Department of Education

Region VI – Western Visayas

SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CAPIZ
Banica, Roxas City

July 2, 2019
DIVISION MEMORANDUM
No. _____, s. 2019

SEARCH FOR THE GAWAD PARANGAL 2019 AWARDEES

TO : Assistant Schools Division Superintendent

SGOD & CID Chiefs
Education Program Supervisors
Schools District Supervisors / Officer-In-Charge of the District
Heads of Public Elementary, Secondary and Integrated Schools

1. In consonance with DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2002 entitled “Establishing the Program on
Awards and Incentives for Excellence (PRAISE) in the Department of Education”, and in
compliance with the Program to Institutionalize Meritocracy and Excellence in Human
Resource Management (PRIME-HRM) of the Civil Service Commission, and with
reference to Division Memorandum No. 176, s. 2015 the Schools Division of Capiz will
hold the Gawad Parangal 2019 on August 2, 2019.

2. The Search aims to inspire, encourage, appreciate, attract, reinforce, motivate, nurture,
retain, engage, and bring out the best in our personnel through the establishment of
awards and incentives system.

3. The Division adheres to the existing general policy of non-discrimination based on

gender identity, sexual orientation, disabilities, religion and/or indigenous group
membership in the selection of nominees and awardees.

4. The bases in determining the awardees will be their accomplishments covering the
period June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2019.

5. Deadline for the submission of all nominees (in all categories) with their corresponding
documents to the Division Selection Committee will be on or before July 8, 2019.

6. The Search Executive Committee, and the rules, regulations, and criteria for the awards
are found in Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively.

7. Wide and immediate dissemination of the Memorandum is enjoined.

ROEL F. BERMEJO, PhD, CESO V

School Division Superintendent

1
Enclosures : As stated
To be indicated in the Perpetual Index under the following subjects:
AWARDS EXCELLENCE PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS
Enclosure No. 1 to Division Memorandum No. ___, s. 2019

SEARCH FOR THE GAWAD PARANGAL 2019 AWARDEES

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Chairman : Dr. Roel F. Bermejo, CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent

Co-Chairmen : Nicasio S. Frio

Asst. Schools Division Superintendent

Dr. Segundina F. Dollete

Chief Education Supervisor – CID

Dr. Marlon P. Destreza

Chief Education Supervisor – SGOD

Ma. Sharon S. Barrientos

Administrative Officer IV-Personnel

Dr. Immaculada J. Amores

SEPS-HRD

Members : Mr. Alan Vincent B. Altamia

EPS I – EsP/Guidance

Mrs. Elenia P. Baranda

EPS I – Mathematics

Mrs. Sephora M. Roldan

EPS I – Aral. Panlipunan

Dr. Merlie J. Rubio

EPS I – Filipino

Mr. Salvador Dale Artates

EPS I – English

Dr. Ruth C. Gervero

EPS I –ALS/SPED Coordinator

Mr. Andres D. Quiachon

EPS I – Science

Dr. Rolando Jamora

EPS I – EPP/TLE

Mr. Ronie T. Reteracion

EPS I – MSEP/MAPEH

2
Shirley A. De Juan
EPS-LRMDS

Dr. Edna B. Azcarraga

EPS I – SGOD

Dr. Heidelyn P. Geromiano

Division Kindergarten/Multigrade Coordinator

Dr. Marggie A. Obligacion

SEPS-Planning & Research

Mr. Ronald D. Dile

SEPS-M & E

Ms. Nannette G. Calixterio

SEPS-Soc. Mob.

Mr. Jerry V. Mosquite

EPS-II-HRD

3
Enclosure No. 2 to Division Memorandum No. ____, s. 2019

A. OUTSTANDING TEACHER IN ELEMENTARY (GRADES 1 TO 3)

CRITERIA WEIGHT for Elementary

(Grades 1 – 3)
Learners Performance (Based on Reading
and Numeracy Results) 20

Performance Indicators 10
Special Programs & Projects; Trainings
and Research Conducted 15

Performance Rating in the Last Three

 Elementary Years 10

Acted as Trainer/Lecturer/ Demo

Teacher/ Resource Speaker
10

Recognition & Awards Received in the

Implementation of PPAs 10

Curricular Innovations (That will lead to

the improvement of the curriculum) 15

Attitude towards Work, Peers, Superiors,

& Subordinates 10

Total 100

Table 1 – Learners Performance (Based on 2019 Reading Results) – 10%

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score

99.26 – 100 100 20 91.01 – 91.75 89 17.8
98.51 – 99.25 99 19.8 90.26 – 91.0 88 17.6
97.76 – 98.5 98 19.6 89.51 – 90.25 87 17.4
97.01 – 97.75 97 19.4 88.76 – 89.50 86 17.2
96.26 – 97.0 96 19.2 88.01 – 88.75 85 17.0
95.6 – 96.25 95 19.0 87.26 – 88.0 84 16.8
94.76 – 95.5 94 18.8 86.51 – 87.25 83 16.6
94.01 – 94.75 93 18.6 86.76 – 86.5 82 16.4
93.26 – 94.0 92 18.4 85.01 – 85.75 81 16.2
92.6 – 93.25 91 18.2 85.0 80 16
91.76 – 92.5 90 18 84.99 and below DQ

Table 2 – Learners Performance (Based on 2019 Numeracy Results) – 10%

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score

99.26 – 100 100 20 91.01 – 91.75 89 17.8
98.51 – 99.25 99 19.8 90.26 – 91.0 88 17.6
97.76 – 98.5 98 19.6 89.51 – 90.25 87 17.4
97.01 – 97.75 97 19.4 88.76 – 89.50 86 17.2
96.26 – 97.0 96 19.2 88.01 – 88.75 85 17.0
95.6 – 96.25 95 19.0 87.26 – 88.0 84 16.8

4
 94.76 – 95.5 94 18.8 86.51 – 87.25 83 16.6
94.01 – 94.75 93 18.6 86.76 – 86.5 82 16.4
93.26 – 94.0 92 18.4 85.01 – 85.75 81 16.2
92.6 – 93.25 91 18.2 85.0 80 16
91.76 – 92.5 90 18 84.99 and below DQ

Table 3 – Performance Indicators (Average of SY 2016 -17, SY 2017-18, SY 2018-19)

PIs Performance Rating PIs Performance Rating

Drop-out Below the Div. Ave 100 Repetition Below the Div. Ave 100
Rate Within the Div. Ave 80 Rate Within the Div. Ave 80
Above the Div. Ave 60 Above the Div. Ave 60
Promotion Above the Div. Ave 100 Below the Div. Ave 100
Rate Within the Div. Ave 80 Within the Div. Ave 80
Below the Div. Ave 60 Above the Div. Ave 60

Table 4 – Special Programs and Projects; Trainings and Researches Conducted

Items Rating Items Rating

Presence of 5 or more 100 Presence of 1 60
Presence of 4 90
Presence of 3 80
Presence of 2 70
Special Programs, Projects, Trainings and Researches must be approved by the Schools Division
Superintendent with complete documentations and terminal report.

Table 5 – Recognition and Awards Received (Awards Received for Outstanding

Accomplishments/ Achievements and Special Assignments – as Trainer, Facilitator, Resource
Speaker, Demo Teacher, Chairmanship)

Level Points
International 10
National 8
Regional 6
Provincial 4
Division 2
District 1
Cluster 0.75
School 0.50

Table 6 – Awards and Recognitions Received by Groups or Individuals (Trainer /Coach for
Curricular and Extra Curricular DepEd Related Activities)

Level Individual Group

First Second Third First Second Third
International 10 9 8 15 10 8
National 9 8 7 13 9 7
Regional 8 7 6 11 8 6
Provincial 7 6 5 9 7 5
Division 6 5 4 7 6 4
District 5 4 3 5 5 3
Cluster 4 3 2 3 4 2
School 3 2 1 1 3 1

5
Table 7 – Equivalent Ratings for the Points Received in Tables 5 and 6

Points Rating Points Rating Points Rating

50 and above 100 36 – 37 93 22 – 23 86
48 – 49 99 34 – 35 92 20 – 21 85
46 – 47 98 32 – 33 91 18 – 19 84
44 – 45 97 30 – 31 90 16 – 17 83
42 – 43 96 28 – 29 89 14 – 15 82
40 – 41 95 26 – 27 88 12 – 13 81
38 – 39 94 24 – 25 87 10 – 11 80

Table 8 – Curricular Innovations (Approved Proposals, Documentations, Terminal Report)

Utilization Level of the Points

Approved Curricular Innovation
National 10
Regional 9
Division 8
District 7
Cluster 6
School 5

Curricular Innovation means something unique and new that leads to an improved curriculum.
Pls refer to table 7 for the equivalent ratings.

Table 9 – Equivalent Ratings for the Points Received in Tables 8.

Points Rating Points Rating Points Rating

25 and above 100 18 93 11 86
24 99 17 92 10 85
23 98 16 91 9 84
22 97 15 90 8 83
21 96 14 89 7 82
20 95 13 88 6 81
19 94 12 87 5 and below 80

B. OUTSTANDING TEACHER IN ELEMENTARY / SECONDARY

(Applicable to all Learning Area)

CRITERIA WEIGHT for WEIGHT for

Elementary (%) Junior HS (%)
Academic Performance (Based on
25 25
SAL Results)
 Elementary Performance Indicators 10 10
Special Programs & Projects;
 Junior High Trainings and Research 15 15
School Conducted
Performance Rating in the Last
10 10
Three Years
Acted as Trainer/Lecturer/ Demo
10 10
Teacher/ Resource Speaker
Recognition & Awards Received
10 10
in the Implementation of PPAs

6
 Curricular Innovations (That will
lead to the improvement of the 10 10
curriculum)
Attitude towards Work, Peers,
10 10
Superiors, & Subordinates
Total 100 100

Table 1 – Academic Performance (Based on 2019 SAL Results - Grades 4 - 6)

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score

98.67 – 100 100 25 83.38 – 84.76 89 22.25
97.28 – 98.66 99 24.75 81.99 – 83.37 88 22.0
95.89 – 97.27 98 24.5 80.60 – 81.98 87 21.75
94.50 – 95.88 97 24.25 79.21 – 80.59 86 21.5
93.11 – 94.49 96 24.0 77.81 – 79.20 85 21.25
91.72 – 93.10 95 23.75 76.42 – 77.80 84 21.0
90.33 – 91.71 94 23.50 75.03 – 76.41 83 20.75
88.94 – 90.32 93 23.25 73.64 – 75.02 82 20.5
87.55 – 88.93 92 23.0 72.25 – 73.63 81 20.25
86.16 – 87.54 91 22.75 70.86 – 72.24 80 20
84.77 – 86.15 90 22.5 70.85 0
Note: Subject to the approval of the Division Committee

Table 2 – Academic Performance (Based on 2019 SAL Results - Grades 7-10)

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score

97.76 - 100 100 25 72.68 – 74.95 89 22.25
85.48 – 97.75 99 24.75 70.40 – 72.67 88 22.0
93.20 – 95.47 98 24.5 68.12 – 70.39 87 21.75
90.92 – 93.19 97 24.25 65.84 – 68.11 86 21.5
88.64 – 90.91 96 24.0 63.56 – 65.83 85 21.25
86.36 – 88.63 95 23.75 61.28 – 63.55 84 21.0
84.08 – 86.35 94 23.50 59.0 - 61.27 83 20.75
81.80 – 84.07 93 23.25 56.72 – 58.99 82 20.5
79.52 – 81.79 92 23.0 54.44 – 56.71 81 20.25
77.24 – 79.51 91 22.75 52.16 – 54.43 80 20
74.96 – 77.23 90 22.5 52.15 and below 0
Note: Subject to the approval of the Division Committee

Table 2 – Performance Indicators (Average of SY 2016 -17, SY 2017-18, SY 2018-19)

PIs Performance Rating PIs Performance Rating

Drop-out Below the Div. Ave 100 Repetition Below the Div. Ave 100
Rate Within the Div. Ave 80 Rate Within the Div. Ave 80
Above the Div. Ave 60 Above the Div. Ave 60
Promotion Above the Div. Ave 100 Below the Div. Ave 100
Rate Within the Div. Ave 80 Within the Div. Ave 80
Below the Div. Ave 60 Above the Div. Ave 60

Table 3 – Special Programs and Projects; Trainings and Researches Conducted

7
 Items Rating Items Rating
Presence of 5 or more 100 Presence of 1 60
Presence of 4 90 No Special Program, 0
Project, Training and
Research conducted
Presence of 3 80
Presence of 2 70
Special Programs, Projects, Trainings and Researches must be approved by the Schools Division
Superintendent with complete documentations and terminal report.

Table 4 – Recognition and Awards Received (Awards Received for Outstanding

Accomplishments/ Achievements and Special Assignments – as Trainer, Facilitator, Resource
Speaker, Demo Teacher, Chairmanship)

Level Points
International 10
National 8
Regional 6
Provincial 4
Division 2
District 1
Cluster 0.75
School 0.50

Table 5 – Awards and Recognitions Received by Groups or Individuals (Trainer /Coach for
Curricular and Extra Curricular DepEd Related Activities)

Level Individual Group

First Second Third First Second Third
International 10 9 8 15 10 8
National 9 8 7 13 9 7
Regional 8 7 6 11 8 6
Provincial 7 6 5 9 7 5
Division 6 5 4 7 6 4
District 5 4 3 5 5 3
Cluster 4 3 2 3 4 2
School 3 2 1 1 3 1

Table 6 – Equivalent Ratings for the Points Received in Tables 5 and 6

Points Rating Points Rating Points Rating

50 and above 100 36 – 37 93 22 – 23 86
48 – 49 99 34 – 35 92 20 – 21 85
46 – 47 98 32 – 33 91 18 – 19 84
44 – 45 97 30 – 31 90 16 – 17 83
42 – 43 96 28 – 29 89 14 – 15 82
40 – 41 95 26 – 27 88 12 – 13 81
38 – 39 94 24 – 25 87 10 – 11 80

Table 7 – Curricular Innovations (Approved Proposals, Documentations, Terminal Report)

8
 Utilization Level of the Points
Approved Curricular Innovation
National 10
Regional 9
Division 8
District 7
Cluster 6
School 5

Curricular Innovation means something unique, relevant, need based and new that leads to an
improved curriculum. Please refer to table 7 for the equivalent ratings.

Table 8 – Equivalent Ratings for the Points Received in Tables 7.

Points Rating Points Rating Points Rating

25 and above 100 18 93 11 86
24 99 17 92 10 85
23 98 16 91 9 84
22 97 15 90 8 83
21 96 14 89 7 82
20 95 13 88 6 81
19 94 12 87 5 and below 80

C. GUIDELINES FOR INNOVATION

1. The innovation project was conducted within June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2019.
2. It should be based on KRAs as indicated in the Philippine Professional Standards for
Teachers (PPST).
3. The proponent must present an approved proposal and a completed/terminal report.
4. The innovation project is aligned with the DepEd thrusts and contributory to the
attainment of the Department’s Vision and Mission and improvement of learner’s
academic performance.
5. The proponent presents the reasons for the project, the needs or problems he/she
wants to solve/address and innovate.
6. The innovation project is qualified to benefit the learners and other stakeholders.
7. The innovation project has a realistic management plan and the resources needed and
to be completed within the prescribed period.
8. Sources of fund to sustain to sustain the project is in the form of donations, income
generating project (IGP), etc. not taken from MOOE fund.
9. The proponent must show proof of donation, Memorandum of Agreement (MoA),
or any proof of the project’s sourcing.
10. The innovation project must have a provision for sustainability and replicability.

CRITERIA FOR INNOVATION

Presence of the following:

a. approved proposal
b. terminal report with Certificate of Completion
c. output (Learning Resources: workbooks, modules, audio-visual device, small/big books
d. Proof(s) of project sourcing (MOA, Certificate of Acceptance, photocopy of checks, bank
deposit(s)
 Presence of 4 = 100%

9
  Presence of 3 = 75%
 Presence of 2 = 50%
 Presence of 1 = 25%

D. Category: Outstanding Teacher –In- Charge/ Head Teacher/ Elementary School

Principal

CRITERIA WEIGHT
A. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP 30

1. Academic Performance: (25 PTS.)

a. School Assessment of Learning (Gr. 4-6) (15 pts.) see Table 1
b. Reading Assessment (Gr. 1-3) (5 pts.)
c. Numeracy Assessment (Gr. 1-3) (5 pts.)
d. Special Curricular Programs and /or Special Programs & Projects,
Innovations/Research conducted (Curriculum focused) (5 pts.) see
Table 7 & 8

B. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 15

1. Performance Indicators (5 pts.) see Table 2

2. School Star Rating (3 years) (SY 2016, SY 2017, SY 2018) (2.5 pts.)
3. School SBM Level of Practice (3 years) (SY 2016, SY 2017, SY 2018) (2.5 pts.)
4. Special Programs and /or Special Programs & Projects, Innovations/Research
conducted (Governance focused) (5 pts.) see Table 7 & 8

C. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT 15

1. Training Conducted serving as Training Manager (5 pts.) see Table 3
2. Acted as Trainer/Lecturer/Resource Speaker (5 pts.) see Table 4,5 & 6
3. Recognitions & Awards Received in the implementation of Deped Programs,
Projects and Activities from Division Level and up ( 5 pts.) see Table 4,5 &6
D. PARENTS’ INVOLVEMENT & COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP 10
1. Generated Resources amounting to 500,000 and up
E. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS 15
1. Fiscal Management (10 pts.)
2. Organized functional school organization (Child Protection, School
Grievance, SGC, SSG/SPG, PTA, SBM/WinS Task Force, YES-0, School
Publication (2.5 pts.)
3. Organized functional school ancillary services (Canteen, Clinic, Guidance
services, Teen center for secondary, Feeding center, Library/LRC, Security
Services
Etc. (2.5 pts.)
F. PERSONAL/PROFESSIONAL ATTRIBUTES/ CHARACTERISTICS 10
1. Attitudes towards word, Peers, Supervisor & Subordinates
G. PLUS FACTOR 5
1.Conversion of schools from PS to ES/ES to IS/ Change name of school (1 pt.)
2.Titling of school site (2 pts.)
3.Hosting of Division activities (1 pt.)
4. other meritorious achievement to be determined by the Parangal Executive
Committee (1 pt.)
TOTAL 100

Table on School Three Star Rating & School SBM Level of Practice:

10
School Year (Endline) School Star Rating/SBM Level of Average Star Level Rating/SBM
Practice Level of Practice
SY 2015-2016
SY 2016-2017
SY 2017-2018
Total(Total the 3 SY Ratings/3=
Average Star Rating

Table Points on School Three Star Rating & SBM Level of Practice:
Average Numerical Star Level Rating Rating
2.75- 3.00 2.5
1.75- 2.74 2
.74- 1.74 1.5

Table for Generated Resources (In cash or in kind)

Amount Generated for the School Points Earned
500,000.00 and up 10
400,000.00 – 499,999.00 8
300,000.00 – 399,999.00 6
200,000.00 – 299,999.00 4
100,000.00 - 199,999.00 2
50,000.00 – 99,999.00 1
10,000.00 – 49,999.00 .5

Table for Functional School Organization/ Functional School Ancillary Services

Number of School Organization/School Ancillary Points Earned
Services
Presence of 8 2.5
Presence of 7 2
Presence of 6 1.5
Presence of 5 1
Presence of 4 .5

Table for PLUS FACTOR

Meritorious Achievements Points Earned (5 pts.)
Conversion of school PS to ES/ESto IS/Change of 1
Name
Titling of School Site 2
Hosting of Division Activities 1
Other Meritorious achievements to be determined 1
by the Parangal Executive Committee

E. SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING EDUCATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR

KRA CRITERIA PERCENTAGE

1.Management of Curriculum Division initiated Contextualized/Special 15%
Implementation Programs Initiated and Implemented,
Trainings and workshop conducted,
Innovation
2.Curriculum Development, Enrichment Published Learning Resources, 15%
and Localization Approved Training design/Memo
modules and materials to localize,
indigenize, and contextualize
competencies in the curriculum per
subject area for use of the schools
division.

11
3.Learning Delivery 15%
Utilization Guide on Contextualized
Learning Competencies with DLL and
assessment per grade level

4.Learning Resource LRs Developed and Utilized (DLL, etc) 15%

5.Learning Outcomes Assessment SAL Results/ Reading and Numeracy 20%
Assessment

6.Special Curricular Programs and Implemented Special Curricular Programs 10%

Support System and support system
7.Research Approved Action Research with proposal 5%
and terminal report
8.Others Personal Characteristics and Attributes 5%
TOTAL 100%

Scoring Guide
Table 1 – Special Programs Initiated and Implemented (15%)
Indicator Rating Score
Presence of 6 and more 100 15
Presence of 5 90 13.5
Presence of 4 80 12
Presence of 3 70 10.5
Presence of 2 60 9
Presence of 1 50 7.5

Table 2 – Curriculum Development, Enrichment and Localization (15%)

Indicator Rating Score
Published 6 LRs and more 100 15
Published 5 LRs 90 13.5
Published 4 LRs 80 12
Published 3 LRs 70 10.5
Published 2 LRs 60 9
Published 1 LRs 50 7.5

Table 3 – Innovations (15%)

Indicator Rating Score
Proposed, Implemented 6 and more Innovations 100 15
with complete documents and Terminal Report
Proposed, Implemented 5 Innovations with 90 13.5
complete documents and Terminal Report
Proposed, Implemented 4 Innovations with 80 12
complete documents and Terminal Report
Proposed, Implemented 3 Innovations with 70 10.5
complete documents and Terminal Report
Proposed, Implemented 2 Innovations with 60 9
complete documents and Terminal Report
Proposed, Implemented 1 Innovations with 50 7.5
complete documents and Terminal Report

Table 4 – Developed and Utilized Learning Resources (15%)

Indicator Rating Score
Developed 6 or more 100 15
Developed 5 or more 90 13.5
Developed 4 or more 80 12
Developed 3 or more 70 10.5

12
Developed 2 or more 60 9
Developed 1 or more 50 7.5
Table 5 – Learning Outcomes (20%)
A. Elementary (10%)
MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score
98.67 – 100 100 10 83.38 – 84.76 89 8.9
97.28 – 98.66 99 9.9 81.99 – 83.37 88 8.8
95.89 – 97.27 98 9.8 80.60 – 81.98 87 8.7
94.50 – 95.88 97 9.7 79.21 – 80.59 86 8.6
93.11 – 94.49 96 9.6 77.81 – 79.20 85 8.5
91.72 – 93.10 95 9.5 76.42 – 77.80 84 8.4
90.33 – 91.71 94 9.4 75.03 – 76.41 83 8.3
88.94 – 90.32 93 9.3 73.64 – 75.02 82 8.2
87.55 – 88.93 92 9.2 72.25 – 73.63 81 8.1
86.16 – 87.54 91 9.1 70.86 – 72.24 80 8.0
84.77 – 86.15 90 9.0 70.85 and below 79 7.9

B. Secondary (10%)
MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score
97.76 – 100 100 10 72.68 – 74.95 89 8.9
85.48 – 97.75 99 9.9 70.40 – 72.67 88 8.8
93.20 – 95.47 98 9.8 68.12 – 70.39 87 8.7
90.92 – 93.19 97 9.7 65.84 – 68.11 86 8.6
88.64 – 90.91 96 9.6 63.56 – 65.83 85 8.5
86.36 – 88.63 95 9.5 61.28 – 63.55 84 8.4
84.08 – 86.35 94 9.4 59.0 - 61.27 83 8.3
81.80 – 84.07 93 9.3 56.72 – 58.99 82 8.2
79.52 – 81.79 92 9.2 54.44 – 56.71 81 8.1
77.24 – 79.51 91 9.1 52.16 – 54.43 80 8.0
74.96 – 77.23 90 9.0 52.15 and below 79 7.9

Table 6 – Special Curricular Programs (10%)

Indicator Rating Score
Presence of 6 and more 100 10
Presence of 5 90 9
Presence of 4 80 8
Presence of 3 70 7
Presence of 2 60 6
Presence of 1 50 5

Table 7 - Research (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
Presence of 6 and more 100 5
Presence of 5 90 4.5
Presence of 4 80 4
Presence of 3 70 3.5
Presence of 2 60 3
Presence of 1 50 2.5

F. SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SUPERVISOR

13
 KRA CRITERIA PERCENTAGE
1. Instructional Supervision Approved Supervisory Plan with narrative 20%
reports, Special Curricular Program,
Innovation, Concept Paper
2. Technical Assistance Trainings Conducted, 20%
TA plan with monitoring tool,
Percentage of schools given technical
assistance based on Accomplishment
Report of the school head
3. Monitoring and Evaluation -Monitoring Tools on programs and 15%
projects of schools approved by the
Division with feedback and
recommendation
-Certificate of No unliquidated cash
advances of schools in the district
-Conducted Training Programs approved
by the division
4. Curriculum Development, Published LRs 15%
Enrichment and Localization Utilization of uploaded LRs (DLL utilizing
the published LR)
5. Learning Outcomes Assessment SAL Results (District MPS) 15%
Reading and Numeracy Assessment 5%
6.Research Approved Action Research 5%
7.Others Personal Characteristics and Attributes 5%
TOTAL 100%

SCORING GUIDE
Table 1 – Instructional Supervision (10%)
No. of Rating Score No. of Rating Score
Supervisions Supervisions
190 and more 100 10 120 - 129 65 6.5
180 – 189 95 9.5 110 - 119 60 6.0
170 – 179 90 9.0 100 - 109 55 5.5
160 – 169 85 8.5 90 - 99 50 5.0
150 – 159 80 8.0 80 -89 45 4.5
140 – 149 75 7.5 70 – 79 40 4.0
130 – 139 70 7.0 60 - 69 35 3.5

Table 2 – Curricular Programs, Innovations, Concept Paper (10%)

Indicator Rating Score
Presence of 6 and more 100 10
Presence of 5 90 9
Presence of 4 80 8
Presence of 3 70 7
Presence of 2 60 6
Presence of 1 50 5

Table 3 – Monitoring and Evaluation (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
Monitored 100% of schools in 100 5
the District
Monitored 90 – 99% of schools 90 4.5
Monitored 80 – 89% of schools 80 4
Monitored 70 – 79% of schools 70 3.5

14
Monitored 60 – 69% of schools 60 3
Monitored 50 – 59% of schools 50 2.5

Table 4 – MOOE Liquidation of Schools (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
100% of Schools Liquidated with 100 5
Certificate
90 – 99% of schools with 90 4.5
Certificate
80 – 89% of schools with 80 4
Certificate
70 – 79% of schools with 70 3.5
Certificate
60 – 69% of schools with 60 3
Certificate
50 – 59% of schools with 50 2.5
Certificate

Table 5 – Training Programs Conducted (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
5 or more training programs conducted 100 5
4 training programs conducted 90 4.5
3 training programs conducted 80 4
2 training programs conducted 70 3.5
1 training programs conducted 60 3

Table 6 – Published LRs (10%)

Indicator Rating Score
5 or more LRs published 100 10
4 LRs published 90 9
3 LRs published 80 8
2 LRs published 70 7
1 LR published 60 6

Table 7 – Utilization of Published LRs (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
50 or more teachers in the District utilizes published LRs 100 5
40 – 49 teachers in the District utilizes published LRs 90 4.5
30 – 39 teachers in the District utilizes published LRs 80 4
20 – 29 teachers in the District utilizes published LRs 70 3.5
10 – 19 teachers in the District utilizes published LRs 60 3

Table 8 – SAL Results (District MPS) – 15%

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score
98.67 – 100 100 15 83.38 – 84.76 89 13.35

97.28 – 98.66 99 14.85 81.99 – 83.37 88 13.2

95.89 – 97.27 98 14.7 80.60 – 81.98 87 13.05

94.50 – 95.88 97 14.55 79.21 – 80.59 86 12.9

93.11 – 94.49 96 14.4 77.81 – 79.20 85 12.75

91.72 – 93.10 95 14.25 76.42 – 77.80 84 12.6

15
 90.33 – 91.71 94 14.1 75.03 – 76.41 83 12.45

88.94 – 90.32 93 13.95 73.64 – 75.02 82 12.3

87.55 – 88.93 92 13.8 72.25 – 73.63 81 12.15

86.16 – 87.54 91 13.65 70.86 – 72.24 80 12

84.77 – 86.15 90 13.5 70.85 and 79 11.85

below

Table 9 – Reading and Numeracy Assessment (5%)

MPS Equivalent Score MPS Equivalent Score
99.26 – 100 100 5 91.01 – 91.75 89 4.45
98.51 – 99.25 99 4.95 90.26 – 91.0 88 4.4
97.76 – 98.5 98 4.9 89.51 – 90.25 87 4.35
97.01 – 97.75 97 4.85 88.76 – 89.50 86 4.3
96.26 – 97.0 96 4.8 88.01 – 88.75 85 4.25
95.6 – 96.25 95 4.75 87.26 – 88.0 84 4.2
94.76 – 95.5 94 4.7 86.51 – 87.25 83 4.15
94.01 – 94.75 93 4.65 86.76 – 86.5 82 4.1
93.26 – 94.0 92 4.6 85.01 – 85.75 81 4.05
92.6 – 93.25 91 4.55 85.0 80 4
91.76 – 92.5 90 4.5 84.99 and below 79 3.95

Table 10 – Research (5%)

Indicator Rating Score
Presence of 6 and more 100 5
Presence of 5 90 4.5
Presence of 4 80 4
Presence of 3 70 3.5
Presence of 2 60 3
Presence of 1 50 2.5

G. MOST OUTSTANDING KINDERGARTEN TEACHER

The kindergarten teacher nominee must:

1. Have at least three (3) years experience in teaching kindergarten level.
2. Have at least very satisfactory or proficient performance rating for the last three years.
3. Have attended any ECE/kindergarten training conducted by regional/division/district
level.
4. Have no pending administrative case filed against her/him.

CRITERIA

No. CRITERIA Points

1 Pupils' Performance (ECCD Result) 30
2 Performance Indicators 10
3 Special Programs/Projects/Research Conducted 10
4 Performance Ratings (3 yrs average) 10
5 Acted as Trainer/Demo Teacher/Resourse Speaker 10

16
 6 Recognition and Awards 10
7 Curricular Innovations/LRs Published in the LR Portal 10
8 Attitude towards work, peers and superiors 10
100%

RUBRIC FOR PUPILS’ PERFORMANCE (Average of 3 years) Points

Above 50% increase of ECCD Post- test Result over Pre-test 30
41% to 50% increase 25
31% to 40% increase 20
21% to 30% increase 15
11% to 20% increase 10
1% to 10% increase 5

RUBRIC FOR INNOVATION/LRs UPLOADED IN THE LR PORTAL

(3 Years) Points
Implemented 3 Innovations/ uploaded 3 LRs in the Portal 10
Implemented 2 innovations/uploaded 2 LRs in the Portal 8
Implemented 1 innovation/uploaded 1 LR in the Portal 6
Submitted LRs in the division for QA 4
Submitted LRs in the district for QA 2
No innovation and No LR submitted 0

Note: The rubric in the elementary level will be adopted by kindergarten for criteria numbers 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 8.

H. OUTSTANDING NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL –

CATEGORY A (Salary Grades 1-9)
I. Eligibility
1. S/he has a permanent appointment and has no pending administrative case.
2. S/he has served the agency for a minimum of at least three (3) years.
3. The performance rating for the last three (3) years must be Outstanding.
4. S/he should be nominated by his/her immediate head and noted by Assistant Schools
Division Superintendent.

II. Criteria
Indicators Points
A. Work Competence 45
B. Outstanding Achievements 25
C. Professional Growth 15
D. Attitude Towards Work, Peers & 15
Supervisors
Total 100

17
A. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Work Competence
Items Points
Work Experience in DepEd 10
 25 years & above 10
 20 – 24 years 8
 15 – 19 years 6
 10 – 14 years 4
 5 – 9 years 2
 Minimum of at least 3 years 0
Performance Rating in the last 3 years 30
Attendance and Punctuality (Usually arrives to work on time, 5
leaves on time or beyond, takes breaks as prescribed, gives
adequate notice for scheduled absences; and utilizes work
time in a responsible and productive manner.)
 Fully meets all criteria 5
 Have one or less elapse of one of the
criteria per month 3
 Have one or less elapse of one of the
criteria per week 1
 Does not meet the criteria 0

**Must be attested by Section Head and provided by a

certification.

B. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Outstanding Achievements

Items Points
Recognition and Awards Received 10
 International 10
 National 8
 Regional 6
 Provincial 4
 Division 2
Innovation/Creativity in work/Publication 10
Acted as Trainer/Lecturer/Resource Speaker 5
 International 5
 National 4
 Regional 3
 Provincial 2
 Division 1

C. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Professional Growth

Items Points
Education 10
 Doctoral degree 10
 Doctoral (CAR) 7
 Master’s degree 5
 Master’s-CAR 3
Trainings (Exclusive of DepEd) 5
 International 5
 National 4

18
  Regional 3
 Provincial 2
 Division 1

D. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Attitude towards Work, Peers and Superiors
(Initiative, Application to Work, Dependability and Relationship with Others)

Items Points
Personal Attributes/Characteristics 15
 Independently innovates or finds/ 15
develops solutions.
Demonstrates outstanding and
positive attitude with enthusiasm.
Completely dependable.
Exemplary working relationship with
others.
 Takes 80-90% initiative of tasks. 10
Very motivated and industrious.
Above average in dependability.
Works well with others.
 Requires some directions or does not 5
take initiative to complete tasks
independently.
Average in diligence and motivation.
Usually dependable.
Gets along satisfactorily with others.

**50% of the Rating will come from Section Head, while the
other
50% will come from peers (half of the population of each
Section).

I. OUTSTANDING NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL –

CATEGORY B (Salary Grades 10-21)
I. Eligibility
1. S/he has a permanent appointment and has no pending administrative case.
2. S/he has served the agency for a minimum of at least three (3) years.
3. The performance rating for the last three (3) years must be Very Satisfactory (VS).
4. S/he should be nominated by his/her immediate head and noted by Assistant Schools
Division Superintendent.
II. Criteria

Indicators Points
A. Work Competence 50
B. Outstanding Achievements 30
C. Professional Growth 15
D. Attitude Towards Work, Peers & 5
Supervisors
Total 100

19
A. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Work Competence

Items Points
Work Experience in DepEd 15
 25 years & above 15
 20 – 24 years 12
 15 – 19 years 9
 10 – 14 years 6
 5 – 9 years 3
 Minimum of at least 3 years 0
Performance Rating in the last 3 years 30
Attendance and Punctuality (Usually arrives to work on time, 5
leaves on time or beyond, takes breaks as prescribed, gives
adequate notice for scheduled absences; and utilizes work
time in a responsible and productive manner.)
 Fully meets all criteria 5
 Have one or less elapse of one of the
criteria per month 3
 Have one or less elapse of one of the
criteria per week 1
 Does not meet the criteria 0

**Must be attested by Section Head and provided by a

certification.

B. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Outstanding Achievements

Items Points
Recognition and Awards Received 10
 International 10
 National 8
 Regional 6
 Provincial 4
 Division 2
Innovation/Research conducted approved by SDS with 10
terminal report
Acted as Trainer/Lecturer/Resource Speaker 10
 International 10
 National 8
 Regional 6
 Provincial 4
 Division 2

C. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Professional Growth

Items Points
Education 10
 Doctoral degree 10
 Doctoral (CAR) 7
 Master’s degree 5
 Master’s-CAR 3
Trainings (Exclusive of DepEd) 5

20
  International 5
 National 4
 Regional 3
 Provincial 2
 Division 1

D. Distribution of Equivalent Rating for Attitude towards Work, Peers and Superiors
(Initiative, Application to Work, Dependability and Relationship with Others)

Items Points
Personal Attributes/Characteristics 5
 Independently innovates or finds/ 5
develops solutions.
Demonstrates outstanding and
positive attitude with enthusiasm.
Completely dependable.
Exemplary working relationship with
others.
 Takes 80-90% initiative of tasks. 3
Very motivated and industrious.
Above average in dependability.
Works well with others.
 Requires some directions or does not 1
take initiative to complete tasks
independently.
Average in diligence and motivation.
Usually dependable.
Gets along satisfactorily with others.

**50% of the Rating will come from Superior, while the other
50% will come from peers (half of the population of each
Section).

Time Table

Date Activity

July 8, 2019 Submission of nominations with corresponding documents to

the Division Selection Committee

July 10, 2019 Meeting of Working and Selection Committees

July 16-19, 2019 Screening period and validation

July 24, 2019 Announcement of finalists and meeting of working committee

July 26, 2019 Rehearsals

August 2, 2019 Gawad Parangal 2019 awarding ceremonies

21
Enclosure No. ___ to Division Memorandum No. ____ s. 2019

GUIDELINES ON THE SCREENING/EVALUATION PROCESS

A. General Guidelines

1. Candidates shall be nominated by either Schools Division Superintendent

(SDS), Asst. Schools Division Superintendent (ASDS), Education Program Supervisors
(EPS), Public Schools District Supervisor (PSDS), School Heads (SH) or co-employee.
SDS, ASDS, EPS, and PSDS can nominate entry(ies) for schools and school heads
categories.
2. A nominee can only be nominated in two (2) award categories.

3. Only accomplishments or achievements within the period from June 1, 2016 to

May 31, 2019 will be considered for validation.

4.The result of School Assessment of Learning (SAL) for School Year 2018-2019 must be
equal to or above the Division MPS. Elementary:70.86, Secondary: 52.16.

5. All nominations should be submitted to the Division Office on or before July 5,

2019 through the records section with its “RECEIVED” notation.

6. For the Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel, the following categories should

be observed:
 Category A Employee receiving a Salary Grade (SG) between 1-9
 Category B Employee receiving a Salary Grade (SG) between 10-21

7. A nominee for Outstanding Teacher/School Head/Instructional Supervisor/Non-

Teaching personnel must be permanent employee with at least three (3) years’
Experience in the category he/she is nominated for.

8. A candidate must get at least an overall rating of eighty (80) based on the
evaluation of his/her documents by the Division Gawad Parangal Screening
Committee to qualify him/her in any award categories. The top ten (10)
finalists per category will be chosen. Finalists will receive certificate of recognition
during the Division Gawad Parangal awarding ceremonies. From among the
finalists, five (5) will be declared as the winner during the said
awarding ceremonies.

9. In the computation of the rank, the candidates will be given points in each criterion
using tables. The points per criterion will be multiplied by its corresponding
percentage weight. The total weights will be computed and will be the basis for
ranking

10. In case of a tie, a standard deviation will be used to measure consistency. The
lower the standard deviation, the consistent the ranks are.

11. An awardee who wins for three consecutive period regardless of the nature of
the awards bestowed will be elevated to the Hall of Fame and shall be
disqualified to join in the same category in the succeeding years’ contest. The
Hall of Fame awardee can join the same contest category after three (3) years.

22
12. The schools should submit papers/certificates to the Division Gawad Parangal
Awards Committee (DGPAC) of their probable
awardees for the 201__ Hall of Fame (i.e., those who/which were bestowed the
same awards three times prior to this school year)

14. All finalists will be informed of the results through a division memorandum which
will be uploaded to the division website and Division Mancom FB account.

15. Nominees must have no pending case.

23
 DIVISION SCREENING COMMITTEE PER CATEGORY

Grade Level
Category Level Screening Committee
Subject Area
Chair: Dr. Heidelyn Geromiano
Kindergarten Members: Mrs. Elenia Baranda
Mr. Ronald Dile
Chair: Mrs. Shirley De Juan
Elementary Grade 1 Members: Dr. Ruth Gervero
Mrs. Mary Grace A. Atinon
Chair: Dr. Merlie Rubio
Elementary Grade 2 Members: Mr. Jerry Mosquite
Dr. Marggie Obligacion
Chair: Mr. Andres Quiachon
Elementary Grade 3 Members: Miss Nannette G. Calixterio
Dr. Ma. Theresa Villagracia
Chair: Mr. Salvador Dale Artates
Elementary &
English Members: Dr. Immaculada Amores
Secondary
Miss Glenda Marie Botin
Chair: Mrs. Elenia Baranda
Elementary &
Mathematics Members: Mr. Emmanuel Lati
Secondary
Outstanding
Chair: Mr. Andres Quiachon
Teachers Elementary & Members: Ronald Dile
Science
Secondary Romar Jaravelo

Chair: Dr. Merlie Rubio

Elementary &
Filipino Members: Mr. Jerry Mosquite
Secondary
Dr. Marggie Obligacion
Chair: Mrs. Sephora Roldan
HeKaSi /
Elementary & Members: Dr. Marggie Obligacion
Araling
Secondary
Panlipunan
Mrs. Mary Grace Atinon
Chair: Dr. Rolando Jamora
Elementary &
EPP & TLE Members: Mrs. Shirley de Juan
Secondary
Mr. Glenn Dollete
Elementary & Chair: Mr. Ronie Reteracion
MAPEH
Secondary Members: Mrs. Dorislyn Bellosillo
Chair: Mr. Alan Vincent Altamia
Elementary &
ESP Members: Dr. Linda Villasis
Secondary
Ms. Glenda Marie Botin
Chair: Dr. Rolando Jamora
Outstanding Members: Mrs. Shirley De Juan
Elementary -
TICs Mr. Glenn Dollete

Chair: Dr. Edna Azcarraga

Outstanding
Elementary - Members: Dr. Ruth Gervero
HTs
Dr. Ma. Theresa Villagracia
Outstanding Chair: Mr. Alan Vincent Altamia
Principals Members: Mr. Vicente Lumaque
Elementary -
(Central & Non- Mr. Zaldy Caalam
Central)

24
 Outstanding Chair: Mr. Nicasio S. Frio
HTs & Secondary - Members: Mr. Salvador Dale Artates
Principals Mrs. Sephora Roldan
Chair: Dr. Roel F. Bermejo
Members: Mr. Nicasio S. Frio
Outstanding DS Elementary - Dr. Segundina F. Dollete
Dr. Marlon P. Destreza

Chair: Dr. Roel F. Bermejo

Members: Mr. Nicasio S. Frio
Outstanding ES - - Dr. Segundina F. Dollete
Dr. Marlon P. Destreza

Other Chair: Mr. Nicasio S. Frio

Categories Members: Atty. Benjie B. Doce
(Outstanding - - Ma. Sharon Barrientos
Office
Employee)

25
 SEARCH FOR THE
GAWAD PARANGAL 2019 AWARDEES

WORKING COMMITTEES

 Registration

Chairman : Mrs. Sephora M. Roldan

Co-Chair : Mrs. Grace A. Atinon
Members : Jasmin Olivare
Formosa Rabe
Glorimie Villaeba
Jeoly Pearl Marie Agabe
Christine Villaruz

 Program/Emcee

Chairman : Mr. Andres Quiachon

Co-Chair : Dr. Heidelyn Geromiano
Members : Mr. Emmanuel Lati
Mr. Joenel Sembrano
Ms. Suzette Posadas

 Stage Decoration and Back Drop

Chairmen : Dr. Rolando Jamora

: Mr. Zaldy Caalam
Members : Cerelo Villagracia
 Food

Chairman : Dr. Immaculada Amores

Co-Chair : Mr. Jerry Mosquite
Members : Mrs. Glenda Cabantug
Ms. Jean Borreros

 Invitation

Chairman : Dr. Merlie Rubio

Co-Chair : Mrs. Elenia Baranda

 Reception/Corsage

Chairman : Mr. Ronald Dile

Co-Chair : Dr. Marggie Obligacion
Members : Mrs. Sheralyn Baticados
Dr. Lourdelyn Fuentes

26
 Awards/Certificates

Chairman : Dr. Edna Azcarraga

Co-Chair : Mrs. Riza Barruela
Members : Dr. Ana Mae Blancaflor
Mr. Daniel Equibal
Mr. Jorge Jimenez
Rogie Paro Jr.
Vincent Lausa
Erden Gentolea

 Documentation/Multimedia

Chairman : Mr. Emmanuel Lati

Co-Chair : Mr. Glenn Dollete
Members : Mr. Zander Frofunga
Mark Dela Cruz
Jess Niño Begona
Christopher Lensig

 Venue, Hall & Physical Arrangement

Chairman : Mr. Kenneth Anoche

Co-Chair : Mr. Jam Aguirre
Members : Mr. Ian Barcena
Mr. Ivan Vito
Mr. Rey Bernardez
Mr. Victor Benjamin
Mr. Michael Dela Torre

 Sound

Chairman : Mr. Allan Vincent Altamia

Co-Chair : Mr. Andy Van Albert Artates
Members : Mr. Elmer Tamayo
Mr. Artuz Dalmacio

 Ways & Means

Chairman : Mr. Benjie Doce

Co-Chair : Mr. Nenito Dacles
Members : Mrs. Josephine Manuel
Mrs. Cecil Joy Diocson
Mrs. Gwen Hortillas
Mr. Regin Agupitan
Mrs. Ma. Sharon Barrientos

 Colors/Intermission :

Chairman : Mr. Ronie Reteracion

27
 Co-Chair : Mrs. Dorislyn Bellosillo

 Mass

Chairman : Mrs. Ma. Rita Villareal

Co-Chair : Mr. Allen Aguirre
Members : Mrs. Rose Baldomar
Ms. Glenda Marie Botin
Mrs. Christine Villaruz
Mr. Cirilo Villagracia
Mrs. Jeoly Pearl Marie Agabe

28
 Department of Education
Region VI – Western Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CAPIZ
Banica, Roxas City

SEARCH FOR THE GAWAD PARANGAL 2019 AWARDEES

EVALUATION FORM

Name:________________________________ Grade Level Taught:___________________

School:_______________________________ Subject Area:_________________________

District:_______________________________ Category: Secondary School Teachers__

Items % Points Obtained

Academic Performance 40

1. Evaluation (Performance Indicators) 10

2. Special Programs & Projects 15

3. Performance Rating 15

4. Recognition and Awards 5

5. Acted as Trainer, etc. 10

6. Attitude 5

Total 100

DIVISION SCREENING COMMITTEE

______________________________ ______________________________
Member Member

______________________________
Chairman

29
 Department of Education
Region VI – Western Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CAPIZ
Banica, Roxas City

SEARCH FOR THE GAWAD PARANGAL 2019 AWARDEES

EVALUATION FORM

Name: MYLENE L. RIVAS Grade Level Taught: KINDERGARTEN

School: MAMBUSAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Subject Area:_________________________

District: MAMBUSAO WEST DISTRICT

Category: MOST OUSTANDING KINDERGARTEN TEACHER__

Items % Points Obtained

Pupil’s Performance (ECCD Result) 30

Performance Indicators 10
10
Special Programs/ Projects/Research Conducted
10
Performance Ratings ( 3 years Average )
10
Acted as Trainer/Demo Teacher/ Resource Speaker
10
Recognition and Awards
10
Curricular Innovations/LR’s Published in the LR Portal
10
Attitude Towards Work, Peers, And Superiors

Total 100

DIVISION SCREENING COMMITTEE

______________________________ ______________________________
Member Member

______________________________
Chairman

30
31