _ _ --'-----'----_j

.
CAPWAP(R) 2000-2 Ucen sedtoGEOD
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: REl-4 Test: 06-0ot-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: l CAPWAP(R) 2aa6-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Oisp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN rom

0 0.0 0.000 0.0 o.oao

2 304.4 0.133 17.1 a.all
4 6a8.9 0.266 34.3 o.a22
6 913.3 0.399 51.4 o.a33
8 1217.8 0.531 68.6 o.a44
10 1522.2 0.664 85.7 0.054
12 1826.7 0.797 102.9 o.a65
14 2131.1 0.930 12a.a o.a76
16 2434.3 1.063 137.2 0.087
18 2730.9 1.195 154.3 0.098
20 3017.2 1.327 171.4 0.109
22 3290.3 1.457 188.6 0.120
24 3544.9 1.585 205.7 0.131
26 3782.3 1. 712 222.9 0.142
28 4002.7 1.836 240.0 0.152
30 4212.5 1. 958 257.2 0.163
32 4408.8 2.078 274.3 0.174
34 4597.9 2.195 291.5 0.185
37 4859.5 2.365 317.2 0.201
40 5096.6 2.525 342.9 0.218
43 5303.7 2.671 368.6 0.234
47 5536.8 2.842 402.9 0.256
51 5727.2 2.99a 437.2 a.278
56 5918.4 3.147 480.1 a.305
63 6111.4 3.320 540.1 0.343
72 6268.3 3.485 617.2 a.392
84 6384.1 3.645 72a.1 a.457
97 6495.5 3.809 831.5 0.528
lla · 66a7.a 3.974 943.0 0.599
123 6718.4 4.138 1054.4 0.669
136 6827.8 4.3a1 1163.8 a.740
150 6932.3 4.465 1268.3 0.816
165 7027.3 4.626 1363.3 0.898
181 7109.5 4.782 1445.5 0.985
199 7178.2 4.938 1514.2 l.a83
218 7223.5 5.08a 1559.5 1.187
229 7237.a 5.151 1573.a 1.246
235 724a.4 5.186 1576.4 1.279
238 7241. a 5.2a3 1577 .a 1.295
240 7245.3 5.218 1581.3 1.306
269 7245.3 5.376 1581.3 1.464
298 7245.3 5.533 1581.3 1. 622
327 7245.3 5.691 1581.3 1. 78a
356 7245.3 5.849 1581.3 1.938

Page 1
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: REl-4 Teat: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN rom kN mm

385 7245.3 6.007 1581.3 2.096

405 7245.3 6.116 1581.3 2.204
415 7245.3 6.170 1581.3 2.259
420 7245.3 6.197 1581.3 2.286
422 7245.3 6.208 1581.3 2.297
423 7245.3 6.214 1581.3 2.302
427 6940.9 6.081 1564.2 2.291
429 6636.4 5.948 1547.0 2.281
431 6332.0 5.815 1529.9 2.270
433 6027.5 5,682 1512.7 2.259
435 5723.1 5.550 1495.6 2.248
437 5418.6 5.417 1478.4 2.237
439 5114.2 5.284 1461.3 2.226
440 4962.0 5.218 1452.7 2.221
442 4661.5 5.085 1435.6 2.210
444 4369.7 4.953 1418.4. 2.199
446 4089.8 4.822 1401.3 2.188
448 3824.1 4.692 1384.1 2.177
450 3580.2 4.565 1367.0 2.166
452 3351.2 4.439 1349.8 2.155
454 3136.4 4.316 1332.7 2.144
456 2933.8 4.196 1315.6 2.134
458 2741.1 4.077 1298.4 2.123
460 2557.8 3.961 1281.3 2.112
463 2303.3 3.794 1255.5 2.096
466 2076.6 3.638 1229.8 2.079
469 1878.7 3.498 1204.1 2.063
473 1657.6 3.333 1169.8 2.041
477 1475.9 3.190 1135.5 2.019
483 1264.3 3.013 1084.1 1.987
490 1088.9 2.850 1024.1 1.949
500 941.4 2.685 938.4 1.894
513 826.9 2.519 826.9 1.823
526 715.5 2.354 715.5 l. 753
539 604.0 2.190 604.0 1.682
552 492.6 2.025 492.6 1.611
565 386.1 1.865 386.1 1.540
579 286.0 l. 705 286.0 1.464
594 195.6 1.547 195.6 1.382
611 114.2 1.386 114.2 1.290
630 49.8 1.228 49.8 1.187
653 9.2 1.069 9.2 1.061

Page 2 Analysis:
CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER
BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II, NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING
ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE NO. MT5-1 0)

MAIN CLIENT Public Works Department

New Delhi.

CONTRACTOR M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited

Sun Dial Park,
Sarai Kale Khan,
New Delhi

TEST AGENCY M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

'Anand', 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society,
Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Baroda -390 023.
Tele I Fax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205

PROJECT NO. PDA-A312-10

DATE November 25, 2015

 CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

3. TEST EQUIPMENT

4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

5. CAPWAP ANALYSIS

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7. CONCLUSIONS

TABLES

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. MT5-10

RV/Dn
 GEO DYNAMICS
"Anand", 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora ParK,
Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Telefax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205.
E-mail : lnfo@geodynamics.net, Website : www.geodynamics.net

Project No.: PDA-A312-10 November 25, 2015

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II,

NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
PILE NO. MT5-10

1.0 INTRODUCTION

M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited to conduct high-strain
dynamic test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.

The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. The field test
was conducted on 23'd November, 2015. This report presents the results of dynamic pile testing and
analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program
(CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D4945.

2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

The pile was r. c. bored pile with diameter of 1200mm, details of which are given below. The pile
was tested using 12.0 tons hammer falling from a height of 0.5m & 1.5m.

Pile No. MT5-10

Pile length below gages 40.3 m

Pile length below grade 40.0m

Liner depths from cut off

8.2 m
level

Concrete Grade M 35

Pile Diameter 1200 mm

Hammer Weight 12.0 T

Drop Height 1.0 m

Working Load 420T

Test Load 630T

Soil Data Availability Not Available

~-~
~\ Jv")
. ~·~~,
MUMBAI• DELHI • VADODARA • CHENNAI• KOLKATA • KOCHI• LUCKNOW 'i'6B92--"
Regd. Office : 1, Ravid~ep Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram. E\lora Park, Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Tel. : 0265 - 2390513.
Project No.: PDA-A312-1 0 Page 2

3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.

Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were
mounted on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the
hammer. The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.

The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer
and stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA
screen.

The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static
pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the
computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.

4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the
restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained
for each hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are
summarized in Table 1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on
the pile. The portion of total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is
determined by the soil damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent
measure of the applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.

The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is
subjected to CAPWAP analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP
refines the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the
CAPWAP analysis.

The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from
the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A
BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial
action in the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as
recommended by the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile
integrity are presented in table below.

INTEGRITY
COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)

100% OK
80%-99% Minor Defect
60%-80% Some Defect
<60% Major Defect
Project No.: PDA-A312-10 Page3

The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Jc value and on the
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case-Goble Resistance
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program.

5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blow delivered to the pile was
further analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis involved applying the
measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation
model of the pile.

The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in an iterative
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.

The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-settlement
curve. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Table 2.

6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 Pile No. MT5-1 0

The CAPWAP analysis results on Pile No. MT5-10 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 713.6 tons at the time of testing. This resistance is more than 1. 7 times the
design/working load. The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further soil strength
changes with time had to be considered.

The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the pile at
the hammer impact was about 10.8 N/mm 2 . This stress is within the allowable stress limits. The
pile integrity was observed to be OK.

From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 630 tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated to
be around 4.7mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. MT5-1 0 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 713.6 tons at the time of testing which is more than the required
test load of 630 tons.

2. The pile integrity was observed to be OK.

3. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing.
Project No.: PDA-A312-10 Page4

4. This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing
practices and as per ASTM 04945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The findings provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested
and information made available to us.
TABLES
Project No.: PDA-A312-10

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity Net Total

Sr. (Tons) Comments
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Settlement
No.
(m) RMX RSU (mm) (mm)

1. 0.5 332 307 0.6 2.8

Used for
2. MT5-10 1.0 527 595 0.7 3.8
analysis
Analysis not
3. 1.5 837 1029 1.0 4.5
required

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

Required I
Pile No. MT5-10 Permissible
Limits

Pile Capacity 713.6 tons 1.5 x Design Load

Skin Friction 531.4 tons --

End Bearing 182.2 tons --
Net Displacement 0.7mm 3-4 mm

Total Displacement 7.0mm --

Compressive Stress 10.8 N/mm 2 0.85fck

Tensile Stress 2.0 N/mm 2 0.12fck

(80%-99%
Pile Integrity
OK classified as minor
(Below Sensor Level)
defect)
 APPENDIX A
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. MTS-10
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP (R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS

=T=o=ta=l=-CA~PW~A~P~C~a;p~a~c~i~t~y~:--~7~1~3~6~·~1~;~a1on~g~S~h~a~f~t~~5~3~1~4~.4~;~a~t~T~o~e=-~1~8=2=1~·~7~~kN~-----------
Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Smith Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Damping
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) Factor
m m kN kN kN kN/m kPa s/m mm

7136.1
1 2.0 1.6 258.1 6878.0 258.1 159.32 42.26 1.313 1.258
2 4.0 3.6 258.1 61)19.9 516.2 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
3 6.1 5.7 258.1 6361.8 774.3 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
4 8.1 7.7 258.1 6103.7 1032.4 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
5 10.1 9.7 258.1 5845.6 1290.5 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
6 12.1 11.7 258.1 5587.5 1548.6 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
7 14.1 13.7 258.1 5329.4 1806.7 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
8 16.2 15.8 258.1 5071.3 2064.8 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
9 18.2 17.8 258.1 4813.2 2322.9 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
10 20.2 19.8 258.1 4555.1 2581.0 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
11 22.2 21.8 258.1 4297.0 2839.1 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
12 24.2 23.8 258.1 4038.9 3097.2 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
13 26.3 25.9 258.1 3780.8 3355.3 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
14 28.3 27.9 258.1 3522.7 3613.4 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
15 30.3 29.9 258.1 3264.6 3871.5 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
16 32.3 31.9 258.1 3006.5 4129.6 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
17 34.3 33.9 258.1 2.748.4 4387.7 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
18 36.4 36.0 308.9 2439.5 4696.6 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260
19 38.4 38.0 308.9 2130.6 5005.5 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260
20 40.4 40.0 308.9 1821.7 5314.4 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260

Avg. Shaft 265.7 132.86 35.24 1.313 1.259

Toe 1821.7 1610.73 1.313 1.004

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Case Damping Factor 0.650 0.223

Damping Type Smith
Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 103 105
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 28
SOil Plug Weight (kN) 25.29

CAPw.APmatch quality 2.04 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA - 0

Observed: final set 0.700 mm; blow count 1429 b/m
Computed: final set 1.487 mm; blow count 673 b/m
max. Top Camp. Stress 10.6 MPa (T= 23.7 ms, max= 1.019 x Top)
max. Comp. Stress 10.8 MPa (Z= 2.0 m, T= 23.9 ms)
max. Tens. Stress -2.09 MPa (Z= 29.3 m, T= 37.5 ms)
max. Energy (EMX} 34.75 kJ; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)= 3.83 mm

Page 1
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
EXTREMA TABLE

Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.

Sgmnt Below Force Force Camp. Tens, Trnsfd. Veloc. Displ.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s

1 1.0 11939.1 -580.0 10.6 -0.51 34.75 1.0 3.866

2 2.0 12170.5 -666.3 10.8 -0.59 34.69 1.0 3.816
4 4.0 12008.8 -629.8 10.6 -0.56 32.92 0.9 3.724
6 6.1 11670.1 -607. 9 10.3 -0.54 31.23 0.9 3.631
8 8.1 11254.3 -694.5 "10.0 -0.61 29.58 0.9 3.534
10 10.1 10777.1 -786.5 9.5 -0.70 27.96 0.9 3.426
12 12.1 10444.2 -8 C.l. 9 9.2 -0.74 26.38 0.9 3.307
14 14.1 10215.0 -861.0 9.0 -0.76 24.85 0.8 3.181
16 16.2 10054.7 -1209.6 8.9 -1.07 23.45 0.8 3.074
18 18.2 9864.5 -1572.7 8.7 -1.39 22.14 0.8 2.977
20 20.2 9545.2 -1721.6 8.4 -1.52 20.90 0.8 2.881
22 22.2 9206.0 -1835.7 8.1 -1.62 19.72 0.7 2.781
24 24.2 8968.4 -1794.9 7.9 -1.59 18.70 0.7 2.688
26 26.3 8870.1 -20.01.9 7.8 -1.81 17.66 0.7 2.614
28 28.3 8587.3 -21%.0 7.6 -1.93 16.67 0.7 2.637
30 30.3 8191.5 -2248.3 7.2 -1.99 15.68 0.7 2.744
32 32.3 7839.2 -1935.2 6.9 -1.71 14.71 0.7 2.845
34 34.3 7468.8 -1719.0 6.6 -1.52 13.63 0.6 2.927
36 36.4 6571.4 -1120.5 5.8 -0.99 12.43 0.7 2.994
38 38.4 5149.2 -645.1. 4.6 -0.57 10.97 0.8 3.027
39 39.4 4316.8 -576.1 3.8 -0.51 9.58 0.8 3.025
40 40.4 4386.2 -.l'i~·l.2 3.9 -0.49 8.41 0.8 3.002

Absolute 2.0 10.8 (T 23.9 ms)

29.3 -2.09 (T = 37.5 ms)

CASE METHOD
J- 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 10762.6 9569.6 8376.5 7183.5 5990.5 4797.4 3604.4 2411.4 1218.3 25.3
RX 10819.5 9623.2 8426.8 7230.5 6034.1 4837.8 3657.5 2481.1 1476.9 1474.2
RU 11809.2 10720.8 9632.4 8544.0 7455.7 6367.3 5278.9 4190.5 3102.2 2013.8
RAU = 1355.6 (kN); RA2 = 3831.1 (kN)

Current CAPWAP Ru = 7136.1 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.30; J(RX) = 0.31

VMX TVP VTl*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN
1.02 23.12 10990.6 11702.3 11824.4 3.832 0.698 0.700 34. 8 15351. 9

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m em' MPa k.N/m3 m

0.00 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

40.40 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

Page 2
23-J.l AFCONS; Pile: MTS-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
Toe Area 1.131 m'

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim,

Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff.
m kN/m/s % mm mm m

1 1.01 10736.99 0.00 500.000 0.400 0.000 0.000 3. 770

2 2.02 10736.99 0.80 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
6 6.06 11736.99 9.31 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
13 13.13 10736,99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 3.770
20 20.20 11536.99 7.45 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
26 26.26 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 3.770
29 29.29 11936.99 11.18 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 3.770
34 34.34 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
40 40.40 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 3.770

Pile Damping 2.0 %, Time I ncr 0. 266 ms, Wave Speed 3800.0 m/s, 2L/c 21.3 ms

Page 3
 23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10; 1200MM; Blow: 2 (Test: 23-0ct-201518:02:) 25-Nov-2015
GEO DYNAMICS CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 !£!lJ
12000 rkN 12000 rkN
- - ForceMsd --ForceMsd
- - ForceCpt - -Velocity Msd

6000 6000

10 eo ms 10 go ms
Q ~ i J I ' I I ! I Jl 1 ' / l ' ! ! ! l 1!l!ill 1 ;¥n9
!l!!l~\:?.>''
1 ·11'·'1'11''!111111!1:1''''1'!!''
''
1
. 0
j ''':: 1'' /I,, i 1, ,\1, I, i,, 1, ·,,!~OJ., rt~ 71-, . . 1 , , , ) 1 ,, U,,
' ......... --- ;
u ), , , 1 1 ,, 1,:

6 Uc
"" J I
6 Uc

Pile
-6000 -6000

Load (kN) 200r-----------------------------,

Pile Top
Shaft Resistance
1875 3750 5625 7500 ---Bottom
Dist_ributil;)n_ _ _
~ 150 1-· - - - - - t- - - - - - - -

.§
z
~
100
' I Ru = 7136.1 kN
"'
E' Rs = 5314.4 kN
=
s Rb
Dy =
1821.7 kN
6.3 mm
50,_ -

"E
<1>
Dx= 7.0 mm
E
I 0~----~~~~llU~~----------------------~
8 3.500 - - -'K - - - - - '
L -- ~~----- Pile Force
_atRu
"'
c.
.!!!
1875

Cl
~ 3750
5.250 '
----,-- -----~- '
' 56251------

7.000L__ _ _ _~_ _ _ __c_ _ _ __c_ _ __,~

,.1
v to;).,..
---.1:~... ~~-4~~n
1,'(., §

= JJJ
CAI'WAP(R) \:.. \c • ~
"<~··, 1?0\~.;:~
'"<-;.:,,;:_~
23-ll· AFCONS; Pile: MTS-10 Test: 23-0ot-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN nun kN nun

0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000

1 186.6 0.096 23.4 0.013
2 373.2 0.193 46.7 0.026
3 559.8 0.289 70.1 0.039
4 746.4 0.386 93.4 0.051
5 933.0 0.482 116.8 0.064
6 1119.6 0.578 140.1 0.077
7 1306.2 0. 675 163.5 0.090
8 1492.8 0.771 186.8 0.103
9 1679.4 0.868 210.2 0.116
10 1865.9 0.964 233.5 0.129
11 2052.5 l . 061 256.9 0.142
12 2237.3 1.157 280.3 0.154
13 2418.6 1. 253 303.6 0.167
15 2766.3 l. 444 350.3 0.193
17 3085.3 1.632 397.0 0.219
19 3369.3 1.815 443.7 0.245
21 3625.2 1.993 490.5 0.270
23 3858.0 2.166 537.2 0.296
25 4071.9 2.334 583.9 0.322
27 4268.0 2.496 630.6 0.348
29 4450.7 2.654 677.3 0.373
32 4702.8 2.881 747.4 0.412
35 4932.6 3.099 817.4 0.451
38 5143.6 3.308 887.5 0.489
41 5337.8 3.508 957.5 0.528
44 5518.9 3.701 1027.6 0.566
47 5688.8 3.887 1097.7 0.605
50 5847.0 4.066 l.l.67.7 0_644
54 6044.8 4.296 1261.2 0.695
58 6224.9 4.512 1351.0 0.747
62 6382.6 4.710 1432.6 0.798
66 6522.3 4.893 1506.3 0.850
71 6671.6 5.098 1587.1 0.914
76 6795.3 5.280 1655.5 0.978
82 6913.9 5.471 1721.1 1.055
89 7012.9 5.657 1774.9 1.146
98 7085.4 5.843 1808.1 1.261
109 7124.8 6.022 1821.7 l. 403
119 7133.0 6.159 1821.7 1.532
124 7134.4 6.225 1821.7 1.596
127 7134.5 6.264 1821.7 1.635
128 7136.1 6.278 1821.7 1.648
142 7136.1 6.458 1821.7 1.828

Page 1
Analysis: 25-Nov-2015

lo~~
(~u~")
~~J
 23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
l200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toa

Step No.

156
170
Top Load
kN

7136.1
7136.1
Top Disp.
mm

6.639
6.819
Toe Load
kN

1821. 7
1821.7
-
Toe Oisp.

2.008
2.188
177 7136.1 6.909 1821.7 2.278
180 7136.1 6.948 1821.7 2.317
182 7136.1 6.973 1821.7 2.343
185 6949.5 6.877 1798.3 2.330
186 6762.9 6.780 1775.0 2.317
187 6576.3 6.684 1751.6 2.304
188 6389.7 6.588 1728.3 2.291
189 6203.1 6.491 1704.9 2.278
190 6016.5 6.395 1681. 6 2.265
191 5829.9 6.298 1658.2 2.253
192 5643.3 6.202 1634.9 2.240
193 5456.7 6.106 1611.5 2.227
194 5270.2 6.009 1588.2 2.214
195 5083.6 5.913 1564.8 2.201
196 4898.8 5.816 1541.4 2.188
197 4717.5 5.720 1518.1 2.175
199 4369.8 5.529 1471.4 2.150
201 4050.8 5.342 1424.7 2.124
203 3766.8 5.158 1378.0 2.098
205 3510.9 4.980 1331.2 2.072
207 3278.1 4.807 1284.5 2.047
209 3064.2 4.639 1237.8 2.021
211 2868.1 4.477 1191.1 1.995
213 2685.4 4.320 1144.4 1. 969
216 2433.3 4.092 1074.3 1.931
219 2203.5 3.874 1004.3 1.892
222 1992.5 3.665 934.2 1.854
225 1798.3 3.465 864.2 1.815
228 1617.2 3.273 794.1 1. 776
231 1447.3 3.086 724.0 1. 738
234 1289.1 2.907 654.0 1.699
238 1.091.3 2.678 560.5 1.648
242 911.2 2.461 470.7 1.596
246 753.5 2.263 389.1 1.545
250 613.8 2.081 315.4 1.493
255 464.5 1.875 234.6 1.429
260 340.8 1. 693 166.2 1.364
266 222.2 1.502 100.6 1.287
273 123.2 1.317 46.8 1.197
282 50.7 1.131 13.6 l.. 081
293 11.3 0.951 11.5 1. 043
306 2.1 0. 774 11.5 1.043

Page 2
CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER
BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II, NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING
ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE NO. MT5-10)

MAIN CLIENT Public Works Department

New Delhi.

CONTRACTOR M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited

Sun Dial Park,
Sarai Kale Khan,
New Delhi

TEST AGENCY M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

'Anand', 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society,
Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Baroda -390 023.
Tele I Fax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205

PROJECT NO. PDA-A312-10

DATE November 25, 2015

 CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

3. TEST EQUIPMENT

4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

5. CAPWAP ANALYSIS

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7. CONCLUSIONS

TABLES

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. MT5-10

RV/Dn
 GEO DYNAMICS
"Anand", 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Telefax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205.
E-mail: info@geodynamics.net, Website: www.geodynamics.net

Project No.: PDA-A312-1 0 November 25, 2015

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II,

NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTI"JG ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
PILE NO. MT5-10

1.0 INTRODUCTION

M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited to conduct high-strain
dynamic test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.

The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. The field test
was conducted on 23'd November, 2015. This report presents the results of dynamic pile testing and
analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program
(CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D4945.

2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

The pile was r. c. bored pile with diameter of 1200mm, details of which are given below. The pile
was tested using 12.0 tons hammer falling from a height of 0.5m & 1.5m.

Pile No. MT5-10

Pile length below gages 40.3 m

Pile length below grade 40.0 m

Liner depths from cut off

8.2 m
level

Concrete Grade M 35

Pile Diameter 1200 mm

Hammer Weight 12.0 T

Drop Height 1.0 m

Working Load 420T

Test Load 630T

Soil Data Availability Not Available

'-{I'IAJl?0,_

MUMBAJ• DELHJ•VADODARA• CHENNAJ• KOLKATA• KOCH!• LUCKNOW

n
!3
\~!)
\t~J.~f};'f/"')
(!>,~
-l<;l

Regd. Office: 1, Ravideep Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park, Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Tel. : 0265- 2390513.
Project No.: PDA-A312-10 Page2

3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.

Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were
mounted on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the
hammer. The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.

The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer
and stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA
screen.

The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Gable solutions to compute static
pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the
computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.

4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the
restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained
for each hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are
summarized in Table 1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on
the pile. The portion of total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is
determined by the soil damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent
measure of the applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.

The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is
subjected to CAPWAP analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP
refines the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the
CAPWAP analysis.

The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from
the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A
BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial
action in the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as
recommended by the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile
integrity are presented in table below.

INTEGRITY
COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)

100% OK

80%-99% Minor Defect

60%-80% Some Defect
< 60% Major Defect
Project No.: PDA-A312-10 Page3

The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Jc value and on the
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case-Gable Resistance
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program.

5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blow delivered to the pile was
further analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis involved applying the
measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation
model of the pile.

The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in an iterative
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.

The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-settlement
curve. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Table 2.

6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 Pile No. MTS-10

The CAPWAP analysis results on Pile No. MT5-10 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 713.6 tons at the time of testing. This resistance is more than 1.7 times the
design/working load. The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further soil strength
changes with time had to be considered.

The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the pile at
the hammer impact was about 10.8 N/mm 2 This stress is within the allowable stress limits. The
pile integrity was observed to be OK.

From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 630 tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated to
be around 4.7mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. MT5-1 0 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 713.6 tons at the time of testing which is more than the required
test load of 630 tons.

2. The pile integrity was observed to be OK.

3. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing.
Project No.: PDA-A312-10 Page4

4. This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing
practices and as per ASTM 04945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The findings provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested
and information made available to us.
TABLES
Project No.: PDA-A312-10

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity Net Total

Sr. (Tons)
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Settlement Comments
No.
(m) RMX RSU (mm) (mm)

1. 0.5 332 307 0.6 2.8

Used for
2. MT5-10 1.0 527 595 0.7 3.8
analysis
Analysis not
3. 1.5 837 1029 1.0 4.5
required

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

Required I
Pile No. MT5-10 Permissible
Limits

Pile Capacity 713.6 tons 1.5 x Design Load

Skin Friction 531.4 tons --

End Bearing 182.2 tons --

Net Displacement 0.7 mm 3-4 mm

Total Displacement 7.0 mm --

2
Compressive Stress 10.8 N/mm 0.85fck
·-
2
Tensile Stress 2.0 N/mm 0.12fck

(80%-99%
Pile Integrity
OK classified as minor
(Below Sensor Level)
defect)
 APPENDIX A
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. MT5-1 0
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS

~T~o~t~a~l~CA~PW~A~P~C~a~p~a=c=~=·t=y~:--~7=1~3~6~·~1~;'-alo.:n~g~S~h~a~f~t~~5~3~1~4~.4~;~a=t=-T~o~e--~1~8~2~1~·~7~=kN~------------
Soil Dist. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Smith Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Damping
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) Factor
m m kN kN kN kN/m kPa s/m nun

7136.1
1 2.0 1.6 258.1 6878.0 258.1 159.32 42.26 1.313 1.258
2 4.0 3.6 258.1 f"'l9.9 516.2 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
3 6.1 5.7 258.1 6361.8 774.3 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
4 8.1 7.7 258.1 6103.7 1032.4 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
5 10.1 9.7 258.1 5845.6 1290.5 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
6 12.1 11.7 258.1 s.:,a?.s 1548.6 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
7 14.1 13.7 258.1 5329.4 1806.7 127 '77 33.89 1.313 1.260
8 16.2 15.8 258.1 5071.3 2064 '8 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
9 18.2 17.8 258.1 4813.2 2322.9 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
10 20.2 19.8 258.1 .:c. 55.1 2581.0 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
11 22.2 21.8 258.1 4297.0 2839.1 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
12 24.2 23.8 258.1 4038.9 3097.2 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
13 26.3 25.9 258.1 3780.8 3355.3 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
14 28.3 27.9 258.1 3522.7 3613.4 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
15 30.3 29.9 258.1 32 64. 6 3871.5 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
16 32.3 31.9 258.1 3006.5 4129.6 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
17 34.3 33.9 258.1 2748.4 4387.7 127.77 33.89 1.313 1.260
18 36.4 36.0 308.9 2139.5 4696.6 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260
19 38.4 38.0 308.9 2130.6 5005.5 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260
20 40.4 40.0 308.9 1821.7 5314.4 152.92 40.56 1.313 1.260

Avg. Shaft 265.7 132.86 35.24 1.313 1.259

Toe 1821.7 1610.73 1.313 1.004

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Case Damping Factor 0.650 0.223

Damping Type Smith
Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 103 105
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru) 28
Soil Plug Weight (kN) 25.29

CAPWAP match quality 2. Oi (Wave Up Match) ; RSA = 0

Observed: final set 0.700 mm; blow count 1429 b/m
Computed: final set 1.487 mmi blow count 673 b/m
max. Top Camp. Stress 10.6 MPa (T= 23.7 ms, max= 1.019 x Top)
max. Camp. Stress 10.8 MPa (Z~ 2.0 m, T~ 23.9 ms)
max. Tens. Stress -2.09 MPa (Z= 29.3 m, T= 37.5 ms)
max. Energy (EMX} 34.75 kJ; max. Measu:r:·ed Top Displ. (DMX) = 3. 83 mm
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MTS-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
1200MM; Blow: 2
GEO DYNAMICS
OP: GEO DYNAMICS
EXTREMA TABLE

Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.

Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Veloc. Displ.
Sgmnt
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s mm

1 1.0 11939.1 -580.0 10.6 -0.51 34.75 1.0 3.866

2 2.0 12170.5 -666.3 10.8 -0.59 34.69 1.0 3.816
4 4.0 12008.8 -6/9. 8 10.6 -0.56 32.92 0.9 3. 724
6 6.1 11670.1 -607.9 10.3 -0.54 31.23 0.9 3.631
8 8.1 11254.3 -694.5 10.0 -0.61 29.58 0.9 3.534
10 10.1 10777.1 -786.5 9.5 -0.70 27.96 0.9 3.426
12 12.1 10444.2 -P~.1.9 9.2 -0.74 26.38 0.9 3.307
14 14.1 10215.0 -861.0 9.0 -0.76 24.85 0.8 3.181
16 16.2 10054.7 -1209.6 8.9 -1.07 23.45 0.8 3.074
18 18.2 9864.5 -1572.7 8.7 -1.39 22.14 0.8 2.977
20 20.2 9545.2 -1721.6 8.4 -1.52 20.90 0.8 2.881
22 22.2 9206.0 -1835.7 8.1 -1.62 19.72 0.7 2.781
24 24.2 8968.4 -1794.9 7.9 -1.59 18.70 0.7 2.688
26 26.3 8870.1 -20S1.9 7.8 -1.81 17.66 0.7 2.614
28 28.3 8587.3 -2>:6.0 7.6 -1.93 16.67 0.7 2.637
30 30.3 8191.5 -2248.3 7.2 -1.99 15.68 0.7 2.744
32 32.3 7839.2 -1935.2 6.9 -1.71 14.71 0.7 2.845
34 34.3 7468.8 -1719.0 6.6 -1.52 13.63 0.6 2.927
36 36.4 6571.4 -1120.5 5.8 -0.99 12.43 0.7 2.994
38 38.4 5149.2 -645.1 4.6 -0.57 10.97 0.8 3.027
39 39.4 4316.8 -576.1 3.8 -0.51 9.58 0.8 3.025
40 40.4 4386.2 3.9 -0.49 8.41 0.8 3.002

Absolute 2.0 10.8 (T = 23.9 ms)

29.3 -2.09 (T = 37.5 ms)

CASE METHOD
J- 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
RP 10762.6 9569.6 8376.5 7JR3.5 5990.5 4797.4 3604.4 2411.4 1218.3 25.3
RX 10819.5 9623.2 8426.8 7200.5 6034.1 4837.8 3657.5 2481.1 1476.9 1474.2
RU 11809.2 10720.8 9632.4 8544.0 7455.7 6367.3 5278.9 4190.5 3102.2 2013.8

RAU = 1355.6 (kN); RA2 = 3831.1 (kN)

Current CAPWAP Ru = 7136.1 (kN); Corresponding J(RP)= 0.30; J(RX) = 0.31

VMX TVP VTl*Z FT1 FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN
1. 02 23.12 10990. 6 11702.3 11824.4 3.832 0.698 0.700 34. 8 15351. 9

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modulus Spec. Weight Perim.
m em' MPa kN/m3 m

0.00 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

40.40 11309.75 36075.5 24.500 3.770

Page 2
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
Toe Area 1.131 m'

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim.

Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff.
m kN/m/s % mm mm m

1 1.01 10736.99 0.00 500.000 0.400 0.000 0.000 3.770

2 2.02 10736.99 o.::::o 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3. 770
6 6.06 11736.99 9.31 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
13 13.13 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
20 20.20 11536.99 7.45 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
26 26.26 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3. 770
29 29.29 11936.99 11.18 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
34 34.34 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
40 40.40 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3. 770
Pile Damping 2.0 %, Time I ncr 0.266 ms, Wave Speed 3800.0 m/s, 2L/c 21.3 ms

Page 3 Analysis:
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10; 1200MM; Blow: 2 (Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:)
GEO DYNAMICS
25-Nov-2015
CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 !2ll
12000 r·-..kN 12000 r---kN
~~ ForceMsd ~~ ForceMsd
- -Force Cpt I - - Velocity Msd
I
I
I
I
6000 6000 I
I
I
I
I
I
10 /\ go ms 10 I ms
Qj-:~!1 ji,,,,. 11,[, ·J' !~ 0 ~I ; I I ;: I II I ' \ \ I,
I I
'I I :I ! ~l::?'
..... - ,/'." ;-,. _ '';I
'I II'!!; I I';IJ
I I '\

6 Lie 6 Lie

Pile
-6000 -6000

Load (kN) 200

Pile Top
1875 3750 5625 7500 ---Bottom Shaft Resistance
Distribution
150

E
~ I, I Ru
Rs
=
=
7136.1
5314.4
kN
kN
-""
E
z 100

=
s Rb
Dy =
1821.7
6.3
kN
mm
50

c
Q)
Ox= 7.0 mm
E 0
l'l 3.500 -~ - - - - - ~ - - - ~~ - - - - Pile Force
"'
1i 1875
_at Ru

"'
i5
z 3750
5.250 ------'\-1 ""
5625

7.000 '---~~~-'-~~~--'~~~~-'--~~~_j
7500
-
/iP_o);,~,,~
-~~
>'
DYNA~~S.l ,. . ,
J() -~,
I _I
\- n.!;
CAPWAP(R) 2005-2 Licensed to GEO .!1
"""\) """·"' '!
,\.:-<..1,._ "}
<.~--~; {) rJ !"\ ~~;Y
·--':;;.~~.b:d.':;7,...
23-11 AFCONS; Pi~e: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN nun

0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000

1 186.6 0.096 23.4 0.013
2 373.2 0.193 46.7 0.026
3 559.8 0.289 70.1 0.039
4 746.4 0.386 93.4 0.051
5 933.0 0.482 116.8 0.064
6 1119.6 0.578 140.1 0.077
7 1306.2 0.675 163.5 0.090
8 1492.8 0. 771 186.8 0.103
9 1679.4 0.868 210.2 0.116
10 1865.9 0. 964 233.5 0.129
11 2052.5 1.061 256.9 0.142
12 2237.3 1.157 280.3 0.154
13 2418.6 1.253 303.6 0.167
15 2766.3 1.444 350.3 0.193
17 3085.3 1. 632 397.0 0.219
19 3369.3 1.815 443.7 0.245
21 3625.2 1. 993 490.5 0.270
23 3858.0 2.166 537.2 0.296
25 4071.9 2.334 583.9 0.322
27 4268.0 2.496 630.6 0.348
29 4450.7 2.654 677.3 0.373
32 4702.8 2.881 747.4 0.412
35 4932. 6 3.099 817.4 0.451
38 5143.6 3.308 887.5 0.489
41 5337.8 3.508 957.5 0.528
44 5518.9 3.701 1027.6 0.566
47 5688.8 3.887 1097.7 0.605
50 5847.0 4.066 1167.7 0.644
54 6044.8 4.296 1261.2 0.695
58 6224.9 4.512 1351.0 0.747
62 6382.6 4.710 1432.6 0.798
66 6522.3 4.893 1506.3 0.850
71 6671. 6 5.098 1587.1 0.914
76 6795.3 5.280 1655.5 0.978
82 6913.9 5.471 1721.1 1.055
89 7012.9 5.657 1774.9 1.146
98 7085.4 5.843 1808.1 1.261
109 7124.8 6.022 1821.7 1.403
119 7133.0 6.159 1821.7 1.532
124 7134.4 6.225 1821.7 1.596
127 7134.5 6.264 1821.7 1.635
128 7136.1 6.278 1821.7 1.648
142 7136.1 6.458 1821.7 1.828

Page 1
23-11 AFCONS; Pile: MT5-10 Test: 23-0ct-2015 18:02:
1200MM; Blow: 2 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN mm

156 7136.1 6.639 1821.7 2.008

170 7136.1 6.819 1821.7 2.188
177 7136.1 6.909 1821.7 2.278
180 7136.1 6.948 1821.7 2.317
182 7136.1 6.973 1821.7 2.343
185 6949.5 6.877 1798.3 2.330
186 6762.9 6.780 1775.0 2.317
187 6576.3 6.684 1751.6 2.304
188 6389.7 6.588 1728.3 2.291
189 6203.1 6. 491 1704.9 2.278
190 6016.5 6.395 1681.6 2.265
191 5829.9 6.298 1658.2 2.253
192 5643.3 6.202 1634.9 2.240
193 5456.7 6.106 1611.5 2.227
194 5270.2 6.009 1588.2 2.214
195 5083.6 5.913 1564.8 2.201
196 4898.8 5.816 1541.4 2.188
197 4717.5 5. 720 1518.1 2.175
199 4369.8 5.529 1471.4 2.150
201 4050.8 5.342 1424.7 2.124
203 3766.8 5.158 1378.0 2.098
205 3510.9 4.980 1331.2 2.072
207 3278.1 4.807 1284.5 2.047
209 3064.2 4.639 1237.8 2.021
211 2868.1 4.477 1191.1 1.995
213 2685.4 4.320 1144.4 1.969
216 2433.3 4.092 1074.3 1.931
219 2203.5 3.874 1004.3 1.892
222 1992.5 3.665 934.2 1.854
225 1798.3 3.465 864.2 1.815
228 1617.2 3.273 794.1 1. 776
231 1447.3 3.086 724.0 1.738
234 1289.1 2.907 654.0 1.699
238 1091.3 2.678 560.5 1. 648
242 911.2 2.461 470.7 1.596
246 753.5 2.263 389.1 1.545
250 613.8 2.081 315.4 1.493
255 464.5 1.875 234.6 1.429
260 340.8 1.693 166.2 1.364
266 222.2 1.502 100.6 1.287
273 123.2 1.317 46.8 1.197
282 50.7 1.131 13.6 1.081
293 11.3 0.951 11.5 1.043
306 2.1 0.774 11.5 1.043

Page 2
CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER
BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II, NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING
ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
(PILE NO. RE1-4)

MAIN CLIENT Public Works Department

New Delhi.

CONTRACTOR M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited

Sun Dial Park,
Sarai Kale Khan,
New Delhi

TEST AGENCY M/s. GEO DYNAMICS

'Anand', 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society,
Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Baroda -390 023.
Tele I Fax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205

PROJECT NO. PDA-A312-09

DATE October 7, 2015

 CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

3. TEST EQUIPMENT

4. PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

5. CAPWAP ANALYSIS

6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7. CONCLUSIONS

TABLES

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX

APPENDIX A CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR PILE NO. RE1-4

RV/Dn
 GEO DYNAMICS
"Anand", 49, Atmajyoti Nagar Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park,
Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Telefax: +91-265-2388139, 2393205.
E-mail : info@geodynamics.net, Website: www.geodynamics.net

Project No.: PDA-A312-09 October 7, 2015

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED BRIDGE PROJECT OVER BARAPULLA NALLAH PHASE-II,

NEW DELHI
REPORT FOR HIGH-STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING ON ONE R. C. BORED PILE
PILE NO. RE1-4

1.0 INTRODUCTION

M/s. Geo Dynamics was engaged by M/s. Afcons Infrastructure Limited to conduct high-strain
dynamic test on one r. c. bored pile installed at the above project site.

The aim of testing was to evaluate pile static capacity and measure the settlement. The field test
was conducted on 6'h October, 2015. This report presents the results of dynamic pile testing and
analysis performed using the Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program
(CAPWAP). The test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D4945.

2.0 PILE AND HAMMER DETAILS

The pile was r. c. bored pile with diameter of 1200mm, details of which are given below. The pile
was tested using 12.0 tons hammer falling from a height of 0.5m & 0.75m.

Pile No. RE1-4

Pile length below gages 34.3 m

Pile length below grade 34.0 m

Concrete Grade M 35

Liner length below grade Unlined

Pile Diameter 1200 mm

Hammer Weight 12.0 T

Drop Height 0.5m

Working Load 475 T

Test Load 712.5 T

Soil Data Availability Not Available

MUMBAI • DELHI • VADODARA • CHENNAI• KOLKATA • KOCH I

Regd. Office: 1, Ravideep Society, Near Atmajyoti Ashram, Ellora Park, Vadodara- 390 023. Gujarat, INDIA. Tel.: 0265- 2390513.
Project No.: PDA-A312-09 Page2

3.0 TEST EQUIPMENT

A Pile Driving Analyzer and its associated pile top force and velocity transducers were used to
conduct the dynamic pile test.

Two strain transducers and two accelerometers were attached to the pile head. They were
mounted on opposite sides of the pile to cancel bending effects during each strike of the
hammer. The signals of strain and acceleration were conditioned and processed by PDA.

The PDA is a micro-processor based signal conditioner and digital computer. Signals of pile top
force and velocity were measured and analyzed during each strike of the pile driving hammer
and stored in the Analyzer. The pile top force and velocity-time curves were displayed on PDA
screen.

The PDA onsite uses a program based on closed form Case-Goble solutions to compute static
pile capacity from the pile top force and velocity data. This is subsequently checked with the
computer program CAPWAP to confirm the static pile capacity obtained on site.

4.0 PDA FIELD TESTING AND RESULTS

Dynamic testing on the pile was conducted by striking the pile with the hammer during the
restriking process. During testing of the pile, complete dynamic measurements were obtained
for each hammer blow delivered to the pile. The field results along with comments are
summarized in Table 1. The PDA measures the total (static plus dynamic) resistance acting on
the pile. The portion of total resistance that is computed as static resistance by the Analyzer is
determined by the soil damping factor Jc set into the analyzer. A more accurate independent
measure of the applicable soil-damping factor was determined using a CAPWAP analysis.

The values measured by the PDA on field are obtained assuming that the pile is uniform
throughout its length. Also, the soil parameters like quake and damping should be assumed
during the field test. Hence the CAPWAP is mandatory for all bored piles to estimate realistic
soil parameters as well as pile profile. Typically one of the blows that is close to the test load is
subjected to CAPWAP analysis. In summary, PDA measures the field capacity while CAPWAP
refines the field results and hence field capacities measured using PDA may not match with the
CAPWAP analysis.

The BETA Value (Integrity Factor) indicates change in the pile impedance and is derived from
the CAPWAP analysis. The PDA is basically used to compute capacity and the BETA factor.
Particularly for bored piles BETA may never be 100% due to inherent nature of installation. A
BETA factor less than 60% indicates a shaft with poor integrity. Such shaft may require remedial
action in the form of reduced loads, redesigning the cap or installation of additional pile as
recommended by the engineer to the project. General guidelines for the assessment of pile
integrity are presented in table below.

INTEGRITY
COMMENT
(BETA FACTOR)

100% OK
80%-99% Minor Defect
60%-80% Some Defect
< 60% Major Defect
Project No.: PDA-A312-09 Page3

The PDA field capacity is estimated by either RMX or RSU for an assumed Jc value and on the
assumption of uniform cross-section of the pile. RMX is the maximum Case-Gable Resistance
(Maximum Capacity) for the assume Jc value (Case Damping) at the project site. The RMX
capacity generally holds good when the pile shows a reasonable movement under the load. The
RSU capacity is applicable when there is very high skin friction and in most cases the pile
movement is nominal. Hence a more realistic estimate of the pile capacity is obtained from the
CAPWAP analysis conducted on one typical blow at the end of testing program.

5.0 CAPWAP ANALYSIS

A selected PDA field recording of force and velocity data for a blow delivered to the pile was
further analyzed using the computer software CAPWAP. The analysis involved applying the
measured pile top velocity time record to the top of a lumped-mass and spring wave equation
model of the pile.

The program computes the pile top force-time record and this is then compared to the actual
measured force-time record. The pile and soil resistance model is then adjusted in an iterative
procedure until good match is obtained between measured and computed forces.

The pile and soil models can then be used to determine the estimated static load-settlement
curve. The results of CAPWAP analysis for a typical blow are briefly summarized in Table 2.

6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

6.1 Pile No. RE1-4

The CAPWAP analysis results on Pile No. RE1-4 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 724.5 tons at the time of testing. This resistance is more than 1.5 times the
design/working load. The capacity is applicable at the time of testing and further soil strength
changes with time had to be considered.

The CAPWAP results showed that the maximum compressive stress experienced by the pile at
the hammer impact was about 7.1 N/mm 2 This stress is within the allowable stress limits. The
pile integrity was observed to be OK.

From CAPWAP analysis, the pile top load vs. settlement curve is obtained by simulating static
load test. The pile top settlement at 712.5 tons (equivalent test load for static test) is estimated
to be around 4.8mm. Please refer to static analysis in Appendix A.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS

1. The CAPWAP analysis results for Pile No. RE1-4 showed that the pile had achieved an
activated capacity of 724.5 tons at the time of testing which is more than the required
lest load of 712.5 tons.

2. The pile integrity was observed to be OK.

3. The stresses in the pile were within the acceptable limits during any stage of testing.
Project No.: PDA-A312-09 Page4

4. This report has been prepared with generally accepted high strain dynamic pile testing
practices and as per ASTM 04945. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
The findings provided in this report are based on the result of the individual pile tested
and information made available to us.
TABLES
Project No.: PDA-A312-09

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PDA FIELD RESULTS

Height Pile Capacity Net Total

Sr. (Tons)
Pile No. of Fall Settlement Settlement Comments
No.
(m) RMX RSU (mm) (mm)

Used for
1. 0.5 523 681 1.0 2.5
analysis
RE1-4
Analysis not
2. 0.75 829 1044 1.3 3.4
required

TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CAPWAP ANALYSIS RESULTS

Required I
Pile No. RE1-4 Permissible
Limits

Pile Capacity 724.5 tons 1.5 x Design Load

Skin Friction 566.4 tons --

End Bearing 158.1 tons --
Net Displacement 1.0 mm 3-4 mm

Total Displacement 6.2mm --

Compressive Stress 7.1 N/mm 2 0.85fck

Tensile Stress 0.5 N/mm 2 0.12fck

(80%-99%
Pile Integrity
OK classified as minor
(Below Sensor Level}
defect)
 APPENDIX A
CAPWAP ANALYSIS FOR
PILE NO. RE1-4
6-10 AFCONS FWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
CAPWAP SUMMARY RESULTS
Total CAPWAP Capacity: 7245.3; along Shaft 5664.0; at Toe 1581.3 kN
Soil Di.st. Depth Ru Force Sum Unit Unit Smith Quake
Sgmnt Below Below in Pile of Resist. Resist. Damping
No. Gages Grade Ru (Depth) (Area) Factor
m m kN kN kN kN/m kPa s/m mm

7245.3
1 2.0 1.7 318.6 6926.7 318.6 185.49 49.20 1.313 1.182
2 4.0 3.7 318.6 6608.1 637.2 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
3 6.1 5.8 318.6 6289.5 955.8 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
4 8.1 7.8 318.6 5970.9 1274.4 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
5 10.1 9.8 318.6 5652.3 1593.0 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
6 12.1 11.8 318.6 5333.7 1911.6 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
7 14.1 13.8 318.6 5015.1 2230.2 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.181
8 16.1 15.8 318.6 4696.5 2548.8 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.115
9 18.2 17.9 318.6 4377.9 2867.4 157.91 41.89 1.313 1.010
10 20.2 19.9 318.6 4059.3 3186.0 157.91 41.89 1.313 0.899
11 22.2 21.9 354.0 3705.3 3540.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.792
12 24.2 23.9 354.0 3351.3 3894.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.691
13 26.2 25.9 354.0 2997.3 4248.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.593
14 28.2 27.9 354.0 2643.3 4602.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.510
15 30.3 30.0 354.0 2289.3 4956.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.417
16 32.3 32.0 354.0 1935.3 5310.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.327
17 34.3 34.0 354.0 1581.3 5664.0 175.45 46.54 1.313 0.272

Avg. Shaft 333.2 166.59 44.19 1.313 0.860

Toe 1581.3 1398.17 1.313 1.004

Soil Model Parameters/Extensions Shaft Toe

Case Damping Factor 0.693 0.193

Unloading Quake (% of loading quake) 100 30
Reloading Level (% of Ru) 100 100
Unloading Level (% of Ru} 0
Soil Plug Weight (kN) 83.89

CAPWAP match quality 4.65 (Wave Up Match) ; RSA - 0

Observed: final set 1. 000 mm; blow count 1000 b/m
Computed: final set = 0.870 mm; blow count = 1149 b/m
max. Top Camp. Stress 7.0 MPa (T= 24.4 ms, max= 1.026 x Top)
max. Camp. Stress 7.1 MPa (Z= 2.0 m, T= 24.7 ms)
max. Tens. Stress -0.52 MPa (Z= 27.2 m, T= 36.9 ms)
max. Energy (EMX) 16.18 kJ; max. Measured Top Displ. (DMX)= 2.47 mm

Page 1 Analysis: 07
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: REl-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
EXTREMA TABLE
Pile Dist. max. min. max. max. max. max. max.
Sgmnt Below Force Force Comp. Tens. Trnsfd. Vel.oc. Displ.
No. Gages Stress Stress Energy
m kN kN MPa MPa kJ m/s mm

1 1.0 7869.1 -1.7 7.0 -0.00 16.18 0.6 2. 710

2 2.0 8076.8 -1.8 7.1 -0.00 16.05 0.5 2. 629
4 4.0 7895.0 -1.8 7.0 -0.00 14.82 0.5 2.485
6 6.1 7614.6 -1.7 6.7 -0.00 13.73 0.5 2.369
8 8.1 7347.8 -1.7 6.5 -0.00 12.75 0.5 2.275
10 10.1 7086.0 -1.7 6.3 -0.00 11.84 0.4 2.191
12 12.1 6822.3 -1.5 6.0 -0.00 11.00 0.4 2.118
14 14.1 6558.6 -1.5 5.8 -0.00 10.21 0.4 2.051
16 16.1 6268.3 -30.1 5.5 -0.03 9.46 0.4 1.982
18 18.2 5931.6 -114.8 5.2 -0.10 8.72 0.4 1.908
20 20.2 5563.4 -172.4 4.9 -0.15 7.98 0.4 1.825
22 22.2 5285.8 -280.3 4.7 -0.25 7.26 0.4 1. 736
24 24.2 5089.7 -384.0 4.5 -0.34 6.60 0.4 1. 646
26 26.2 4853.1 -437.5 4.3 -0.39 5.99 0.3 1. 606
27 27.2 4463.5 -588.9 3.9 -0.52 5.39 0.3 1.604
28 28.2 4526.5 -403.6 4.0 -0.36 5.38 0.3 1.604
29 29.3 4064.4 -470.3 3.6 -0.42 4.77 0.3 1.612
30 30.3 4053.1 -173.1 3.6 -0.15 4.75 0.3 1. 617
31 31.3 3478.6 -161.6 3.1 -0.14 4.10 0.3 1. 624
32 32.3 3348.9 -203.7 3.0 -0.18 4.08 0.3 1. 623
33 33.3 2687.8 -210.6 2.4 -0.19 3.38 0.3 1. 622
34 34.3 2573.0 -261.6 2.3 -0.23 2.73 0.3 1. 610

Absolute 2.0 7.1 (T 24.7 ms)

27.2 -0.52 (T = 36.9 ms)

CASE METHOD
J- 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 O.B 0.9
RP 7909.2 7362.2 6815.2 6268.2 5721.2 5174.2 4627.2 4080.2 3533.2 2966.2
RX 7928.6 7362.2 6815.2 6268.2 5721. 2 517 4. 2 4627.2 4080.2 3533.2 2986.2
R\1 8646.6 8173.4 7700.1 7226.9 6753.6 6280.3 5807.1 5333.8 4860.5 4387.3
RAU 970.1 (kN); RA2 = 5761.5 (kN)

Current CAPWAP Ru = 7245.3 (kN); Corresponding J(RP}= 0.12; J(RX) = 0.12

VMX TVP VTl*Z FTl FMX DMX DFN SET EMX QUS
m/s ms kN kN kN mm mm mm kJ kN
0.53 23.36 5669.7 7709.6 8373.5 2.469 0.999 1.000 15.5 8924.3

PILE PROFILE AND PILE MODEL

Depth Area E-Modul.us Spec. Weight Perim.
m em' MPa kN/m3 m

0.00 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

34.30 11309.76 36075.5 24.500 3.770

Page 2 Analysis: 07-0c

6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
Toe Area 1.131 m'

Segmnt Dist. Impedance Imped. Tension Compression Perim.

Number B.G. Change Slack Eff. Slack Eff.
m kN/m/s % mm mm m

1 1.01 10736.99 0.00 500.000 0.500 0.000 0.000 3. 770

2 2.02 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
6 6.05 13736.99 27.94 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770
24 24.21 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3. 770
34 34.30 10736.99 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.770

Pile Damping 2.0 %, Time I ncr 0.265 ms, Wave Speed 3800.0 m/s, 2L/c 18.1 ms

Page 3
 6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4; 1200MM; Blow: 1 (Test: 06-0ct-201514:45:) 07-0ct-2015
GEODYNAMICS CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 !2lJ
20000 r·-·kN 20000 r ..·kN
- - ForceMsd - - ForceMsd
--Force Cpt - - Velocity Msd

10000 1--- 10000

~
~

"
})I ~~~ I I
~

I I ! i II ' II ; I I ' I I!' ''I I I j'

75
'''I;
ms
0 1
15
1, )I 1
I
,;\,~,I __I'' I I vI' I I ••r•-H
~ ----..
j bl I I'
I
'l I IiI I 'I
75
>I I
ms

5 Uc / 5' Uc

-10000 -10000
Pile

Load (kN) Pile Top 200

o 1875 3750 5625 7500 - - - Bottom Shaft Resistance
0.000 ""'c---~----~---~----, Distribution __ _
150 •··
"' ...;:
"
"\
I
Ru = 7245.3 kN
-
E
z
-"'
100

E' 2.ooo ::'-:.. -.. . .: :. L Rs = 5664.0 kN

.s "
Rb =
Dy =
1581.3 kN
5.2 mm
50
c
(!)
Ox= 6.2 mm
E 0
g 4.000
'
L - - - -
'
L.. Pile Force
_at Ru
c. 1875
"'
i5
z 3750
-"'
6.000 - -
5625

7500
s.ooo L ___,___,_,_____,____

CAPWAP(R) 2006-2 Licensed to GEO DY

6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPWAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN 1!1111 kN 1!1111

0 0.0 0.000 0.0 0.000

2 304.4 0.133 17.1 0.011
4 608.9 0.266 34.3 0.022
6 913.3 0.399 51.4 0.033
8 1217.8 0.531 68.6 0.044
10 1522.2 0.664 85.7 0.054
12 1826.7 0.797 102.9 0.065
14 2131.1 0.930 120.0 0.076
16 2434.3 1.063 137.2 0.087
18 2730.9 1.195 154.3 0.098
20 3017.2 1.327 171.4 0.109
22 3290.3 1.457 188.6 0.120
24 3544.9 1.585 205.7 0.131
26 3782.3 1. 712 222.9 0.142
28 4002.7 1.836 240.0 0.152
30 4212.5 1. 958 257.2 0.163
32 4408.8 2.078 274.3 0.174
34 4597.9 2.195 291.5 0.185
37 4859.5 2.365 317.2 0.201
40 5096.6 2.525 342.9 0.218
43 5303.7 2.671 368.6 0.234
47 5536.8 2.842 402.9 0.256
51 5727.2 2.990 437.2 0.278
56 5918.4 3.147 480.1 0.305
63 6111.4 3.320 540.1 0.343
72 6268.3 3.485 617.2 0.392
84 6384.1 3. 645 720.1 0.457
97 6495.5 3.809 831.5 0.528
110 6607.0 3.974 943.0 0.599
123 6718.4 4.138 1054.4 0.669
136 6827.8 4.301 1163.8 0.740
150 6932.3 4.465 1268.3 0.816
165 7027.3 4.626 1363.3 0.898
181 7109.5 4.782 1445.5 0.985
199 7178.2 4.938 1514.2 1.083
218 7223.5 5.080 1559.5 1.187
229 7237.0 5.151 1573.0 1.246
235 7240.4 5.186 1576.4 1.279
238 7241.0 5.203 1577.0 1.295
240 7245.3 5.218 1581.3 1.306
269 7245.3 5.376 1581.3 1.464
298 7245.3 5.533 1581.3 1.622
327 7245.3 5.691 1581.3 1.780
356 7245.3 5.849 1581.3 1.938

Page 1 Analysis:
6-10 AFCONS PWD; Pile: RE1-4 Test: 06-0ct-2015 14:45:
1200MM; Blow: 1 CAPIOAP(R) 2006-2
GEO DYNAMICS OP: GEO DYNAMICS
STATIC ANALYSIS

Monotonic D-Toe, E-P R-Toe

Step No. Top Load Top Disp. Toe Load Toe Disp.
kN mm kN mm

385 7245.3 6.007 1581.3 2.096

405 7245.3 6.116 1581.3 2.204
415 7245.3 6.170 1581.3 2.259
420 7245.3 6.197 1581.3 2.286
422 7245.3 6.208 1581.3 2.297
423 7245.3 6.214 1581.3 2.302
427 6940.9 6.081 1564.2 2.291
429 6636.4 5.948 1547.0 2.281
431 6332.0 5.815 1529.9 2.270
433 6027.5 5.682 1512.7 2.259
435 5723.1 5.550 1495.6 2.248
437 5418.6 5.417 1478.4 2.237
439 5114.2 5.284 1461.3 2.226
440 4962.0 5.218 1452.7 2.221
442 4661.5 5.085 1435.6 2.210
444 4369.7 4.953 1418.4 2.199
446 4089.8 4.822 1401.3 2.188
448 3824.1 4.692 1384.1 2.177
450 3580.2 4.565 1367.0 2.166
452 3351.2 4.439 1349.8 2.155
454 3136.4 4.316 1332.7 2.144
456 2933.8 4.196 1315.6 2.134
458 2741.1 4.077 1298.4 2.123
460 2557.8 3.961 1281.3 2.112
463 2303.3 3.794 1255.5 2.096
466 2076.6 3.638 1229.8 2.079
469 1878.7 3.498 1204.1 2.063
473 1657.6 3.333 1169.8 2.041
477 1475.9 3.190 1135.5 2.019
483 1264.3 3.013 1084.1 1.987
490 1088.9 2.850 1024.1 1.949
500 941.4 2.685 938.4 1. 894
513 826.9 2.519 826.9 1. 823
526 715.5 2.354 715.5 1.753
539 604.0 2.190 604.0 1. 682
552 492.6 2.025 492.6 1.611
565 386.1 1.865 386.1 1.540
579 286.0 1.705 286.0 1.464
594 195.6 1. 547 195.6 1.382
611 114.2 1.386 114.2 1.290
630 49.8 1.228 49.8 1.187
653 9.2 1.069 9.2 1.061

Page 2 Anal.ysis: